Lumbar epidural fentanyl: segmental spread and effect on temporal summation and muscle pain

Increased Experimental Pain Sensitivity in Chronic Pain Patients Who Developed Opioid Use Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Although the great majority of individuals who take opioids for chronic pain use them appropriately and to good effect, a certain minority will develop the problematic outcome of opioid use disorder (OUD). Characteristics associated with the development of OUD in individuals with chronic pain have been described; however, relatively unexplored is how sensitivity to pain is associated with OUD outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined for differences in response to static and dynamic experimental pain stimuli between individuals with chronic nonmalignant pain who developed OUD after starting opioid therapy (n=20) and those on opioid therapy who did not (n=20). During a single experimental session, participants underwent cold pressor and quantitative sensory testing pain assays, and objective and subjective responses were compared between groups; the role of pain catastrophizing in mediating pain responses was examined.

RESULTS

Results suggested that both groups of opioid-dependent patients were similarly hyperalgesic to the cold pressor pain stimulus, with nonparametric testing revealing worsened central pain sensitization (temporal summation) in those who developed OUD. Significant group differences were evident on subjective ratings of experimental pain, such that those who developed OUD rated the pain as more severe than those who did not. Pain catastrophizing was unrelated to pain responses.

DISCUSSION

Despite the small sample size and cross-sectional design, these findings suggest that experimental pain testing may be a novel technique in identifying patients with chronic pain likely to develop OUD, in that they are likely to evidence exacerbated temporal summation and to rate the associated pain as more severe.

Labor epidural analgesia onset time and subsequent analgesic requirements: a prospective observational single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the correlation between lumbar epidural analgesia onset time and pain intensity at 60 and 120 min after initiation.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of nulliparous women receiving lumbar epidural analgesia (initial bolus 15 mL bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 3.33 μg/mL), followed by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The measured variable was lumbar epidural analgesia onset time (time to pain numerical rating score ≤3). Secondary outcomes were pain score at 60 and 120 min and at full dilatation; and analgesic requirements through the labor.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-five women were eligible for analysis. There was a significant correlation between lumbar epidural analgesia onset time and pain intensity at 60 min (Spearman's R²=0.286, P=0.003), but not at 120 min (R²=0.030, P=0.76). Women who requested more PCEA boluses during the first 120 min had a longer lumbar epidural analgesia onset time (R²=0.321, P=0.001) and reported higher pain scores at 60 min (R²=0.588, P <0.001) and at 120 min (R²=0.539, P <0.001). Women who reported higher pain scores at 60 min had more pain at 120 min (R²=0.47, P <0.001) and higher analgesic consumption during labor (R²=0.403, P <0.001). Women who were at a greater cervical dilatation at 60 and 120 min had higher pain scores at the same time point (R²=0.259, P=0.008 and R²=0.243, P=0.013 respectively).

CONCLUSION

There was a correlation between the onset time of lumbar epidural analgesia during labor and the pain score 60 min later but this had disappeared by 120 min.

Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine as supplements to epidural clonidine-bupivacaine in patients with lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The analgesic and sedative effect of clonidine explain its common use as adjuvant in regional anesthesia, however the hemodynamic instability associated with its neuroaxial administration is the major drawback. Our study hypothesis is to compare the hemodynamic and analgesic effect of epidural fentanyl in comparison to meperidine when added to clonidine in patients undergoing lower limbs orthopedic surgery using combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

METHODS

One hundred thirty five ASA physical status I or II patients were recruited for lower limb orthopedic surgery. All received 2 mL intrathecal 0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine, 10 mL epidural 0.25 % plain bupivacaine, and 1 mL epidural clonidine 2 μg/kg (Clonidine group) and then either 1 ml fentanyl 25 μg (Fentanyl Group) or 1 ml meperidine 25 mg (Meperidine Group). The quality of surgical anesthesia, incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, intra-operative pain assessment, and onset of postoperative pain, sedation scores and side effects in the postoperative period were recorded.

