Betadine and Breast Implants

Protocol for single-arm clinical trial evaluating medical grade polycaprolactone breast scaffold implantation with autologous fat grafting for breast implant revision and congenital defect correction surgery

INTRODUCTION

Revision surgery following primary breast augmentation is common due to well-reported long-term limitations of permanent silicone implants. There are limited options for revision breast augmentation which avoids using silicone implants. Scaffold-guided breast tissue engineering (SGBTE) is a novel technique which uses breast scaffolds additively manufactured from medical grade polycaprolactone (mPCL), which is implanted and filled with autologous fat graft. This approach avoids limitations as observed with permanent silicone breast implants as the scaffold is porous and biodegradable. This clinical trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of SGBTE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is an open, single-arm, monocentric, interventional, prospective clinical trial. The trial is being conducted at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) in Herston (Queensland, Australia) of the Metro North Health Service. The trial investigates 15-20 women who require breast implant surgery and/or congenital breast defect correction surgery, where a mPCL breast scaffold is implanted and filled with autologous fat graft. The primary endpoint is postoperative device safety by assessing the rate of adverse device effect rate. Secondary endpoints include general adverse event frequency and severity, number of revision surgeries, general surgical outcomes and complications, patient-reported outcomes and volume replacement outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The RBWH Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00172) has approved this clinical trial (ethics approval: HREC/2021/QRBW/79906). Findings from this clinical trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting mPCL scaffolds filled with autologous fat graft. The results of this clinical trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05437757.

Capsular Contracture After Breast Augmentation: Our Approach to Prevent Reoccurrence with Combined Total Capsulectomy and Implantation of Motiva Ergonomix® Implants

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation is the second most common aesthetic surgery worldwide. Capsular contracture, a prevalent complication which affects up to 30% of patients post-surgery, often leads to further necessary surgeries.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the effectiveness of total capsulectomy combined with Motiva Ergonomix® implant replacement in resolving capsular contracture and minimizing recurrence rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 1067 patients and enrolled 51 women with capsular contracture post-breast augmentation. Patients were treated between 2014 and 2023 in a single center by three surgeons. Capsular contracture severity was graded using Baker's classification. Surgical interventions included total capsulectomy and implant replacement, using various incision techniques and changes in implant anatomical planes. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months to a maximum of 9 years.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients with grade III or IV capsular contracture underwent revisional surgery, involving the implantation of 102 Motiva Ergonomix® prostheses; 77 explanted implants resulted intact, 15 exhibited silicone bleeding, and 10 showed ruptured. Capsular contracture recurrence was observed in only 1.96% of cases during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of total capsulectomy and implantation of Motiva Ergonomix® implants significantly reduces the recurrence rate of capsular contracture. Despite the study's limitations, including its single-center design and a small sample size, our results suggest that this approach is a viable and effective solution to manage this common complication in breast augmentation patients. Further multicentric studies are recommended to validate these results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 .

Concentration of Povidone-Iodine Pocket Irrigation in Implant-Based Breast Surgery: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

In implant-based breast surgery, microbial contamination of implant surfaces predisposes complications such as overt periprosthetic infection and has been linked to capsular contracture (CC). Anti-microbial practices, including povidone-iodine (PVP-I) breast pocket irrigation, are routinely employed to minimise these risks. No standardised protocol for using this antiseptic exists, particularly concerning the ideal concentration. This review investigates how PVP-I concentration affects outcomes in these procedures while highlighting research gaps.

METHODS

Using PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases from their inception to June 2024. Studies were screened using pre-determined criteria for inclusion. The methodological quality of relevant studies was assessed using the MINORS tool. Data regarding basic characteristics, PVP-I irrigation implementation, and outcomes (primarily periprosthetic infection and CC) were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

Nine articles, primarily observational studies, and retrospective analyses were included. These mainly focused on breast augmentation with a few including reconstruction. There was considerable heterogeneity in surgical techniques, and reported PVP-I concentrations ranged from 4 to 20%. This was further confounded by frequent mixing of irrigation solution with antibiotics. Although infection and CC rates were frequently reported, most studies did not specify outcome data for patients receiving PVP-I irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

While PVP-I irrigation is extensively used in implant surgeries, the current evidence base is insufficient to determine the optimal concentration and application techniques. This review underscores the need for further detailed research to establish evidence-based guidelines for PVP-I use, aiming to improve patient care and surgical outcomes in breast surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .

Outcomes of In-Office, High Resolution Ultrasound Silicone Breast Implant Surveillance by Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Implant rupture is a known complication in cosmetic breast surgery, but access and cost barriers hinder proper implant surveillance.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we aimed to validate high resolution ultrasound (HRUS) for diagnosing silicone implant rupture, and secondarily explore the predictors of implant rupture in a single-surgeon cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent HRUS of silicone breast implants that were placed by W.P.A. HRUS sensitivity and specificity and predictive values were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of implant rupture. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated 10-year and 15-year implant survival.

RESULTS

Among 254 patients (508 implants) included, 52 patients (104 implants) underwent operative exploration for various reasons; 20 implants had confirmed ruptures. Examining this operative cohort, HRUS had excellent positive and negative predictive value, respectively, 100% (95% CI 83.1%-100%) and 97.6% (95% CI 91.6-99.3%); the sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 70.8-98.9%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 95.6%-100%). The median age of the implant at the time of ultrasound was 119 months (10 years; interquartile range 79-152 months). After multivariable adjustment, only the implant age was a significant predictor of implant rupture (P = .04). Across the entire cohort, Kaplan-Meier methods estimated 10-year and 15-year implant survival rates of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.87), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed 10-year and 15-year implant survival rates of 0.99 and 0.92, respectively, for surveillance-only HRUS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Plastic surgeon-delivered office-based HRUS surveillance is a highly sensitive and specific method for assessing silicone breast implant integrity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

In Vivo Comparison of the Efficacy and Duration of Local Antibiotics on Smooth, Textured and Polyurethane Implant Surfaces

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture is one of the most common complications after breast surgery involving silicone implants. The most likely cause of this condition is biofilm formation. In this study, the efficacy of local antibiotherapy against biofilm formation on implant surfaces was investigated.

METHODS

Thirty-six rats were divided into six groups. Three pockets were created on the dorsum of each rat, and 1 × 2 cm implant surface samples from smooth, polyurethane and textured implants were randomly placed into pockets. All samples were inoculated with staphylococcus epidermidis. In groups 1-2-3, inoculated samples were placed into the pockets and removed after 1, 6 and 24 h, respectively. In groups 4-5-6, inoculated samples immersed with rifamycin were placed and removed after 1, 6 and 24 h, respectively. Bacterial load was measured with plate count method.

