Resistant hypertension and preoperative silent myocardial ischaemia in surgical patients

Predictors of silent myocardial ischemia in resistant hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the most prevalent and significant modifiable risk factor for coronary heart disease. A portion of patients with uncontrolled hypertension are considered to have resistant hypertension (RHTN). Myocardial ischemia incidence increases along with blood pressure (BP) levels. However, the prevalence of myocardial ischemia in patients with RHTN, as well as the factors associated with it, is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 129 patients with true RHTN regularly followed in our specialty hypertension clinic and evaluated then by resting and dipyridamole pharmacological stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: those with (I-RHTN; n = 36) and those without (NI-RHTN; n = 93) myocardial ischemia. Echocardiography, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and flow mediated dilation (FMD) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty six (28%) patients had myocardial ischemia. There was no difference between groups regarding age, sex, biochemical parameters, office, and 24-hour ABPM levels. Patients in the I-RHTN group were more likely diabetic (31% vs. 11%; P < 0.05) and obese (75% vs. 40%; P < 0.001). Adjusting for age and body mass index, multiple logistic regression showed that diabetes (odds ratio (OR) = 6.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-40.14; P = 0.04), FMD (OR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07-0.41; P < 0.001), heart rate (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.11-1.36; P < 0.001), left ventricular mass index (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.04; P = 0.04), and microalbuminuria (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.04; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, there is a high prevalence of myocardial ischemia in patients with RHTN. Increased microalbuminuria, heart rate, endothelial dysfunction, and left ventricular mass can be useful to guide the investigation for myocardial ischemia in these high risk patients.

[Perioperative myocardial damage in non-cardiac surgery patients]

Perioperative myocardial damage occurs with a high incidence depending on the operative procedure and the patients examined and is considered to be among the most relevant risk factors for increased perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The pathophysiology of myocardial damage in the perioperative period is still not well understood. Both ischemia with and without acute coronary occlusion and non-ischemic stimuli can put a substantial strain on the heart in the perioperative period. However, in many cases the clinical presentation does not allow a clear differentiation between ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial damage. In the majority of cases perioperative myocardial infarctions occur with only mild or even without any clinical symptoms. This is probably due to a considerable difference in phenotype and pathophysiology between perioperative and non-perioperative myocardial infarctions. As a result of this unexplained etiology of perioperative myocardial infarction it remains an open question whether the contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for the acute coronary syndrome can be extrapolated to the perioperative situation. The present review reflects the current state of knowledge and presents an optional approach to the diagnosis and therapy of perioperative myocardial injury.

Perioperative control of hypertension: when will it adversely affect perioperative outcome?

Much has been published about the impact of treatment on adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Hypertension is an extremely common condition affecting a significant percentage of the world population. Although care guidelines exist for the medical patient with raised blood pressure, there are no accepted guidelines for the preoperative evaluation and perioperative care of the patient with hypertension who undergoes noncardiac surgery. Of particular importance are defining at-risk groups of patients, and the indications for cancellation to treat and hence reduce this risk. This review examines the interactions between hypertension, drug therapies, anesthesia, and adverse outcomes in these patients. Recommendations for identifying patients at greatest risk of adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac mortality have been developed through evaluation of available data. Based on these findings, the only patients in whom cancellation may be justified and the level of hypertension treated prior to surgery are those with stage 2 hypertension and accompanying target-organ damage, or stage 3 hypertension (blood pressure > 180/> 110 mm Hg).

Surgical risk in patients with metabolic syndrome: focus on lipids and hypertension

The metabolic syndrome describes a clustering of risk factors that predispose individuals to cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Abdominal obesity is a key component of the metabolic syndrome, increasing the incidence of insulin resistance, vascular inflammation, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Adipose tissue (now recognized as an endocrine organ) and its hormonal products appear to play a significant role in signaling organs throughout the body in the regulation of fat and glucose metabolism. These mechanisms are clearly involved in the development of cardiovascular and metabolic disease and may also lead to increased surgical risks. The components of the syndrome that are most likely to affect surgical patients are obesity, hypertension, and disorders of glucose metabolism. This article focuses on each of these risk factors, the effects on surgical patients, and strategies to improve outcomes in the perioperative period.