RESULTS

The 1(st) analgesic requirement in the postoperative period was significantly prolonged in the meperidine group (p = 0.001). Significant decrease in the mean arterial blood pressure in fentanyl group was at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min (p = 0.035, 0.019, 0.027, 0.032 and 0.039) respectively, significant decrease in meperdine group was at 15 and 30 min (p = 0.038 and 0.043), while in clonidine group a significant decrease was at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min (p = 0.025, 0.028, 0.036 and 0.042) respectively. Among group changes, the mean arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in meperdine group at 30, 45, 60 and 90 min (p = 0.007, 0.015, 0.029 and 0.033) respectively. A significant decrease in the heart rate in fentanyl group at 15, 30 and 45 min (p = 0.035, 0.018 and 0.029), in meperdine group a significant decrease in the heart rate was at 15 min (p = 0.038), while in clonidine group a significant decrease was at 15, and 30 min (p = 0.016 and 0.003) . Among group changes, the heart rate was significantly higher in meperdine group at 30, 45 and 60 min (p = 0.021, 0.017 and 0.011). VAS were significantly lower in meperdine group in comparison to fentanyl and clonidine groups at 2 h, 3 h and 4 h post-operative period (p = 0.024, 0.001 and 0.039).

CONCLUSION

The combined administration of epidural clonidine and meperidine provided better intraoperative hemodynamics and prolonged postoperative analgesia than epidural clonidine fentanyl combination in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trail Registry (Clinicaltrail.gov) NCT 02128451 .

Alteration in pain modulation in women with persistent pain after lumpectomy: influence of catastrophizing

CONTEXT

Persistent pain is common after surgical treatment of breast cancer, but fairly little is known about the changes in sensory processing that accompany such pain syndromes.

OBJECTIVES

This study used quantitative sensory testing to compare psychophysical responses to standardized noxious stimulation in two groups of women who had previously undergone breast cancer surgery: women with (n=37) and without (n=34) persistent postoperative pain.

METHODS

Participants underwent a single testing session in which responses to a variety of noxious stimuli were assessed.

RESULTS

Findings suggested that women with chronic pain after breast cancer surgery display enhanced temporal summation of mechanical pain, deficits in endogenous pain inhibition, and more intense painful aftersensations compared with those without long-term pain. Some of these group differences were mediated by higher levels of pain catastrophizing in the group of women with persistent pain.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that persistent postoperative pain is associated with alterations in central nervous system pain-modulatory processes. Future treatment studies might benefit from targeting these pain-modulatory systems, and additional studies using functional neuroimaging methods might provide further valuable information about the pathophysiology of long-term postsurgical pain in women treated for breast cancer.

Reproducibility of current perception threshold with the Neurometer(®) vs the Stimpod NMS450 peripheral nerve stimulator in healthy volunteers: an observational study

PURPOSE

Current methods of assessing nerve blocks, such as loss of perception to cold sensation, are subjective at best. Transcutaneous nerve stimulation is an alternative method that has previously been used to measure the current perception threshold (CPT) in individuals with neuropathic conditions, and various devices to measure CPT are commercially available. Nevertheless, the device must provide reproducible results to be used as an objective tool for assessing nerve blocks.

METHODS

We recruited ten healthy volunteers to examine CPT reproducibility using the Neurometer(®) and the Stimpod NMS450 peripheral nerve stimulator. Each subject's CPT was determined for the median (second digit) and ulnar (fifth digit) nerve sensory distributions on both hands - with the Neurometer at 5 Hz, 250 Hz, and 2000 Hz and with the Stimpod at pulse widths of 0.1 msec, 0.3 msec, 0.5 msec, and 1.0 msec, both at 5 Hz and 2 Hz. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were also calculated to assess reproducibility; acceptable ICCs were defined as ≥ 0.4.

RESULTS

The ICC values for the Stimpod ranged from 0.425-0.79, depending on pulse width, digit, and stimulation; ICCs for the Neurometer were 0.615 and 0.735 at 250 and 2,000 Hz, respectively. These values were considered acceptable; however, the Neurometer performed less efficiently at 5 Hz (ICCs for the second and fifth digits were 0.292 and 0.318, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the Stimpod device displayed good to excellent reproducibility in measuring CPT in healthy volunteers. The Neurometer displayed poor reproducibility at low frequency (5 Hz). These results suggest that peripheral nerve stimulators may be potential devices for measuring CPT to assess nerve blocks.

