Multi-profile Bayesian alignment model for LC-MS data analysis with integration of internal standards

Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics in Translational Research

Metabolomics is the systematic study of metabolite profiles of complex biological systems, and involves the systematic identification and quantification of metabolites. Metabolism is integrated with all biochemical reactions in biological systems; thus metabolite profiles provide collective information on biochemical processes induced by genetic or environmental perturbations. Transcriptomes or proteomes may not be functionally active and not always reflect phenotypic variations. The metabolome, however, consists of the biomolecules closest to the phenotype of living organisms, and is often called the molecular phenotype of biological systems. Thus, metabolome alterations can easily result in disease states, providing important clues to understand pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to various biomedical symptoms. The metabolome and metabolomics have been emphasized in translational research related to biomarker discovery, drug target discovery, drug responses, and disease mechanisms. This review describes the basic concepts, workflows, and applications of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in translational research.

Uncertainty estimation of predictions of peptides' chromatographic retention times in shotgun proteomics

Motivation

Liquid chromatography is frequently used as a means to reduce the complexity of peptide-mixtures in shotgun proteomics. For such systems, the time when a peptide is released from a chromatography column and registered in the mass spectrometer is referred to as the peptide's retention time . Using heuristics or machine learning techniques, previous studies have demonstrated that it is possible to predict the retention time of a peptide from its amino acid sequence. In this paper, we are applying Gaussian Process Regression to the feature representation of a previously described predictor E lude . Using this framework, we demonstrate that it is possible to estimate the uncertainty of the prediction made by the model. Here we show how this uncertainty relates to the actual error of the prediction.

Results

In our experiments, we observe a strong correlation between the estimated uncertainty provided by Gaussian Process Regression and the actual prediction error. This relation provides us with new means for assessment of the predictions. We demonstrate how a subset of the peptides can be selected with lower prediction error compared to the whole set. We also demonstrate how such predicted standard deviations can be used for designing adaptive windowing strategies.

Contact

lukas.kall@scilifelab.se.

Availability and Implementation

Our software and the data used in our experiments is publicly available and can be downloaded from https://github.com/statisticalbiotechnology/GPTime .

An alignment algorithm for LC-MS-based metabolomics dataset assisted by MS/MS information

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is an important analytical platform for metabolomics study. Peak alignment of metabolomics dataset is one of the keys for a successful metabolomics study. In this work, a MS/MS-based peak alignment method for LC-MS metabolomics data was developed. A rigorous strategy for screening endogenous reference variables was proposed. Firstly, candidate endogenous reference variables were selected based on MS, MS/MS and retention time in all samples. Multiple robust endogenous reference variables were obtained through further evaluation and confirmation. Then retention time of each metabolite feature was corrected by local linear regression using the four nearest neighbor robust reference variables. Finally, peak alignment was carried out based on corrected retention time, MS and MS/MS. Comparing with the other two peak alignment methods, the developed method showed a good performance and was suitable for metabolomics data with larger retention time drift. Our approach provides a simple and robust alignment method which is reliable to align LC-MS metabolomics dataset.

Quantitative profiling of glycans and glycopeptides: an informatics' perspective

Experimental techniques to identify and quantify glycan structures in a given sample are continuously improving. However, as they advance data analysis and annotation seems to become more complex. To address this issue, much progress has been made in developing software for interpretation of quantitative glycan profiles. Here, we focus on these informatics tools for high/ultra performance liquid chromatography (H/UPLC), mass spectrometry (MS), tandem mass spectrometry (MSⁿ) and combinations thereof. Software for biomarker discovery, pathway, genomic and disease analysis and a final note on some future prospects for glycoinformatics are also mentioned.

Gaussian Process Modeling of Protein Turnover

We describe a stochastic model to compute in vivo protein turnover rate constants from stable-isotope labeling and high-throughput liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments. We show that the often-used one- and two-compartment nonstochastic models allow explicit solutions from the corresponding stochastic differential equations. The resulting stochastic process is a Gaussian processes with Ornstein-Uhlenbeck covariance matrix. We applied the stochastic model to a large-scale data set from (15)N labeling and compared its performance metrics with those of the nonstochastic curve fitting. The comparison showed that for more than 99% of proteins, the stochastic model produced better fits to the experimental data (based on residual sum of squares). The model was used for extracting protein-decay rate constants from mouse brain (slow turnover) and liver (fast turnover) samples. We found that the most affected (compared to two-exponent curve fitting) results were those for liver proteins. The ratio of the median of degradation rate constants of liver proteins to those of brain proteins increased 4-fold in stochastic modeling compared to the two-exponent fitting. Stochastic modeling predicted stronger differences of protein turnover processes between mouse liver and brain than previously estimated. The model is independent of the labeling isotope. To show this, we also applied the model to protein turnover studied in induced heart failure in rats, in which metabolic labeling was achieved by administering heavy water. No changes in the model were necessary for adapting to heavy-water labeling. The approach has been implemented in a freely available R code.

