The Retro-Rectus Prosthesis for Core Myofascial Restoration in Cosmetic Abdominoplasty

Surgical techniques for repair of abdominal rectus diastasis: a scoping review

Rectus diastasis is characterized by widening and laxity of the linea alba, causing the abdominal content to bulge. Rectus diastasis is treated either conservatively with physiotherapy, or surgically, surgical treatment showing especially convincing results. The primary aim of this study was to describe surgical techniques used to correct abdominal rectus diastasis. Secondary, we wished to assess postoperative complications in relation to the various techniques. A systematic scoping review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Studies were included if they described a surgical technique used to repair abdominal rectus diastasis, with or without concomitant ventral hernia. Secondary outcomes were recurrence rate and other complications. A total of 61 studies were included: 46 used an open approach and 15 used a laparoscopic approach for repair of the abdominal rectus diastasis. All the included studies used some sort of plication, but various technical modifications were used. The most common surgical technique was classic low abdominoplasty. The plication was done as either a single or a double layer, most commonly with permanent sutures. There were overall low recurrence rates and other complication rates after both the open and the laparoscopic techniques. We identified many techniques for repair of abdominal rectus diastasis. Recurrence rate and other complication rates were in general low. However, there is a lack of high-level evidence and it is not possible to recommend one method over another. Thus, further randomized controlled trials are needed in this area.

Impact of Rectus Diastasis Repair on Abdominal Strength and Function: A Systematic Review

Rectus diastasis plication performed during abdominoplasty aims to narrow the widened linea alba and return the rectus muscle bellies to their anatomic position. It is unclear whether plication improves abdominal strength and function.

This systematic review summarizes the effect of rectus plication on abdominal strength, function, and postoperative complications.

A comprehensive search of CINAHL, Embase, Medline and Web of Science was performed. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data were extracted from the included articles, and outcomes were analyzed categorically.

A total of 497 patients from seven articles were included. Mean age was 44.5 years (range 20.5-72) and 94.4% were female. Three articles reported abdominal strength measurements, with two showing significant improvement. Four articles used the SF-36 survey, all demonstrating improvement in physical function subscale postoperatively. An additional six instruments were used to assess functional outcomes, of which four demonstrated significant improvement. The overall complication rate was 17.0%.

Rectus plication is commonly performed during abdominoplasty to improve abdominal form and function. While the literature to date is encouraging with respect to functional outcomes, improvements in abdominal strength are less consistent. Heterogeneity in patient population, outcome measures, and comparison groups limit the strength of our conclusions. Future research should include a large comparative study as well as a protocol for standardizing outcomes in this population.

Improvement in Back Pain Following Abdominoplasty: Results of a 10-Year, Single-Surgeon Series

Background

Few studies have examined the impact of abdominoplasty on chronic back pain.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to test our hypothesis that patients undergoing abdominoplasty with anterior abdominal wall plication will show significant improvements in back pain and physical function compared with those without plication.

Methods

We utilized Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify patients who underwent abdominoplasty with the senior author over a 10-year period. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the RAND 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered. All patients indicating preoperative back pain were reviewed.

Results

Of 338 patients, 143 surveys (42.3%) were returned; 51 patients (35.7%; n = 28 aesthetic, n = 23 massive weight loss) reported preoperative back pain on the ODI. Paired t tests compared overall and strata-specific changes in ODI and SF-36 pre- and postsurgery. Multivariable linear regression models were fitted to model relations between scores and plication, adjusting for presurgery scores and patient variables. There were significant improvements in overall patient cohort in ODI (–15.14), SF-36 physical function (19.92), and pain (17.42) (P < 0.001), as well as when patients were stratified by plication status. However, outcomes between those with plication and those without were not significantly different.

Conclusions

Abdominoplasty with and without anterior abdominal wall plication significantly improves ODI and SF-36 scores relating to physical function and pain, in both aesthetic and massive weight loss patients. Outcomes did not differ based on plication status. All patients with preoperative back pain showed improvement regardless of operation performed, suggesting that abdominoplasty with or without abdominal wall plication improves chronic back pain in this patient population.

Level of Evidence: 4

Concomitant Abdominoplasty and Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

Umbilical hernia is a common finding in patients undergoing abdominoplasty, especially those who are postpartum with rectus divarication. Concurrent surgical treatment of the umbilical hernia at abdominoplasty presents a "vascular challenge" due to the disruption of dermal blood supply to the umbilicus, leaving the stalk as the sole axis of perfusion. To date, there have been no surgical techniques described to adequately address large umbilical herniae during abdominoplasty.

OBJECTIVES

To present an effective and safe technique that can address large umbilical herniae during abdominoplasty.

METHODS

A prospective series of 10 consecutive patients, undergoing concurrent abdominoplasty and laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair between 2014 and 2017 were included in the study. All procedures were performed by the same general surgeon and plastic surgeon at the Macquarie University Hospital in North Ryde, NSW, Australia. Data were collected with approval of our ethics committee.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow up there were no instances of umbilical necrosis, wound complications, seroma, or recurrent hernia. The mean body mass index was 23.8 kg/m2 (range, 16.1-30.1 kg/m2). Rectus divarication ranged from 35 to 80 mm (mean, 53.5 mm). Umbilical hernia repair took a mean of 25.9 minutes to complete (range, 18-35 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

We present a technique that avoids incision of the rectus fascia minimizes dissection of the umbilical stalk and is able to provide a gold standard hernia repair with mesh. This procedure is particularly suited to postpartum patients with large herniae (>3-4 cm diameter) and wide rectus divarication, where mesh repair with adequate overlap is the recommended treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4