RESULTS

Bacterial load was lower in groups 4-5-6 than in groups 1-2-3 (p < 0.05). In groups 4-5-6, bacterial load was lower for polyurethane than for textured surfaces at all time points (1, 6 and 24 h; p < 0.05). Again, in groups 4-5-6, bacterial load was lower for smooth than for textured surfaces at 24 h (p < 0.05). In groups 4-5-6, bacterial load was lower for polyurethane than for smooth surfaces at all time points, but difference was not statistically significant (1, 6 and 24 h; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that local antibiotic therapy was effective in reducing the bacterial load on all surfaces. The effectiveness of local rifamycin on the polyurethane surface was higher, and the duration of activity was longer than other surfaces.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

SMI-Capsular Fibrosis and Biofilm Dynamics: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Antimicrobial Approaches

Silicone mammary implants (SMIs) frequently result in capsular fibrosis, which is marked by the overproduction of fibrous tissue surrounding the implant. This review provides a detailed examination of the molecular and immunological mechanisms driving capsular fibrosis, focusing on the role of foreign body responses (FBRs) and microbial biofilm formation. We investigate how microbial adhesion to implant surfaces and biofilm development contribute to persistent inflammation and fibrotic responses. The review critically evaluates antimicrobial strategies, including preoperative antiseptic protocols and antimicrobial-impregnated materials, designed to mitigate infection and biofilm-related complications. Additionally, advancements in material science, such as surface modifications and antibiotic-impregnated meshes, are discussed for their potential to reduce capsular fibrosis and prevent contracture of the capsule. By integrating molecular insights with clinical applications, this review aims to elucidate the current understanding of SMI-related fibrotic responses and highlight knowledge gaps. The synthesis of these findings aims to guide future research directions of improved antimicrobial interventions and implant materials, ultimately advancing the management of capsular fibrosis and enhancing patient outcomes.

Contemporary Trends in Antiseptic Pocket Rinse in Primary Breast Implant Surgery

BACKGROUND

Broad evidence supports the use of antiseptic pocket rinse in breast implant surgery to minimize the risk of capsular contracture or other complications. However, there is limited consensus or standardization of antiseptic rinse in practice.

OBJECTIVES

In this preliminary study, we sought to determine contemporary trends in antiseptic rinse use in primary breast implant surgery based on Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR) data, and whether these trends align with the suggestions of the 14-point plan. This further served as a feasibility study for subsequent comparison of antiseptic rinse effects on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Institutional ethics approval was obtained and national ABDR data for primary breast implant surgery from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed for the use and type of antiseptic rinse. The surgeon-reported data were homogenized with regard to terminology and categorized by major trends, and the literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 37,143 patients, totaling 73,935 primary implants. Antiseptic rinse included povidone-iodine (PVP-I) in 35,859 (48.5%), no antiseptic use in 24,216 (32.8%), other concentrations of PVP-I in 4200 (5.7%), and Betadine triple antibiotic in 1831 implants (2.5%). Multiple other antiseptic permutations were noted in 7004 implants (9.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority (56.7%) of Australian practitioners utilize previously described antiseptic pocket irrigation solutions that align with the 14-point plan. A third (32.8%), however, do not record any antiseptic pocket irrigation. These findings will permit a subsequent (ongoing) study of outcomes comparing PVP-I pocket rinse to no antiseptic pocket rinse, which will likely constitute the largest study of its kind.

Preventing Bacterial Contamination of Breast Implants Using Infection Mitigation Techniques: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Bacterial contamination of implants has been linked to biofilm formation and subsequent infection, capsular contracture, and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Reducing contamination during implant insertion should therefore reduce biofilm formation disease sequelae.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare levels of contamination between preventative techniques.

METHODS

A model to simulate the passage of implants through a skin incision was designed that utilized a sterile textured polyvinyl plastic sheet contaminated with Staphylococcus epidermidis. In the first stage of the polyvinyl contamination model, implants were subject to infection-mitigation techniques and passed through the incision, then placed onto horse blood agar plates and incubated for 24 hours. In the second stage of the study the same contamination was applied to human abdominal wall specimens. A 5 cm incision was made through skin and fat, then implants were passed through and levels of contamination were measured as described.

RESULTS

Smooth implants grew a mean of 95 colony-forming units (CFUs; approximately 1 CFU/cm2) and textured implants grew 86 CFUs (also approximately 1 CFU/cm2). CFU counts were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test which showed no significant difference between implant types (P < .05); independent-sample t-tests showed a significant difference. The dependent-variable techniques were then compared as groups by one-way analysis of variance, which also showed a significant reduction compared with the control group (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This in vitro study has shown the effectiveness of antiseptic rinse and skin/implant barrier techniques for reducing bacterial contamination of breast implants at the time of insertion.

The Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation (ASERF): A 30-Year Retrospective Analysis

Federal government research grants provide limited funding to plastic surgeon-scientists, with reconstructive research taking precedence over aesthetic research. The Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation (ASERF) is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization that seeks to support innovative, diverse research endeavors within aesthetic surgery. A total of 130 ASERF-funded studies and 32 non-funded applications from 1992 to 2022 were reviewed. Kruskal Wallis, Fisher's exact, and chi-squared tests were utilized to assess the potential relationship between self-identified gender, practice setting, geographical location, and study type with individual grant amounts and grant funding decision. Although significant differences were observed between male and female grant recipient h-indices (P < .05), there were no differences in the amount of funding they received (P > .05). Grant amounts were also consistent between study types as well as principal investigator practice settings and geographical locations (P > .05). The subanalysis revealed that the practice setting of the primary investigator (PI) was the only variable to exhibit a significant association with the decision to award funding (P < .05). Further, of the 61 applicants between 2017 and 2022, only 2 PIs self-identified as female. ASERF serves as an excellent funding source for global aesthetic surgery. To promote further research diversification, increased emphasis should be placed on recruiting applicants from outside academia and those who identify as female or gender nonbinary.

Management of Biofilm with Breast Implant Surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand how bacteria negatively impact aesthetic and reconstructive breast implants. 2. Understand how bacteria infect breast implants. 3. Understand the evidence associated with common implant infection-prevention strategies, and their limitations. 4. Understand why implementation of bacteria-mitigation strategies such as antibiotic administration or "no-touch" techniques may not indefinitely prevent breast implant infection.

