MEScan: a powerful statistical framework for genome-scale mutual exclusivity analysis of cancer mutations

Analysis of mutually exclusive expression in cancer cells identifies a previously unknown intergenic regulatory paradigm

Mutual exclusion of gene expression has received limited attention. Gene (expression) plasticity analysis provides an efficient way to identify highly plastic genes (HPGs) based on changes in expression rank. In this study, we quantitatively measured the expression plasticity of 19 961 protein-coding genes in 24 human cancer cell lines and identified HPGs in these cells. By comparing methods, we showed that virtual sorting and cosine similarity, rather than Pearson and Spearman rank correlations, are suitable for mutual exclusion. Mutually exclusive gene pairs were identified in each cell type. Experimental validation showed that thiol methyltransferase 1B (TMT1B; also known as METTL7B) and CD274 molecule (CD274; also known as PD-L1) were mutually exclusively expressed at either the mRNA or protein level. METTL7B negatively regulated PD-L1 expression in several cell types, and the JAK/STAT3 pathway was involved. Knockdown of METTL7B in Huh7 cells inhibited interleukin 2 (IL-2) secretion by Jurkat cells in co-culture experiments, and the inhibition was blocked by anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Therefore, this study provides an efficient method of expressional mutual exclusion and implies a newly identified intergenic regulatory paradigm.

A latent variable model for evaluating mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence between driver mutations in cancer

A key challenge in cancer genomics is understanding the functional relationships and dependencies between combinations of somatic mutations that drive cancer development. Such driver mutations frequently exhibit patterns of mutual exclusivity or co-occurrence across tumors, and many methods have been developed to identify such dependency patterns from bulk DNA sequencing data of a cohort of patients. However, while mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence are described as properties of driver mutations, existing methods do not explicitly disentangle functional, driver mutations from neutral, passenger mutations. In particular, nearly all existing methods evaluate mutual exclusivity or co-occurrence at the gene level, marking a gene as mutated if any mutation - driver or passenger - is present. Since some genes have a large number of passenger mutations, existing methods either restrict their analyses to a small subset of suspected driver genes - limiting their ability to identify novel dependencies - or make spurious inferences of mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence involving genes with many passenger mutations. We introduce DIALECT, an algorithm to identify dependencies between pairs of driver mutations from somatic mutation counts. We derive a latent variable mixture model for drivers and passengers that combines existing probabilistic models of passenger mutation rates with a latent variable describing the unknown status of a mutation as a driver or passenger. We use an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate the parameters of our model, including the rates of mutually exclusivity and co-occurrence between drivers. We demonstrate that DIALECT more accurately infers mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence between driver mutations compared to existing methods on both simulated mutation data and somatic mutation data from 5 cancer types in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

Adaptation of a mutual exclusivity framework to identify driver mutations within oncogenic pathways

Distinguishing genomic alterations in cancer-associated genes that have functional impact on tumor growth and disease progression from the ones that are passengers and confer no fitness advantage have important clinical implications. Evidence-based methods for nominating drivers are limited by existing knowledge on the oncogenic effects and therapeutic benefits of specific variants from clinical trials or experimental settings. As clinical sequencing becomes a mainstay of patient care, applying computational methods to mine the rapidly growing clinical genomic data holds promise in uncovering functional candidates beyond the existing knowledge base and expanding the patient population that could potentially benefit from genetically targeted therapies. We propose a statistical and computational method (MAGPIE) that builds on a likelihood approach leveraging the mutual exclusivity pattern within an oncogenic pathway for identifying probabilistically both the specific genes within a pathway and the individual mutations within such genes that are truly the drivers. Alterations in a cancer-associated gene are assumed to be a mixture of driver and passenger mutations with the passenger rates modeled in relationship to tumor mutational burden. We use simulations to study the operating characteristics of the method and assess false-positive and false-negative rates in driver nomination. When applied to a large study of primary melanomas, the method accurately identifies the known driver genes within the RTK-RAS pathway and nominates several rare variants as prime candidates for functional validation. A comprehensive evaluation of MAGPIE against existing tools has also been conducted leveraging the Cancer Genome Atlas data.

