1
|
Hosseini-Mellner S, Wickberg Å, Karakatsanis A, Valachis A. Impact of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis in patients with hormone-receptor positive / HER2-negative breast cancer: A propensity score matching population-based study. Breast 2024; 76:103741. [PMID: 38759576 PMCID: PMC11127261 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this population-based cohort study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in prognosis among patients with HR+/HER2 negative breast cancer. METHOD This population-based study utilized data from the research database BCBaSe 3.0, based on the Swedish National Quality breast cancer register, including all patients with breast cancer diagnosis in Sweden between 2008 and 2019. Propensity score matching approach was applied. The outcomes of interest consisted of distant-disease free (DDFS), breast-cancer specific (BCSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 14 459 patients were included in the study cohort of whom 2086 received NACT. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 1539 patients in each study group were available for analyses. No statistically significant difference in survival outcomes were observed between patients treated with NACT compared to those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR) for DDFS: 1.20; 95 % CI: 0.80-1.79; HR for BCSS: 1.16; 95 % CI: 0.54-2.49; HR for OS: 1.14; 95 % CI: 0.64-2.05). CONCLUSION In this population-based cohort study of patients with HR+/HER2-breast cancer, the use of NACT seems to be comparable to adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of prognosis, although non-inferiority cannot be proven by this study design. Until further evidence suggesting a survival benefit in favor of either treatment is available, NACT can be pursued when surgical-de-escalation is intended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Servah Hosseini-Mellner
- Institution for Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa Wickberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Andreas Karakatsanis
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Antonis Valachis
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cardoso MJ, de Boniface J, Dodwell D, Kaidar-Person O, Poortmans P, van Maaren MC. Which real indications remain for mastectomy? LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2024; 33:100734. [PMID: 38590325 PMCID: PMC11000187 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Joao Cardoso
- Champalimaud Foundation, Faculty of Medicine University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Dodwell
- Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marissa C. van Maaren
- Department of Health Technology & Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede 7500 AE, the Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), P.O. Box 19079, Utrecht 3501 DB, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang L, Alice A, Friedenreich CM. Physical activity for cancer prehabilitation: A scoping review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104319. [PMID: 38460927 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
This scoping review aims to synthesize the current landscape of physical activity in cancer prehabilitation and identify knowledge gaps. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE for exercise interventions and observational studies that measured exercise or physical activity before cancer treatment from inception to January 20, 2023. Fifty-one articles from 44 unique studies were reviewed, including 32 intervention and 12 observational studies. Surgery is the only treatment modality that has been investigated. Included studies used heterogeneous exercise interventions and measures for physical activity. Colorectal and other gastrointestinal, lung, and urologic cancers are the most studied cancer types. Exercise intervention in cancer prehabilitation is highly feasible. The evidence for improved fitness, functional, psychosocial, and clinical outcomes is promising yet limited. Although research has increased recently, prehabilitation exercise remains a relatively under-investigated area in oncology. We have provided research directions towards an ideal cancer prehabilitation design in the real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada; Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Azam Alice
- Adapted Physical Activity and Health, University Rennes 2, Rennes, France
| | - Christine M Friedenreich
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada; Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tasman J, Roberson PNE, Clegg D, Boukovalas S, Lloyd J. The impact of rural structural and community health factors on postmastectomy complications among south central Appalachian breast cancer patients. J Rural Health 2024; 40:104-113. [PMID: 37144973 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study examined how structural and community health factors, including primary care physicians (PCP), food insecurity, diabetes, and mortality rate per county, are linked to the number and severity of postmastectomy complications among south central Appalachian breast cancer patients depending on rural status. METHODS Data was obtained through a retrospective review of 473 breast cancer patients that underwent a mastectomy from 2017 to 2021. Patient's ZIP Code was used to determine their rural-urban community area code and their county of residence for census data. We conducted a zero inflated Poisson regression. FINDINGS Results demonstrated that patients in small rural/isolated areas with low (B = -4.10, SE = 1.93, OR = 0.02, p = 0.03) to average (B = -2.67, SE = 1.32, OR = 0.07, p = 0.04) food insecurity and average (B = -2.67, SE = 1.32, OR = 0.07, p = 0.04) to high (B = -10.62, SE = 4.71, OR = 0.00, p = 0.02) PCP have significantly fewer postmastectomy complications compared to their urban counterparts. Additionally, patients residing in small rural/isolated areas with high (B = 4.47, SE = 0.49, d = 0.42, p < 0.001) diabetes and low mortality (B = 5.70, SE = 0.58, d = 0.45, p < 0.001) rates have significantly more severe postmastectomy complications. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate that patients who reside in small/rural isolated areas may experience fewer and less severe postmastectomy when there is certain optimal structural and community health factors present compared to their urban counterparts. Oncologic care teams could utilize this information in routine consult for risk assessment and mitigation. Future research should further examine additional risks for postmastectomy complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Tasman
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Devin Clegg
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stefanos Boukovalas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jillian Lloyd