SUMMARY

Bacterial infection of aesthetic and reconstructive breast implants is a common and expensive problem. Subacute infections or chronic capsular contractures leading to device explantation are the most commonly documented sequelae. Although bench and translational research underscores the complexities of implant-associated infection, high-quality studies with adequate power, control groups, and duration of follow-up are lacking. Common strategies to minimize infections use antibiotics-administered systemically, in the breast implant pocket, or by directly bathing the implant before insertion-to limit bacterial contamination. Limiting contact between the implant and skin or breast parenchyma represents an additional common strategy. The clinical prevention of breast implant infection is challenged by the clean-contaminated nature of breast parenchyma, and the variable behavior of not only specific bacterial species but also their strains. These factors impact bacterial virulence and antibiotic resistance.

Single-Institution Early Experience With a New, Smooth, Opaque, and Round Breast Implant Over a 2-Year Period

Background

The ideal breast implant does not exist and the choice of implant for breast augmentation is largely based on what surgeons think will be best for their patients.

Objectives

To evaluate the preliminary results of a new, smooth, round, and opaque breast implant (PERLE, GC Aesthetics; Dublin, Ireland) from a single-center UK aesthetic practice.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing breast implant surgery with PERLE at the authors' center between January 2021 and December 2022. Outcomes data such as rates of capsular contracture, infection, revision surgery, and synchronous mastopexy were analyzed.

Results

Of the 385 patients identified, 374 (97.1%) had PERLE implants placed by 3 surgeons for primary (n = 290) and secondary breast augmentation (n = 21), and augmentation-mastopexy (n = 63). Capsular contracture occurred in no cases, infection in 1 (0.2%), and revision surgery in 21 patients (5%). The incision used was always submammary, unless a synchronous mastopexy was performed; implants were placed in the subglandular/subfascial plane in the majority of cases (85.3%), and the rest were dual plane (14.7%). Eight revisions were performed in patients undergoing breast augmentation (due to implant displacement in 6 patients, and hematoma and infection in 1 patient each). Fourteen revisions were performed in those undergoing augmentation-mastopexy. The average follow-up time was 18 months.

Conclusions

The authors' early, single-center experience with PERLE implants suggests a safety profile and overall complication rate that is comparable with other modern implants. They will continue to monitor the safety and effectiveness of PERLE and discuss the reasons and evolution in the choice of breast implant.

Level of Evidence 4

Comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial pocket-irrigation protocols in an in vivo breast implant infection model

BACKGROUND

Breast implant infection and biofilm formation are major concerns in reconstructive and esthetic breast surgery, with significant medical and economic consequences. Staphylococcus is the common pathogen, with rapidly increasing rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There is no consensus on prevention practices. This study compares the effect of several pocket irrigation and antibiotic prophylaxis regimens on implant colonization and biofilm formation in an established rat model of MRSA-infected silicone breast implants.

METHODS

Silicone discs were inserted in a sub-pectoral pocket in 57 rats (114 implants). Implant infection was induced by injection of free planktonic MRSA into the surgical pocket. Rats were allocated to study groups treated by different antimicrobial protocols: pocket irrigation with vancomycin, povidone-iodine, or saline. Each group was divided into subgroups treated with or without additional peri-operative systemic vancomycin. Implant colonization or overt infection was assessed at post-operative day 14 both clinically and by cultures.

RESULTS

Pocket irrigation with vancomycin prevented contamination in 87% of implants. Irrigation and systemic vancomycin prevented contamination in 100% of implants with no difference between a single preoperative dose and a 48-h regimen. Systemic vancomycin alone or irrigation with povidone-iodine alone resulted in 100% contamination rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this in vivo model, combination of systemic vancomycin with vancomycin pocket irrigation was the most effective regimen, preventing contamination in 100% of implants. Continuation of post-operative antibiotic treatment showed no added advantage.

Anaplastic lymphoma associated with breast implants-Early diagnosis and treatment

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with breast implants is a relatively new disease that deserves attention from the academic community. Brazil figures as one of the protagonists in plastic surgery, however publications are insufficient and very few cases are reported in comparison to other countries. It is a disease with excellent prognosis when diagnosed early and treated effectively, but for this to happen, it is essential that health care professionals and the patient understand its pathology. We reported two cases in a small town during a short period of time. In both cases reported by this study, the patients presented late seroma, associated with pain as a clinical presentation, at 13 and 9 years after the placement of silicone implants with textured polyurethane surfaces. After the procedure, the patients were screened for cancer. Further research with more robust samples is still needed to fully determine the risks and benefits of using textured versus smooth implants.

Breast Augmentation: A Cross-Sectional Survey of UK and Irish Aesthetic Surgeons

Background

Breast augmentation surgery is the most frequently performed aesthetic surgical procedure within the United Kingdom year on year. However, many variations exist among surgeons regarding various aspects of implant usage and technique.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate current trends and practices in breast augmentation, within the United Kingdom and correlate them to evidence-based literature.

Methods

An electronic survey of 41 questions was sent to 201 surgeons performing breast augmentation within the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. The survey inquired about the surgeons themselves, their practice, implant choice, surgical technique, post-op care, revision surgery, and impact of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma among several other questions.

Results

There were a total of 166 respondents, with 146 completing the survey fully, equaling a response rate of approximately 73%. Overall, there were specific trends in certain aspects such as type of practice, number of augmentations performed per surgeon per year, preferred implant manufacturer, and implant characteristics. That said, there has been a change in other aspects such as implant texture with an increase in the use of smooth implants. The United Kingdom and Ireland concur with certain internationally dominant practice preferences, including the use of inframammary incisions and post-op bra use.

Conclusions

This survey suggests that many aspects of breast augmentation surgery in the United Kingdom are approaching standardization. There are, however, some variations in practice and controversies remaining as expected. It is our belief that further standardizing this very common aesthetic surgical procedure according to evidence-based guidelines will help to improve outcomes for patients.

Advances on Capsular Contracture-Prevention and Management Strategies: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Capsular contracture (CC) is the most relevant complication of both aesthetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. For many years, experimental and clinical trials have attempted to analyze CC risk factors, clinical features, and appropriate management strategies. It is commonly accepted that a multifactorial etiology promotes CC development. However, the heterogeneity in patients, implants and surgical techniques make it difficult to suitably compare or analyze specific factors. As a consequence, discordant data are present in literature, and a true systematic review is often limited in its conclusions. Hence, we decided to present a comprehensive review of current theories on prevention and management strategies, rather than a specific "solution" to this complication.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched for literature regarding CC prevention and management strategies. Pertinent articles in English, published before December 1, 2022, were compared with selection criteria and eventually included in this review.

Results

Through the initial search, 97 articles were identified, of which 38 were included in the final study. Several articles explored different medical and surgical preventive and therapeutic strategies, showing numerous controversies on appropriate CC management.

