1
|
Adeva J, Sangro B, Salati M, Edeline J, La Casta A, Bittoni A, Berardi R, Bruix J, Valle JW. Medical treatment for cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2019; 39 Suppl 1:123-142. [PMID: 30892822 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Most of the patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) present with advanced (inoperable or metastatic) disease, and relapse rates are high in those undergoing potentially curative resection. Previous treatment nihilism of patients with advanced disease has been replaced by active clinical research with the advent of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and a much greater effort at understanding molecular mechanisms underpinning CCA. Three RCTs have recently been reported evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy following curative resection; only one of these has the potential to change practice. The BILCAP study failed to meet its primary endpoint by intention-to-treat analysis; however, a survival benefit was seen in a preplanned sensitivity analysis (predominantly adjusting for lymph nodes status). This, along with the numerical difference in median overall survival has led to the uptake of adjuvant capecitabine by many clinicians. In patients with advanced disease, the only level 1 data available supports the use of cisplatin and gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced disease; there is no established second-line chemotherapy. Previous forays into targeted therapy have proven unfruitful (namely targeting the epithelial growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways). An increasing number of genomic subtypes are being defined; for some of these on-target therapeutic options are under active investigation. The most developed are studies targeting IDH-1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase) mutations and FGFR-2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor) fusions, with promising early results. Several other pathways are under evaluation, along with early studies targeting the immune environment; these are too premature to change practice to date. These emerging treatments are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Adeva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maximiliano Salati
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research and Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Julien Edeline
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Adelaida La Casta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Navarra, Spain
| | - Alessandro Bittoni
- Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rosanna Berardi
- Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jordi Bruix
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan W Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|