Silent myocardial ischaemia and haemoglobin concentration: a randomized controlled trial of transfusion strategy in lower limb arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Red cell transfusion is commonly used in orthopaedic surgery. Evidence suggests that a restrictive transfusion strategy may be safe for most patients. However, concern has been raised over the risks of anaemia in those with ischaemic cardiac disease. Perioperative silent myocardial ischaemia (SMI) has a relatively high incidence in the elderly population undergoing elective surgery. This study used Holter monitoring to compare the effect of a restrictive and a liberal red cell transfusion strategy on the incidence of SMI in patients without signs or symptoms of ischaemic heart disease who were undergoing lower limb arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a multicentre, controlled trial in which 260 patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgery were enrolled and randomized to transfusion triggers that were either restrictive (8 g/dl) or liberal (10 g/dl). Participants were monitored with continuous ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) (Holter monitoring), preoperatively for 12 h and postoperatively for 72 h. The tapes were analysed for new ischaemia by technicians blinded to treatment. The total ischaemia time in minutes was divided by the recording time in hours and an ischaemic load in min/h was calculated. Haemoglobin levels were measured preoperatively, postoperatively in the recovery room, and on days one, three and five after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative haemoglobin concentration was 9.87 g/dl in the restrictive group and 11.09 g/dl in the liberal group. In the restrictive group, 34% were transfused a total of 89 red cell units, and in the liberal group 43% were given a total of 119 red cell units. A postoperative episode of silent ischaemia was experienced by 21/109 (19%) patients in the restrictive group and by 26/109 (24%) patients in the liberal group [mean difference -4.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -15.5% to 6%, P = 0.41). There was no significant difference (P = 0.53) between the overall ischaemic load in the restrictive group (median 0 min/h, range 0-4.18) and the liberal group (median 0 min/h, range 0-19.48). In those patients who did experience postoperative SMI, the mean ischaemic load was 0.48 min/h in the restrictive group and 1.51 min/h in the liberal group (ratio 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.76, P = 0.011). The median postoperative length of hospital stay in the restrictive group was 7.3 days [range 5-11; interquartile range (IQR) 6-8] compared with 7.5 days (range 5-13; IQR 7-8) in the liberal group. The numbers were not large enough to conclude equivalence.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without preoperative evidence of myocardial ischaemia undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgery, a restrictive transfusion strategy seems unlikely to be associated with an increased incidence of SMI. A proportion of these patients experience moderate SMI, regardless of the transfusion trigger. Use of a restrictive transfusion strategy did not increase length of hospital stay, and use of this strategy would lead to a significant reduction in red cell transfusion in orthopaedic surgery. Our data did not indicate any potential for harm in employing such a strategy in patients with no prior evidence of cardiac ischaemia who were undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery.

Bradycardia and hypertension in anticipation of, and exacerbated by, peribulbar block: a prospective audit

BACKGROUND

Changes in heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) occur in anticipation of, and following, injection of a peribulbar local analgesic agent. We examined these changes in two groups of awake patients given a pre-medication of either hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg alone (control) or hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg with morphine 0.05 mg/kg.

METHODS

HR, SAP and DAP of 100 patients per group were monitored the day before surgery (baseline), every 5 min in the anesthesia holding room before peribulbar injection, every minute for the first 5 min after peribulbar injection and then every 5 min until transfer to the operating room. Within and between pre-medication group values of HR, SAP and DAP before and after peribulbar injection were compared with baseline.

RESULTS

The two groups of patients were similar. Before peribulbar injection, HR was unchanged in the hydroxyzine group, but 6% slower in those given morphine (P<0.01). After injection, HR slowed in both groups, by 5% and 7% (P<0.01, both comparisons), respectively. In anticipation of injection, SAP increased in both groups to 20% and 16% above baseline, respectively, and increased further after injection to 26% and 24% above baseline, respectively (P<0.001, all comparisons). In both groups, maximum SAP following injection exceeded maximum SAP before injection (P<0.02, both comparisons). DAP increased by 4% (P<0.05) in the hydroxyzine group before injection, and by 5% and 4%, respectively (P<0.005 and P<0.05, respectively) after peribulbar injection.

CONCLUSION

The audit reveals pronounced increases in SAP accompanied by lesser increases in DAP and a tendency to slowing of HR in awake patients in anticipation of peribulbar injections. Peribulbar injections cause further increases in blood pressure and mild bradycardia. These changes occur similarly in patients pre-medicated with hydroxyzine or hydroxyzine plus morphine. A mix of neuro-humoral influences (anxiety/catecholamine/baroreceptor/trigemino-vagal) are postulated as etiological.