Conclusions

This review provides a clear overview of the complexity of CC. The wide variety of clinical situations in term of patients, implants, and surgical techniques prevent the standardization of CC management strategies. By contrast, a patient-customized approach should be preferred, and different strategies should be considered depending on the specific case. Further research is desirable to better ascertain evidence-based protocols with regard to CC prevention and treatment.

Evaluation of the role of povidone‑iodine in the prevention of surgical site infections

Background

The occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) is associated with increased risk of mortality, development of other infections, and the need for reintervention, posing a significant health burden. The aim of this review was to examine the current data and guidelines around the use of antiseptic povidone‑iodine (PVP-I) for the prevention of SSIs at each stage of surgical intervention.

Methods

A literature search for selected key words was performed using PubMed. Additional papers were identified based on author expertise.

Results

Scientific evidence demonstrates that PVP-I can be used at every stage of surgical intervention: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. PVP-I is one of the most widely used antiseptics on healthy skin and mucous membranes for preoperative surgical site preparation and is associated with a low SSI rate. For intraoperative irrigation, aqueous PVP-I is the recommended agent and has been demonstrated to decrease SSIs in a range of surgical settings, and for postoperative wound healing, there is a growing body of evidence to support the use of PVP-I.

Conclusions

There is a need for more stringent study designs in clinical trials to enable meaningful comparisons between antiseptic agents, particularly for preoperative skin preparation. The use of a single agent (PVP-I) at each stage of surgical intervention could potentially provide advantages, including economic benefits, over agents that can only be used at discrete stages of the surgical procedure.

Key message

Evidence supports the use of PVP-I at all stages of surgical intervention, from preoperative measures (including skin preparation, preoperative washing, and nasal decolonization) to intraoperative irrigation, through to postoperative wound management. However, there is a need for more stringent study designs in clinical trials to enable meaningful comparisons between antiseptic agents, particularly for preoperative skin preparation.

Complication Rates after Breast Surgery with the Motiva Smooth Silk Surface Silicone Gel Implants-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In an era where textured devices are being phased out due to concerns about BIA-ALCL, the Motiva SilkSurface breast implants intend to alleviate historical prosthesis-related complications. However, its safety and feasibility remain unelucidated.

METHODS

An analysis of Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and Embase databases was performed. A total of 114 studies were identified initially, and 13 of these met the inclusion criteria and were assessed regarding postoperative parameters such as complication rate or follow-up period.

RESULTS

In 4784 patients who underwent breast augmentation with Motiva SilkSurface breast implants, a total of 250 (5.2%) complications were observed. Short- and medium-term complication rates ranged from 2.8-14.4% and 0.32-16.67%, respectively. The most common complication was early seroma (n = 52, overall incidence = 1.08%), followed by early hematoma (n = 28, overall incidence = 0.54%). The incidence of capsule contracture was 0.54% and breast implant-associated-anaplastic large cell lymphoma was not observed.

DISCUSSION

Although the majority of the studies in the current literature suggest the distinction of the Motiva SilkSurface breast implants in terms of postoperative complications and capsular contracture, its safety and feasibility need to be further elucidated with well-designed, large-scale, multicenter, prospective case-control studies. Other: No funding was received.

The Role of Microorganisms in the Development of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a variant of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) associated with textured-surface silicone breast implants. Since first being described in 1997, over 1100 cases have been currently reported worldwide. A causal relationship between BIA-ALCL and textured implants has been established in epidemiological studies, but a multifactorial process is likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of BIA-ALCL. However, pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear. One of the hypotheses that could explain the link between textured implants and BIA-ALCL consists in the greater tendency of bacterial biofilm in colonizing the surface of textured implants compared to smooth implants, and the resulting chronic inflammation which, in predisposed individuals, may lead to tumorigenesis. This review summarizes the existing evidence on the role of micro-organisms and rough surface implants in the development of BIA-ALCL. It also provides insights into the most updated clinical practice knowledge about BIA-ALCL, from clinical presentation and investigation to treatment and outcomes.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Solution Infection Prophylaxis in Immediate Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Controlled Retrospective Analysis

Background: There is currently no consensus among plastic surgeons regarding the optimal infection prophylaxis for immediate tissue expander placement following mastectomy. The goal of this study was to determine whether irrigation with 1 L of standard triple antibiotic solution (TAS) can achieve similar infection rates compared to a regimen of 180 mL of TAS with povidone-iodine solution (Betadine) painted on the field immediately prior to the placement of the expander. Methods: The 2 regimens were compared via retrospective propensity matching of all patients of the 2 senior authors who underwent bilateral tissue expander placement immediately following mastectomy with one of 3 mastectomy surgeons from January 2013 to December 2019 (n = 281). Groups were controlled for mastectomy surgeon, mastectomy type, mastectomy weight, age, race, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, smoking status, prepectoral/subpectoral placement, use of acellular dermal matrix, operating room time, and duration of postoperative antibiotics. Results: Compared to the Betadine cohort (n = 65), the non-Betadine cohort (n = 65) experienced a similar rate of infections (13.8% vs 12.3%, P = 1.00), including major injections requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment (10.8% vs 9.2%, P = 1.00), after propensity matching. Infections in the non-Betadine cohort did not grow different bacteria on culture, require different antibiotic coverage, or result in prolonged duration of average antibiotic therapy (12.0 days vs 19.3 days, P = .19). Rates of subsequent expander washout and exchange (P = 1.00) and overall complications that required return to the operating room (P = .826) were similar between groups. Conclusion: The addition of Betadine solution to TAS added no benefit to infection prophylaxis or reduction of surgical complications in immediate tissue expander placement procedures.

Enhancing Patient Outcomes in Aesthetic Breast Implant Procedures Using Proven Antimicrobial Breast Pocket Irrigations: A 20-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture (CC) remains the most common complication of implant-based aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. With subclinical infection proven to be the primary etiology, antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation has been recommended as the key step to reduce CC but has not been universally adopted.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the rates of CC observed when applying proven antimicrobial breast pocket irrigations.

METHODS

Data from patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation were recorded prospectively from 1997 to 2017. The irrigation was performed with either a Betadine-containing (50% Betadine or "Betadine triple") or a non-Betadine triple antibiotic regimen. The database was assessed to determine the type of implant used, the incidence of CC, and possible contributing factors. The degree of CC was recorded according to the Baker classification.

RESULTS

A 20-year prospective data collection yielded 2088 patients with 4176 implants; of these patients, 826 had textured implants and 1262 had smooth implants. The incidence of Grade III/IV CC was found to be 0.57% in all patients undergoing primary breast augmentation (1.21% in textured implants and 0.16% in smooth implants).

