Long-Term Safety Analysis of a Fibrinogen Concentrate (RiaSTAP®/Haemocomplettan® P)

Fibrinogen concentrate treatment is recommended for acute bleeding episodes in adult and pediatric patients with congenital and acquired fibrinogen deficiency. Previous studies have reported a low risk of thromboembolic events (TEEs) with fibrinogen concentrate use; however, the post-treatment TEE risk remains a concern. A retrospective evaluation of RiaSTAP®/Haemocomplettan® P (CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) post-marketing data was performed (January 1986-June 2022), complemented by a literature review of published studies. Approximately 7.45 million grams of fibrinogen concentrate was administered during the review period. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 337 patients, and 81 (24.0%) of these patients experienced possible TEEs, including 14/81 (17.3%) who experienced fatal outcomes. Risk factors and the administration of other coagulation products existed in most cases, providing alternative explanations. The literature review identified 52 high-ranking studies with fibrinogen concentrate across various clinical areas, including 26 randomized controlled trials. Overall, a higher number of comparative studies showed lower rates of ADRs and/or TEEs in the fibrinogen group versus the comparison group(s) compared with those that reported higher rates or no differences between groups. Post-marketing data and clinical studies demonstrate a low rate of ADRs, including TEEs, with fibrinogen concentrate treatment. These findings suggest a favorable safety profile of fibrinogen concentrate, placing it among the first-line treatments effective for managing intraoperative hemostatic bleeding.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Does Intraoperative Fibrinogen Affect Blood Loss or Transfusion Practice After Aortic Arch Surgery: A Prematurely Ended Randomized Trial

Cardiovascular surgery is often complicated by significant bleeding due to perioperative coagulopathy. The effectiveness of treatment with fibrinogen concentrate to reduce the perioperative blood transfusion rate after thoracic aortic replacement surgery in prior studies has shown conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to investigate if a single dose of intraoperative fibrinogen administration reduced blood loss and allogeneic transfusion rate after elective surgery for thoracic arch aneurysm with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Twenty patients were randomized to fibrinogen concentrate (N = 10) or placebo (N = 10). The recruitment of study patients was prematurely ended due to a low inclusion rate. Perioperative transfusion, 5-minute bleeding mass after study medication and postoperative blood loss were not different between the groups with fibrinogen concentrate or placebo. Due to small volumes of postoperative blood loss and premature study termination, a beneficial effect of fibrinogen concentrate on the number of blood transfusions could not be established. However, treatment with fibrinogen efficiently restored fibrinogen levels and clot strength to preoperative values with a more effective preserved postoperative thrombin generation capacity. This result might serve as a pilot for further multicenter studies to assess the prospective significance of automated and standardized thrombin generation as a routine assay for monitoring perioperative coagulopathy and its impact on short- and long-term operative results.

Fibrinogen and Bleeding in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Review of the Literature

Background: Fibrinogen is a substrate for blood clots formation. In cardiac surgery, a number of different mechanisms lead to a decrease in fibrinogen levels and consequent impaired haemostasis. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are therefore frequently exposed to blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion, which are risk factors associated with morbidity and mortality. Thus, particular efforts in fibrinogen management should be made to decrease bleeding and the need for blood transfusion. Therefore, fibrinogen remains an active focus of investigations from basic science to clinical practice. This review aims to summarise the latest evidence regarding the role of fibrinogen and current practices in fibrinogen management in adult cardiac surgery. Methods: The PubMed database was systematically searched for literature investigating the role and disorders of fibrinogen in cardiac surgery and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures related to fibrinogen deficiency aimed at reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements. Clinical trials and reviews from the last 10 years were included. Results: In total, 146 articles were analysed. Conclusion: The early diagnosis and treatment of fibrinogen deficiency is crucial in maintaining haemostasis in bleeding patients. Further studies are needed to better understand the association between fibrinogen levels, bleeding, and fibrinogen supplementation and their impacts on patient outcomes in different clinical settings.

Use of laboratory testing for prediction of postoperative bleeding volume in cardiovascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Coagulopathy and following massive bleeding are complications of cardiovascular surgery, particularly occurring after procedures requiring prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Reliable and rapid tests for coagulopathy are desirable for guiding transfusion. Measuring multiple coagulation parameters may prove useful. The purpose of this study is to determine the laboratory parameters predicting massive bleeding.

