1
|
Holm MB, Lenggenhager D, Detlefsen S, Sántha P, Verbeke CS. Identification of tumour regression in neoadjuvantly treated pancreatic cancer is based on divergent and nonspecific criteria. Histopathology 2024. [PMID: 38571446 DOI: 10.1111/his.15190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Following the increased use of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer, grading of tumour regression (TR) has become part of routine diagnostics. However, it suffers from marked interobserver variation, which is mainly ascribed to the subjectivity of the defining criteria of the categories in TR grading systems. We hypothesized that a further cause for the interobserver variation is the use of divergent and nonspecific morphological criteria to identify tumour regression. METHODS AND RESULTS Twenty treatment-naïve pancreatic cancers and 20 pancreatic cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed by three experienced pancreatic pathologists who, blinded for treatment status, categorized each tumour as treatment-naïve or neoadjuvantly treated, and annotated all tissue areas they considered showing tumour regression. Only 50%-65% of the cases were categorized correctly, and the annotated tissue areas were highly discrepant (only 3%-41% overlap). When the prevalence of various morphological features deemed to indicate TR was compared between treatment-naïve and neoadjuvantly treated tumours, only one pattern, characterized by reduced cancer cell density and prominent stroma affecting a large area of the tumour bed, occurred significantly more frequently, but not exclusively, in the neoadjuvantly treated group. Finally, stromal features, both morphological and biological, were investigated as possible markers for tumour regression, but failed to distinguish TR from native tumour stroma. CONCLUSION There is considerable divergence in opinion between pathologists when it comes to the identification of tumour regression. Reliable identification of TR is only possible if it is extensive, while lesser degrees of treatment effect cannot be recognized with certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Blomhoff Holm
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniela Lenggenhager
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Petra Sántha
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Caroline Sophie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park Y, Han YB, Kim J, Kang M, Lee B, Ahn ES, Han S, Kim H, Na HY, Han HS, Yoon YS. Microscopic tumor mapping of post-neoadjuvant therapy pancreatic cancer specimens to predict post-surgical recurrence: A prospective cohort study. Pancreatology 2024:S1424-3903(24)00074-7. [PMID: 38556428 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although various pathological grading systems are available for evaluating the response of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), their prognostic value has not been thoroughly validated. This study examined whether microscopic tumor mapping of post-NAT specimens could predict tumor recurrence. METHODS This prospective study enrolled 52 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT for PDAC between 2019 and 2021. Microscopic mapping was performed to identify residual tumor loci within the tumor bed using 4 mm2 pixels. Patients were divided into small extent (SE; n = 26) and large extent (LE; n = 26) groups using a cutoff value of 226 mm2. The diagnostic performance for predicting tumor recurrence was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were normalised after NAT in more patients in the SE group (SE 21 [80.8%] vs. LE 13 [50.0%]; P = 0.041). Tumor size (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), positive lymph node yield (P = 0.024), and perineural invasion rate (P = 0.018) were significantly greater in the LE group. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly lower in the LE group (SE 83.3% vs. LE 50.0%, P = 0.004). The area under the ROC curve for mapping extent was 0.743, which was greater than that of the other tumor response scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS Microscopic tumor mapping of the residual tumor in post-NAT specimens is a significant predictor of post-surgical recurrence, and offers better prognostic performance than the current grading systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeshong Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Bi Han
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinju Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - MeeYoung Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Sung Ahn
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Saemi Han
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee-Young Na
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ, Wolfgang CL, van Tienhoven G, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Wilmink JW, Del Chiaro M, Katz MHG, Hackert T, Besselink MG. Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 21:101-124. [PMID: 38036745 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rutger T Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zaharia C, Søreide K. Call for better response evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2023; 110:294-296. [PMID: 36630676 PMCID: PMC10364493 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Zaharia