CONCLUSIONS

This study constitutes the largest and longest review of CC in a controlled, single-surgeon setting. The incidence of CC is low and reinforces the efficacy/utility of antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation. Both the Betadine and non-Betadine antibiotic regimens were found to be effective, with the Betadine regimen being preferred. Universal adoption of Betadine-containing antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation is recommended to reduce CC and other device-associated infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Pharmacological Approaches for the Prevention of Breast Implant Capsular Contracture

Capsular contracture is a common complication associated with breast implants following reconstructive or aesthetic surgery in which a tight or constricting scar tissue capsule forms around the implant, often distorting the breast shape and resulting in chronic pain. Capsulectomy (involving full removal of the capsule surrounding the implant) and capsulotomy (where the capsule is released and/or partly removed to create more space for the implant) are the most common surgical procedures used to treat capsular contracture. Various structural modifications of the implant device (including use of textured implants, submuscular placement of the implant, and the use of polyurethane-coated implants) and surgical strategies (including pre-operative skin washing and irrigation of the implant pocket with antibiotics) have been and/or are currently used to help reduce the incidence of capsular contracture. In this article, we review the pharmacological approaches-both commonly practiced in the clinic and experimental-reported in the scientific and clinical literature aimed at either preventing or treating capsular contracture, including (i) pre- and post-operative intravenous administration of drug substances, (ii) systemic (usually oral) administration of drugs before and after surgery, (iii) modification of the implant surface with grafted drug substances, (iv) irrigation of the implant or peri-implant tissue with drugs prior to implantation, and (v) incorporation of drugs into the implant shell or filler prior to surgery followed by drug release in situ after implantation.

Breast Implant Illness: Treatment Using Total Capsulectomy and Implant Removal

BACKGROUND

Breast implant illness (BII) is extramammary systemic symptoms that are caused by breast implants. The emergence of this controversial topic has spurred patients with breast implants who are experiencing these symptoms to seek implant removal, hoping to feel better. This article presents novel outcomes and suggestions for plastic surgeons in managing BII using total capsulectomy and breast implant removal.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study conducted between 2016 and 2020, medical records of all patients undergoing breast implant removal were reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of all patients with history of breast implant placement presenting with mastodynia and capsular contracture on physical examination. Patients with history of implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy and patients who underwent implant exchange were excluded. All patients underwent bilateral implant removal and total capsulectomies.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were identified. Average age was 45.5 (range: 29-73) years and average body mass index was 26.28 (range: 19-36.8), with an average follow-up time of 5 months postoperatively. Of patients with a presentation of BII, 96% reported improved or complete resolution of their systemic symptoms after implant removal and total capsulectomy. A positive microbial culture was found in 68.5% of patients, and all culture-positive patients reported improvement post-treatment. The most common organisms found were Propionibacterium acnes (49.6%). There were no associations between implant characteristics and rate of positive microbiology findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that implant removal with capsulectomy drastically improves BII symptoms. Further large prospective cohort studies are needed to better understand this entity.

Preventing Infection in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Evaluating the Evidence for Common Practices and Standardized Protocols

Infection following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) results in increased rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, patient and hospital expenses, and reconstructive failure. IBBR is a complex, multistep procedure, and there is a relative lack of high-quality plastic surgery evidence regarding "best practices" in the prevention of implant infections. In the absence of strong data, standardizing procedures based on available evidence can reduce error and improve efficacy and outcomes.

Methods

We performed a focused literature review of the available evidence supporting specific interventions for infection prevention in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care that are applicable to IBBR. In addition, we examined previously published standardized perioperative protocols for implant reconstruction.

Results

Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative planning and organization is crucial in IBBR. Preoperative planning involves skin decolonization in advance of surgery with either chlorhexidine gluconate or mupirocin. Intraoperative methods that have shown potential benefit include double-gloving, breast pocket irrigation, separate closing instruments, and the utilization of "no-touch" techniques. In the postoperative period, the duration of drain removal and postoperative antibiotic administration play an important role in the prevention of surgical site infection.

Conclusions

There is a crucial need to establish an evidence-based set of "best practices" for IBBR, and there exists a paucity of evidence in the breast literature. These data can be utilized to develop a standardized protocol as part of a rigorous quality improvement methodology.

Implants and Breast Pocket Irrigation: Outcomes of Antibiotic, Antiseptic, and Saline Irrigation

BACKGROUND

Breast implant-associated infection and capsular contracture are challenging complications that can result in poor outcomes following implant-based breast surgery. Antimicrobial irrigation of the breast pocket or implant is a widely accepted strategy to prevent these complications, but the literature lacks an evidence-based consensus on the optimal irrigation solution.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes, specifically capsular contracture, infection, and reoperation rates, associated with the use of antibiotic, antiseptic, and saline irrigation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in March 2020 based on the following search terms: "breast implant," "irrigation," "antibiotic," "bacitracin," "antiseptic," "povidone iodine," "betadine," "low concentration chlorhexidine," and "hypochlorous acid." Capsular contracture, infection, and reoperation rates were compared by analysis of forest plots.

RESULTS

Out of the 104 articles screened, 14 met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in capsular contracture rates between antibiotic and povidone-iodine irrigation, although the data comparing these 2 groups were limited and confounded by the concurrent use of steroids. Antibiotic irrigation showed a significantly lower rate of capsular contracture compared with saline irrigation and a lower rate of capsular contracture and reoperation compared with no irrigation at all. Povidone-iodine was associated with lower rates of capsular contracture and reoperation compared with saline irrigation but there were no data on infection rates specific to povidone-iodine irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the use of antibiotics or povidone-iodine for breast implant irrigation. Further research is required to better determine which of these 2 irrigation types is superior.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

In Vitro Evaluation of Common Antimicrobial Solutions Used for Breast Implant Soaking and Breast Pocket Irrigation-Part 1: Efficacy Against Planktonic Bacteria

BACKGROUND

Planktonic bacteria can be inadvertently introduced during breast surgery procedures, which are hypothesized to lead to complications such as infection, capsular contracture, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and a prolonged local inflammatory response. The utilization of antimicrobial solutions such as triple antibiotic solution (TAB) and/or 10% povidone-iodine (PI) in breast pocket irrigation or implant soaking has been proposed to reduce planktonic bacterial attachment and potential complications.

OBJECTIVES

A series of in vitro assessments were performed to evaluate the antimicrobial utility of TAB and PI, either alone or in combination, against planktonic bacteria.

METHODS

Planktonic gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were exposed to TAB and PI ± TAB for up to 10 minutes in a bacterial time-kill assay. The efficacy of various dilutions of PI as well as the effects of serum protein on PI efficacy were also investigated.

