Alternative method for predicting optimal insertion depth of the laryngeal tube in children

Comparing leak pressure of LMA® ProSeal™ versus i-gel® at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The effect of head rotation on supraglottic airway (SGA) oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) has not been well elucidated. The aim of this study was to help clarify which SGA device provides higher OPLP at head-rotated position.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into laryngeal mask airway (LMA®) ProSeal™ and i-gel® groups. The allocated SGA device was inserted under anesthesia. The primary outcome was OPLP, and secondary outcomes were ventilation score, expiratory tidal volume, and maximum pressure under volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with an inspiratory tidal volume of 10 mL·kg-1 ideal body weight and fibreoptic view of the vocal cords at 0°, 30°, and 60° head rotation.

RESULTS

Data from 78 and 76 patients were analyzed in the LMA ProSeal and i-gel groups, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) OPLP of the LMA ProSeal was significantly higher than that of the i-gel at the 60° head-rotated position (LMA ProSeal, 20.4 [6.5] vs i-gel, 16.9 [7.8] cm H2O; difference in means, 3.6; adjusted 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 6.6; adjusted P = 0.02, adjusted for six comparisons). The maximum pressure under VCV at 60° head rotation was significantly higher in the LMA ProSeal group than in the i-gel group. The expiratory tidal volume of the LMA ProSeal did not significantly change with head rotation and was significantly higher than that of the i-gel at 60° head rotation. Ventilation score, fibreoptic view of the vocal cords, and complications were not significantly different between the ProSeal and i-gel groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The LMA ProSeal provides higher OPLP than the i-gel at a 60° head-rotated position under general anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) (JRCT1012210043); registered 18 October 2021.

Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are useful for airway management during positive pressure ventilation in general anesthesia and emergency medicine. In some clinical settings, such as the anesthetic management of awake craniotomy, SGAs are used in the head-rotated position, which is required for exposure of the surgical field, although this position sometimes worsens the efficiency of mechanical ventilation with SGAs. In this study, we investigated and compared the influence of head rotation on oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP) of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™, which are second-generation SGA devices.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into i-gel or LMA Supreme groups. After induction of anesthesia with muscle relaxation, the i-gel or LMA Supreme was inserted according to computerized randomization. The primary outcome was the OPLP at 0°, 30°, and 60° head rotation. The secondary outcomes were the maximum airway pressure and expiratory tidal volume when patients were mechanically ventilated using a volume-controlled ventilation mode with a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg (ideal body weight), ventilation score, and fiber-optic views of vocal cords.

RESULTS

Thirty-four and 36 participants were included in the i-gel and LMA Supreme groups, respectively. The OPLPs of the i-gel and LMA Supreme significantly decreased as the head rotation angle increased (mean difference [95% confidence interval], P value: i-gel; 0° vs 30°: 3.5 [2.2-4.8], P < .001; 30° vs 60°: 2.0 [0.6-3.5], P = .002; 0° vs 60°: 5.5 [3.3-7.8], P < .001, LMA Supreme; 0° vs 30°: 4.1 [2.6-5.5], P < .001; 30° vs 60°: 2.4 [1.1-3.7], P < .001; 0° vs 60°: 6.5 [5.1-8.0], P < .001). There were statistically significant differences in expiratory tidal volume and ventilation score between 0° and 60° in the i-gel group and in ventilation score between 30° and 60° in the LMA Supreme group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 devices in all outcome measures. The incidences of adverse events, such as hoarseness or sore throat, were not significantly different between i-gel and LMA Supreme.

CONCLUSIONS

Head rotation to 30° and 60° reduces OPLP with both i-gel and LMA Supreme. There is no difference in OPLP between i-gel and LMA Supreme in the 3 head rotation positions.

Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Changes in head and neck position may significantly affect the performance of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) by altering the pharyngeal structure.

Purpose

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the effect of changes in head and neck position on performance of SADs.

Data source

Bibliographic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and the Web of Science.

