Roles of fusion genes in digestive system cancers: dawn for cancer precision therapy

For advanced and advanced tumors of the digestive system, personalized, precise treatment could be a lifesaving medicine. With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, detection of fusion genes in solid tumors has become more extensive. Some fusion gene targeting therapies have been written into the guidelines for digestive tract tumors, such as for neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2. There are also many fusion genes being investigated as potential future therapeutic targets. This review focuses on the current detection methods for fusion genes, fusion genes written into the digestive system tumor guidelines, and potential fusion gene therapy targets in different organs to discuss the possibility of clinical treatments for these targets in digestive system tumors.

Current and emerging therapies for advanced biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers (cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancers) are increasing in incidence and have a poor prognosis. Most patients present with advanced disease, for which the treatment is palliative chemotherapy. Over the past few years, the genomic landscape of biliary tract cancers has been examined and several targeted therapies have been developed. Molecular targets with clinically meaningful activity include fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), RAS-RAF-MEK (MAP2K1)-ERK (MAPK3), HER2 (also known as ERBB2), DNA mismatch repair, and NTRK. Pemigatinib, a FGFR1-3 inhibitor, showed encouraging response rates and survival data as second-line treatment and received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in April, 2020, for previously treated advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangements. Ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, showed improved progression-free survival versus placebo in second-line treatment in the phase 3 ClarIDHy trial. Early phase trials of dabrafenib plus trametinib (BRAF and MEK inhibition) and zanidatamab (a bispecific HER2-antibody) have yielded encouraging response rates. Immunotherapy has mainly produced responses in tumours with deficient mismatch repair or high microsatellite instability (also known as dMMR or MSI-H) or higher PD-L1 score, or both. However, early phase trials of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in unselected patient populations appear promising. NTRK inhibitors have also shown promise in early phase trials of NTRK-fusion positive solid tumours, including cholangiocarcinoma. In this Review, we discuss current and emerging therapies for advanced biliary tract cancers, with a focus on molecularly targeted therapy.

Comparative Genomic Analysis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Biopsy Type, Ancestry, and Testing Patterns

BACKGROUND

At diagnosis, the majority of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) present with advanced disease and a poor prognosis. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) early in the disease course may increase access to targeted therapies and clinical trials; however, unresolved issues remain surrounding the optimal biopsy type to submit for CGP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Mutational frequencies between primary tumor biopsies (Pbx), metastatic biopsies (Mbx), and liquid biopsies (Lbx) in 1,632 patients with IHCC were compared.

RESULTS

Potentially actionable alterations were found in 52%, 34%, and 35% of patients in the Pbx, Mbx, and Lbx cohorts, respectively. In Pbx, Mbx, and Lbx, FGFR2 rearrangements were found in 9%, 6%, and 4%, and IDH1 mutations were identified in 16%, 5%, and 9% patients, respectively. Moreover, alterations in FGFR2 and IDH1 were significantly associated with distinct ancestries, including 2.1-fold enrichment for FGFR2 rearrangements in patients with African ancestry and 1.5-fold enrichment for IDH1 mutations in patients with admixed American (Hispanic) ancestry. Finally, the publication of biomarker-driven clinical trials in IHCC correlated with changing CGP testing patterns. Significant correlations between patient characteristics and IHCC trial disclosures were observed, including a significant decrease from time between biopsy and CGP testing, and more frequent testing of primary versus metastatic samples.

CONCLUSION

Overall, because of the high likelihood of identifying actionable genomic alterations, CGP should be considered for the majority of patients with inoperable IHCC, and Lbx and Mbx can be considered as part of the diagnostic suite.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) should be considered for all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) or suspected IHCC, as actionable alterations were commonly found in multiple genes and a wide variety of FGFR2 fusion partners were identified. The disclosure of IHCC trial data correlated with increased use of CGP, an encouraging trend that moves new therapeutic options forward for rare cancers with a rare biomarker. Although tissue from the primary lesion may identify actionable alterations at higher rates, CGP of a liquid biopsy or metastatic site can be considered, particularly if the primary tissue block is exhausted.

Infigratinib (BGJ398): an investigational agent for the treatment of FGFR-altered intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway is essential in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival. Cancers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCA) have demonstrated alterations of FGFR allowing unregulated growth. Infigratinib (BGJ398) is a potent ATP-competitive inhibitor of all four FGFR receptors as demonstrated by the consistently high prevalence of hyperphosphatemia, indicating disruption of FGFR-related phosphate homeostasis.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, the authors discuss preclinical studies and the biological characterization of BGJ398 that inspired its investigation for cancer treatment. They summarize results from phase I and II studies and comment on ongoing phase III clinical trials primarily focusing on its role in treating IHCA.

EXPERT OPINION

Infigratinib exhibits high potency FGFR1-3 inhibition in preclinical studies. Clinically, agents targeting FGFR including infigratinib show promising anti-tumor activity in targeted trials. Pemigatinib, an FGFR inhibitor, has recently been approved by the FDA for use in refractory IHCA. We believe infigratinib represents a promising agent in the treatment of refractory IHCA with FGFR2 fusions and is uniquely positioned to be a potential option in chemonaive patient populations. An ongoing phase III trial (PROOF-301) compares the efficacy and safety of infigratinib versus standard gemcitabine and cisplatin in untreated patients with IHCA and FGFR2 fusions.