METHODS

In a prospectively collected cohort of 48 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis were measured using automated analyzer and their correlations with bleeding volume were determined.

RESULTS

Operation time was 318 (107-654) min. CPB time was 181 (58-501) min. Bleeding volume during surgery was 2269 (174-10,607) ml. Number of transfusion units during surgery were packed red blood cells 12 (0-30) units, fresh frozen plasma 12 (0-44) units, platelets 20 (0-60) units and intraoperative autologous blood collection 669 (0-4439) ml. Post-surgery activities of coagulation factors II (FII), FV, FVII, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI and FXII were decreased. Values of fibrinogen, antithrombin, α2 plasmin inhibitor (α2PI) and FXIII were also decreased. Values of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) were increased. Values of FII, FIX, FXI and α2PI before surgery were negatively correlated with bleeding volume (FII, r = - 0.506: FIX, r = - 0.504: FXI, r = - 0.580; α2PI, r = - 0.418). Level of FIX after surgery was negatively correlated with bleeding volume (r = - 0.445) and level of TAT after surgery was positively correlated with bleeding volume (r = 0.443).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that several clinical and routine laboratory parameters of coagulation were individually associated with bleeding volume during cardiovascular surgery. Determining the patterns of coagulopathy may potentially help guide transfusion during cardiovascular surgery.

Prophylactic fibrinogen concentrate administration in surgical correction of paediatric craniosynostosis: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical craniosynostosis repair in children is associated with massive blood loss and significant transfusion of blood products. Fibrinogen concentrate is claimed to be useful in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether prophylactic administration of fibrinogen concentrate will reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements during paediatric craniofacial surgery.

DESIGN

Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

SETTING

University medical centre.

PATIENTS

A total of 114 infants and children up to 25 months of age (median age 10 months).

INTERVENTION

Surgical craniosynostosis repair by calvarial remodelling was performed in each patient. Patients were randomised to receive prophylactic fibrinogen concentrate (Haemocomplettan P) at a mean dose of 79 mg kg-1 body weight or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was the volume of transfused blood products. Secondary outcomes were peri-operative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of stay in the paediatric ICU, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and adverse effects of fibrinogen concentrate infusion.

RESULTS

No significant differences (P < 0.05) were found in the volume of transfused blood products (median 29 ml kg-1 body weight vs. 29 ml kg-1 body weight), intra-operative estimated blood loss (45 vs. 46 ml kg-1), calculated blood loss (57 vs. 53 ml kg-1), or postoperative blood loss (24 vs. 24 ml kg-1) between the intervention and placebo groups. In addition, duration of surgery, length of stay in the paediatric ICU, hospital stay and complications were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

During surgical craniosynostosis repair in young children, prophylactic administration of high-dose fibrinogen concentrate did not reduce the amount of transfused blood products or decrease peri-operative blood loss.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

National Trial Register (NTR2975) and EudraCT (2011-002287-24).

Pro-Con Debate: Fibrinogen Concentrate or Cryoprecipitate for Treatment of Acquired Hypofibrinogenemia in Cardiac Surgical Patients

Cryoprecipitate has been the gold standard for treating acquired hypofibrinogenemia in cardiac surgery for nearly 50 years. More recently, fibrinogen concentrate has been used off-label in the United States and is the standard in European countries and Canada to treat the acquired hypofibrinogenemia during cardiac surgery. Fibrinogen concentrate has multiple potential advantages including rapid reconstitution, greater dose predictability, viral inactivation during processing, and reduced transfusion-related adverse events. However, because fibrinogen concentrate lacks the other components contained in the cryoprecipitate, it may not be the "ideal" product for replacing fibrinogen in all cardiac surgical patients, particularly those with longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration. In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate to treat acquired hypofibrinogenemia in cardiac surgical patients.

