MTHFR act as a potential cancer biomarker in immune checkpoints blockades, heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment and immune infiltration

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role and landscape of 5-10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) to immune infiltration, tumor microenvironment, heterogeneity, immune checkpoints blockades, prognostic significance across cancer types.

METHODS

Data sets of genomic, transcriptomic and clinic features of MTHFR across > 60,000 patients and up to 44 cancer types were comprehensively analyzed using R software.

RESULTS

Expression of MTHFR gene is significantly lower in 17 tumors and correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free interval (PFI) in specific tumors. Gene alterations of MTHFR are observed significant differences across tumor types. Expression of MTHFR is negatively correlated with the stemness index (mDNAsi, mRNAsi, DMPsi, ENHsi, EREG-mDNAsi and EREG-mRNAsi) in the most cancers. MTHFR showed significantly correlated with 67 types of immune cell infiltration scores in 44 cancer types by XCELL algorithm. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis are conducted to show the core tumor mechanism and biological process. Correlations between MTHFR and biomarkers of heterogeneity (MSI, TMB, MATH, HRD, LOH, Neoantigen, ploidy and purity) are also significant in specific tumors. MTHFR is significantly positively correlated with biomarkers of immune related genes (CD19, CD274, CD80, CD86) and mismatched repair genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, EPCAM, MLH3, PMS1, EXO1) in most cancer types. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses show MTHFR could act as a potential biomarker in anti-PD-1 (nivolumab to melanoma) and anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab to melanoma) group of ontreatment, in anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab to melanoma) group of pretreatment. Two immunohistochemistry antibodies HPA076180 and HPA077255 are verified in 20 types of tumor and could be used to detect the expression of MTHFR efficiently in clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

MTHFR could predict the response of immune checkpoints blockades, heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment and immune infiltration.

What Happens to the Immune Microenvironment After PD-1 Inhibitor Therapy?

The fruitful results of tumor immunotherapy establish its indispensable status in the regulation of the tumorous immune context. It seems that the treatment of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade is one of the most promising approaches for cancer control. The significant efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor therapy has been made in several cancer types, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, and multiple myeloma. Even so, the mechanisms of how anti-PD-1 therapy takes effect by impacting the immune microenvironment and how partial patients acquire the resistance to PD-1 blockade have yet to be studied. In this review, we discuss the cross talk between immune cells and how they promote PD-1 blockade efficacy. In addition, we also depict factors that may underlie tumor resistance to PD-1 blockade and feasible solutions in combination with it.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy leads to pathological responses in MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient early-stage colon cancers

PD-1 plus CTLA-4 blockade is highly effective in advanced-stage, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers, yet not in MMR-proficient (pMMR) tumors. We postulated a higher efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage colon cancers. In the exploratory NICHE study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03026140), patients with dMMR or pMMR tumors received a single dose of ipilimumab and two doses of nivolumab before surgery, the pMMR group with or without celecoxib. The primary objective was safety and feasibility; 40 patients with 21 dMMR and 20 pMMR tumors were treated, and 3 patients received nivolumab monotherapy in the safety run-in. Treatment was well tolerated and all patients underwent radical resections without delays, meeting the primary endpoint. Of the patients who received ipilimumab + nivolumab (20 dMMR and 15 pMMR tumors), 35 were evaluable for efficacy and translational endpoints. Pathological response was observed in 20/20 (100%; 95% exact confidence interval (CI): 86-100%) dMMR tumors, with 19 major pathological responses (MPRs, ≤10% residual viable tumor) and 12 pathological complete responses. In pMMR tumors, 4/15 (27%; 95% exact CI: 8-55%) showed pathological responses, with 3 MPRs and 1 partial response. CD8⁺PD-1⁺ T cell infiltration was predictive of response in pMMR tumors. These data indicate that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may have the potential to become the standard of care for a defined group of colon cancer patients when validated in larger studies with at least 3 years of disease-free survival data.