Study eligibility criteria

Prospective studies investigating the effects of head and neck positions on the performance of SADs.

Methods

A random effect model was applied in the all analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of device and the age of patient. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included peak inspiratory pressure, fibreoptic view, and ventilation score (PROSPERO, CRD42017076971).

Results

Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, the oropharyngeal leak pressure significantly increased (mean difference 4.07 cmH₂O; 95% confidence interval 3.30 to 4.84) during neck flexion with adverse effects on ventilation and fibreoptic view. Conversely, the oropharyngeal leak pressure decreased (mean difference −4.05; 95% confidence interval −4.90 to −3.20) during neck extension with no significant effect on ventilation or fibreoptic view. Rotation of the head and neck did not significantly affect SAD performance.

Conclusions

The reduced oropharyngeal leak pressure in the extended neck position was not associated with impaired ventilation except with the air-Q self-pressurizing airway. The flexed neck position significantly worsens ventilation and the alignment between the SAD and glottis despite improving the seal except with the air-Q self-pressurizing airway and LMA Proseal.

The influence of head and neck position on ventilation with the i-gel airway in paralysed, anaesthetised patients

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

We hypothesised that head and neck position could affect the effectiveness of ventilation with the i-gel airway. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the influence of different head and neck positions on oropharyngeal sealing pressures and ventilation scores during ventilation with i-gel.

METHODS

A single, experienced supraglottic airway device user inserted the i-gel in 20 paralysed, anaesthetised patients who were scheduled for oral surgery. Oropharyngeal leak pressures and ventilation scores were measured with the head and neck in the neutral position, flexed, extended or rotated to the right. Ventilation was scored from 0 to 3 based on three criteria (no leakage with an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O, bilateral chest excursion and a square wave capnogram; each item scoring 0 or 1 point).

RESULTS

Compared with the neutral position (25.8 ± 5.2 cmH2O), oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher with flexion (28.5 ± 3.4 cmH2O, P=0.015) and lower with extension (23.0 ± 4.2 cmH2O, P=0.015), but similar with rotation (26.7 ± 5.1 cmH2O, P=0.667). Flexion of the head and neck [2 (1-3)] adversely affected the ventilation score compared with the neutral position [3 (2-3), P=0.004].

CONCLUSION

Effective ventilation with an i-gel can be performed in patients in whom the head and neck is extended or rotated, whereas flexion of the head and neck adversely affects ventilation. Clinically, flexion of the head and neck should be avoided during ventilation with the i-gel.

Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children

BACKGROUND

There are insufficient data as to the influence of the head and neck flexion, extension, and rotation on the ventilation with laryngeal tube suction II (LTS II). The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the head and neck position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure (primary outcome) and ventilation score (secondary outcome) during ventilation with the LTS II in children.

METHODS

We studied 33 children scheduled for elective surgery. Oropharyngeal sealing pressure and ventilation score were measured with the head and neck in a neutral position, flexed, extended and rotated to the right. The ventilation score was scored from 0 to 3 based on three items (no leakage with an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O, bilateral chest excursion, and a square wave capnogram; each item scored 0 or 1 point). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) at a tidal volume of 10 ml x kg(-1) and fiberoptic laryngeal views were also assessed in each position.

RESULTS

Although the sealing pressure was lower in the extended position [22 (8) cmH2O] than that in the neutral position [25 (7) cmH2O], there was no significant leakage during ventilation with a tidal volume of 10 ml x kg(-1). In the neutral, extended and rotated positions, the median ventilation scores were better (3 point respectively) than that with the head and neck flexed (1 point). PIP was decreased with the head and neck extended or rotated but was significantly increased in flexion position. During fibreoptic examination, the vocal cords were more easily seen in extension and right rotation, compared with the neutral position and flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Although oropharyngeal sealing pressure is decreased with the head and neck extended, effective ventilation with LTS II can be performed like in the neutral position or the rotated position. While the sealing pressure is maintained with the head and neck flexed, flexion compromises the ventilation with LTS II in children.