1
|
Kraus AC, De Miguel C. Hyperoxia and Acute Kidney Injury: A Tale of Oxygen and the Kidney. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:151282. [PMID: 36404211 PMCID: PMC9825666 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Although oxygen supplementation is beneficial to support life in the clinic, excessive oxygen therapy also has been linked to damage to organs such as the lung or the eye. However, there is a lack of understanding of whether high oxygen therapy directly affects the kidney, leading to acute kidney injury, and what molecular mechanisms may be involved in this process. In this review, we revise our current understanding of the mechanisms by which hyperoxia leads to organ damage and highlight possible areas of investigation for the scientific community interested in novel mechanisms of kidney disease. Overall, we found a significant need for both animal and clinical studies evaluating the role of hyperoxia in inducing kidney damage. Thus, we urge the research community to further investigate oxygen therapy and its impact on kidney health with the goal of optimizing oxygen therapy guidelines and improving patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigayle C Kraus
- Section of Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Carmen De Miguel
- Section of Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neethling E, Moreno Garijo J, Mangalam TK, Badiwala MV, Billia P, Wasowicz M, Van Rensburg A, Slinger P. Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Management of Heart Transplantation: Anesthetic Implications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2189-2206. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Revised: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
3
|
Bignami E, Saglietti F, Di Lullo A. Mechanical ventilation management during cardiothoracic surgery: an open challenge. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:380. [PMID: 30460254 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.06.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation during surgery is a highly complex procedure, particularly in cardiothoracic surgery, where patients need to undergo substantial hemodynamic management, involving large fluid exchanges and pharmacological manipulation of vascular resistance, as well as direct manipulation of the lungs themselves. Cardiothoracic surgery is burdened by a high rate of postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC), comorbidity, and mortality. Recent trials have examined various techniques to preserve lung function, although consensus on best practice has yet to be reached. This might be due to the close relationship between the circulatory and pulmonary systems. The use of a technique designed to prevent pulmonary complication might negatively impact the hemodynamics of an already critical patient. Stress-induced lung injury can occur during surgery for various reasons, some of which have yet to be fully investigated. In cardiac surgery, this damage is mainly ascribed to two events: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and sternotomy. In thoracic surgery, on the other hand, overdistention and permissive hyperoxia, both routinely used on one lung to compensate for the collapse of the other, are generally to blame for lung injury. In recent years "protective" ventilation strategies have been proposed to spare lung parenchyma from stress-induced damage. Despite the growing interest in protective ventilation techniques, there are still no clear international guidelines for mechanical ventilation in cardiothoracic surgery. However, some recent progress has been made, with positive clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bignami
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Saglietti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Lullo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bignami E, Guarnieri M, Saglietti F, Maglioni EM, Scolletta S, Romagnoli S, De Paulis S, Paternoster G, Trumello C, Meroni R, Scognamiglio A, Budillon AM, Pota V, Zangrillo A, Alfieri O. Different strategies for mechanical VENTilation during CardioPulmonary Bypass (CPBVENT 2014): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:264. [PMID: 28592276 PMCID: PMC5463370 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2008-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is no consensus on which lung-protective strategies should be used in cardiac surgery patients. Sparse and small randomized clinical and animal trials suggest that maintaining mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass is protective on the lungs. Unfortunately, such evidence is weak as it comes from surrogate and minor clinical endpoints mainly limited to elective coronary surgery. According to the available data in the academic literature, an unquestionable standardized strategy of lung protection during cardiopulmonary bypass cannot be recommended. The purpose of the CPBVENT study is to investigate the effectiveness of different strategies of mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary function and complications. Methods/design The CPBVENT study is a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. We are going to enroll 870 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with planned use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients will be randomized into three groups: (1) no mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass, (2) continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cmH2O during cardiopulmonary bypass, (3) respiratory rate of 5 acts/min with a tidal volume of 2–3 ml/Kg of ideal body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure of 3–5 cmH2O during cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary endpoint will be the incidence of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 until the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. The secondary endpoints will be the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and 30-day mortality. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months after the date of randomization. Discussion The CPBVENT trial will establish whether, and how, different ventilator strategies during cardiopulmonary bypass will have an impact on postoperative pulmonary complications and outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02090205. Registered on 8 March 2014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2008-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bignami
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marcello Guarnieri
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Saglietti
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Enivarco Massimo Maglioni
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Medical Biotechnologies University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Sabino Scolletta
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Medical Biotechnologies University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Stefano Romagnoli
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano De Paulis
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Paternoster
- Department of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Cinzia Trumello
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Meroni