RESULTS

TAB was ineffective at the timeframes tested (≤10 minutes) when utilized alone; however, when utilized with PI, significant log reduction of all tested planktonic species was achieved. PI alone was also effective, even including dilute concentrations (eg, 0.5% PI), although the presence of serum proteins required higher concentrations of PI (eg, 2.5%) to eradicate the bacterial load.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest PI-containing solutions may be preferred over either saline or TAB without PI for primary breast pocket irrigation and implant soaking in primary breast surgeries as a means to significantly reduce planktonic bacteria. These data provide an impetus for surgeons to re-evaluate the efficacy of TAB solution in these clinical settings.

In Vitro Evaluation of Common Antimicrobial Solutions Used for Breast Implant Soaking and Breast Pocket Irrigation-Part 2: Efficacy Against Biofilm-Associated Bacteria

Background

Biofilm-associated bacteria have been observed in both breast implant revision and tissue expander-implant exchange surgeries. The utilization of antimicrobial solutions in breast surgery, especially those containing triple antibiotics (TAB) and/or 10% povidone-iodine (PI), may help reduce existing biofilm-associated bacteria, which is particularly important in a mature breast pocket that may contain residual bacteria from a previously colonized implant surface or, theoretically, bacteria that may arrive postoperatively through hematogenous spread.

Objectives

A series of in vitro assessments was performed to evaluate the antimicrobial utility of TAB and PI, either alone or in combination, against preformed biofilm-associated bacteria.

Methods

Preformed biofilm-associated gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were exposed to TAB and PI ± TAB for up to 30 minutes in a bacterial time-kill assay. Efficacy of various dilutions of PI and the effects of serum protein on PI efficacy were also investigated.

Results

TAB was ineffective at the timeframes tested when utilized alone; when utilized in conjunction with PI, significant log reduction of all biofilm-associated bacterial species tested was achieved when treated for at least 5 minutes. PI alone at a concentration of 25% or higher was also effective, although its efficacy was negatively affected by increasing serum protein concentration only for Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that PI-containing solutions significantly reduce biofilm-associated bacteria, suggesting potential utility for breast pocket irrigation during revision or exchange surgeries. Care should be taken to minimize excessive dilution of PI to maintain efficacy.

Revision Breast Augmentation

Breast augmentation is consistently one of the most commonly performed aesthetic operations every year. Unfortunately, revision rates following primary augmentation remain as high as 36%. There are several causes for revision breast augmentation; however, the most common and challenging of these include capsular contracture, implant malposition, and ptosis of the aging breast following augmentation. Successful management of these problems requires knowledge on how to best treat the implant and capsule with the corresponding soft tissue simultaneously. While surgical management is important, understanding the pathological causes of these entities during the primary operation can reduce the need for revision. This article utilizes the most up-to-date literature to review the appropriate clinical evaluation and surgical management of these complex cases.

Preliminary Outcomes of Hypochlorous Acid as an Adjunct for Pocket Irrigation in Revision Aesthetic Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture is a challenging problem for plastic surgeons despite advances in surgical technique. Breast pocket irrigation decreases bacterial bioburden. Studies have shown that hypochlorous acid (HOCl; PhaseOne Health, Nashville, TN) effectively penetrates and disrupts biofilms; however, there are limited clinical data regarding this irrigation in breast augmentation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of HOCl pocket irrigation in revision breast augmentation by evaluating rates of capsular contracture recurrence, infection, and allergic reactions.

METHODS

We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of revision breast augmentation cases for Baker grade III/IV capsular contractures in which pockets were irrigated with HOCl. Data were obtained from 3 board-certified plastic surgeons.

RESULTS

The study included 135 breasts in 71 patients, who ranged in age from 27 to 77 years (mean, 53.7 years). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 41 months (mean, 20.2 months). Postoperatively, there were 2 unilateral Baker grade III/IV recurrences at 13 months and 1 bilateral Baker grade II recurrence at 3 months. There were no infections or allergic reactions. The overall Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture recurrence rate was 0% at 12 months and 1.5% at 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast pocket irrigation decreases bioburden, which may influence capsular contracture recurrence. We evaluated 3 varied applications of HOCl in revision aesthetic breast surgery and found a low capsular contracture recurrence rate and no adverse reactions. We plan to report our findings with HOCl in primary breast augmentation in the future, and other studies are being conducted on the efficacy of HOCl in aesthetic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Contemporary Breast Augmentation Practice in the United States

ABSTRACT

Breast augmentation is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedures in the United States. Modern breast augmentation has evolved with the development of various implant options, as well as surgical techniques. To achieve ideal result, it is important for the surgeon to develop a systematic approach to evaluate each patient. The 5 key steps in determining the best surgical plan include: (1) assess the need for concurrent mastopexy, (2) implant selection, (3) pocket plane, (4) inframammary fold position, (5) choice of incision. The purpose of this review is to discuss the principles behind each of these key concepts and how to utilize them in achieving the optimal outcome in breast augmentation.

A Systematic Review of Breast Irrigation in Implant-Based Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic and reconstructive implant-based breast surgeries are some of the most frequently performed procedures by plastic surgeons. As such, prevention of implant infection is of high importance. However, there remains no criterion-standard protocol for irrigation of the breast pocket. This review focuses on current irrigation practices in implant-based breast surgery.

METHODS

Four databases were used to search for all studies, including randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort, and prospective cohort, containing original data related to the outcomes investigated in this study. Search terms included "breast," "irrigation," and "infection" in different combinations to isolate studies that focused on irrigation methods in both reconstructive and augmentation surgeries. Our selection criteria specifically concentrated on those studies that explicitly related irrigation procedures to rates of clinical infection and/or capsular contracture. Each was compiled into a table in chronological order to make comparisons between the differing irrigation methods.

RESULTS

Our search returned 239 full-text articles eligible for our review. Two independent screeners identified 9 studies that met the inclusion criteria. This included 1 prospective study and 8 retrospective studies. Two studies reported the use of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation resulting in protection from clinical infection. Two studies investigated the role of triple antibiotic solution (TAS) either alone or combined with something else on risk of infection, and 3 reported TAS use on rates of capsular contracture. Two additional studies investigated the role of single antibiotic irrigation, concluding that some antibiotic regimen for irrigation may be sufficient in the breast pocket. Interestingly, one study noted the potential use of povidone-iodine (Betadine) as a method of irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that chlorhexidine gluconate, Betadine, and TAS irrigation of the breast pocket can provide protection against infection and implant loss in both reconstruction and augmentation surgeries.

Etiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL): Current Directions in Research

Simple Summary

The first report of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) was in 1997. Although BIA-ALCL develops around breast implants, it is considered a cancer of the immune system and not a cancer of the breast ducts or lobules. Nearly all confirmed cases to date have been associated with textured surface (versus smooth surface) breast implants. As physicians have become more aware of BIA-ALCL, so has the number of reported cases, although the number of cases remains low. In most instances, patients have an excellent prognosis following removal of the breast implant and its surrounding fibrous capsule. Many theories on factors that trigger the development of BIA-ALCL, such as the presence of bacteria, have been proposed. However, the sequence(s) of events that follow the initial triggering event(s) have not been fully determined. This article summarizes the current scientific knowledge on the development of BIA-ALCL.

Abstract

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a CD30-positive, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative T-cell lymphoma. Where implant history is known, all confirmed cases to date have occurred in patients with exposure to textured implants. There is a spectrum of disease presentation, with the most common occurring as a seroma with an indolent course. A less common presentation occurs as locally advanced or, rarely, as metastatic disease. Here we review the immunological characteristics of BIA-ALCL and potential triggers leading to its development. BIA-ALCL occurs in an inflammatory microenvironment with significant lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration and a prominent Th1/Th17 phenotype in advanced disease. Genetic lesions affecting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway are commonly present. Proposed triggers for the development of malignancy include mechanical friction, silicone implant shell particulates, silicone leachables, and bacteria. Of these, the bacterial hypothesis has received significant attention, supported by a plausible biologic model. In this model, bacteria form an adherent biofilm in the favorable environment of the textured implant surface, producing a bacterial load that elicits a chronic inflammatory response. Bacterial antigens, primarily of Gram-negative origin, may trigger innate immunity and induce T-cell proliferation with subsequent malignant transformation in genetically susceptible individuals. Although much remains to be elucidated regarding the multifactorial origins of BIA-ALCL, future research should focus on prevention and treatment strategies, recognizing susceptible populations, and whether decreasing the risk of BIA-ALCL is possible.

Is Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Better Classified as a Lymphoproliferative Disorder and How Surgeons Reduce Risk?

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a complex topic with evolving classification and etiology. Commonalities between BIA-ALCL and lymphoproliferative disorders exist, suggesting that BIA-ALCL may be better represented on a spectrum of disease from benign effusion to malignant metastatic lymphoma. Meticulous sterile surgical technique, involving the use of betadine-containing irrigation, should be used to decrease the biological burden introduced into the surgical field and possibly prevent future incidences of BIA-ALCL.

The Efficacy of Breast Implant Irrigant Solutions: A Comparative Analysis Using an In Vitro Model

BACKGROUND

Infections are challenging complications of implant-based breast reconstruction and augmentation. They pose a clinical challenge, with significant economic implications. One proposed solution is implant irrigation at the time of placement. There is no consensus on the optimal irrigant solution.

METHODS

The authors tested the relative efficacy of 10% povidone-iodine, Clorpactin, Prontosan, triple-antibiotic solution, or normal saline (negative control) against two strains each of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sterile, smooth silicone implant disks were immersed in irrigant solution, then incubated in suspensions of methicillin-resistant S. aureus or S. epidermidis overnight. The disks were rinsed and sonicated to displace adherent bacteria from the implant surface, and the displaced bacteria were quantified. Normalized values were calculated to characterize the relative efficacy of each irrigant.

RESULTS

Povidone-iodine resulted in reductions of the bacterial load by a factor of 10 to 10 for all strains. Prontosan-treated smooth breast implant disks had a 10-fold reduction in bacterial counts for all but one methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain. In comparison to Prontosan, triple-antibiotic solution demonstrated a trend of greater reduction in methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacterial load and weaker activity against S. epidermidis strains. Clorpactin reduced the recovered colony-forming units for only a single strain of S. epidermidis. Povidone-iodine demonstrated the greatest efficacy against all four strains. However, Clorpactin, triple-antibiotic solution, and Prontosan demonstrated similar efficacies.

CONCLUSIONS

Povidone-iodine was the most efficacious of the irrigants at reducing methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. epidermidis contamination. Given the recent lifting of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration moratorium, larger clinical studies of povidone-iodine as a breast implant irrigant solution are warranted.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Povidone-iodine Does Not Affect Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration in Patients Undergoing 2-staged, Prepectoral, Breast Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

Povidone-iodine has been traditionally used as an antimicrobial agent to irrigate the breast pocket and rinse the prosthesis before placement in the pocket. Use of povidone-iodine with breast implants was banned from 2000 to 2017. During this period, acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was introduced to breast surgery. In nonclinical studies, povidone-iodine can impair collagen synthesis and kill fibroblasts. Cellular repopulation was critical for ADM integration. Whether povidone-iodine impacts ADM integration was unknown.

Methods:

Patients who underwent immediate, prepectoral, 2-staged breast reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. Study population was divided into povidone-iodine–treated patients and triple-antibiotic–treated patients. The breast pockets were rinsed with the antimicrobial agent, and the prostheses and ADMs were presoaked in the agent perioperatively. At implant exchange, the extent of ADM integration was clinically assessed. ADM integration was defined as >25% of matrix vascularization. ADM integration and postoperative complications were compared between the groups.

Results:

A total of 111 patients (257 reconstructions) were included—58 patients (111 reconstructions) were exposed to povidone-iodine and 53 patients (97 reconstructions) to triple-antibiotic solution. ADM integration was noted in 97% of breasts in each group. Integrated matrices appeared healthy, had no signs of foreign body reaction, and demonstrated punctate bleeding. Complications did not differ between the groups, including the rate of infections, seroma, and expander loss.

Conclusion:

Irrigation of the breast pocket and presoaking of the prosthesis and ADM with povidone-iodine appear to have no adverse consequences on clinical outcomes and did not impede matrix integration.

Optimizing Breast Pocket Irrigation: The Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) Era

BACKGROUND

Specific antimicrobial breast pocket irrigations have been proven over the past 20 years to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture by a factor of 10, and the emergence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and its link to bacteria/technique has created renewed interest in different antimicrobial breast pocket preparation agents. Our previous studies have identified that both Betadine-containing and non-Betadine-containing antimicrobial irrigations provide excellent broad-spectrum bacterial coverage. The current science of BIA-ALCL has implicated the Gram-negative microbiome as a key in pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to revisit the antimicrobial effectiveness of clinically utilized Betadine and non-Betadine solutions, along with other antimicrobial agents that have not yet been tested, against multiple organisms, including additional common Gram-negative bacteria associated with chronic breast implant infections/inflammation.

