Sun Protection Behaviors of State Park Workers in the Southeastern USA

Systematic review and analysis of self-efficacy in sun protection measurement instruments

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was toidentify and appraise available sun protection self-efficacy instruments and synthesize information.

DATA SOURCE

A systematic search of electronic databases from 2005 to 2023 included PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO.

BACKGROUND

While instruments have been developed to evaluate sun-protective behaviors and self-efficacy separately, sun-protection self-efficacy instruments have yet to be widely studied. Self-efficacy is an essential antecedent to performing health-related behaviors or practices that can promote or hinder the health of individuals and groups.

STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies randomized control trials or descriptive studies that used self-efficacy measurement tools to evaluate behaviors, intentions, and sun protection knowledge were included in this review. Sun protection surveys that targeted providers or parents and non-English articles were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by one independent researcher.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criterion and included 10 scales of self-efficacy in sun protection. Study design and purpose, and the instrument's validity and reliability statistics, including Cronbach's alphas, were extracted.

RESULTS

The two-factor self-efficacy in sun protection scale was the most common measure for primary prevention, with acceptable reliability and validity. However, other instruments also showed reliable psychometric properties, especially measures of sunscreen self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

More research in self-efficacy measurement is warranted to examine specific populations and determine the appropriate constructs of self-efficacy. It is crucial to design evidence-based interventions that affect self-efficacy, are measured by a reliable, valid instrument, and have the potential to increase sun-protective and screening behaviors.

Economic Evaluation of an Intervention Promoting Adoption of Occupational Sun Protection Policies

OBJECTIVE

Economic evaluation of an intervention promoting adoption of occupational sun protection actions by Colorado public sector employers.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up conducted during 2010 to 2013. Thirty-three intervention and 30 attention-control worksites in final economic sample. Twenty-four-month intervention of personal contacts, training, and materials. Intervention delivery micro-costed. Costs of implemented actions from employer self-report.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-month intervention costs: $121,789, 51.8% incurred by project staff (per-worksite mean=$1,732). Worksite costs: $58,631 (mean = $1,777). Per-employee costs: $118 project staff, $56 worksites. Materials cost: $5990 (mean = $181). Intervention worksites implemented 72 nontraining sun protection actions post-Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) (mean = 2.18). Control worksites implemented 39 actions (mean = 1.30). Total costs to intervention worksites of implementing the 72 post-SSW actions: $90,645 (mean = $2,747). Control worksite costs: $66,467 (mean = $2,216). Per-employee implementation costs are comparable to other worksite health interventions.

CONCLUSION

SSW expanded adoption of sun protection actions at a reasonable per-employee cost.

Senior managers' awareness of sun protection policy predicts implementation of worksite sun safety in a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Outdoor workers experience chronic exposure to harmful ultraviolet radiation (UV) elevating their risk for skin cancer.

METHODS

A controlled randomized trial promoted the adoption of workplace sun safety policy and employee education at 98 public organizations in Colorado. A 2-year follow-up study with 68 organizations assessed the association of senior manager awareness of sun safety policies and implementation of sun safety actions.

RESULTS

Senior managers' awareness of existing sun safety policies, but not their personal sun protection behaviors, predicted implementation of sun safety actions including the number of sun protection messages and sun protection items in the workplace and increased communication about sun safety to employees.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizational adoption of sun safety policy must include efforts to broadly inform a workplace's senior management to ensure the policies are actually implemented and provide support for sun protection behaviors by outdoor workers to reduce UV exposure and skin cancer risk.