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Gastrointestinal and Translational Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Gastrointestinal and Translational Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Jong TL, Koopman D, van der Worp CAJ, Stevens H, Vuijk FA, Vahrmeijer AL, Mieog JSD, de Groot JWB, Meijssen MAC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Lioe-Fee DGO, Jager PL, Patijn GA. Added value of digital FDG-PET/CT in disease staging and restaging in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol 2023; 47:101909. [PMID: 36739788 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We studied the added value of digital FDG-PET/CT in disease staging and restaging compared to the standard work-up with contrast enhanced CT (ceCT) and CA19-9 in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received neo-adjuvant therapy. Primary endpoints were tumor response compared to ceCT and CA19.9 as well as the ability to detect distant metastatic disease. METHODS 35 patients were included in this dual-center prospective study. FDG-PET using digital photon counting technology combined with CT scans were acquired before (T1) and after neo-adjuvant therapy (T2). Patients were staged and restaged based on standard protocol with ceCT and CA 19.9, while all PET/CT scans were stored securely and not included in clinical decision making. After the pancreatic resection, an expert team retrospectively assessed the CT tumor diameter, CA19-9, tumor FDG-uptake, and appearance of metastatic disease of all patients for both time points. RESULTS CA19-9 levels, CT tumor diameter, and tumor FDG-uptake on PET significantly decreased from T1 to T2 (p = 0.017, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001). The change in FDG-uptake values showed a strong positive correlation with the change in CT tumor diameter and change in CA19-9 (R = 0.75 and R = 0.73, respectively). In addition, small-volume liver lesions were detected on digital PET/CT in 5/35 patients (14%), 4 of which were pathology confirmed at laparotomy. Only one of these five cases was detected on baseline staging ceCT (3%). CONCLUSION We found that adding digital PET/CT strengthens restaging after neo-adjuvant therapy based on the observed strong correlation with ceCT tumor diameter and Ca19.9. Also, digital PET/CT was found to detect occult metastatic disease not visualized on ceCT, that would have resulted in altered disease staging and therapeutic strategy in a substantial proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonke L de Jong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle Koopman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Henk Stevens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Floris A Vuijk
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten A C Meijssen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - de Geus-Oei Lioe-Fee
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter L Jager
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A review of the evidence. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2022; 67:102305. [PMID: 36223686 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy that carries a poor prognosis because the majority of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. However, even patients who are fortunate enough to present with resectable disease are often plagued by high recurrence rates. While adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence after surgery, post operative complications and poor performance status after surgery prevent up to 50% of patients from receiving it. Given the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with borderline resectable disease, it is understandable that neoadjuvant therapy has been steadily increasing in patients with resectable cancers as well. In this review paper, we highlight the rational and existing evidence of using neoadjuvant therapy in all patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
7
|
Choi JH, Kim MK, Lee SH, Park JW, Park N, Cho IR, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Jang JY, Kwon W, Kim H, Paik WH. Proper adjuvant therapy in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who had received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Front Oncol 2022; 12:945829. [PMID: 36226066 PMCID: PMC9549517 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The complete resection rate of pancreatic cancer has increased because of the advent of efficacious first-line treatments for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Still, strategies regarding adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment remain to be established. Methods Data on 144 patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX between January 2013 and April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Among the study patients, 113 patients (78.5%) were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and 31 patients (21.5%) were diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Seventy-five patients (52.1%) received radiotherapy before surgery. After radical resection, 84 patients (58.3%) received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy and 60 patients (41.7%) received non-5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil-based regimen [hazard ratio (HR), 0.43 (95% CI, 0.21–0.87); p = 0.019], preoperative assessment as locally advanced pancreatic cancer [HR, 2.87 (95% CI, 1.08–7.64); p = 0.035], positive resection margin [HR, 3.91 (95% CI, 1.71–8.94); p = 0.001], and presence of pathologic lymph node involvement [HR, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.00–5.33), p = 0.050] were associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil-based regimen [HR, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.15–0.84); p = 0.018], positive resection margin [HR, 4.14 (95% CI, 1.75–9.78); p = 0.001], presence of pathologic lymph node involvement [HR, 3.36 (95% CI, 1.23–9.15); p = 0.018], poor differentiation [HR, 5.69 (95% CI, 1.76–18.36); p = 0.004], and dose reduction during adjuvant therapy [HR, 1.78 (95% CI, 1.24–24.37); p = 0.025] were associated with decreased overall survival. Conclusions The 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy seems to be the proper adjuvant therapy for patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Kyu Kim
