DataRemix: a universal data transformation for optimal inference from gene expression datasets

Ensemble classification based signature discovery for cancer diagnosis in RNA expression profiles across different platforms

Molecular signatures have been excessively reported for diagnosis of many cancers during the last 20 years. However, false-positive signatures are always found using statistical methods or machine learning approaches, and that makes subsequent biological experiments fail. Therefore, signature discovery has gradually become a non-mainstream work in bioinformatics. Actually, there are three critical weaknesses that make the identified signature unreliable. First of all, a signature is wrongly thought to be a gene set, each component of which keeps differential expressions between or among sample groups. Second, there may be many false-positive genes expressed differentially found, even if samples derived from cancer or normal group can be separated in one-dimensional space. Third, cross-platform validation results of a discovered signature are always poor. In order to solve these problems, we propose a new feature selection framework based on ensemble classification to discover signatures for cancer diagnosis. Meanwhile, a procedure for data transform among different expression profiles across different platforms is also designed. Signatures are found on simulation and real data representing different carcinomas across different platforms. Besides, false positives are suppressed. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Robust normalization and transformation techniques for constructing gene coexpression networks from RNA-seq data

BACKGROUND

Constructing gene coexpression networks is a powerful approach for analyzing high-throughput gene expression data towards module identification, gene function prediction, and disease-gene prioritization. While optimal workflows for constructing coexpression networks, including good choices for data pre-processing, normalization, and network transformation, have been developed for microarray-based expression data, such well-tested choices do not exist for RNA-seq data. Almost all studies that compare data processing and normalization methods for RNA-seq focus on the end goal of determining differential gene expression.

RESULTS

Here, we present a comprehensive benchmarking and analysis of 36 different workflows, each with a unique set of normalization and network transformation methods, for constructing coexpression networks from RNA-seq datasets. We test these workflows on both large, homogenous datasets and small, heterogeneous datasets from various labs. We analyze the workflows in terms of aggregate performance, individual method choices, and the impact of multiple dataset experimental factors. Our results demonstrate that between-sample normalization has the biggest impact, with counts adjusted by size factors producing networks that most accurately recapitulate known tissue-naive and tissue-aware gene functional relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this work, we provide concrete recommendations on robust procedures for building an accurate coexpression network from an RNA-seq dataset. In addition, researchers can examine all the results in great detail at https://krishnanlab.github.io/RNAseq_coexpression to make appropriate choices for coexpression analysis based on the experimental factors of their RNA-seq dataset.

An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data

The NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort ($N=\kern0.5em 1649$) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, two cohorts of moderate sample size ($N=359$ and$130$) and a small published dataset ($N=12$). The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation (e.g. from different study phases or sites) more reliably than the three other methods, including NanoString's commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multiphase or multisite cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that systematic quality control, normalization and visualization of NanoString nCounter data are an imperative component of study design that influences results in downstream analyses.