Improving deep learning-based protein distance prediction in CASP14

Unveiling the evolution of policies for enhancing protein structure predictions: A comprehensive analysis

Predicting protein structure is both fascinating and formidable, playing a crucial role in structure-based drug discovery and unraveling diseases with elusive origins. The Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) serves as a biannual battleground where global scientists converge to untangle the intricate relationships within amino acid chains. Two primary methods, Template-Based Modeling (TBM) and Template-Free (TF) strategies, dominate protein structure prediction. The trend has shifted towards Template-Free predictions due to their broader sequence coverage with fewer templates. The predictive process can be broadly classified into contact map, binned-distance, and real-valued distance predictions, each with distinctive strengths and limitations manifested through tailored loss functions. We have also introduced revolutionary end-to-end, and all-atom diffusion-based techniques that have transformed protein structure predictions. Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have significantly improved prediction accuracy, although the effectiveness is contingent upon the quality of input features derived from natural bio-physiochemical attributes and Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSA). Hence, the generation of high-quality MSA data holds paramount importance in harnessing informative input features for enhanced prediction outcomes. Remarkable successes have been achieved in protein structure prediction accuracy, however not enough for what structural knowledge was intended to, which implies need for development in some other aspects of the predictions. In this regard, scientists have opened other frontiers for protein structural prediction. The utilization of subsampling in multiple sequence alignment (MSA) and protein language modeling appears to be particularly promising in enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of predictions, ultimately aiding in drug discovery efforts. The exploration of predicting protein complex structure also opens up exciting opportunities to deepen our knowledge of molecular interactions and design therapeutics that are more effective. In this article, we have discussed the vicissitudes that the scientists have gone through to improve prediction accuracy, and examined the effective policies in predicting from different aspects, including the construction of high quality MSA, providing informative input features, and progresses in deep learning approaches. We have also briefly touched upon transitioning from predicting single-chain protein structures to predicting protein complex structures. Our findings point towards promoting open research environments to support the objectives of protein structure prediction.

Freeprotmap: waiting-free prediction method for protein distance map

BACKGROUND

Protein residue-residue distance maps are used for remote homology detection, protein information estimation, and protein structure research. However, existing prediction approaches are time-consuming, and hundreds of millions of proteins are discovered each year, necessitating the development of a rapid and reliable prediction method for protein residue-residue distances. Moreover, because many proteins lack known homologous sequences, a waiting-free and alignment-free deep learning method is needed.

RESULT

In this study, we propose a learning framework named FreeProtMap. In terms of protein representation processing, the proposed group pooling in FreeProtMap effectively mitigates issues arising from high-dimensional sparseness in protein representation. In terms of model structure, we have made several careful designs. Firstly, it is designed based on the locality of protein structures and triangular inequality distance constraints to improve prediction accuracy. Secondly, inference speed is improved by using additive attention and lightweight design. Besides, the generalization ability is improved by using bottlenecks and a neural network block named local microformer. As a result, FreeProtMap can predict protein residue-residue distances in tens of milliseconds and has higher precision than the best structure prediction method.

CONCLUSION

Several groups of comparative experiments and ablation experiments verify the effectiveness of the designs. The results demonstrate that FreeProtMap significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in accurate protein residue-residue distance prediction, which is beneficial for lots of protein research works. It is worth mentioning that we could scan all proteins discovered each year based on FreeProtMap to find structurally similar proteins in a short time because the fact that the structure similarity calculation method based on distance maps is much less time-consuming than algorithms based on 3D structures.

Prediction of inter-chain distance maps of protein complexes with 2D attention-based deep neural networks

Residue-residue distance information is useful for predicting tertiary structures of protein monomers or quaternary structures of protein complexes. Many deep learning methods have been developed to predict intra-chain residue-residue distances of monomers accurately, but few methods can accurately predict inter-chain residue-residue distances of complexes. We develop a deep learning method CDPred (i.e., Complex Distance Prediction) based on the 2D attention-powered residual network to address the gap. Tested on two homodimer datasets, CDPred achieves the precision of 60.94% and 42.93% for top L/5 inter-chain contact predictions (L: length of the monomer in homodimer), respectively, substantially higher than DeepHomo's 37.40% and 23.08% and GLINTER's 48.09% and 36.74%. Tested on the two heterodimer datasets, the top Ls/5 inter-chain contact prediction precision (Ls: length of the shorter monomer in heterodimer) of CDPred is 47.59% and 22.87% respectively, surpassing GLINTER's 23.24% and 13.49%. Moreover, the prediction of CDPred is complementary with that of AlphaFold2-multimer.

High-Performance Deep Learning Toolbox for Genome-Scale Prediction of Protein Structure and Function

Computational biology is one of many scientific disciplines ripe for innovation and acceleration with the advent of high-performance computing (HPC). In recent years, the field of machine learning has also seen significant benefits from adopting HPC practices. In this work, we present a novel HPC pipeline that incorporates various machine-learning approaches for structure-based functional annotation of proteins on the scale of whole genomes. Our pipeline makes extensive use of deep learning and provides computational insights into best practices for training advanced deep-learning models for high-throughput data such as proteomics data. We showcase methodologies our pipeline currently supports and detail future tasks for our pipeline to envelop, including large-scale sequence comparison using SAdLSA and prediction of protein tertiary structures using AlphaFold2.

Improving protein tertiary structure prediction by deep learning and distance prediction in CASP14

Substantial progresses in protein structure prediction have been made by utilizing deep‐learning and residue‐residue distance prediction since CASP13. Inspired by the advances, we improve our CASP14 MULTICOM protein structure prediction system by incorporating three new components: (a) a new deep learning‐based protein inter‐residue distance predictor to improve template‐free (ab initio) tertiary structure prediction, (b) an enhanced template‐based tertiary structure prediction method, and (c) distance‐based model quality assessment methods empowered by deep learning. In the 2020 CASP14 experiment, MULTICOM predictor was ranked seventh out of 146 predictors in tertiary structure prediction and ranked third out of 136 predictors in inter‐domain structure prediction. The results demonstrate that the template‐free modeling based on deep learning and residue‐residue distance prediction can predict the correct topology for almost all template‐based modeling targets and a majority of hard targets (template‐free targets or targets whose templates cannot be recognized), which is a significant improvement over the CASP13 MULTICOM predictor. Moreover, the template‐free modeling performs better than the template‐based modeling on not only hard targets but also the targets that have homologous templates. The performance of the template‐free modeling largely depends on the accuracy of distance prediction closely related to the quality of multiple sequence alignments. The structural model quality assessment works well on targets for which enough good models can be predicted, but it may perform poorly when only a few good models are predicted for a hard target and the distribution of model quality scores is highly skewed. MULTICOM is available at https://github.com/jianlin-cheng/MULTICOM_Human_CASP14/tree/CASP14_DeepRank3 and https://github.com/multicom-toolbox/multicom/tree/multicom_v2.0.