1
|
Oulas A, Minadakis G, Zachariou M, Sokratous K, Bourdakou MM, Spyrou GM. Systems Bioinformatics: increasing precision of computational diagnostics and therapeutics through network-based approaches. Brief Bioinform 2019; 20:806-824. [PMID: 29186305 PMCID: PMC6585387 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Systems Bioinformatics is a relatively new approach, which lies in the intersection of systems biology and classical bioinformatics. It focuses on integrating information across different levels using a bottom-up approach as in systems biology with a data-driven top-down approach as in bioinformatics. The advent of omics technologies has provided the stepping-stone for the emergence of Systems Bioinformatics. These technologies provide a spectrum of information ranging from genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics to epigenomics, pharmacogenomics, metagenomics and metabolomics. Systems Bioinformatics is the framework in which systems approaches are applied to such data, setting the level of resolution as well as the boundary of the system of interest and studying the emerging properties of the system as a whole rather than the sum of the properties derived from the system's individual components. A key approach in Systems Bioinformatics is the construction of multiple networks representing each level of the omics spectrum and their integration in a layered network that exchanges information within and between layers. Here, we provide evidence on how Systems Bioinformatics enhances computational therapeutics and diagnostics, hence paving the way to precision medicine. The aim of this review is to familiarize the reader with the emerging field of Systems Bioinformatics and to provide a comprehensive overview of its current state-of-the-art methods and technologies. Moreover, we provide examples of success stories and case studies that utilize such methods and tools to significantly advance research in the fields of systems biology and systems medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasis Oulas
- Bioinformatics European Research Area Chair, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - George Minadakis
- Bioinformatics European Research Area Chair, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Margarita Zachariou
- Bioinformatics European Research Area Chair, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Kleitos Sokratous
- Bioinformatics European Research Area Chair, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Marilena M Bourdakou
- Bioinformatics European Research Area Chair, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - George M Spyrou
- Bioinformatics European Research Area Chair, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papatsenko D, Darr H, Kulakovskiy IV, Waghray A, Makeev VJ, MacArthur BD, Lemischka IR. Single-Cell Analyses of ESCs Reveal Alternative Pluripotent Cell States and Molecular Mechanisms that Control Self-Renewal. Stem Cell Reports 2016; 5:207-20. [PMID: 26267829 PMCID: PMC4618835 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Revised: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Analyses of gene expression in single mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) cultured in serum and LIF revealed the presence of two distinct cell subpopulations with individual gene expression signatures. Comparisons with published data revealed that cells in the first subpopulation are phenotypically similar to cells isolated from the inner cell mass (ICM). In contrast, cells in the second subpopulation appear to be more mature. Pluripotency Gene Regulatory Network (PGRN) reconstruction based on single-cell data and published data suggested antagonistic roles for Oct4 and Nanog in the maintenance of pluripotency states. Integrated analyses of published genomic binding (ChIP) data strongly supported this observation. Certain target genes alternatively regulated by OCT4 and NANOG, such as Sall4 and Zscan10, feed back into the top hierarchical regulator Oct4. Analyses of such incoherent feedforward loops with feedback (iFFL-FB) suggest a dynamic model for the maintenance of mESC pluripotency and self-renewal. Mouse embryonic stem cells grown on serum and LIF contain two subpopulations of cells Oct4 and Nanog alternatively regulate a class of pluripotency genes We demonstrate stabilization of Oct4 concentration and pluripotency via feedback control The “state exchange” model explains self-renewal
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitri Papatsenko
- Department of Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | - Henia Darr
- Department of Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Ivan V Kulakovskiy
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Strasse 32, Moscow 119991, Russia; Department of Computational Systems Biology, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina Strasse 3, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Avinash Waghray
- Department of Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Vsevolod J Makeev
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Strasse 32, Moscow 119991, Russia; Department of Computational Systems Biology, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina Strasse 3, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Ben D MacArthur
- Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells, and Regeneration, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Ihor R Lemischka
- Department of Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pharmacology and System Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Systems Biology Center New York, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Papatsenko D, Lemischka IR. Emerging Modeling Concepts and Solutions in Stem Cell Research. Curr Top Dev Biol 2016; 116:709-21. [PMID: 26970649 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Modern stem cell research, as well as other fields of contemporary biology involves quantitative sciences in many ways. Identifying candidates for key differentiation or reprogramming factors, tracing global transcriptome changes, or finding drugs is now broadly involves bioinformatics and biostatistics. However, the next key step, understanding the underlying reasons and establishing causal links leading to differentiation or reprogramming requires qualitative and quantitative biological models describing complex biological systems. Currently, quantitative modeling is a challenging science, capable to deliver rather modest results or predictions. What model types are the most popular and what features of stem cell behavior they are capturing? What new insights do we expect from the computational modeling of stem cells in the foreseeable future? Current review attempts to approach these essential questions by considering published quantitative models and solutions emerging in the area of stem cell research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitri Papatsenko
- Department of Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Ihor R Lemischka
- Department of Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Pharmacology and System Therapeutics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Systems Biology Center New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|