The role of exogenous Fibrinogen in cardiac surgery: stop bleeding or induce cardiovascular disease

The surgical treatment contributes to broad variety of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Due to many involved factors in preoperative bleeding, it is almost difficult to perform better Haemostatic approach. Fibrinogen is a major blood glycoprotein and a coagulation factor which decreases postoperative bleeding. It has a potential role in platelet activation and bleeding inhibition; it may reflect the inflammatory responses and be related to the endothelial dysfunction. Fibrinogen can act as a pro-inflammatory element via increasing some inflammatory markers including IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), monocyte chemo attractant protein (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 (MIP-1a and b), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-1 and MMP-9) and Toll-like Receptors (TLRs); through activation of these factors, fibrinogen may induce some inflammatory mechanisms such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathways. It may cause endothelial dysfunction by increasing P and E-selection, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) levels which activate MAPK and NF-κB pathways. This factor is also associated with increased exocytosed von Willebrand factor (vWF) as well as activation of Rho-GTPase mechanism. All of these data demonstrate the dual role of fibrinogen in cardiac surgeries, bleeding inhibition and CVD. Therefore, identifying the CVD factors is helpful for designing preventive strategies and alternative drugs.

Preoperative plasma fibrinogen level and transfusion in cardiac surgery: a biphasic correlation

Coagulopathic bleeding is a serious complication of cardiac surgery. A very low preoperative plasma fibrinogen level (PFL) has been previously described as a risk factor for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the perioperative setting. Nevertheless, contradictory results have been published concerning preoperative fibrinogen infusion to decrease RBC transfusion. These results highlight the need for a better description of the relation between preoperative PFL and RBC transfusion. In this single-centre retrospective study, we showed that both high and low PFLs are associated with an increase in RBC transfusion. A pro-inflammatory preoperative status could be involved in the association between high PFL and the increase in RBC transfusion. This non-linear relation between PFL and RBC transfusion could explain the difficulty of decreasing postoperative bleeding using only an algorithm aimed at increasing preoperative PFL.

Current perspective on fibrinogen concentrate in critical bleeding

INTRODUCTION

. Massive hemorrhage continues to be a treatable cause of death. Its management varies from prefixed ratio-driven administration of blood components to goal-directed therapy based on point-of-care testing and administration of coagulation factor concentrates.

AREAS COVERED

. We review the current role of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the management of massive hemorrhage, either administered without coagulation testing in life-threatening hemorrhage, or within an algorithm based on viscoelastic hemostatic assays and plasma fibrinogen level. We identified relevant guidelines, meta-analyzes, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that included indications, dosage, and adverse effects of FC, especially thromboembolic events.

EXPERT OPINION

. Moderate- to high-grade evidence supports the use of FC for the treatment of severe hemorrhage in trauma and cardiac surgery; a lower grade of evidence is available for its use in postpartum hemorrhage and end-stage liver disease. Pre-emptive FC administration in non-bleeding patients is not recommended. FC should be administered early, in a goal-directed manner, guided by early amplitude of clot firmness parameters (A5- or A10-FIBTEM) or hypofibrinogenemia. Further investigation is required into the early use of FC, as well as its potential advantages over cryoprecipitate, and whether or not its administration at high doses leads to a greater risk of adverse events.

A randomised controlled trial of fibrinogen concentrate during scoliosis surgery

Bleeding and blood transfusion are common after scoliosis surgery. Fibrinogen is essential for blood clot formation and depletes quickly during haemorrhage. We randomly allocated 102 children 12-18 years old having surgery for idiopathic scoliosis, 51 to intra-operative fibrinogen concentrate 30 mg.kg^-1 (maximum 2 g) and 51 to saline placebo. Fibrinogen reduced peri-operative blood loss by a median (95%CI) volume of 155 (5-320) ml, from a median (IQR [range]) of 1035 (818-1420 [400-3030]) ml to 885 (755-1155 [270-2645]) ml, p = 0.04. Seven and four children received allogeneic red blood cell transfusion after fibrinogen and placebo, respectively, p = 0.34. There were no side-effects.

The prophylactic use of fibrinogen concentrate in high-risk cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Perioperative blood loss is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery. Plasma fibrinogen levels play an essential role in hemostasis and deplete quickly during hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to determine whether prophylactic fibrinogen concentrate administration lowers overall blood product transfusion requirements in high-risk cardiac surgery in patients with low fibrinogen plasma levels.

METHODS

The study was performed in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded design. The investigation included 62 patients undergoing elective, high-risk cardiac surgery. After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and reversal of heparin patients received either fibrinogen concentrate or placebo. The primary outcome variable was overall blood product usage 24 hours after intervention.