Specific effect of levetiracetam in experimental human pain models*

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam is a new antiepileptic drug. There is only limited experience with levetiracetam in clinical neuropathic pain.

AIM

To test the analgesic effect of levetiracetam in a human experimental pain model in order to obtain preclinical evidence for its potential effect in neuropathic pain.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy volunteers completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with a single oral dose of 1500 mg levetiracetam against placebo. Pain tests included pain detection and tolerance to single electrical stimulation and temporal pain summation threshold to repetitive electrical stimulation (3 Hz) of the sural nerve.

RESULTS

Levetiracetam significantly increased the pain tolerance thresholds (p=0.04), and the pain detection thresholds tended to be increased (p=0.06), whereas levetiracetam had no effect on temporal pain summation thresholds (p=0.30).

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam has an analgesic effect in the electrical sural nerve stimulation pain model, but it did not increase temporal pain summation threshold. Levetiracetam may still be effective in clinical neuropathic pain.

Onset of labor epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and a varying dose of fentanyl: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to investigate the onset of labor epidural analgesia using 0.17% ropivacaine with a varying dose of fentanyl. We hypothesized that the onset of analgesia would be shortened in proportion to an increase in fentanyl dose.

METHODS

Women requesting labor epidural analgesia were enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Each woman was randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 0, 50, 75, or 100 μg with 0.17% ropivacaine 12 mL. The onset and duration of analgesia, the incidence of side effects and patient satisfaction were measured.

RESULTS

Data from 102 women were analyzed. The onset of analgesia (mean ± SD) was shortened with an increasing dose of fentanyl (14.3 ± 5.4, 14.2 ± 6.5, 12.1 ± 5.1, and 8.7 ± 3.8 min with fentanyl 0, 50, 75, or 100 μg, respectively, P=0.001). The duration of analgesia was prolonged with an increasing dose of fentanyl (87.4 ± 20.8, 112.3 ± 19.5, 140.8 ± 18.8, and 143.6 ± 18.6 min with fentanyl 0, 50, 75, or 100 μg, respectively, P<0.001). The incidence of pruritus increased with an increasing dose of fentanyl (P=0.027) but there were no differences for other maternal side effects. There was a significant difference in satisfaction score among groups (P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

The addition of increasing doses of fentanyl to 0.17% ropivacaine contributed to shortened onset as well as prolonged duration of labor epidural analgesia and improved patient satisfaction.

Alterations in pain responses in treated and untreated patients with restless legs syndrome: associations with sleep disruption

OBJECTIVE

There has been recent interest in characterizing potential abnormalities of pain processing in patients with sleep disorders such as Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). The aim of this study was to evaluate psychophysical responses to noxious heat and pressure stimuli in both treated and untreated RLS patients, compared to matched controls.

METHODS

This study is a cross-sectional group comparison of RLS patients with matched controls. A total of 31 patients (15 treated, 16 untreated) with a confirmed diagnosis of RLS were compared to 18 controls with no history of RLS or related sleep disorders.

RESULTS

RLS patients (both treated and untreated) demonstrated reduced pain thresholds and reported greater clinical pain relative to controls. Moreover, RLS patients demonstrated enhanced temporal summation of heat pain (p<.05), which may reflect aberrant central nervous system facilitation of pain transmission. Both treated and untreated RLS patients reported disrupted sleep relative to controls, and mediation analyses suggested that the reduced pain thresholds in RLS were attributable to sleep disturbance. However, the effect of RLS on the magnitude of temporal summation of heat pain was independent of sleep disturbance.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that central nervous system pain processing may be amplified in RLS, perhaps partially as a consequence of sleep disruption. RLS patients, even those whose symptoms are managed pharmacologically, may be at elevated long-term risk for the development or maintenance of persistent pain conditions. Further studies in larger samples could help to improve the prospects for pain management in RLS patients.