Treatment of Rectal Cancer in Older Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older adults but current guidelines do not incorporate the associated specific challenges leading to wide variation in the delivery of cancer care to this subset of population. Here, we will review the current data available regarding the management of rectal cancer in older adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

The greatest challenge arises in the management of stage II/III disease as it involves tri-modality treatment that can be harder to tolerate by frail older patients. Response to neoadjuvant treatment is being used as a new marker to tailor further therapy and possibly avoid surgery. Oxaliplatin can be omitted from the adjuvant treatment without compromising outcomes. Physicians should perform geriatric assessment utilizing many validated tools available to help predict treatment tolerability and outcomes in older adults that can help personalize subsequent management. Most older adults can undergo standard therapy for stages I, II, or III rectal cancer with curative intent. Increasing evidence suggests that patients with a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant treatment may be observed closely with the possibility of avoiding surgery. Studies are evaluating alternate systemic treatments for advanced metastatic disease with the hope of maintaining quality of life without compromising cancer outcomes.

Immune therapy in colorectal cancer

The evidence that the immune system, when rightly stimulated, can eradicate cancer cells, combined with the latest knowledge about antitumor immunity, has led to recent progress in cancer immunotherapy. While infiltration of tumors with immune cells is described in advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC), the first data concerning the clinical efficacy of immune-targeted therapies in CRC patients were disappointing. The evidence of tumor responses in CRC patients with microsatellite instability treated with immune checkpoint blockers has renewed the interest for research in the field of CRC immunotherapy. In this article, we briefly review the role of T lymphocytes infiltrating CRC tumors in order to introduce a brief history of CRC immunotherapy and then current trials involving immune-based strategies and particularly immune checkpoint blockers.

BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

OPINION STATEMENT

The BRAF activating mutation, harbored by approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), confers dramatic prognosis to advanced diseases. In early-stage setting, the identification of the BRAF mutation does not impact the therapeutic decision. Yet, the BRAF mutation could be considered as a stratification factor in adjuvant trials, because of its prognostic impact after relapse. Moreover, both BRAF mutation and mismatch repair (MMR) statuses should be determined in all CRC to help identify sporadic tumors versus Lynch syndrome-related tumors. Indeed, in patients with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors and MLH1 loss of expression, the BRAFV600E mutation indicates a sporadic origin. In advanced BRAF-mutated CRC, the standard of care remains fluoropyrimidine-based cytotoxic regimen in combination with bevacizumab. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that there was insufficient data to justify the exclusion of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, antiangiogenic agents should be preferred in the first-line setting. Despite the lack of a randomized phase 3 study dedicated to BRAF-mutated CRC, chemotherapy intensification combining a quadruple association of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI), and bevacizumab seems like a valid option. Although first results with BRAF inhibitors as single agents in BRAF-mutated CRC were disappointing, their association with therapies targeting the MAPK pathway seems to overcome the primary resistance to BRAF inhibition. In the field of sporadic CRC, the BRAF mutation is strongly associated with MMR deficiency. Considering breakthrough results of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR repair tumors, determination of the MMR status appears to be mandatory. Given the dramatic prognosis conferred by the BRAF mutation, patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC need to be systematically identified and proposed for clinical trial enrolment in order to benefit from innovative therapies.

Immunotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Gastrointestinal cancers represent a major public health problem worldwide. Immunotherapeutic strategies are currently under investigation in this setting and preliminary results of ongoing trials adopting checkpoint inhibitors are striking. Indeed, although a poor immunogenicity for GI has been reported, a strong biological rationale supports the development of immunotherapy in this field. The clinical and translational research on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancers started firstly with the identification of immune-related mechanisms possibly relevant to GI tumours and secondly with the development of immunotherapy-based agents in clinical trials. In the present review a general overview is firstly provided followed by a focus on major findings on gastric, colorectal, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Finally, pathological and molecular perspectives are provided since many efforts are ongoing in order to identify possible predictive biomarkers and to improve patients' selection. Many issues are still unsolved in this field; however, we strongly believe that immunotherapy might positively affect the natural history of a subgroup of GI cancer patients improving outcome and the overall quality of life.