Is there a strong rationale for deferring elective surgery in patients with poorly controlled hypertension?

Hypertension remains one of the most common avoidable medical indications for deferring elective surgery, thereby increasing both the financial and emotional burden of having an operation. Although the evidence supporting the current guidelines on management of hypertension is among the best available in any field of medicine, our knowledge on whether high blood pressure (BP) is an independent perioperative risk factor is plagued by much uncertainty. Indeed, it is still unclear whether postponing surgery on the ground of elevated preoperative BP measurements will lead to a reduction in perioperative cardiac risk. Similarly, the importance of multiple versus isolated BP measurements in predicting perioperative complications has not yet been assessed. As most studies have evaluated the predictive value of diastolic BP, the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events associated with isolated systolic hypertension remains uncertain. With no controlled evidence to address these issues, no firm recommendations can be made to improve patients' safety. These important issues now need to be addressed by modern clinical trials.

Risk factors for perioperative myocardial ischemia in carotid artery endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To identify variables associated with perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital operating room and intensive care unit.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients who underwent CEA during a 7-year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients had general anesthesia with sevoflurane or isoflurane. CEA was performed by standard methods with shunting if clinically indicated. Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring was performed during surgery and 24 hours after surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia was examined, and perioperative risk factors were analyzed. Nineteen patients (15%) showed significant perioperative ECG abnormalities indicative of myocardial ischemia (10 patients during surgery, 12 patients after surgery, and 3 patients both during and after surgery). Multivariate analysis showed perioperative myocardial ischemia to be significantly associated with a history of angina (odds ratio, 11.68; 95% confidence interval, 2.64-51.70) and a history of hypertension (odds ratio, 14.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-131.04).

CONCLUSION

The data indicate that perioperative myocardial ischemia defined as an ECG abnormality does not often occur in patients undergoing CEA. However, angina and hypertension may be important risk factors warranting further investigation.

Anaesthesia and isolated systolic hypertension--pathophysiology and anaesthesia risk

This review examines the pathophysiology of isolated systolic hypertension, changing medical perspectives on this condition as a cardiovascular risk factor in the community and evolving evidence of it being an independent risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is regarded as an added risk in anaesthesia. Continuation of antihypertensive medication through the perioperative period is an established principle. Studies supporting this practice have demonstrated greater perioperative haemodynamic stability in association with general anaesthesia and surgery in patients with treated hypertension compared to untreated hypertension. Therapy has historically focused on control of diastolic blood pressure, rather than systolic blood pressure. Recent clinical trial data and data from large observational studies show a closer association of systolic hypertension with both coronary heart disease and stroke compared with diastolic hypertension. This has led to recommendations for aggressive treatment of isolated systolic hypertension, especially in patients over 65 years old. The association between decreased compliance of the central systemic arteries and isolated systolic hypertension is well understood. The fact that this same pathology, lack of compliance of central arteries, can cause a decrease in diastolic blood pressure is not so well recognised. This means that, in patients with isolated systolic hypertension, decreasing diastolic blood pressure can be associated with worsening arterial disease and that systolic minus diastolic blood pressure may give a better indication of the problem. Anaesthetic assessment and technique should be studied and potentially revised in the light of these changes in perspective on isolated systolic hypertension.

ST segment depression criteria and the prevalence of silent cardiac ischemia in hypertensives

The reported prevalence of silent cardiac ischemia as assessed by ambulatory electrocardiographic recording varies widely. The influence of the stringency of the analysis criteria has never been reported. We performed 24-hour, 12-lead ambulatory electrocardiographic recording in patients with hypertension but without proven coronary artery disease. The recordings were analyzed according to strict ST segment depression criteria adapted from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and according to basic ST segment depression criteria adapted from studies with only concise descriptions of ambulatory electrocardiographic recording analysis. Also, we performed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. More than 4400 hours of ambulatory electrocardiographic recording and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 194 patients with hypertension were analyzed. Medication was withdrawn in 45% of the patients. The average systolic blood pressure during the day was 152+/-13 (mean+/-SD); diastolic blood pressure was 94+/-17 mm Hg. According to the basic ST segment depression criteria, we found a prevalence of silent ischemia of 11.3%, and with the strict criteria the prevalence was 5.2%. The patients who were considered positive according to the basic criteria but not according to the strict criteria (false-positive) in the majority of cases (58%) had depression of an elevated baseline ST segment. We found a lower prevalence of silent cardiac ischemia as assessed by ambulatory electrocardiographic recording than generally reported. The stringency of applied analysis criteria appear to play an important role in this outcome.

