The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice

Prior studies suggest that clinical trials are often hampered by problems in design, conduct and reporting that limit their uptake in clinical practice. We have described 'informativeness' as the ability of a trial to guide clinical, policy or research decisions. Little is known about the proportion of initiated trials that inform clinical practice. We created a cohort of randomized interventional clinical trials in three disease areas (ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus and lung cancer), that were initiated between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 using ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted inclusion to trials aimed at answering a clinical question related to the treatment or prevention of disease. Our primary outcome was the proportion of clinical trials fulfilling four conditions of informativeness: importance of the clinical question, trial design, feasibility, and reporting of results. Our study included 125 clinical trials. The proportion meeting four conditions for informativeness was 26.4% (95% CI 18.9 - 35.0). Sixty-seven percent of participants were enrolled in informative trials. The proportion of informative trials did not differ significantly between our three disease areas. Our results suggest that the majority of clinical trials designed to guide clinical practice possess features that may compromise their ability to do so. This highlights opportunities to improve the scientific vetting of clinical research.

CT Combined with Multiparameter MRI in Differentiating Pathological Subtypes of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer before Surgery

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for preoperative differentiation of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

CT and MRI imaging data were collected from all patients with squamous lung cancer and adenocarcinoma admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to December 2020 (286 cases). ROC curves were plotted to evaluate the performance of CT, mpMRI, and CT combined with mpMRI to differentiate pathological subtypes of NSCLC. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to be independent predictors of pathological subtypes of NSCLC.

Results

ROC curves showed that CT combined with mpMRI had the largest area under the curve, followed by mpMRI and CT successively. Univariate regression analysis showed that gender, smoking, tumor size, morphology, marginal lobulation, marginal burr, bronchial truncation sign, and vascular convergence sign were factors influencing the pathological subtype of NSCLC. Multivariate regression analysis suggested the fact that gender, tumor size, morphology, marginal lobulation, bronchial truncation, and vascular convergence sign are likely the independent predictors of NSCLC pathological subtypes.

Conclusions

CT combined with mpMRI can effectively distinguish NSCLC pathological subtypes, which is worthy of clinical application.

Eribulin improves tumor oxygenation demonstrated by 18F-DiFA hypoxia imaging, leading to radio-sensitization in human cancer xenograft models

PURPOSE

Eribulin, an inhibitor of microtubule dynamics, is known to show antitumor effects through its remodeling activity in the tumor vasculature. However, the extent to which the improvement of tumor hypoxia by eribulin affects radio-sensitivity remains unclear. We utilized 1-(2,2-dihydroxymethyl-3-¹⁸F-fluoropropyl)-2-nitroimidazole (¹⁸F-DiFA), a new PET probe for hypoxia, to investigate the effects of eribulin on tumor hypoxia and evaluate the radio-sensitivity during eribulin treatment.

METHODS

Mice bearing human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells or human lung cancer NCI-H1975 cells were administered a single dose of eribulin. After administration, mice were injected with ¹⁸F-DiFA and pimonidazole, and tumor hypoxia regions were analyzed. For the group that received combined treatment with radiation, ¹⁸F-DiFA PET/CT imaging was performed before tumors were locally X-irradiated. Tumor size was measured every other day after irradiation.

RESULTS

Eribulin significantly reduced ¹⁸F-DiFA accumulation levels in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the reduction in ¹⁸F-DiFA accumulation levels by eribulin was most significant 7 days after treatment. These results were also supported by reduction of the pimonidazole-positive hypoxic region. The combined treatment showed significant retardation of tumor growth in comparison with the control, radiation-alone, and drug-alone groups. Importantly, tumor growth after irradiation was inversely correlated with ¹⁸F-DiFA accumulation.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that ¹⁸F-DiFA PET/CT clearly detected eribulin-induced tumor oxygenation and that eribulin efficiently enhanced the antitumor activity of radiation by improving tumor oxygenation.

Selection of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients for Intercalated Chemotherapy and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

When treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy, intercalated schedule with time separation between the two classes of drugs should avoid their mutual antagonism. In a survey of published trials, we focus on relation between eligibility criteria and effectiveness of intercalated treatment.

METHODS

Published documents were identified using major medical databases, conference proceedings and references of published trials. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was taken as the basic parameter of treatment efficacy. Correlation between characteristics of patients and median PFS was assessed through the Pearson's correlation coefficient and the coefficient of determination, separately for first-line and second-line setting.

RESULTS

The series includes 11 single-arm trials and 18 randomized phase II or phase III trials with a total of 2903 patients. Treatment-naive patients or those in progression after first-line treatment were included in 16 and 13 trials, respectively. In 14 trials, only patients with non-squamous histology were eligible. Proportion of patients with non-squamous carcinoma (in first-line setting), proportion of never-smokers (both in first- and second-line setting) and proportion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant patients (both in first- and second-line setting) showed a moderate or strong correlation with median PFS. In six trials of intercalated treatment applied to treatment-naive EGFR-mutant patients, objective response was confirmed in 83.1% of cases and median PFS was 18.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Most suitable candidates for intercalated treatment are treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutant tumors, as determined from biopsy or liquid biopsy. For these patients, experience with intercalated treatment is most promising and randomized trials with comparison to the best standard treatment are warranted.

A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician's choice (TPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including platinum-based doublet and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or TPC (gemcitabine, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, docetaxel). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and objective response rate.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty patients were randomized to either eribulin (n = 270) or TPC (n = 270). Median OS for eribulin and TPC was the same: 9.5 months [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.41; P = 0.13]. Progression-free survival for eribulin and TPC was 3.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (HR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.90-1.32; P = 0.39). The objective response rate was 12% for eribulin and 15% for TPC. Clinical benefit rate (eribulin, 57%; TPC, 55%) and disease control rate (eribulin, 63%; TPC, 58%) were similar between treatment arms. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 57% of eribulin patients and 49% of TPC patients at all grades. Other non-hematologic side-effects were manageable and similar in both groups except for peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades; eribulin, 16%; TPC, 9%).

CONCLUSION

This phase 3 study did not demonstrate superiority of eribulin over TPC with regard to overall survival. However, eribulin does show activity in the third-line setting for NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION ID

www.ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01454934.

Eribulin in Cancer Treatment

Halichondrin B is a complex, natural, polyether macrolide derived from marine sponges. Eribulin is a structurally-simplified, synthetic, macrocyclic ketone analogue of Halichondrin B. Eribulin was approved by United States Food and Drug Administration in 2010 as a third-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. It has a unique microtubule dynamics inhibitory action. Phase III studies have either been completed or are currently ongoing in breast cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Phase I and II studies in multiple cancers and various combinations are currently ongoing. This article reviews the available information on eribulin with respect to its clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, mechanism of action, metabolism, preclinical studies, and with special focus on clinical trials.