RESULTS

The fibrinogen group received numerically fewer total units of blood products than the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically or clinically significant (for groups n = 27; n = 29 and 19 vs 37 units, respectively, P = .908). The overall transfusion rate in both groups was significantly lower than the institutional average suggested (fibrinogen group 26%, placebo group 28%). The fibrinogen group showed significantly higher fibrinogen levels (2.38 vs 1.83 g/L (end of surgery), P < .001; 3.33 vs 2.68 g/L (12 hours after intervention), P = .003) and improved viscoelastic coagulation parameters (FIBTEM MCF, 27 vs 23 mm, P = .022).

CONCLUSION

This randomized, controlled trial demonstrates that point-of-care guided and prophylactic treatment with fibrinogen concentrate does not reduce transfusion of blood products in a setting of unexpectedly low transfusion rate as tested in this cohort, but may improve coagulation parameters in the setting of high-risk cardiac surgery.

A Low-dose human fibrinogen is not effective in decreasing postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements during cardiac surgery in case of concomitant clinical bleeding and low FIBTEM values: A retrospective matched study

Background

Studies evaluating the hemostatic effects of fibrinogen administration in cardiac surgery are not conclusive.

Aims

We investigated whether the use of a low-dose human fibrinogen in case of clinical bleeding after protamine administration and concomitant low FIBTEM values is effective in reducing postoperative bleeding. Secondary end-point was to investigate the consumption of allogeneic blood products.

Setting and Design

This was a retrospective matched study conducted at university hospital.

Materials and Methods

Among 2257 patients undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary (CPB) bypass, 73 patients received a median dose of 1 g human fibrinogen (ROTEM-Fibri group). This group was matched with 73 patients who had not received human fibrinogen (control group) among 390 patients having undergone surgery at the moment FIBTEM analysis was unavailable.

Statistical Analysis

Matching was performed for the type and the presence of redo surgery. McNemar and Wilcoxon paired tests were used to respectively compare the categorical and quantitative variables.

Results

The CPB bypass time was significantly higher in the ROTEM-Fibri group (P = 0.006). This group showed significantly higher bleeding in the first 12 and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001) and required significantly more transfusion of blood products (P < 0.001) and surgical revision (P = 0.007) when compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in the number of thromboembolic complications.

Conclusions

These results show that the administration of 1 g of fibrinogen based on low-FIBTEM values and clinical bleeding after protamine administration does not stop bleeding and the need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products.

Effects of fibrinogen and platelet transfusion on coagulation and platelet function in bleeding cardiac surgery patients

BACKGROUND

Excessive bleeding is a significant problem in cardiac surgery. Fibrinogen and platelet concentrate transfusion are used clinically to improve haemostasis and reduce bleeding but little is known about their functional effects on coagulation and platelet function in patients with ongoing bleeding.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with ongoing bleeding after cardiac surgery were included in an observational study. Patients received either fibrinogen concentrate (n = 16), platelet concentrate (n = 12), or both fibrinogen and platelets (n = 14), median doses 2 g fibrinogen and 2 units platelets given at one occasion. Blood samples were collected before and after transfusion. Coagulation (clotting time and clot stability) was analysed with rotational thromboelastometry, and platelet function with impedance aggregometry. In addition, platelet count and fibrinogen concentration was measured. Chest drain output was measured before and after the transfusion.

RESULTS

Fibrinogen infusion resulted in an increase in fibrinogen concentration and clot stability (P = 0.001), but had no effect on platelet aggregation. Platelet transfusion did not significantly affect coagulation, but improved arachidonic acid- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation (P = 0.017 and 0.034 respectively) and increased platelet count. Combined fibrinogen and platelet transfusion shortened clotting time (P = 0.005) and increased clot stability (P = 0.001), and improved arachidonic acid- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation (P = 0.004 and 0.016 respectively), and increased fibrinogen concentration and platelet count. The median bleeding volume was 150 (25th-75th percentile 70-240) mL/h before, and 60 (40-110) mL/h after transfusion of fibrinogen and/or platelet concentrate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate improved coagulation and platelet function following fibrinogen and platelet transfusion in patients bleeding after cardiac surgery.

