Hydroxyethyl starch in patients with trauma

Perioperative management of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A narrative review

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or motor neuron disease, is an uncommon progressive neurological disorder. Professionals working in the perioperative field may encounter patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis only rarely. The relevant published literature on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is broad in scope, but a contemporary review focused on the perioperative period is absent. This structured narrative review seeks to provide a summary of the contemporary management of patients and then focuses on eliciting if there are perioperative management considerations specific to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that can be optimised. A comprehensive structured narrative literature review, including grey literature searching, indicated worsening ventilatory failure is of prime concern but that patients may present with a broad range of neurological symptoms, and that cardiovascular and cognitive dysfunction specific to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis may exist and be occult. Exacerbation of neuromuscular weakness during the perioperative period is multifaceted and requires the application of a high standard of the core principles of surgical and anaesthetic management of neuromuscular disease. Standard perioperative approaches require rigorous attention and potential exists for significant alteration. There is a potential high risk of postoperative increased morbidity from neurological decline and mortality from pulmonary complications. A meticulous approach to planning preoperative assessment, shared decision-making, intraoperative and postoperative care is required.

Understanding the Harms of HES: A Review of the Evidence to Date

Intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation is one of the most common interventions in intensive care medicine. Despite clear guidelines, the choice of IV fluid is largely dependent on physician preference instead of high-quality evidence of efficacy and safety. This is particularly the case for synthetic colloids, such as hydroxyethyl starch (HES). The use of HES in critical care has been associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal replacement therapy and mortality. In light of this, current guidelines and scientific and regulatory bodies do not recommend the use of HES for fluid therapy in critical illness and caution against its use in many other settings. Despite this, HES products are still debated and used. Awareness of the indications, contraindications, doses, benefits and adverse effects for IV fluids, as well as recommendations from scientific and regulatory bodies, is essential to guarantee patients' safety. Poor awareness of optimal IV fluid therapy has recently been revealed in some countries including Turkey. Therefore, we provide a review of fluids used for resuscitation, discuss safety data and adverse effects of HES, such as increased AKI and mortality, and discuss recent updates from scientific and regulatory bodies in order to raise awareness of fluid therapy. We conclude that given the lack of a clear benefit of HES in any clinical setting and the availability of safer alternatives, such as crystalloids and albumin, HES should be avoided.

Organ Donor Management: Part 1. Toward a Consensus to Guide Anesthesia Services During Donation After Brain Death

Worldwide 715 482 patients have received a lifesaving organ transplant since 1988. During this time, there have been advances in donor management and in the perioperative care of the organ transplant recipient, resulting in marked improvements in long-term survival. Although the number of organs recovered has increased year after year, a greater demand has produced a critical organ shortage. The majority of organs are from deceased donors; however, some are not suitable for transplantation. Some of this loss is due to management of the donor. Improved donor care may increase the number of available organs and help close the existing gap in supply and demand. In order to address this concern, The Organ Donation and Transplantation Alliance, the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, and the Transplant and Critical Care Committees of the American Society of Anesthesiologists have formulated evidence-based guidelines, which include a call for greater involvement and oversight by anesthesiologists and critical care specialists, as well as uniform reporting of data during organ procurement and recovery.

Clinical research in critical care. Difficulties and perspectives

In the field of Intensive Care Medicine, improved survival has resulted from better patient care, the early detection of clinical deterioration, and the prevention of iatrogenic complications, while research on new treatments has been followed by an overwhelming number of disappointments. The origins of these fiascos must be sought in the conjunction of methodological problems - common to other disciplines - and the particularities of critically ill patients. The present article discusses both aspects and suggests some options for progress.

[Limited applications for hydroxyethyl starch : background and alternative concepts]

BACKGROUND

Within the framework of a risk assessment procedure the Committee for Risk Assessment of Pharmacovigilance (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) came to the conclusion that the benefits of hydroxylethyl starch infusion solutions (HES) no longer outweighed the risks and on 14 June 2013 recommended that approval should be suspended. Until the procedure has finally been concluded, which could last several months, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM) has recommended that HES should not be used.

AIM

The aim of this article is to present the data situation in the most objective and compact way and to ultimately give the reader the foundations in order to be able to form a personal opinion. In addition an attempt will be made to describe a concept how infusion therapy can be carried out without using hydroxyethyl starch (HES).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The background to this decision is given based on a review of the literature and the relevance for intensive care, emergency and perioperative medicine is assessed. Furthermore, a concept of infusion therapy without hydroxyethyl starch is formulated also based on the results of current studies.

RESULTS

For infusion regimens without HES it should be noted that gelatin represents a considerable risk for anaphylactic reactions, that transfer of the new variants of Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy BSE) cannot fundamentally be excluded and that some evidence has been found that gelatin can cause kidney injury, probably in a similar way to HES. With respect to the cost-benefit analysis of infusion solutions, blood loss in adults of approximately 1-1.5 l can be substituted by balanced crystalloids (basic therapy 4-5 times compared to the amount of blood lost). For larger blood losses small amounts of hyperoncotic albumin solution (20 %) or alternatively 5 % albumin solution can be used. The 20 % albumin solution seems to have some advantages because it has a higher volume effect (approximately 200 %) and can be more favourable for the fluid balance than 5 % albumin solution. Blood losses greater than 2-3 l normally also require administration of blood products (e.g. fresh frozen plasma FFP and erythrocyte concentrates EC).

CONCLUSIONS

The third generation HES solutions cannot be completely replaced by other colloids and in future crystalloids will more strongly again broadly form the basis for infusion therapy. In this aspect balanced crystalloids have priority with respect to the acid-base equilibrium. The history of HES has impressively shown that infusion therapy must be adjusted on a scientifically founded basis, whether in intensive care medicine, perioperative or emergency medicine. Large prospective studies with clinically relevant endpoints are urgently needed.

Reporting bias in trials of volume resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch

The possibility of renal damage by hydroxyethyl starch has become the focus of intensive dispute based on the findings of published large trials. The aim of this narrative review is to analyze outcome reporting bias in the literature on volume resuscitation, focusing on selective outcome reporting in published randomized and observational trials with “modern” hydroxyethyl starch as therapeutic intervention. Three recent publications claimed to confirm renal safety of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 for indications in severe sepsis, trauma, and critical illness, respectively. Selective outcome reporting was identified in these studies including underreporting of side effects and change of primary study outcomes. In conclusion, selective outcome reporting bias is identified in recent publications of clinical trials on volume resuscitation with HES.

The maintenance and monitoring of perioperative blood volume

The assessment and maintenance of perioperative blood volume is important because fluid therapy is a routine part of intraoperative care. In the past, patients undergoing major surgery were given large amounts of fluids because health-care providers were concerned about preoperative dehydration and intraoperative losses to a third space. In the last decade it has become clear that fluid therapy has to be more individualized. Because the exact determination of blood volume is not clinically possible at every timepoint, there have been different approaches to assess fluid requirements, such as goal-directed protocols guided by invasive and less invasive devices.

This article focuses on laboratory volume determination, capillary dynamics, aspects of different fluids and how to clinically assess and monitor perioperative blood volume.