METHODS

Current and new antimicrobial breast irrigations were tested via standard techniques for bactericidal activity against multiple Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. Test results are detailed and clinical recommendations for current antimicrobial irrigations are provided.

RESULTS

Betadine-containing irrigations were found to be superior according to the testing performed.

CONCLUSIONS

There are quite few misconceptions with regard to antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation. These are discussed and final evidence-based recommendations for practice are given.

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and the Textured Breast Implant Crisis

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon T-cell, CD-30+/ALK lymphoma. Late (9 years) periprosthetic fluid (seroma) is the most common presentation (90% of the cases). A combination of textured breast implant, bacterial contamination, and genetic predisposition seems to be necessary for BIA-ALCL to occur. There are 35 million patients with implants in the world, and at the present moment, 573 cases of BIA-ALCL have been reported. The risk of developing BIA-ALCL in Australia varies from 1:2832 to 1:86,029, with texture grades 3 and 4 seeming to pose a higher risk than grades 2 and 1. NCCN has established guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, and early diagnosis is the key to cure. At an early stage and for the vast majority of patients, the treatment consists of capsulectomy and implant removal. However, at stages II to IV, a systemic treatment is warranted, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy (residual disease), and brentuximab vedotin. The majority of patients can be cured, and complete capsular removal is the most important factor. So far, 33 patients have died from BIA-ALCL worldwide, with deaths related to delay in diagnosis and treatment. Textured implants have been in the midst of the current implant crisis, and Biocell was recalled worldwide after the latest FDA update on the disease. At the present moment, no medical society or regulatory agency has recommended implant removal. It is about time that we start robust breast implant registries to determine risks. Besides, based on scientific criteria, we must consider all the benefits and risks associated with the available breast devices.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The history and development of breast implants

This review discusses the historical development of smooth and textured silicone gel filled implants, and examines the reasoning behind product development and aspects of surgical technique from a surgeon's perspective.

Aspergillus fumigatus Spores Are Not Able to Penetrate Silicone Breast Implant Shells

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial contamination is hypothesized to be one reason for the development of capsular contracture after alloplastic breast reconstruction using silicone breast implants. The role of fungal colonization or infection in this context as well as the question if microorganisms can penetrate the shell of silicone breast implants remains an unresolved question to date. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess whether fungal spores are able to penetrate the shell of silicone implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an experimental in vitro setup with different arrangements of growth compartments, silicone chambers were placed in culture dishes filled with Aspergillus minimal medium or liquid culture medium. Inoculation was performed with conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus and incubated for seven days. On a daily basis, plates were inspected for conidial germination and hyphal growth.

RESULTS

In none of the different experimental settings nutrients or hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus were able to penetrate the silicone material.

CONCLUSIONS

Fungal spores and hyphae do not permeate through an intact silicone shell used in breast implants; thus, the silicone material serves as an impenetrable barrier.

Implant Surface Options and Biofilm Mitigation Strategies

Two important topics in breast augmentation and reconstruction relate to device surface texture and practices to mitigate biofilm contamination of implants. Breast augmentation can be considered a manufacturing process where planning concepts of process engineering and quality can be used to produce great outcomes. This article reviews the options available for surgeons with regards to device surface texture selection and practices to mitigate biofilm contamination of implants at the time of surgery.

Antimicrobial Irrigation and Technique during Breast Augmentation: Survey of Current Practice

Breast augmentation is among the most common procedures performed in the United States. Though bacterial contamination of breast prostheses is associated with adverse sequelae, there are no universally accepted guidelines and limited best practice recommendations for antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation. We designed a survey to identify pocket irrigation preferences and antimicrobial techniques during implant-based breast augmentation among American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) members.

METHODS

In January 2018, a random cohort of 2,488 ASPS members was surveyed. Questions queried breast pocket irrigation methods and surgical techniques including implant placement, incision location, and implant soaking agents. An extensive literature review of breast pocket irrigation practices was completed and used as a basis for the survey.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was above the ASPS average at 16% (n = 407). Respondents preferred an inframammary incision (90%) and submuscular implant placement (92%). Triple antibiotic solution (TAS) and TAS + Betadine ± Bacitracin were preferred by 61% and Betadine variants by 11%. Preferred dwell times stratified to 30 seconds (39%), 1 minute (18%), 2-5 minutes (21%), and >5 minutes (22%). Among those employing a TAS variant, 53% preferred a suboptimal dwell time of ≤1 minute. Prostheses were soaked in TAS (42%), TAS + Betadine ± Bacitracin (15%), a Betadine variant (12%), or other (31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Periprosthetic bacterial contamination leads to comorbidity following breast augmentation. Our results reveal significant variability regarding breast pocket irrigation techniques among ASPS members during cosmetic breast augmentation. These data suggest the need for best practice guidelines regarding breast pocket irrigation and implant soaking agents.

Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method

Background:

Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast implant selection in Australia and New Zealand based on practice patterns in those countries.

Methods:

A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus from experts in breast augmentation surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Panelists anonymously completed an initial questionnaire on current considerations in implant selection, discussed a summary of their responses in a live meeting, and completed a final consensus survey based on their live recommendations.

Results:

Seven panelists completed the final consensus survey. Consensus recommendations included ensuring consideration of proper surgical technique (pocket formation, positioning of implant) and patient tissue and anatomical characteristics, weighing relative expected results of various surface textures, sizes, and degrees of cohesivity, and careful contemplation of the migration risk.

Conclusions:

This modified Delphi exercise provided consensus recommendations on the key factors involved in implant selection from the perspective of plastic surgeons with practices in Australia and New Zealand. A primary recommendation was that the choice of implant for each patient should be individualized to patient tissue and anatomical characteristics.

Modern Primary Breast Augmentation: Best Recommendations for Best Results

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Develop a practical method for preoperative implant size selection. 2. List characteristics and examples of fourth- and fifth-generation silicone implants. 3. Recognize the differences in "profile" designations across implant manufacturers. 4. Recall updated statistics on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and describe current guidelines on disease diagnosis and treatment. 5. Apply atraumatic and aseptic surgical techniques in primary breast augmentation.

SUMMARY

Modern primary breast augmentation requires an intimate knowledge of the expanding breast implant market, including characteristics of current generation silicone implants and "profile" types. Optimal implant size selection requires balancing patient desires with tissue qualities. Evidence and awareness of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma continue to grow, and patients and surgeons alike should be informed on the most updated facts of the disease entity. Atraumatic surgical technique and aseptic adjuncts are critical in reducing periprosthetic inflammation and contamination, both of which are known instigators of capsular contracture and potentially breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.