- The Armed Forces Medical Command, Ministry of National Defense, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Woo Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Namyoung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Rae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Kon Ryu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong-Tae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- *Correspondence: Woo Hyun Paik,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schuurmans M, Alves N, Vendittelli P, Huisman H, Hermans J. Setting the Research Agenda for Clinical Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143498. [PMID: 35884559 PMCID: PMC9316850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, associated with a 98% loss of life expectancy and a 30% increase in disability-adjusted life years. Image-based artificial intelligence (AI) can help improve outcomes for PDAC given that current clinical guidelines are non-uniform and lack evidence-based consensus. However, research on image-based AI for PDAC is too scattered and lacking in sufficient quality to be incorporated into clinical workflows. In this review, an international, multi-disciplinary team of the world’s leading experts in pancreatic cancer breaks down the patient pathway and pinpoints the current clinical touchpoints in each stage. The available PDAC imaging AI literature addressing each pathway stage is then rigorously analyzed, and current performance and pitfalls are identified in a comprehensive overview. Finally, the future research agenda for clinically relevant, image-driven AI in PDAC is proposed. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), estimated to become the second leading cause of cancer deaths in western societies by 2030, was flagged as a neglected cancer by the European Commission and the United States Congress. Due to lack of investment in research and development, combined with a complex and aggressive tumour biology, PDAC overall survival has not significantly improved the past decades. Cross-sectional imaging and histopathology play a crucial role throughout the patient pathway. However, current clinical guidelines for diagnostic workup, patient stratification, treatment response assessment, and follow-up are non-uniform and lack evidence-based consensus. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can leverage multimodal data to improve patient outcomes, but PDAC AI research is too scattered and lacking in quality to be incorporated into clinical workflows. This review describes the patient pathway and derives touchpoints for image-based AI research in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional expert panel. The literature exploring AI to address these touchpoints is thoroughly retrieved and analysed to identify the existing trends and knowledge gaps. The results show absence of multi-institutional, well-curated datasets, an essential building block for robust AI applications. Furthermore, most research is unimodal, does not use state-of-the-art AI techniques, and lacks reliable ground truth. Based on this, the future research agenda for clinically relevant, image-driven AI in PDAC is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Schuurmans
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (N.A.)
| | - Natália Alves
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (N.A.)
| | - Pierpaolo Vendittelli
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
| | - Henkjan Huisman
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
| | - John Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Claus A, Sweeney A, Sankepalle DM, Li B, Wong D, Xavierselvan M, Mallidi S. 3D Ultrasound-Guided Photoacoustic Imaging to Monitor the Effects of Suboptimal Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Pancreatic Tumors. Front Oncol 2022; 12:915319. [PMID: 35875138 PMCID: PMC9300843 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.915319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a disease with an incredibly poor survival rate. As only about 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection, neoadjuvant treatments that can relieve symptoms and shrink tumors for surgical resection become critical. Many forms of treatments rely on increased vulnerability of cancerous cells, but tumors or regions within the tumors that may be hypoxic could be drug resistant. Particularly for neoadjuvant therapies such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors utilized to shrink tumors, it is critical to monitor changes in vascular function and hypoxia to predict treatment efficacy. Current clinical imaging modalities used to obtain structural and functional information regarding hypoxia or oxygen saturation (StO2) do not provide sufficient depth penetration or require the use of exogenous contrast agents. Recently, ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging (US-PAI) has garnered significant popularity, as it can noninvasively provide multiparametric information on tumor vasculature and function without the need for contrast agents. Here, we built upon existing literature on US-PAI and demonstrate the importance of changes in StO2 values to predict treatment response, particularly tumor growth rate, when the outcomes are suboptimal. Specifically, we image xenograft mouse models of pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with suboptimal doses of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib. We utilize the US-PAI data to develop a multivariate regression model that demonstrates that a therapy-induced reduction in tumor growth rate can be predicted with 100% positive predictive power and a moderate (58.33%) negative predictive power when a combination of pretreatment tumor volume and changes in StO2 values pretreatment and immediately posttreatment was employed. Overall, our study indicates that US-PAI has the potential to provide label-free surrogate imaging biomarkers that can predict tumor growth rate in suboptimal therapy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Redegalli M, Schiavo Lena M, Cangi MG, Smart CE, Mori M, Fiorino C, Arcidiacono PG, Balzano G, Falconi M, Reni M, Doglioni C. Proposal for a New Pathologic Prognostic Index After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PINC). Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3492-3502. [PMID: 35230580 PMCID: PMC9072515 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11413-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited information is available on the relevant prognostic variables after surgery for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). NACT is known to induce a spectrum of histological changes in PDAC. Different grading regression systems are currently available; unfortunately, they lack precision and accuracy. We aimed to identify a new quantitative prognostic index based on tumor morphology. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population was composed of 69 patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC treated with preoperative NACT (neoadjuvant group) and 36 patients submitted to upfront surgery (upfront-surgery group). A comprehensive histological assessment on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections evaluated 20 morphological parameters. The association between patient survival and morphological variables was evaluated to generate a prognostic index. RESULTS The distribution of morphological parameters evaluated was significantly different between upfront-surgery and neoadjuvant groups, demonstrating the effect of NACT on tumor morphology. On multivariate analysis for patients that received NACT, the predictors of shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were perineural invasion and lymph node ratio. Conversely, high stroma to neoplasia ratio predicted longer OS and DFS. These variables were combined to generate a semiquantitative prognostic index based on both OS and DFS, which significantly distinguished patients with poor outcomes from those with a good outcome. Bootstrap analysis confirmed the reproducibility of the model. CONCLUSIONS The pathologic prognostic index proposed is mostly quantitative in nature, easy to use, and may represent a reliable tumor regression grading system to predict patient outcomes after NACT followed by surgery for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Redegalli
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - M Schiavo Lena
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - M G Cangi
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - C E Smart
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - M Mori
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - C Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - P G Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - G Balzano
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - M Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - M Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, Milan, Italy.
| | - C Doglioni
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Labori KJ. Short-Course or Total Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer - Current Status and Future Perspectives. Front Surg 2022; 9:839339. [PMID: 35548190 PMCID: PMC9082635 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.839339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy improves overall survival compared with a surgery-first approach in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Evidence of higher quality is required to determine whether neoadjuvant therapy has potential benefits and improves survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored short-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SNT), but total neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TNT) is now the experimental arm of ongoing RCTs. This article reviews the current status of SNT and TNT in RPC and BRPC, and provides perspectives of future challenges and research directions in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dopico PJ, Le MCN, Burgess B, Yang Z, Zhao Y, Wang Y, George TJ, Fan ZH. Longitudinal Study of Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. BIOSENSORS 2022; 12:206. [PMID: 35448266 PMCID: PMC9028387 DOI: 10.3390/bios12040206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
While patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) show improved survival compared to their non-resectable counterparts, survival remains low owing to occult metastatic disease and treatment resistance. Liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been shown to predict recurrence and treatment resistance in various types of cancers, but their utility has not been fully demonstrated in resectable PDAC. We have simultaneously tracked three circulating biomarkers, including CTCs, cfDNA, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), over a period of cancer treatment using a microfluidic device and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). The microfluidic device is based on the combination of filtration and immunoaffinity mechanisms. We have measured CTCs, cfDNA, and ctDNA in a cohort of seven resectable PDAC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, and each patient was followed up to 10 time points over a period of 4 months. CTCs were detectable in all patients (100%) at some point during treatment but were detectable in only three out of six patients (50%) prior to the start of treatment. Median cfDNA concentrations remained comparable to negative controls throughout treatment. ddPCR was able to find KRAS mutations in six of seven patients (86%); however, these mutations were present in only two of seven patients (29%) prior to treatment. Overall, the majority of circulating biomarkers (81% for CTCs and 91% for cfDNA/ctDNA) were detected after the start of neoadjuvant therapy but before surgery. This study suggests that a longitudinal study of circulating biomarkers throughout treatment provides more useful information than those single time-point tests for resectable PDAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo J. Dopico
- Interdisciplinary Microsystems Group, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (P.J.D.); (M.-C.N.L.)