Warming the epidural injectate improves first sacral segment block: a randomised double-blind study

This study investigated the effect of local anaesthetic temperature on block of the first sacral segment. Twenty-four patients undergoing lumbar epidural anaesthesia at L2-3 or L3-4 were randomly divided in double-blind fashion into two groups to receive 22 ml of lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000, sodium bicarbonate and fentanyl, at either 21 degrees C (cold group) or 37 degrees C (warm group). The sensory block was assessed by loss of sensation to pinprick and the pain threshold after repeated electrical stimulation at L2, S1 and S3 dermatomes. Motor block was evaluated using the modified Bromage scale. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups. Onset of block at the first sacral segment (S1) was faster in the warm group than in the cold (10 vs. 17.5 minutes, P < 0.001). The pain threshold at S1 was significantly higher in the warm group. We concluded that epidural lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000, sodium bicarbonate and fentanyl injected at 370C hastens SI block within 10 minutes of administration.

Tramadol, fentanyl and sufentanil but not morphine block voltage-operated sodium channels

Lidocaine-like sodium channel blocking drugs provide pain relief either by interrupting impulse conduction in neurons when applied locally in high concentrations or, when given systemically, by suppressing high-frequency ectopic discharges due to preferential drug binding to inactivated channel states. Lidocaine-like actions of opioids have frequently been demonstrated clinically. However, drug binding to resting and inactivated channel conformations has been studied systematically only in the case of meperidine. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of four currently used opioids on heterologously expressed neuronal (NaV(1.2)) voltage-gated sodium channels. Block of sodium currents was studied at hyperpolarized holding potentials and at depolarized potentials inducing either fast- or slow-inactivation. Sufentanil, fentanyl and tramadol but not morphine reversibly suppressed sodium inward currents at high concentrations (half-maximum blocking concentrations (IC50) 49+/-4, 141+/-6 and 103+/-8 microM) when depolarizations were started from hyperpolarized holding potentials. Short depolarizations inducing fast-inactivation and long prepulses inducing slow-inactivation significantly (*p < or = 0.001) increased the blocking potency for these opioids. 15% slow inactivated channels reduced the respective IC50 values to 5+/-3, 12+/-2 and 21+/-2 microM. These results show that: (1) Sufentanil, fentanyl and tramadol block voltage-gated sodium channels with half-maximum inhibitory concentrations similar to the IC50 reported for meperidine. (2) Slow inactivation--a physiological mechanism to suppress ectopic activity in response to slow shifts in membrane potential--increases binding affinity for sufentanil, fentanyl and tramadol. (3) Morphine has no such effects.

Identification of thoracic intervertebral spaces by means of surface anatomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND

Successful thoracic epidural analgesia depends on the sensory blockage of specific dermatomes following appropriate placement of the epidural catheter. This study aimed to ascertain how accurately anaesthesiologists identify thoracic intervertebral spaces, and whether counting from the prominent vertebra is easier than using the iliac crest as an anatomical landmark.

METHODS

Five anaesthesiologists attempted to locate one out of five consecutive intervertebral spaces (Th7-Th8 to Th11-Th12) on patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging of the vertebral column. The intended thoracic interspace and the counting reference point (C7-Th1 or L3-L4) were marked with oil capsules. The body mass index, gender and position of the patient were recorded. The exact capsule positions were determined by a radiologist after the study.

RESULTS

In 92 patients, 26.7% of the thoracic interspaces were correctly identified. The counting reference point was the only variable studied with a significant influence on error. The accuracy increased when the iliac crest was used as an anatomical landmark rather than the prominent vertebra (odds ratio, 0.29). The majority (76.4%) of all the incorrectly placed capsules were found cephalad to the intended level.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that the caudal of two to three possible interspaces should be used when placing an epidural catheter in the thoracic spine. Because of the inaccurate localization of the thoracic intervertebral spaces, documentation should state the site of puncture as being in the upper or lower thoracic spine instead of claiming to be in an exact interspace.

