1
|
Lan F, Wang X, Zhou Q, Li X, Jin J, Zhang W, Wen C, Wu G, Li G, Yan Y, Yang N, Sun C. Deciphering the coordinated roles of the host genome, duodenal mucosal genes, and microbiota in regulating complex traits in chickens. MICROBIOME 2025; 13:62. [PMID: 40025569 PMCID: PMC11871680 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-025-02054-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complex interactions between host genetics and the gut microbiome are well documented. However, the specific impacts of gene expression patterns and microbial composition on each other remain to be further explored. RESULTS Here, we investigated this complex interplay in a sizable population of 705 hens, employing integrative analyses to examine the relationships among the host genome, mucosal gene expression, and gut microbiota. Specific microbial taxa, such as the cecal family Christensenellaceae, which showed a heritability of 0.365, were strongly correlated with host genomic variants. We proposed a novel concept of regulatability ( r b 2 ), which was derived from h2, to quantify the cumulative effects of gene expression on the given phenotypes. The duodenal mucosal transcriptome emerged as a potent influencer of duodenal microbial taxa, with much higher r b 2 values (0.17 ± 0.01, mean ± SE) than h2 values (0.02 ± 0.00). A comparative analysis of chickens and humans revealed similar average microbiability values of genes (0.18 vs. 0.20) and significant differences in average r b 2 values of microbes (0.17 vs. 0.04). Besides, cis ( h cis 2 ) and trans heritability ( h trans 2 ) were estimated to assess the effects of genetic variations inside and outside the cis window of the gene on its expression. Higher h trans 2 values than h cis 2 values and a greater prevalence of trans-regulated genes than cis-regulated genes underscored the significant role of loci outside the cis window in shaping gene expression levels. Furthermore, our exploration of the regulatory effects of duodenal mucosal genes and the microbiota on 18 complex traits enhanced our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms, in which the CHST14 gene and its regulatory relationships with Lactobacillus salivarius jointly facilitated the deposition of abdominal fat by modulating the concentration of bile salt hydrolase, and further triglycerides, total cholesterol, and free fatty acids absorption and metabolism. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlighted a novel concept of r b 2 to quantify the phenotypic variance attributed to gene expression and emphasize the superior role of intestinal mucosal gene expressions over host genomic variations in elucidating host‒microbe interactions for complex traits. This understanding could assist in devising strategies to modulate host-microbe interactions, ultimately improving economic traits in chickens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangren Lan
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xiqiong Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Qianqian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xiaochang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Jiaming Jin
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Wenxin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Chaoliang Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Guiqin Wu
- Beijing Engineering Research Centre of Layer, Beijing, 101206, China
| | - Guangqi Li
- Beijing Engineering Research Centre of Layer, Beijing, 101206, China
| | - Yiyuan Yan
- Beijing Engineering Research Centre of Layer, Beijing, 101206, China
| | - Ning Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
| | - Congjiao Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niharika, Asthana S, Narayan Yadav H, Sharma N, Kumar Singh V. A compendium of methods: Searching allele specific expression via RNA sequencing. Gene 2025; 936:149102. [PMID: 39561903 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.149102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024]
Abstract
Diploid mammalian genome has paired alleles for each gene; typically allowing for equal expression of the two alleles within the cell/tissue. However, genetic regulatory elements and epigenetic modifications can disrupt this equality, leading to preferential expression of one allele. Examining high-confidence allele-specific expression (ASE) is vital for understanding genetic variations and their impact on major diseases like cancers and diabetes. ASE analysis not only aids in disease prognosis and diagnosis but also helps to identify regulatory mechanisms operating within the genome. While advances in sequencing technologies have greatly improved our understanding of ASE, challenges remain in estimating it accurately. In this article, we reviewed methods for detecting ASE using both bulk RNASeq and single-cell RNASeq data to provide deeper insights beyond the mere prediction of ASE genes. Fundamentally, ASE detection methods are data-driven and can be classified according to type of data used. Some methods utilize both, DNA genotyping information and RNASeq while others rely solely on RNASeq data. This article offers a comparative analysis of these methods and compilation of repositories providing valuable insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niharika
- Department of Bioinformatics, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, Bihar 824236, India
| | - Shailendra Asthana
- Computational and Mathematical Biology Centre, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Science Cluster 3rd 15 Milestone, Faridabad-Gurugram 16 expressway, PO Box # 4. Faridabad, Haryana 121001, India
| | - Harlokesh Narayan Yadav
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Nanaocha Sharma
- Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development, Takyelpat, Manipur 795001 Imphal, India.
| | - Vijay Kumar Singh
- Department of Bioinformatics, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, Bihar 824236, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burnham KL, Milind N, Lee W, Kwok AJ, Cano-Gamez K, Mi Y, Geoghegan CG, Zhang P, McKechnie S, Soranzo N, Hinds CJ, Knight JC, Davenport EE. eQTLs identify regulatory networks and drivers of variation in the individual response to sepsis. CELL GENOMICS 2024; 4:100587. [PMID: 38897207 PMCID: PMC11293594 DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Sepsis is a clinical syndrome of life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated response to infection, for which disease heterogeneity is a major obstacle to developing targeted treatments. We have previously identified gene-expression-based patient subgroups (sepsis response signatures [SRS]) informative for outcome and underlying pathophysiology. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of genetic variation in determining the host transcriptomic response and to delineate regulatory networks underlying SRS. Using genotyping and RNA-sequencing data on 638 adult sepsis patients, we report 16,049 independent expression (eQTLs) and 32 co-expression module (modQTLs) quantitative trait loci in this disease context. We identified significant interactions between SRS and genotype for 1,578 SNP-gene pairs and combined transcription factor (TF) binding site information (SNP2TFBS) and predicted regulon activity (DoRothEA) to identify candidate upstream regulators. Overall, these approaches identified putative mechanistic links between host genetic variation, cell subtypes, and the individual transcriptomic response to infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie L Burnham
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Nikhil Milind
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wanseon Lee
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Andrew J Kwok
- Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kiki Cano-Gamez
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK; Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yuxin Mi
- Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ping Zhang
- Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Chinese Academy of Medical Science Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nicole Soranzo
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Charles J Hinds
- Centre for Translational Medicine & Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Julian C Knight
- Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Chinese Academy of Medical Science Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|