Outcomes of special histotypes of breast cancer after adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole or tamoxifen in the monotherapy cohort of the BIG 1-98 trial

Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer is a collection of diseases including the more common invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas and rarer subtypes of breast cancer. This review summarizes the features of rare breast cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Each of the rare tumors has defined pathological and clinical features that impact treatment recommendations. In this review, we summarize these for each rare type of breast cancer and where available we include molecular features of each tumor. Rare subtypes of breast cancer each have unique features. In many cases, data is limited for the optimal treatment approaches.

Special subtypes with favorable prognosis in breast cancer: A registry-based cohort study and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to explore whether cribriform and adenoid cystic carcinoma had comparable prognoses to mucinous, tubular and papillary carcinoma, which were long recognized as favorable histologies by NCCN guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study (SEER) database (1994-2014) was conducted. The prognostic significance of all clinicopathological factors was calculated using univariate and multivariate analyses. A systematic review based on PubMed and network meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

From the SEER database, the histologic subtypes of breast cancer (tubular, cribriform, adenoid cystic, mucinous, and papillary) were sorted by overall survival (OS) (94.4%, 91.6%, 90.8%, 87.6%, and 84.2%, respectively) and tubular, cribriform, mucinous, papillary, and adenoid cystic carcinoma by breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (99.4%, 98.4%, 97.7%, 95.2%, and 94.9%, respectively). A network meta-analysis combining 11 studies (886,649 patients) was conducted, which demonstrated consistent outcomes. SEER-based analyses revealed that, among the favorable subtypes, systemic chemotherapy did not improve OS or BCSS in hormone receptor-positive, node-negative patients, validating that these subtypes are generally associated with excellent outcomes, for which systemic chemotherapy may not be warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data are consistent with guidelines suggesting that the mucinous, tubular, and papillary subtypes of breast cancer have favorable histologies. SEER data and meta-analysis supports this favorable category to include adenoid cystic and cribriform carcinoma, whose OS and BCSS outcomes are comparable to the former three. These findings add to the body of data, suggesting that patients with these histologic subtypes confer excellent prognosis, which may guide optimal therapeutic management strategies.

Aromatase inhibitors and risk of cardiovascular events in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular events (CVEs) was considered as one of the primary cause to reduce the quality of life in breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) treatment, which has not been sufficiently addressed. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between risk of CVEs and AIs in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Included studies were obtained from the databases of Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, and reference lists. The main outcome measures were overall incidence, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, the association and the risk differences among different tumor types, AIs,ages,or treatment regimens were conducted. Fixed-effect or random-effect models were applied in the statistical analyses according to the heterogeneity. Our analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, which included 44,411 subjects, were included in our analyses. The overall incidence of CVEs in AIs group was 13.02% (95% CI: 8.15-20.17%) and almost all of the high-grade CVEs occurred in patients treated with AIs. The pooled ORs of CVEs was 0.9940 (95% CI: 0.8545-1.1562). Under sub-group analysis, the incidence of CVEs related to exemestane was higher than that of controls (OR = 1.1564, 95% CI: 1.0656-1.2549), but no statistical differences in risk of CVEs were found in other sub-group analysis. No evidence of publication bias was found for incidence of CVEs in our meta-analysis by a funnel plot.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that patients with breast cancer treated with AIs do not have a significant risk of developing CVEs in comparison with the controls, and exemestane might not be considered as the alternative AI to the breast cancer patients from the perspective of CVEs. Further studies are recommended to investigate this association and the risk differences among different tumor types, AIs or treatment regimens.

Mucin 2 (MUC2) modulates the aggressiveness of breast cancer

PURPOSE

Tumors that secrete large volumes of mucus are chemotherapy resistant, however, mechanisms underlying this resistance are unknown. One protein highly expressed in mucin secreting breast cancers is the secreted mucin, Mucin 2 (MUC2). While MUC2 is expressed in some breast cancers it is absent in normal breast tissue, implicating it in breast cancer. However, the effects of MUC2 on breast cancer are largely unknown. This study examined the role of MUC2 in modulating breast cancer proliferation, response to chemotherapy and metastasis.

METHODS

Using patient derived xenografts we developed two novel cell lines, called BCK4 and PT12, which express high levels of MUC2. To modulate MUC2 levels, BCK4 and PT12 cells were engineered to express shRNA targeted to MUC2 (shMUC2, low MUC2) or a non-targeting control (shCONT, high MUC2) and proliferation and apoptosis were measured in vitro and in vivo. BCK4 cells with shCONT or shMUC2 were labeled with GFP-luciferase and examined in an experimental metastasis model; disease burden and site specific dissemination were monitored by intravital imaging and fluorescence guided dissection, respectively.

RESULTS

Proliferation decreased in BCK4 and PT12 shMUC2 cells versus control cells both in vitro and in vivo. Chemotherapy induced minimal apoptosis in control cells expressing high MUC2 but increased apoptosis in shMUC2 cells containing low MUC2. An experimental metastasis model showed disease burden decreased when breast cancer cells contained low versus high MUC2. Treatment with Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) increased MUC2 expression in BCK4 cells; this induction was abolished by the EGF-receptor inhibitor, Erlotinib.

CONCLUSIONS

MUC2 plays an important role in mediating proliferation, apoptosis and metastasis of breast cancer cells. MUC2 may be important in guiding treatment and predicting outcomes in breast cancer patients.

Comparison of failure patterns between tubular breast carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma (KROG 14-25)

PURPOSE

Information on tubular carcinoma (TC) of breast is limited due to its rarity. A multi-institutional study was performed to investigate the prognosis and failure patterns of TC compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected retrospective data on 205 patients with TC from eleven institutions. For each TC case, 3 cases with IDC were matched according to similar size, t-stage, and n-stage from the same institution. Patterns of failure, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

DFS at 5 years was 98.8% and 97.3% and OS at 5 years was 99.5% and 99.6% in TC and IDC, respectively. Among the patients with TC, 5 patients (2.4%) developed contralateral breast cancer, while 3 patients (0.5%) presented with contralateral breast cancer in patients with IDC.

CONCLUSIONS

The TC of breast presents an excellent prognosis, but the contralateral breast cancer tends to be more frequently observed compared to IDC in Korean women.