Silent myocardial ischaemia in treated hypertensives with and without left ventricular hypertrophy

BACKGROUND

Silent ischaemia has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction and sudden death in a wide range of patient groups. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of silent ischaemia in hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).

METHODS

Twenty hypertensive patients participating in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial with echocardiographic LVH (11 males, nine females), and 20 age, sex, blood pressure, and drug treatment-matched hypertensive patients without LVH underwent 24-h combined ambulatory blood pressure and electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Ischaemic events were defined by the 'rule of 3 x 1'-asymptomatic ST-depression >/= 1 mm (0.1 mV), lasting at least 1 min, and with a duration of at least 1 min between two events.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with LVH had ischaemic events, whilst only four without LVH demonstrated ischaemia. Median numbers of events (seven versus zero; P < 0.01) and median total ischaemic area (0.25 versus 0 mV*min/day; P < 0.01) were significantly increased amongst hypertensive patients with LVH by comparison to those without LVH.

CONCLUSION

Despite similar levels of established risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, the prevalence of silent ischaemia was markedly increased amongst hypertensive patients with LVH by comparison to those with normal left ventricular dimensions. Ambulatory ECG monitoring may have a use in the identification of those at greatest risk of cardiovascular complications and sudden death, amongst hypertensive patients with persistent cardiac hypertrophy despite anti-hypertensive therapy.

Issues in the perioperative management of the elderly patient with cardiovascular disease

The elderly patient may show normal physiological changes of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems that accompany aging, as well as features of intrinsic cardiac disease. The latter include: a past history of myocardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease; history of congestive cardiac failure; angina; arterial hypertension (BP >140/90mm Hg); and conduction disorders. A key aspect to the safe and effective anaesthetic management of the elderly patient with cardiac disease is a careful preoperative assessment and optimisation of pre-existing drug therapies. All cardiac medications should be continued up to and including the morning of surgery with the exception of anticoagulation involving warfarin, and perhaps large doses of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in patients with hypertension or heart failure. Anaesthetic techniques used in these patients should avoid episodes of excessive hypotension after induction of anaesthesia or large blood loss, or the combination of hypertension and tachycardia after noxious stimulation. The latter physiological disturbances are pivotal for the development of myocardial ischaemia. Both premedication (if used) and anaesthesia should avoid excessive sedation and respiratory depression. The choice of anaesthetic technique may vary between: a balanced technique involving an opiate and a volatile agent; an intravenous technique utilising infusions of propofol; or regional anaesthesia with or without additional sedation. There are no good data to suggest any one technique is better than the rest. The occurrence of ischaemia in the perioperative period may precede the postoperative development of significant cardiac morbidity and mortality (including myocardial infarction or unstable angina, congestive cardiac failure, cerebrovascular accidents, and severe arrhythmias). A number of strategies have been examined to reduce these adverse outcomes. The effect of acute beta-adrenoceptor blockade in treatment-naive patients is associated with reduction in the haemodynamic response to noxious stimuli and decreased ECG evidence of myocardial ischaemia, as well as a reduction in the number of cardiac adverse events. Other drugs (calcium channel antagonists, alpha(2)-agonists and adenosine modulators) have a less predictable influence on both myocardial ischaemia and hard cardiac outcomes. There is inadequate evidence at present to define the optimal time course for acute beta-blockade, or the groups of patients in whom preoperative beta-blockade should be initiated in the absence of contraindications. Nevertheless, addition of beta-blockers to the preoperative regimen should be considered in patients with evidence of or at risk for coronary disease undergoing major surgery. There is also evidence that long-term beta-adrenoceptor or calcium channel blockade or nitrate therapy for the high-risk cardiac patient offers little protection against silent myocardial ischaemia, nonfatal infarction, cardiac failure and cardiac death.