What’s new and novel in obstetric anesthesia? Contributions from the 2003 scientific literature

THE PREGNANT PATIENT: Age; maternal disease; prophylactic antibiotics; gastroesophageal reflux; obesity; starvation; genotyping; coagulopathy; infection; substance abuse; altered drug responses in pregnancy; physiological changes of pregnancy. THE FETUS: Fetal monitoring; intrauterine surgery. THE NEWBORN: Breastfeeding; maternal infection, fever, and neonatal sepsis evaluation. OBSTETRIC COMPLICATIONS: Embolic phenomena; hemorrhage; preeclampsia; preterm delivery. OBSTETRIC MANAGEMENT: External cephalic version and cervical cerclage; elective cesarean delivery; fetal malpresentation; vaginal birth after cesarean delivery; termination of pregnancy. OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA: Analgesia for labor and delivery; anesthesia for cesarean delivery; anesthesia for short obstetric operations; complications of anesthesia. MISCELLANEOUS: Consent; ethics; history; labor support; websites/books/leaflets/journal announcements.

Experimental Human Pain Models: A Review of Standardised Methods for Preclinical Testing of Analgesics

Treatment of pain is one of the major challenges in clinical medicine. However, it is often difficult to evaluate the effect of a treatment, as the many symptoms of the underlying diseases often confound this assessment. Furthermore, as the pain mechanisms in many diseases are poorly understood, the limited successful trial and error approach is most often used in the selection of analgesics. Hence, there is a need for new methods in the characterization and treatment of pain. Human experimental pain models offer the possibility to explore the pain system under controlled settings. The models can also be used to screen the analgesic profiles of drugs targeted to treat pain. This review gives a brief introduction to the methods used to evoke and assess pain in the skin, muscle and viscera. New methods using multimodal stimulation and activation of central pain mechanisms can to a higher degree mimic the clinical situation, and such methods are recommended in the future screening of analgesics. Examples of the use of experimental pain models in the testing of analgesics are given. With these models the therapeutic spectrum may be defined from a differentiated knowledge on the effect of drugs on the pain system. Such information may be used in the future guidelines for trials and clinical use of analgesics.

Investigation of the facilitation of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex evoked by repeated transcutaneous electrical stimulations as a measure of temporal summation in conscious horses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether facilitation of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) can be evoked and quantified as a measure of temporal summation from the distal aspect of the left forelimb and hind limb in standing nonsedated horses via repeated stimulations of various subthreshold intensities and frequencies.

ANIMALS

10 adult horses.

PROCEDURE

Surface electromyographic activity evoked by stimulation of the digital palmar and plantar nerves was recorded from the common digital extensor and cranial tibial muscles. For each horse, the NWR threshold intensity to a single stimulus was determined for the forelimb and hind limb. Repeated stimulations were performed at subthreshold intensities and at frequencies of 2, 5, and 10 Hz. The reflex amplitude was quantified, and the behavioral responses accompanying the stimulations were scored.

RESULTS

Repeated stimulations at subthreshold intensities were able to summate and facilitate the NWR in conscious horses. The reflex facilitation was significantly related to the intensity of the repeated stimuli, whereas no effect of stimulation frequency was found. Reaction scores increased significantly for increasing stimulation intensities.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Temporal summation obtained by repeated stimulations of subthreshold intensity appears to represent a new tool for investigating nociceptive pathophysiologic processes in horses; this experimental model may be useful to examine the mode of action and efficacy of analgesic and anesthetic interventions and possibly to assess sensory dysfunction in clinical settings.

Assessment of regional analgesia in clinical practice and research

Assessment of pain and sensory function during regional analgesia contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the action of drugs and techniques, and provides information on the effectiveness of regional analgesia in daily practice. Sensory tests only partially mimic clinical pain, mainly because they are artificial and reproduce only a part of the complex experience of pain. Therefore information gained by sensory tests should not be uncritically generalized to clinical pain conditions. Studies using experimental pain models are not in competition with studies performed under clinical conditions, but complement them. In order to mirror clinical pain, experimental models ideally stimulate muscles and viscera, induce peripheral and central sensitization, and evoke temporal and spatial summation. These methods are available, but are underused. Test modalities used in clinical practice have limited validity. In recent years almost no research has been performed to develop better test modalities that are suitable for daily practice.