Preprocessing and Analysis of LC-MS-Based Proteomic Data

Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has been widely used for profiling protein expression levels. This chapter is focused on LC-MS data preprocessing, which is a crucial step in the analysis of LC-MS based proteomics. We provide a high-level overview, highlight associated challenges, and present a step-by-step example for analysis of data from LC-MS based untargeted proteomic study. Furthermore, key procedures and relevant issues with the subsequent analysis by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) are discussed.

Current controlled vocabularies are insufficient to uniquely map molecular entities to mass spectrometry signal

Background

The comparison of analyte mass spectrometry precursor (MS1) signal is central to many proteomic (and other -omic) workflows. Standard vocabularies for mass spectrometry exist and provide good coverage for most experimental applications yet are insufficient for concise and unambiguous description of data concepts spanning the range of signal provenance from a molecular perspective (e.g. from charged peptides down to fine isotopes). Without a standard unambiguous nomenclature, literature searches, algorithm reproducibility and algorithm evaluation for MS-omics data processing are nearly impossible.

Results

We show how terms from current official ontologies are too vague or ambiguous to explicitly map molecular entities to MS signals and we illustrate the inconsistency and ambiguity of current colloquially used terms. We also propose a set of terms for MS1 signal that uniquely, succinctly and intuitively describe data concepts spanning the range of signal provenance from full molecule downs to fine isotopes. We suggest that additional community discussion of these terms should precede any further standardization efforts. We propose a novel nomenclature that spans the range of the required granularity to describe MS data processing from the perspective of the molecular provenance of the MS signal.

Conclusions

The proposed nomenclature provides a chain of succinct and unique terms spanning the signal created by a charged molecule down through each of its constituent subsignals. We suggest that additional community discussion of these terms should precede any further standardization efforts.

Incorporating peak grouping information for alignment of multiple liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry datasets

Motivation: The combination of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC/MS) has been widely used for large-scale comparative studies in systems biology, including proteomics, glycomics and metabolomics. In almost all experimental design, it is necessary to compare chromatograms across biological or technical replicates and across sample groups. Central to this is the peak alignment step, which is one of the most important but challenging preprocessing steps. Existing alignment tools do not take into account the structural dependencies between related peaks that coelute and are derived from the same metabolite or peptide. We propose a direct matching peak alignment method for LC/MS data that incorporates related peaks information (within each LC/MS run) and investigate its effect on alignment performance (across runs). The groupings of related peaks necessary for our method can be obtained from any peak clustering method and are built into a pair-wise peak similarity score function. The similarity score matrix produced is used by an approximation algorithm for the weighted matching problem to produce the actual alignment result.

Results: We demonstrate that related peak information can improve alignment performance. The performance is evaluated on a set of benchmark datasets, where our method performs competitively compared to other popular alignment tools.

Availability: The proposed alignment method has been implemented as a stand-alone application in Python, available for download at http://github.com/joewandy/peak-grouping-alignment.

Contact:Simon.Rogers@glasgow.ac.uk

Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Classical MALDI-MS versus CE-based ESI-MS proteomic profiling in urine for clinical applications

Human urine is an attractive and informative biofluid for medical diagnosis, which has been shown to reflect the (patho)-physiology of not only the urogenital system, but also others such as the cardiovascular system. For this reason, many studies have concentrated on the study of the urine proteome, aiming to find relevant biomarkers that could be applied in a clinical setting. However, this goal can only be achieved after reliable quantitative and qualitative analysis of the urinary proteome. In the last two decades, MS-based platforms have evolved to become indispensable tools for biomarker research. In this review, we will present and compare two of the most clinically relevant analytical platforms that have been used for the study of the urinary proteome, namely CE-based ESI-MS and classical MALDI-MS. These platforms, although not directly comparable, have been extensively used in proteomic profiling and therefore their comparison is fundamentally relevant to this field.

LC-MS alignment in theory and practice: a comprehensive algorithmic review

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is widely used for comparative replicate sample analysis in proteomics, lipidomics and metabolomics. Before statistical comparison, registration must be established to match corresponding analytes from run to run. Alignment, the most popular correspondence approach, consists of constructing a function that warps the content of runs to most closely match a given reference sample. To date, dozens of correspondence algorithms have been proposed, creating a daunting challenge for practitioners in algorithm selection. Yet, existing reviews have highlighted only a few approaches. In this review, we describe 50 correspondence algorithms to facilitate practical algorithm selection. We elucidate the motivation for correspondence and analyze the limitations of current approaches, which include prohibitive runtimes, numerous user parameters, model limitations and the need for reference samples. We suggest and describe a paradigm shift for overcoming current correspondence limitations by building on known liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry behavior.