Survey of cancellation rate of hypertensive patients undergoing anaesthesia and elective surgery

Hypertension is the commonest avoidable medical indication for postponing anaesthesia and surgery. There are no universally accepted guidelines stating the arterial pressure values at which anaesthesia should be postponed. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of variation across the South-West region of the UK in the anaesthetic management of patients presenting with stage 2 or stage 3 hypertension. Each anaesthetist in the region was sent a questionnaire with five imaginary case histories of patients with stage 2 or stage 3 hypertension. They were asked if they would be prepared to provide anaesthesia for each patient. The response rate was 58%. We found great variability between anaesthetists as to which patients would be cancelled. Departmental protocols may aid general practitioners and surgeons in the preparation of patients for surgery, but such protocols may be difficult to agree in the light of such a wide variation in practice.

Silent ischaemia and hypertension

For many years now, silent ischaemia has been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, and its relevance in different patient groups has been established. However, a number of basic questions have not been answered. In explaining the pathophysiology of silent ischaemia, factors affecting both the demand and the supply side are now being recognized. With the exception of certain well-defined groups, it is not clear why some patients are mostly symptomatic, while other patients are predominantly asymptomatic. There appear to be many factors influencing the ischaemic pain threshold. Studies investigating the prevalence of silent ischaemia show a remarkably high prevalence of silent ischaemia in different patient groups. Patients with hypertension but without coronary artery disease form a specific and vulnerable high-risk population that is particularly prone to silent ischaemia. Since changes at the macrovascular level are not responsible, various factors negatively influencing either cardiac supply or demand have been investigated. A reduced coronary reserve is central in explaining the increased prevalence of silent ischaemia in hypertensives. Left ventricular hypertrophy renders meaningful detection of ST segment changes difficult, but a possible solution dealing with this problem is offered by applying more stringent criteria in terms of minimal ST depression in the definition of ischaemia. The treatment of silent ischaemia is largely the same as for angina pectoris, but whether therapy should be directed at elimination of all ischaemic episodes or only of symptomatic episodes depends on further prospective work addressing this question.

Peri-operative silent myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing lower limb joint replacement surgery: an indicator of postoperative morbidity or mortality?

One hundred and twenty-seven patients undergoing major lower limb joint replacement surgery were studied to determine the incidence of silent myocardial ischemia and to ascertain any link between pre-operative cardiac risk factors, silent myocardial ischaemia and postoperative morbidity. Patients underwent ambulatory ECG monitoring for 4 days (on the pre-operative night and for 3 days postoperatively). Postoperative cardiorespiratory symptomatology and morbidity was assessed by questionnaire at 3 months. Eighty-seven patients had risk factors for silent myocardial ischaemia; 42 patients (30 with risk factors) had peri-operative silent myocardial ischaemia. The median ischaemic loads (range) were 1.04 (0.32-13.31) min.h-1 pre-operatively and 5.53 (0.26-56.39), 6.69 (0.04-42.71) and 1.23 (0.1-53.74) min.h-1 on postoperative days 1-3, respectively. Risk factors did not predict the occurrence of silent myocardial ischaemia or an increased ischaemic load pre-operatively or overall postoperatively. New symptoms (chest pain, palpitations, breathlessness or fatigue) were associated with both silent myocardial ischaemia and ischaemic load (p < 0.05). Thus cardiac risk factors do not predict the occurrence of silent myocardial ischaemia or adverse outcome. Peri-operative silent myocardial ischaemia was associated with increased postoperative fatigue.

Hypertension, admission blood pressure and perioperative cardiovascular risk

We performed a retrospective case-control study to investigate hypertension and admission blood pressure as risk factors for postoperative cardiovascular death. We identified records of 76 patients who had died of a cardiovascular cause within 30 days of anaesthesia and elective surgery and 76 matched controls. From the records of each patient (case and control) we recorded the admission blood pressure and details of any history of hypertension. A pre-operative history of hypertension was strongly associated with perioperative cardiovascular death (p < 0.001 with one degree of freedom: odds ratio 4.14, 95% confidence intervals 1.63-11.69). There was no association between systolic or diastolic pressure at admission for operation and perioperative cardiovascular death. The mean admission systolic pressure of the cases was 145.5 mmHg (range 90-250 mmHg) and that of the controls was 146.5 mmHg (range 100-200 mmHg). The mean admission diastolic pressure of the cases was 83.2 mmHg (range 60-130 mmHg), and that of the controls was 84.5 mmHg (range 60-110 mmHg).