Solving genomic puzzles: computational methods for metagenomic binning

From air to insight: the evolution of airborne DNA sequencing technologies

Historically, the analysis of airborne biological organisms relied on microscopy and culture-based techniques. However, technological advances such as PCR and next-generation sequencing now provide researchers with the ability to gather vast amounts of data on airborne environmental DNA (eDNA). Studies typically involve capturing airborne biological material, followed by nucleic acid extraction, library preparation, sequencing and taxonomic identification to characterize the eDNA at a given location. These methods have diverse applications, including pathogen detection in agriculture and human health, air quality monitoring, bioterrorism detection and biodiversity monitoring. A variety of methods are used for airborne eDNA analysis, as no single pipeline meets all needs. This review outlines current methods for sampling, extraction, sequencing and bioinformatic analysis, highlighting how different approaches can influence the resulting data and their suitability for specific use cases. It also explores current applications of airborne eDNA sampling and identifies research gaps in the field.

Evaluating the potential of assembler-binner combinations in recovering low-abundance and strain-resolved genomes from human metagenomes

Human-associated microbial communities are a complex mixture of bacterial species and diverse strains prevalent at varying abundances. Due to the inherent limitations of metagenomic assemblers and genome binning tools in recovering low-abundance species (<1 %) and strains, we lack comprehensive insight into these communities. Although many bioinformatics approaches are available for recovering metagenome-assembled genomes, their effectiveness in recovering low-abundance species and strains is often questioned. Moreover, each tool has its trade-offs, making selecting the right tools challenging. In this study, we investigated the combinatory effect of various assemblers and binning tools on the recovery of low-abundance species and strain-resolved genomes from real and simulated human metagenomes. We evaluated the performance of nine combinations of metagenome assemblers and genome binning tools for their potential to recover genomes of useable quality. Our results revealed that the metaSPAdes-MetaBAT2 combination is highly effective in recovering low-abundance species, while MEGAHIT-MetaBAT2 excels in recovering strain-resolved genomes. These findings highlight the significant variation in the performance of different combinations, even when aiming for the same objective. This suggests the profound impact of selecting the right assembler-binner combination for metagenome analyses. We believe this study will be a cornerstone for the scientific community, guiding the choice of tools by highlighting their complementary effects. Furthermore, it underscores the potential of existing tools to address the current challenges in the field improving the recovery of information from metagenomes.