Comparison of the maternal and fetal effects associated with intermittent or continuous infusion of extradural analgesia

Comparison of intermittent and continuous epidural analgesia on delivery and progression of labour

In this study, 205 nulliparous parturients were enrolled to receive either intermittent (n = 101) or continuous (n = 104) type of epidural analgesia in labour. The primary outcome was rate of caesarean deliveries, whereas secondary outcomes included rate of fundal pressure manoeuvres, duration of labour from application of analgesia, dose of anaesthetic and short-term maternal and neonatal outcome between two groups. Rate of caesarean deliveries was significantly increased in the continuous group (15/104 vs 5/101, p = 0.02), as well as rate of fundal pressure manoeuvres (24/104 vs 11/101, p = 0.02) and dose of fentanyl (100 [100-300] vs 187.5 [125-450] μg, p < 0.001 and levobupivacaine (40 [40-60] vs 75 [50-90] ml, p < 0.001). Duration of labour from analgesia to delivery was not significantly different between the two groups (414 ± 101 vs 432 ± 94 min, p = 0.12).

A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor

BACKGROUND

The best combination of bolus size and lockout interval for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is not known. This study compared a 5-min with a 15-min lockout interval.

METHODS

Parturients were randomly assigned to receive PCEA with either a 5-min or a 15-min interval. All had a 15-mL loading dose, continuous background infusion 6 mL/h of 0.125% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 2 mug/mL, PCEA bolus volume 5 mL, maximum hourly dose 26 mL. Visual analogue scores for pain, nausea and pruritus, sensory levels to ice, sacral analgesia, motor power, blood pressure and fetal heart rate were assessed pre-epidural and regularly thereafter until delivery. The numbers of boluses and attempts and patient satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

29 patients were assigned to the 5-min group and 31 to the 15-min group, but the 15-min group contained twice as many nulliparous women. Side-effect and complication rates did not differ between groups. VAS pain scores were reduced from a median of 79 in the 15-min group and 82 in the 5-min group to a median of zero 30 min after epidural insertion. Bolus/attempt ratio was 0.88 in the 5-min vs. 0.70 in the 15-min group. The numbers of requests for physician intervention were similar. No differences in pain scores, side-effects, drug use or patient satisfaction were demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

The 5-min lockout interval appears the more efficient and has been used safely in our practice for 15,000 parturients, although a larger study is required to confirm the relative efficacy, efficiency and safety of this regimen.

The effect of ultra low dose epidural analgesia on newborn breastfeeding behaviors

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a difference in breastfeeding behaviors could be observed between newborns whose mothers received epidural analgesia for labor pain relief and those newborns whose mothers received no pain medication in labor.

DESIGN

There were two groups of neonates in this study. One group was born to mothers who received epidural analgesia, and one group was born to mothers who received no pain medication for labor. Both groups were observed for initial breastfeeding behaviors using the Premature Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale following birth and at 24 hours. Central nervous system functioning in the newborn was measured with the Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score at 2 and 24 hours of age.

SETTING

A large tertiary hospital in northeast Ohio.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-six breastfeeding mother-newborn dyads. All mothers were healthy multiparae who gave birth vaginally to normal, full-term, healthy newborns.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Newborns were observed for rooting, latch on, sucking, swallowing, activity state, and neurobehavior.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in breastfeeding behaviors at birth or at 24 hours of age.

CONCLUSION

A possible cause for the lack of significant results may have been the ultra low dose of bupivacaine and fentanyl used in this sample.

Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits

BACKGROUND

Intrapartum epidural analgesia has become increasingly popular because it is the most effective method of providing pain relief during labor. Much attention is given to its safety and efficacy, and many health care providers and consumers are unaware of its potential drawbacks. This article reviews the literature about the effects of epidural analgesia on the mother and infant.

METHODS

We performed a computer-assisted MEDLINE search for articles and a review of bibliographies from articles on epidural analgesia. When reported data were incomplete, authors were contacted for more detailed information.

RESULTS

The most common procedure-related complications, hypotension, inadvertent dural puncture, and headache, are easily treated and usually self-limited. Permanent morbidity and mortality are rare. Retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials both demonstrate that epidural analgesia is associated with increases in duration of labor, instrument vaginal delivery, and cesarean birth. To date only three trials randomized patients to narcotic versus epidural groups, and all showed a twofold to threefold increase in cesarean section for dystocia. Limiting epidural use in nulliparous labor and delaying its placement until after 5 cm of cervical dilation may reduce the risk of operative intervention for dystocia. Epidural analgesia may also increase intervention for fetal distress. Several studies show its association with maternal fever in labor. Its association with chronic back pain, neonatal behavioral changes, and maternal-infant bonding are more tenuous and require further study.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural analgesia is a safe and effective method of relieving pain in labor, but is associated with longer labor, more operative intervention, and increases in cost. It must remain an option; however, caregivers and consumers should be aware of associated risks. Women should be counseled about these risks and other pain-relieving options before the duress of labor.