Immunotherapy in Melanoma: Recent Advances and Future Directions

The use of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced and high-risk melanoma has led to a striking improvement in outcomes. Although the incidence of melanoma has continued to rise, median survival has improved from approximately 6 months to nearly 6 years for patients with advanced inoperable stage IV disease. Recent understanding of the tumor microenvironment and its interplay with the immune system has led to the explosive development of novel immunotherapy treatments. Since the approval of the therapeutic cytokines interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2 in the 1990s, the development of novel immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), oncolytic virus therapy, and modulators of the tumor microenvironment have given way to a new era in melanoma treatment. Monoclonal antibodies directed at programmed cell death protein 1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PDL-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) have provided robust activation of the adaptive immune system, restoring immune surveillance leading to host tumor recognition and destruction. Multiple other immunomodulatory therapeutics are under investigation to overcome resistance to ICI therapy, including the toll-like receptor-9 (TLR-9) and 7/8 (TLR-7/8) agonists, stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists, and fecal microbiota transplantation. In this review, we focus on the recent advances in immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma and provide an update on novel therapies currently under investigation.

Functional Downregulation of PD-L1 and PD-L2 by CpG and non-CpG Oligonucleotides in Melanoma Cells

Simple Summary

Although metastatic melanoma is still not a curable disease, targeting of immunologically relevant checkpoints represents a turning point in the treatment. Particularly, targeting the interaction between PD-L1 and its referring receptor PD-1 with antibodies has been shown to activate T-cell function abrogating the evasion of tumor cells from immune recognition. Here, we present another approach that interferes with this system by showing that treatment of melanoma cells with oligonucleotides reduces the expression of PD-L1 (and PD-L2) on tumor cells. Specifically, non-CpG-6-PTO, an ODN that forms superstructures known as G-quartets, has been found to inhibit the interferon-γ-induced signaling cascade which fosters PD-L1 expression. These findings suggest a new therapeutic strategy to interfere with one of the most important immune checkpoints.

Abstract

The clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors represents a breakthrough progress in the treatment of metastasized melanoma and other tumor entities. In the present study, it was hypothesized that oligonucleotides (ODNs), known as modulators of the immune response, have an impact on the endogenous expression of checkpoint molecules, namely PD-L1 and PD-L2 (PD-L1/2). IFNγ-stimulated melanoma cells (A375, SK-Mel-28) were treated with different synthetically manufactured oligonucleotides which differed in sequence, length and backbone composition. It was found that a variety of different ODN sequences significantly suppressed PD-L1/2 expression. This effect was dependent on length and phosphorothioate (PTO) backbone. In particular, a sequence containing solely guanines (nCpG-6-PTO) was highly effective in downregulating PD-L1/2 at the protein, mRNA and promoter levels. Mechanistically, we gave evidence that ODNs with G-quartet-forming motifs suppress the interferon signaling axis (JAK/STAT/IRF1). Our findings identify a subset of ODNs as interesting pharmacological compounds that could expand the arsenal of targeted therapies to combat the immunological escape of tumor cells.

Therapeutic Advancements Across Clinical Stages in Melanoma, With a Focus on Targeted Immunotherapy

Melanoma is the most fatal skin cancer. In the early stages, it can be safely treated with surgery alone. However, since 2011, there has been an important revolution in the treatment of melanoma with new effective treatments. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors have changed the history of this disease. To date, more than half of advanced melanoma patients are alive at 5 years; despite this breakthrough, approximately half of the patients still do not respond to treatment. For these reasons, new therapeutic strategies are required to expand the number of patients who can benefit from immunotherapy or combination with targeted therapy. Current research aims at preventing primary and acquired resistance, which are both responsible for treatment failure in about 50% of patients. This could increase the effectiveness of available drugs and allow for the evaluation of new combinations and new targets. The main pathways and molecules under study are the IDO inhibitor, TLR9 agonist, STING, LAG-3, TIM-3, HDAC inhibitors, pegylated IL-2 (NKTR-214), GITR, and adenosine pathway inhibitors, among others (there are currently about 3000 trials that are evaluating immunotherapeutic combinations in different tumors). Other promising strategies are cancer vaccines and oncolytic viruses. Another approach is to isolate and remove immune cells (DCs, T cells, and NK cells) from the patient's blood or tumor infiltrates, add specific gene fragments, expand them in culture with growth factors, and re-inoculate into the same patient. TILs, TCR gene transfer, and CAR-T therapy follow this approach. In this article, we give an overview over the current status of melanoma therapies, the clinical rationale for choosing treatments, and the new immunotherapy approaches.

Targeting nuclear acid-mediated immunity in cancer immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies

Cancer immunotherapy especially immune checkpoint inhibition has achieved unprecedented successes in cancer treatment. However, there are many patients who failed to benefit from these therapies, highlighting the need for new combinations to increase the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we summarized the latest discoveries on the combination of nucleic acid-sensing immunity and immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy. Given the critical role of nuclear acid-mediated immunity in maintaining the activation of T cell function, it seems that harnessing the nuclear acid-mediated immunity opens up new strategies to enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors for tumor control.