Pro-coagulant haemostatic factors for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in people without haemophilia

BACKGROUND

Some hospital patients may be at risk of or may present with major bleeding. Abnormalities of clotting (coagulation) are often recorded in these people, and the traditional management has been with transfusions of blood components, either to prevent bleeding (prophylactic) or to treat bleeding (therapeutic). There is growing interest in the use of targeted therapies with specific pro-coagulant haemostatic (causing bleeding to stop and to keep blood within a damaged blood vessel) factor concentrates in place of plasma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects and safety of pro-coagulant haemostatic factors and factor concentrates in the prevention and treatment of bleeding in people without haemophilia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2018, issue 3), MEDLINE (from 1948), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1938), PubMed (publications in process to 18 April 2018), PROSPERO, Transfusion Evidence Library (from 1950), LILACS (from 1980), IndMED (from 1985), KoreaMed (from 1934), Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index (from 1990) and ongoing trial databases to 18 April 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that compared intravenous administration of a pro-coagulant haemostatic factor concentrate, either with placebo, current best or standard treatment, or another pro-coagulant haemostatic factor concentrate for prevention or treatment of bleeding. There was no restriction on the types of participants. We excluded studies of desmopressin, tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid and use of pro-coagulant haemostatic factors for vitamin K over-anticoagulation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methodological procedures.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 31 RCTs with 2392 participants and 22 ongoing trials. There were 13 therapeutic RCTs that randomised 1057 participants (range from 20 to 249 participants) and 18 prophylactic trials that randomised 1335 participants (range 20 to 479 participants). The pro-coagulant haemostatic factor concentrate was fibrinogen in 23 trials, Factor XIII in seven trials and pro-thrombin complex concentrates (PCC) in one trial.Seventeen trials had industrial funding or support, eight studies either did not declare their funding or were unclear about their source of funding and six studies declared non-industrial funding sources.Certainty in the evidence and included study biasOur certainty in the evidence, using GRADE criteria, ranged from very low to high across all outcomes. We assessed most outcomes as being of low certainty. Risks of bias were a concern in many of the RCTs; randomisation methodology was unclear in 15 RCTs, with allocation concealment unclear in 14 RCTs and at high risk of bias in five RCTs. The blinding status of outcome assessors was unclear in 13 RCTs and at high risk of bias in five RCTs, although most outcomes in these trials were objective and not prone to observer bias. Study personnel were often unblinded or insufficient information was available to assess their level of blinding (five RCTs were at unclear risk and seven at high risk of bias).Primary outcomesAll-cause mortality was reported by 21 RCTs, arterial thromboembolic events by 22 RCTs, and venous thromboembolic events by 21 RCTs.Fibrinogen concentrate: prophylactic trials with inactive comparator (nine RCTs)The trials had heterogeneous clinical settings and outcome time points, so we did not pool the data. Compared to placebo, there was no evidence that prophylactic fibrinogen concentrate reduced all-cause mortality (4 RCTs; 248 participants). Compared to inactive comparators there was low- to moderate-quality evidence that prophylactic fibrinogen concentrate did not increase the risk of arterial or venous thromboembolic complications (7 RCTs; 398 participants).Fibrinogen concentrate: prophylactic trials with active comparator (two RCTs)There was no mortality or incidence of thromboembolic events in these two RCTs (with 57 participants).Fibrinogen concentrate: therapeutic trials with inactive comparator (eight RCTs)The trials had heterogeneous surgical settings and outcome time points, so we pooled data for subgroups only. Compared to an inactive comparator, there was no evidence (quality ranging from low to high) that fibrinogen concentrate reduced all-cause mortality in actively bleeding participants (7 RCTs; 724 participants). Compared to inactive comparators there was no evidence that the use of fibrinogen concentrate in active bleeding increased arterial (7 RCTs; 607 participants) or venous (6 RCTs; 562 participants) thromboembolic events.Fibrinogen concentrate: therapeutic trials with active comparator (four RCTs)We did not pool the outcome data, as they were not measured at comparable time points. Compared to other active pro-coagulant agents, there was no evidence (very low to moderate quality) that fibrinogen concentrate reduced all-cause mortality in actively bleeding participants (4 RCTs; 220 participants). There was no evidence that fibrinogen concentrate increased the risk of arterial (3 RCTs; 126 participants) or venous (4 RCTs; 220 participants) thromboembolic events.FactorXIII: Prophylactic trials with inactive comparator (six trials)The trials were heterogeneous in their surgical settings and time points for outcome analysis, so we pooled data for subgroups only. Compared to an inactive comparator, there was no evidence that prophylactic Factor XIII reduced all-cause mortality (5 RCTs; 414 participants). There was no evidence (very low to low quality) of a difference in the arterial or venous event rate between Factor XIII and inactive comparators (4 trials; 354 participants).FactorXIII: therapeutic trials with inactive comparator (one trial)There was no mortality or incidence of thromboembolic events in this trial.Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC): prophylactic trials with inactive comparator (one trial)There was no evidence (moderate quality) that PCC reduced all-cause mortality (1 trial; 78 participants). No thromboembolic complications were reported in this trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The paucity of good-quality comparable evidence precludes the drawing of conclusions for clinical practice. Further research is required to determine the risk-to-benefit ratio of these interventions. The sample sizes of future RCTs would need to be greatly increased to detect a reduction in mortality or thromboembolic events between treatment arms. To improve consistency in outcome reporting, the development of core outcome sets is essential and may help address a number of the limitations identified in this review.