| | - Minh-Chau N. Le
- Interdisciplinary Microsystems Group, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (P.J.D.); (M.-C.N.L.)
| | - Benjamin Burgess
- UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Rd., Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;
| | - Zhijie Yang
- Atila Biosystems, 740 Sierra Vista Ave., Unit E, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA; (Z.Y.); (Y.Z.); (Y.W.)
| | - Yu Zhao
- Atila Biosystems, 740 Sierra Vista Ave., Unit E, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA; (Z.Y.); (Y.Z.); (Y.W.)
| | - Youxiang Wang
- Atila Biosystems, 740 Sierra Vista Ave., Unit E, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA; (Z.Y.); (Y.Z.); (Y.W.)
| | - Thomas J. George
- UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Rd., Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd., Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Z. Hugh Fan
- Interdisciplinary Microsystems Group, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (P.J.D.); (M.-C.N.L.)
- UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Rd., Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Janssen BV, Theijse R, van Roessel S, de Ruiter R, Berkel A, Huiskens J, Busch OR, Wilmink JW, Kazemier G, Valkema P, Farina A, Verheij J, de Boer OJ, Besselink MG. Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation of Residual Tumor in Histopathology of Pancreatic Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205089. [PMID: 34680241 PMCID: PMC8533716 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing. Objective quantification of the histopathological response to NAT may be used to guide adjuvant treatment and compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant regimens. However, current tumor response scoring (TRS) systems suffer from interobserver variability, originating from subjective definitions, the sometimes challenging histology, and response heterogeneity throughout the tumor bed. This study investigates if artificial intelligence-based segmentation of residual tumor burden in histopathology of PDAC after NAT may offer a more objective and reproducible TRS solution. Abstract Background: Histologic examination of resected pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used to assess the effect of NAT and may guide the choice for adjuvant treatment. However, evaluating residual tumor burden in pancreatic cancer is challenging given tumor response heterogeneity and challenging histomorphology. Artificial intelligence techniques may offer a more reproducible approach. Methods: From 64 patients, one H&E-stained slide of resected pancreatic cancer after NAT was digitized. Three separate classes were manually outlined in each slide (i.e., tumor, normal ducts, and remaining epithelium). Corresponding segmentation masks and patches were generated and distributed over training, validation, and test sets. Modified U-nets with varying encoders were trained, and F1 scores were obtained to express segmentation accuracy. Results: The highest mean segmentation accuracy was obtained using modified U-nets with a DenseNet161 encoder. Tumor tissue was segmented with a high mean F1 score of 0.86, while the overall multiclass average F1 score was 0.82. Conclusions: This study shows that artificial intelligence-based assessment of residual tumor burden is feasible given the promising obtained F1 scores for tumor segmentation. This model could be developed into a tool for the objective evaluation of the response to NAT and may potentially guide the choice for adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris V. Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.V.J.); (R.T.); (S.v.R.); (O.R.B.)
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (A.F.); (J.V.); (O.J.d.B.)
| | - Rutger Theijse
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.V.J.); (R.T.); (S.v.R.); (O.R.B.)