E3611-A Randomized Phase II Study of Ipilimumab at 3 or 10 mg/kg Alone or in Combination with High-Dose Interferon-α2b in Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Interferon-α favors a Th1 shift in immunity, and combining with ipilimumab (ipi) at 3 or 10 mg/kg may downregulate CTLA4-mediated suppressive effects, leading to more durable antitumor immune responses. A study of tremelimumab and high-dose interferon-α (HDI) showed promising efficacy, supporting this hypothesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

E3611 followed a 2-by-2 factorial design (A: ipi10+HDI; B: ipi10; C: ipi3+HDI; D: ipi3) to evaluate (i) no HDI versus HDI (across ipilimumab doses) and (ii) ipi3 versus ipi10 (across HDI status). We hypothesized that median progression-free survival (PFS) would improve from 3 to 6 months with HDI versus no HDI and with ipi10 versus ipi3.

RESULTS

For eligible and treated patients (N = 81) at a median follow-up time of 29.8 months, median PFS was 4.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7-8.2] when ipilimumab was used alone and 7.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-11.0) when HDI was added. Median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-7.5) with 3 mg/kg ipilimumab and 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-13.5) with 10 mg/kg. By study arm, median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-20.2) in arm A, 6.2 months (95% CI, 2.7-25.7) in B, 5.7 months (95% CI, 1.5-11.1) in C, and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.7) in D. The differences in PFS and overall survival (OS) did not reach statistical significance. Adverse events were consistent with the known profiles of ipilimumab and HDI and significantly higher with HDI and ipi10.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PFS was increased, the differences resulting from adding interferon-α or a higher dose of ipilimumab did not reach statistical significance and do not outweigh the added toxicity risks.

Emerging Strategies in Systemic Therapy for the Treatment of Melanoma

Recent years have seen major improvements in survival of patients with advanced melanoma with the advent of various novel systemic immunotherapies and targeted therapies. As our understanding of these agents and their various mechanisms of action improves, even more impressive outcomes are being achieved through use of various combination strategies, including the combining of different immunotherapies with one another as well as with other modalities. However, despite the improved outcomes that have been achieved in advanced melanoma, responses to treatment are heterogeneous and may not always be durable. Additional advances in therapy are required, and several emerging strategies are a focus of interest. These include the investigation of several new immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy combinations, such as checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4) with other immunotherapies (e.g., indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase [IDO] inhibitors, antilymphocyte activation 3 [anti-LAG-3], histone deacetylase [HDAC] inhibitors, Toll-like receptor 9 [TLR-9] agonists, antiglucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor [anti-GITR], pegylated interleukin-2 [IL-2]), combined targeted therapies (e.g., MEK and CDK4/6 coinhibition), and combined immunotherapy and targeted therapy (e.g., the triplet combination of BRAF/MEK inhibition with anti-PD-1s). The identification of novel therapeutic targets in the MAP kinase pathway also offers opportunities to improve outcomes by overcoming de novo and acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition (e.g., the development of ERK inhibitors). In addition, adoptive cell transfer, the infusion of large numbers of activated autologous lymphocytes, may have a potential role in patients whose disease has progressed after immunotherapy. Taken together, these new approaches offer further potential to increase systemic treatment options and improve long-term outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma.

Modulation of the tumor microenvironment by intratumoral administration of IMO-2125, a novel TLR9 agonist, for cancer immunotherapy

The objective of cancer immunotherapy is to prime the host's immune system to recognize and attack malignant tumor cells. IMO‑2125, a Toll‑like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist, exhibited potent antitumor effects in the murine syngeneic A20 lymphoma and the CT26 colon carcinoma models. IMO‑2125 exhibited superior A20 antitumor activity when injected intratumorally (i.t.) compared with equivalent subcutaneous doses. In mice bearing dual CT26 grafts, the i.t. injection of right flank tumors elicited infiltration of cluster of differentiation (CD)3+ T lymphocytes into tumors, resulting in the regression of injected and uninjected left flank tumors. Depletion of CD8+, but not CD4+, T‑cells abrogated the IMO‑2125‑mediated antitumor response, suggesting that CD8+ lymphocytes are required for the antitumor activity. In mice harboring right flank CT26 and left flank β‑galactosidase (β‑gal)‑expressing CT26.CL25 grafts, the i.t. administration of IMO‑2125 to the CT26 graft resulted in potent and dose‑dependent antitumor activity against the two grafts. Splenic T‑cells isolated from these mice responded to AH1 antigen (present in the two tumors) and β‑gal antigen (present only in CT26.CL25) in an interferon γ enzyme‑linked immunospot assay, suggesting the clonal expansion of T‑cells directed against antigens from the two tumors. Mice with ablated CT26 tumors by previous IMO‑2125 treatment rejected re‑implanted CT26 tumor cells, but not A20 tumor cells, demonstrating that the initial IMO‑2125 treatment created a long‑lived tumor‑specific immune memory of CT26 antigens. A quantitative increase in CD3+ T lymphocytes in injected A20 tumors and an upregulation of selected checkpoint genes, including indoleamine 2,3‑dioxygenase (IDO)‑1, IDO‑2, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1); programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), carcinoembryonic antigen‑related cell adhesion molecule 1, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4 (OX40), OX40 ligand, T‑cell immunoglobulin and mucin‑domain‑containing 3 protein, lymphocyte‑activation gene 3, cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte‑associated protein 4, were observed following IMO‑2125 treatment. IMO‑2125 also increased immune checkpoint gene expression in injected and uninjected contralateral CT26 tumors, suggesting that the co‑administration of anti‑CTLA‑4, anti‑PD‑1 or anti‑PD‑L1 therapies with IMO‑2125 may provide additional therapeutic efficacy.