Short-term recovery pattern of plasma fibrinogen after cardiac surgery: A prospective observational study

Low plasma fibrinogen level is common after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Current substitution practice with fibrinogen concentrate generally follows a single measurement and cut-off values from the literature, whereas early postoperative endogenous fibrinogen kinetics is incompletely described and widely disregarded. The aim of this study was to determine the short-term recovery pattern of plasma fibrinogen after CPB weaning. Our hypothesis was that in the absence of surgical bleeding, CPB-induced hypofibrinogenemia would resolve spontaneously and predictably within a few hours. In a prospective, observational study of 26 patients undergoing conventional CPB (cCPB) or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC), Clauss fibrinogen level (C-FIB) was determined at 10 closely spaced time points after protamine administration. Primary endpoint was the time to recovery of post-CPB fibrinogen levels to ≥1.5 g/L. C-FIB reached its nadir after protamine administration corresponding to 62 ± 5% (mean ± SD) of the baseline level after cCPB and 68 ± 7% after MiECC (p = 0.027 vs. cCPB). C-FIB recovered spontaneously at a nearly constant rate of approximately 0.08 g/L per hour. In all patients, C-FIB was ≥1.5 g/L at 4 hours and ≥2.0 g/L at 13 hours after CPB weaning. Following cardiac surgery with CPB and in the absence of surgical bleeding, spontaneous recovery of normal endogenous fibrinogen levels can be expected at a rate of 0.08 g/L per hour. Administration of fibrinogen concentrate triggered solely by a single-point measurement of low plasma fibrinogen some time after CPB is not justified.

The effect of fibrinogen concentrate on perioperative bleeding in transurethral resection of the prostate: a double-blind placebo-controlled and randomized study

Essentials Perioperative bleeding during prostate surgery is still a common morbidity. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications contribute to the risk of hemorrhage and prolonged hospital stay. Multiple pharmacological agents have been proposed, but none of them have been widely accepted. It is crucial to find a safe and effective modality to reduce hemorrhage.

SUMMARY

Background Hemorrhage during transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) has always been a concern. Several studies have shown preoperative administration of fibrinogen concentrate to have promising results in reducing hemorrhage in cardiac surgery. Objectives To investigate the hemostatic effect of fibrinogen concentrate administration on reducing the amount of bleeding during TUR-P in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods Sixty men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, who were chosen to undergo TUR-P, entered this prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: treatment (n = 31) and placebo (n = 29). They received an infusion of 2 g of fibrinogen concentrate (treatment group) or normal saline (placebo group) before surgery. Data regarding the amount of bleeding, the operation and complications were recorded and analyzed. Results No difference was observed in bleeding between the fibrinogen and placebo groups during (521 mL versus 557 mL, respectively) and after (291 mL versus 341 mL, respectively) surgery. This lack of difference was also seen in operation time (43 min versus 42 min), irrigating fluid volume used during (17 L versus 19 L) and after (29 L versus 28 L) surgery, and resected adenoma volume (19 g versus 19 g). The mean blood pressure was also similar in both groups as a confounding factor for the amount of bleeding. Conclusion Preoperative administration of fibrinogen concentrate had no significant influence on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding in TUR-P surgery.

Noteworthy Literature Published in 2016 for Cardiothoracic Critical Care

In 2016, demand for the presence of cardiothoracic anesthesiologists outside of the cardiac operating rooms continues to expand. This article is the second in this annual series to review relevant contributions in postoperative cardiac critical care that may impact the cardiac anesthesiologist. We explore the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), management of postoperative atrial fibrillation, coagulopathy, respiratory failure, and role of quality in cardiac surgery.