Prioritizing hypothesis tests for high throughput data

Pairwise ratio-based differential abundance analysis of infant microbiome 16S sequencing data

Differential abundance analysis of infant 16S microbial sequencing data is complicated by challenging data properties, including high sparsity, extreme dispersion and the relative nature of the information contained within the data. In this study, we propose a pairwise ratio analysis that uses the compositional data analysis principle of subcompositional coherence and merges it with a beta-binomial regression model. The resulting method provides a flexible and easily interpretable approach to infant 16S sequencing data differential abundance analysis that does not require zero imputation. We evaluate the proposed method using infant 16S data from clinical trials and demonstrate that the proposed method has the power to detect differences, and demonstrate how its results can be used to gain insights. We further evaluate the method using data-inspired simulations and compare its power against related methods. Our results indicate that power is high for pairwise differential abundance analysis of taxon pairs that have a large abundance. In contrast, results for sparse taxon pairs show a decrease in power and substantial variability in method performance. While our method shows promising performance on well-measured subcompositions, we advise strong filtering steps in order to avoid excessive numbers of underpowered comparisons in practical applications.

Impact of adaptive filtering on power and false discovery rate in RNA-seq experiments

Background

In RNA-sequencing studies a large number of hypothesis tests are performed to compare the differential expression of genes between several conditions. Filtering has been proposed to remove candidate genes with a low expression level which may not be relevant and have little or no chance of showing a difference between conditions. This step may reduce the multiple testing burden and increase power.

Results

We show in a simulation study that filtering can lead to some increase in power for RNA-sequencing data, too aggressive filtering, however, can lead to a decline. No uniformly optimal filter in terms of power exists. Depending on the scenario different filters may be optimal. We propose an adaptive filtering strategy which selects one of several filters to maximise the number of rejections. No additional adjustment for multiplicity has to be included, but a rule has to be considered if the number of rejections is too small.

Conclusions

For a large range of simulation scenarios, the adaptive filter maximises the power while the simulated False Discovery Rate is bounded by the pre-defined significance level. Using the adaptive filter, it is not necessary to pre-specify a single individual filtering method optimised for a specific scenario.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-022-04928-z.

A Structured Approach to Evaluating Life-Course Hypotheses: Moving Beyond Analyses of Exposed Versus Unexposed in the -Omics Context

The structured life-course modeling approach (SLCMA) is a theory-driven analytical method that empirically compares multiple prespecified life-course hypotheses characterizing time-dependent exposure-outcome relationships to determine which theory best fits the observed data. In this study, we performed simulations and empirical analyses to evaluate the performance of the SLCMA when applied to genomewide DNA methylation (DNAm). Using simulations (n = 700), we compared 5 statistical inference tests used with SLCMA, assessing the familywise error rate, statistical power, and confidence interval coverage to determine whether inference based on these tests was valid in the presence of substantial multiple testing and small effects-2 hallmark challenges of inference from -omics data. In the empirical analyses (n = 703), we evaluated the time-dependent relationship between childhood abuse and genomewide DNAm. In simulations, selective inference and the max-|t|-test performed best: Both controlled the familywise error rate and yielded moderate statistical power. Empirical analyses using SLCMA revealed time-dependent effects of childhood abuse on DNAm. Our findings show that SLCMA, applied and interpreted appropriately, can be used in high-throughput settings to examine time-dependent effects underlying exposure-outcome relationships over the life course. We provide recommendations for applying the SLCMA in -omics settings and encourage researchers to move beyond analyses of exposed versus unexposed individuals.

Family-Based Quantitative Trait Meta-Analysis Implicates Rare Noncoding Variants in DENND1A in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

CONTEXT

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is among the most common endocrine disorders of premenopausal women, affecting 5% to15% of this population depending on the diagnostic criteria applied. It is characterized by hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction, and polycystic ovarian morphology. PCOS is highly heritable, but only a small proportion of this heritability can be accounted for by the common genetic susceptibility variants identified to date.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to test whether rare genetic variants contribute to PCOS pathogenesis.

DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND METHODS

We performed whole-genome sequencing on DNA from 261 individuals from 62 families with one or more daughters with PCOS. We tested for associations of rare variants with PCOS and its concomitant hormonal traits using a quantitative trait meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We found rare variants in DENND1A (P = 5.31 × 10-5, adjusted P = 0.039) that were significantly associated with reproductive and metabolic traits in PCOS families.

CONCLUSIONS

Common variants in DENND1A have previously been associated with PCOS diagnosis in genome-wide association studies. Subsequent studies indicated that DENND1A is an important regulator of human ovarian androgen biosynthesis. Our findings provide additional evidence that DENND1A plays a central role in PCOS and suggest that rare noncoding variants contribute to disease pathogenesis.

Increasing accuracy of genomic selection in presence of high density marker panels through the prioritization of relevant polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

It becomes clear that the increase in the density of marker panels and even the use of sequence data didn't result in any meaningful increase in the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) using either regression (RM) or variance component (VC) approaches. This is in part due to the limitations of current methods. Association model are well over-parameterized and suffer from severe co-linearity and lack of statistical power. Even when the variant effects are not directly estimated using VC based approaches, the genomic relationships didn't improve after the marker density exceeded a certain threshold. SNP prioritization-based fixation index (F_ST) scores were used to track the majority of significant QTL and to reduce the dimensionality of the association model.

RESULTS

Two populations with average LD between adjacent markers of 0.3 (P1) and 0.7 (P2) were simulated. In both populations, the genomic data consisted of 400 K SNP markers distributed on 10 chromosomes. The density of simulated genomic data mimics roughly 1.2 million SNP markers in the bovine genome. The genomic relationship matrix (G) was calculated for each set of selected SNPs based on their F_ST score and similar numbers of SNPs were selected randomly for comparison. Using all 400 K SNPs, 46% of the off-diagonal elements (OD) were between - 0.01 and 0.01. The same portion was 31, 23 and 16% when 80 K, 40 K and 20 K SNPs were selected based on F_ST scores. For randomly selected 20 K SNP subsets, around 33% of the OD fell within the same range. Genomic similarity computed using SNPs selected based on F_ST scores was always higher than using the same number of SNPs selected randomly. Maximum accuracies of 0.741 and 0.828 were achieved when 20 and 10 K SNPs were selected based on F_ST scores in P₁ and P₂, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic similarity could be maximized by the decrease in the number of selected SNPs, but it also leads to a decrease in the percentage of genetic variation explained by the selected markers. Finding the balance between these two parameters could optimize the accuracy of GS in the presence of high density marker panels.