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (A.F.); (J.V.); (O.J.d.B.)
| | - Stijn van Roessel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.V.J.); (R.T.); (S.v.R.); (O.R.B.)
| | - Rik de Ruiter
- SAS Institute Besloten Vennootschap, 1272 PC Huizen, The Netherlands; (R.d.R.); (A.B.); (J.H.)
| | - Antonie Berkel
- SAS Institute Besloten Vennootschap, 1272 PC Huizen, The Netherlands; (R.d.R.); (A.B.); (J.H.)
| | - Joost Huiskens
- SAS Institute Besloten Vennootschap, 1272 PC Huizen, The Netherlands; (R.d.R.); (A.B.); (J.H.)
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.V.J.); (R.T.); (S.v.R.); (O.R.B.)
| | - Johanna W. Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Pieter Valkema
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (A.F.); (J.V.); (O.J.d.B.)
| | - Arantza Farina
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (A.F.); (J.V.); (O.J.d.B.)
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (A.F.); (J.V.); (O.J.d.B.)
| | - Onno J. de Boer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (A.F.); (J.V.); (O.J.d.B.)
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (B.V.J.); (R.T.); (S.v.R.); (O.R.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-4444
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Verbeke C, Webster F, Brosens L, Campbell F, Del Chiaro M, Esposito I, Feakins RM, Fukushima N, Gill AJ, Kakar S, Kench JG, Krasinskas AM, van Laethem JL, Schaeffer DF, Washington K. Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology 2021; 79:902-912. [PMID: 34379823 DOI: 10.1111/his.14540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Current guidelines for the pathology reporting on pancreatic cancer differ in certain aspects, resulting in divergent reporting practice and a lack of comparability of data. Here we report on a new international dataset for the pathology reporting of resection specimens with cancer of the exocrine pancreas (ductal adenocarcinoma and acinar cell carcinoma). The dataset was produced under the auspices of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR), a global alliance of major (inter-)national pathology and cancer organisations. METHODS AND RESULTS According to the ICCR's rigorous process for dataset development, an international expert panel consisting of pancreatic pathologists, a pancreatic surgeon and an oncologist produced a set of core and non-core data items based on a critical review and discussion of current evidence. Commentary was provided for each data item to explain the rationale for selecting it as a core or non-core element, its clinical relevance, and to highlight potential areas of disagreement or lack of evidence, in which case a consensus position was formulated. Following international public consultation, the document was finalised and ratified, and the dataset, which includes a synoptic reporting guide, was published on the ICCR website. CONCLUSIONS This first international dataset for cancer of the exocrine pancreas is intended to promote high quality, standardised pathology reporting. Its widespread adoption will improve consistency of reporting, facilitate multidisciplinary communication and enhance comparability of data, all of which will help to improve the management of pancreatic cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fleur Webster
- International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lodewijk Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands and Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Pathology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, United States
| | - Irene Esposito
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roger M Feakins
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anthony J Gill
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, Australia.,NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Sanjay Kakar
- Department of Pathology, University of California, M590 San Francisco, United States
| | - James G Kench
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Alyssa M Krasinskas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, United States
| | - Jean-Luc van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Medical Oncology, Hôpital Erasme and Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David F Schaeffer
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
[Standardized diagnosis of pancreatic head carcinoma]. DER PATHOLOGE 2021; 42:453-463. [PMID: 34357472 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-021-00971-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are localized in the pancreatic head. Due to the complex anatomic relationships with the surrounding organs and vascular structures in the retroperitoneal space and to the presence of numerous transection margins and dissection planes, pancreatic head resections belong to the most complex specimens concerning grossing and sampling for histopathologic analysis.Here we discuss current guidelines for standardized grossing and reporting of pancreatic cancer, with special reference to the assessment of the resection margin status. The importance of standardized reporting for the sake of completeness, comprehensibility, comparability, and quality control as well as for the integration of pathology reports in interdisciplinary digital workflows and artificial intelligence applications will be emphasized.
Collapse
|