Adaptation of a Mutual Exclusivity Framework to Identify Driver Mutations within Biological Pathways

Distinguishing genomic alterations in cancer genes that have functional impact on tumor growth and disease progression from the ones that are passengers and confer no fitness advantage has important clinical implications. Evidence-based methods for nominating drivers are limited by existing knowledge on the oncogenic effects and therapeutic benefits of specific variants from clinical trials or experimental settings. As clinical sequencing becomes a mainstay of patient care, applying computational methods to mine the rapidly growing clinical genomic data holds promise in uncovering novel functional candidates beyond the existing knowledge-base and expanding the patient population that could potentially benefit from genetically targeted therapies. We propose a statistical and computational method (MAGPIE) that builds on a likelihood approach leveraging the mutual exclusivity pattern within an oncogenic pathway for identifying probabilistically both the specific genes within a pathway and the individual mutations within such genes that are truly the drivers. Alterations in a cancer gene are assumed to be a mixture of driver and passenger mutations with the passenger rates modeled in relationship to tumor mutational burden. A limited memory BFGS algorithm is used to facilitate large scale optimization. We use simulations to study the operating characteristics of the method and assess false positive and false negative rates in driver nomination. When applied to a large study of primary melanomas the method accurately identified the known driver genes within the RTK-RAS pathway and nominated a number of rare variants with previously unknown biological and clinical relevance as prime candidates for functional validation.

Epistasis and evolutionary dependencies in human cancers

Cancer evolution is driven by the concerted action of multiple molecular alterations, which emerge and are selected during tumor progression. An alteration is selected when it provides an advantage to the tumor cell. However, the advantage provided by a specific alteration depends on the tumor lineage, cell epigenetic state, and presence of additional alterations. In this case, we say that an evolutionary dependency exists between an alteration and what influences its selection. Epistatic interactions between altered genes lead to evolutionary dependencies (EDs), by favoring or vetoing specific combinations of events. Large-scale cancer genomics studies have discovered examples of such dependencies, and showed that they influence tumor progression, disease phenotypes, and therapeutic response. In the past decade, several algorithmic approaches have been proposed to infer EDs from large-scale genomics datasets. These methods adopt diverse strategies to address common challenges and shed new light on cancer evolutionary trajectories. Here, we review these efforts starting from a simple conceptualization of the problem, presenting the tackled and still unmet needs in the field, and discussing the implications of EDs in cancer biology and precision oncology.

A Network-Centric Framework for the Evaluation of Mutual Exclusivity Tests on Cancer Drivers

One of the key concepts employed in cancer driver gene identification is that of mutual exclusivity (ME); a driver mutation is less likely to occur in case of an earlier mutation that has common functionality in the same molecular pathway. Several ME tests have been proposed recently, however the current protocols to evaluate ME tests have two main limitations. Firstly the evaluations are mostly with respect to simulated data and secondly the evaluation metrics lack a network-centric view. The latter is especially crucial as the notion of common functionality can be achieved through searching for interaction patterns in relevant networks. We propose a network-centric framework to evaluate the pairwise significances found by statistical ME tests. It has three main components. The first component consists of metrics employed in the network-centric ME evaluations. Such metrics are designed so that network knowledge and the reference set of known cancer genes are incorporated in ME evaluations under a careful definition of proper control groups. The other two components are designed as further mechanisms to avoid confounders inherent in ME detection on top of the network-centric view. To this end, our second objective is to dissect the side effects caused by mutation load artifacts where mutations driving tumor subtypes with low mutation load might be incorrectly diagnosed as mutually exclusive. Finally, as part of the third main component, the confounding issue stemming from the use of nonspecific interaction networks generated as combinations of interactions from different tissues is resolved through the creation and use of tissue-specific networks in the proposed framework. The data, the source code and useful scripts are available at: https://github.com/abu-compbio/NetCentric.

Fast mutual exclusivity algorithm nominates potential synthetic lethal gene pairs through brute force matrix product computations

Mutual Exclusivity analysis of genomic aberrations contributes to the exploration of potential synthetic lethal (SL) relationships thus guiding the nomination of specific cancer cells vulnerabilities. When multiple classes of genomic aberrations and large cohorts of patients are interrogated, exhaustive genome-wide analyses are not computationally feasible with commonly used approaches. Here we present Fast Mutual Exclusivity (FaME), an algorithm based on matrix multiplication that employs a logarithm-based implementation of the Fisher's exact test to achieve fast computation of genome-wide mutual exclusivity tests; we show that brute force testing for mutual exclusivity of hundreds of millions of aberrations combinations can be performed in few minutes. We applied FaME to allele-specific data from whole exome experiments of 27 TCGA studies cohorts, detecting both mutual exclusivity of point mutations, as well as allele-specific copy number signals that span sets of contiguous cytobands. We next focused on a case study involving the loss of tumor suppressors and druggable genes while exploiting an integrated analysis of both public cell lines loss of function screens data and patients' transcriptomic profiles. FaME algorithm implementation as well as allele-specific analysis output are publicly available at https://github.com/demichelislab/FaME.