Analysis of trimodal and bimodal therapy in a selective-surgery paradigm for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Long-term survival outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with intraoperative thoracic duct ligation: a large-scale propensity score matching analysis

Background

Esophagectomy is the primary treatment for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Intraoperative thoracic duct ligation (TDL) has been suggested as an adjunct to reduce the risk of postoperative chylothorax in patients with ESCC, but its effect on long-term oncologic outcomes remains uncertain.

Methods

Data from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database were analyzed for patients treated between 2010 and 2017. Participants were classified into TDL and non-TDL groups. Univariate Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to identify independent risk factors for overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 2,510 patients were included, with 2,095 in the TDL group and 415 in the non-TDL group. The median follow-up was 63.97 months. No significant differences in OS were observed between the TDL and non-TDL groups (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96-1.31; P = 0.13). After PSM, the analysis continued to show no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.72).

Conclusion

Intraoperative TDL during esophagectomy did not significantly impact long-term OS in patients with ESCC.

Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Salvage oesophagectomies are associated with an increased risk of mortality, although recent data suggests that long-term survival rates following salvage oesophagectomy are similar to planned oesophagectomy. The aim was therefore to meta-analyse outcomes for patients undergoing salvage versus planned oesophagectomies to assess the differences in short-term mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which compared patients in the planned oesophagectomy group (n = 23 555) to patients in the salvage oesophagectomy group (n = 2227). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of rates of postoperative mortality (5.7% salvage oesophagectomy versus 3.1% planned oesophagectomy, P = 0.0004), anastomotic leak (20.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 14.5% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.00001), pulmonary complications (37.1% salvage oesophagectomy versus 24.2% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001) and R0 margin (87.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 91.3% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between long-term survival rates at 5 years with 39.2% for salvage and 42.6% for planned oesophagectomy (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage oesophagectomies do offer a meaningful chance of long-term survival (at 5 years) for select patients with oesophageal cancer, but the elevated risk of post-operative complications and mortality following salvage oesophagectomy should be recognized.

Association of interleukin-10 rs1800896, rs1800872, and interleukin-6 rs1800795 polymorphisms with squamous cell carcinoma risk: A meta-analysis

The relationship between interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-6 gene polymorphisms and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been demonstrated but with inconsistent conclusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential associations of IL gene polymorphisms and the SCC risk. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biomedical Database, WanFang, and China Science and Technology Journal Database databases were searched for articles reporting the correlations of IL-10 and IL-6 gene polymorphisms with the SCC risk. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using Stata Version 11.2. Meta-regression, sensitivity, and publication bias were analyzed. False-positive reporting probability and Bayesian measure of the false-discovery probability were used to explore the credibility of the calculation. Twenty-three articles were included. The IL-10 rs1800872 polymorphism showed a significant correlation with the SCC risk in the overall analysis. Studies pooled by ethnicity revealed that the IL-10 rs1800872 polymorphism reduced the SCC risk in the Caucasian population. The results of this study suggest that the IL-10 rs1800872 polymorphism may confer a genetic susceptibility to SCC, particularly oral SCC, in Caucasians. However, the IL-10 rs1800896 or IL-6 rs1800795 polymorphism was not significantly associated with the SCC risk.

Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers

BACKGROUND

In retrospective studies, the definition of salvage esophagectomy has been inconsistent and is a source of bias. We sought to describe how variability in the definition of salvage affects comparative outcomes of TMT and BMT therapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who completed chemoradiation (CRT) from 2002-2017 were identified. TMT included patients who had a planned esophagectomy after CRT. BMT included patients treated with CRT only, plus salvage esophagectomy, variably defined as an esophagectomy occurring either A) 3 months after CRT; B) 3 months after CRT, excluding delayed recovery; C) 3 months after CRT, excluding delayed work-up; or D) 6 months after CRT. Long-term survival outcomes between the TMT and BMT groups were compared for each definition of salvage esophagectomy. Time to surgery was included a priori in a multivariable model for overall survival.

RESULTS

The study included 143 patients. Ninety (63%) underwent esophagectomy; 53(37%) received CRT only. While the total patients remained the same, the composition of the TMT and BMT groups varied by salvage definitions A-D. Various definitions resulted in different 5-year survival rates for TMT vs. BMT groups. A), 56% vs. 39%; B), 61% vs. 34%; C), 50% vs. 42%; and D), 51% vs. 39%. In a Cox multivariable analysis, age and proximal/middle esophageal tumors were associated with worse post-operative survival, but time to surgery was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Slight variations in the definition of salvage esophagectomy can influence the interpretation of TMT and BMT outcomes. Future studies should consistently define treatment groups.