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Scognamiglio
- Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 16, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Pota
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Pineta Grande Private Hospital, 80122, Castelvolturno, Italy
| | - Alberto Zangrillo
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio Alfieri
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bignami E, Guarnieri M, Saglietti F, Belletti A, Trumello C, Giambuzzi I, Monaco F, Alfieri O. Mechanical Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016; 30:1668-1675. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
6
|
Effect of intraoperative high inspired oxygen fraction on surgical site infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pulmonary function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 2013; 119:303-16. [PMID: 23719611 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e31829aaff4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative high inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) is thought to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and to promote postoperative atelectasis. METHODS The authors searched for randomized trials (till September 2012) comparing intraoperative high with normal FIO2 in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia and reporting on SSI, nausea or vomiting, or pulmonary outcomes. RESULTS The authors included 22 trials (7,001 patients) published in 26 reports. High FIO2 ranged from 80 to 100% (median, 80%); normal FIO2 ranged from 30 to 40% (median, 30%). In nine trials (5,103 patients, most received prophylactic antibiotics), the incidence of SSI decreased from 14.1% with normal FIO2 to 11.4% with high FIO2; risk ratio, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.00). After colorectal surgery, the incidence of SSI decreased from 19.3 to 15.2%; risk ratio, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-1.02). In 11 trials (2,293 patients), the incidence of nausea decreased from 24.8% with normal FIO2 to 19.5% with high FIO2; risk ratio, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.93). In patients receiving inhalational anesthetics without prophylactic antiemetics, high FIO2 provided a significant protective effect against both nausea and vomiting. Nine trials (3,698 patients) reported on pulmonary outcomes. The risk of atelectasis was not increased with high FIO2. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative high FIO2 further decreases the risk of SSI in surgical patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics, has a weak beneficial effect on nausea, and does not increase the risk of postoperative atelectasis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The current practice of mechanical ventilation comprises the use of the least inspiratory O2 fraction associated with an arterial O2 tension of 55 to 80 mm Hg or an arterial hemoglobin O2 saturation of 88% to 95%. Early goal-directed therapy for septic shock, however, attempts to balance O2 delivery and demand by optimizing cardiac function and hemoglobin concentration, without making use of hyperoxia. Clearly, it has been well-established for more than a century that long-term exposure to pure O2 results in pulmonary and, under hyperbaric conditions, central nervous O2 toxicity. Nevertheless, several arguments support the use of ventilation with 100% O2 as a supportive measure during the first 12 to 24 hrs of septic shock. In contrast to patients without lung disease undergoing anesthesia, ventilation with 100% O2 does not worsen intrapulmonary shunt under conditions of hyperinflammation, particularly when low tidal volume-high positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation is used. In healthy volunteers and experimental animals, exposure to hyperoxia may cause pulmonary inflammation, enhanced oxidative stress, and tissue apoptosis. This, however, requires long-term exposure or injurious tidal volumes. In contrast, within the timeframe of a perioperative administration, direct O2 toxicity only plays a negligible role. Pure O2 ventilation induces peripheral vasoconstriction and thus may counteract shock-induced hypotension and reduce vasopressor requirements. Furthermore, in experimental animals, a redistribution of cardiac output toward the kidney and the hepato-splanchnic organs was observed. Hyperoxia not only reverses the anesthesia-related impairment of the host defense but also is an antibiotic. In fact, perioperative hyperoxia significantly reduced wound infections, and this effect was directly related to the tissue O2 tension. Therefore, we advocate mechanical ventilation with 100% O2 during the first 12 to 24 hrs of septic shock. However, controlled clinical trials are mandatory to test the safety and efficacy of this approach.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ouattara A, Benhaoua H, Bréant V, Ayeb H, Amour J, Barraket M, Ziad A, Regan-Mastret M, Coriat P. [Comparison of three ventilatory modes during immediate postoperative transfer of cardiac surgical patients]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D'ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION 2009; 28:844-849. [PMID: 19773146 DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.07.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2009] [Accepted: 07/23/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Compare three ventilatory strategies during the immediate postoperative transfer of cardiac surgical patient. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, comparative and observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS After approval by our local ethical committee, 330 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were consecutively included. Patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exhibiting intraoperative hypoxemia or requiring nitric oxide were excluded. The ventilatory mode was left at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and included: controlled mechanical ventilation (FiO(2)=1, N=124) or (FiO(2)=0.6, N=106), and manual ventilation using rebreathing bag (N=100). A blood gas analysis was performed immediately prior to connecting patient at ventilator at the arrival in ICU. RESULTS The mean duration of transfer was 3.9+/-1.4 min. Invasive pressure monitoring was used in all patients. The pulse oxymetry and electrocardiogram were respectively used in 78% and 24% of patients. PaO(2) values less than 100 mmHg and those more than 300 mmHg were more frequently found in patients ventilated by rebreathing bag (42%) and mechanical ventilation FiO(2)1 (52%), respectively. No significant difference was found between groups regarding PaCO(2) values. CONCLUSION When rebreathing bag is used for transfer in ICU, severe decrease in PaO(2) may be observed. In absence of intraoperative hypoxemia, a mechanical ventilation with FiO(2)0.6 seems to be the most suitable ventilatory strategy for such short immediate postoperative transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ouattara
- Département d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, institut de cardiologie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, UPMC Paris 6, 75013 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|