- Cancer Institute, The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agrawal A, Romics L, Thekkinkattil D, Soliman M, Kaushik M, Barmpounakis P, Mortimer C, Courtney CA, Goyal A, Garreffa E, Carmichael A, Lane RA, Rutherford C, Kim B, Achuthan R, Pitsinis V, Goh S, Ray B, Grover K, Vidya R, Murphy J. 'PartBreCon' study. A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study to assess outcomes following PARTial BREast reCONstruction with chest wall perforator flaps. Breast 2023; 71:82-88. [PMID: 37544090 PMCID: PMC10430575 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial breast reconstruction with a pedicled chest wall perforator flap (CWPF) enables breast conservation in a higher tumour: breast volume ratio scenario. Since there is limited evidence, this retrospective cohort study aimed to ascertain immediate (30-days) and medium-term (follow-up duration) surgical outcomes. METHODS STROBE-compliant protocol ascertained CWPF outcomes between March 2011-March 2021. UK centres known to perform CWPF were invited to participate if they performed at least 10 cases. Data were retrospectively collected, including patient demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics, and surgical and oncological outcomes. Statistical analysis (R™) included multivariable logistic regression and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Across 15 centres, 507 patients with median age (54 years, IQR; 48-62), body mass index (25.4 kg/m2, IQR; 22.5-29), tumour size (26 mm, IQR; 18-35), and specimen weight (62 g, IQR; 40-92) had following flap types: LiCAP (54.1%, n = 273), MiCAP/AiCAP (19.6%, n = 99), LiCAP + LTAP (19.8%, n = 100) and TDAP (2.2%, n = 11). 30-days complication rates were in 12%: haematoma (4.3%, n = 22), wound infection (4.3%, n = 22), delayed wound healing (2.8%, n = 14) and flap loss (0.6%, n = 3; 1 full) leading to readmissions (2.6%, n = 13) and re-operations (2.6%, n = 13). Positive margins (n = 88, 17.7%) led to 15.9% (n = 79) re-excisions, including 7.5% (n = 37) at the planned 2nd of 2-stage surgery and 1.8% (n = 9) mastectomy. At median 23 months (IQR; 11-39) follow-up, there were 1.2% (n = 6) symmetrisations; recurrences: local (1%), regional/nodal (0.6%) and distant (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS This large multicentre cohort study demonstrates acceptable complication and margin re-excision rates. CWPF extends the range of breast conservation techniques. Further studies are required for long-term oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Agrawal
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
| | - L Romics
- New Victoria Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | - M Soliman
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK; Mansoura University, Egypt.
| | - M Kaushik
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - P Barmpounakis
- Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | - A Goyal
- Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
| | | | - A Carmichael
- University Hospital of Derby and Burton, Belvedere Road, Burton on Trent, UK.
| | - R A Lane
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | - B Kim
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | - R Achuthan
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | | | - S Goh
- Peterborough Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
| | - B Ray
- Harrogate NHS Trust, Harrogate, UK.
| | | | - R Vidya
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
| | - J Murphy
- Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghilli M, Mariniello MD, Ferrè F, Morganti R, Perre E, Novaro R, Colizzi L, Camilleri V, Baldetti G, Rossetti E, Coletti L, Scatena C, Ghilardi M, Cossu MC, Roncella M. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after oncoplastic or traditional breast-conserving surgery using the BREAST-Q (BCT module): a prospective study. Breast Cancer 2023; 30:802-809. [PMID: 37358721 PMCID: PMC10404206 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01474-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The oncoplastic conservative surgery was developed as a natural evolution of traditional surgery, attempting to improve the therapeutic and aesthetic outcomes where tumor resection could be followed by not-adequate results. Our primary aim is to evaluate how patient satisfaction and quality-of-life after conservative oncoplastic surgery, using BREAST-Q (BCT Module), change pre- and post-operatively. The secondary aim is to compare patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic or traditional conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We enrolled 647 patients who underwent traditional conservative surgery or oncoplastic surgery from January 2020 to December 2022. Only 232 women (35.9%) completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire on a web-based platform, at the preoperative phase and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS The average score of "Psychosocial well-being" and "Satisfaction with Breasts" 3 months after surgery showed a statistically significant improvement, while the average score for "Physical well-being: Chest" at 3 months showed a worsening compared to the baseline. "Sexual well-being" did not show statistically significant change. A significant difference between the post-operative outcome of oncoplastic surgery and traditional surgery was observed only for Physical well-being (better for traditional surgery). CONCLUSIONS The study showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes 3 months after the surgery, except for physical discomfort that increases especially after oncoplastic surgery. Furthermore, our data, as well as many others, point to the appropriateness of using OCS where there is an effective indication, while the perspective of patients cannot find significant superiority over TCS in any of the areas analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ghilli
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | - M D Mariniello
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - F Ferrè
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, Laboratorio Management E Sanità, Istituto di Management, Pisa, Italy
| | - R Morganti
- Unit of Statistics, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - E Perre
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - R Novaro
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, Laboratorio Management E Sanità, Istituto di Management, Pisa, Italy
| | - L Colizzi
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - V Camilleri
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Baldetti
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - E Rossetti
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - L Coletti
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - C Scatena
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Ghilardi
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M C Cossu
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Roncella
- Breast Centre AOUP, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zaborowski AM, Heeney A, Walsh S, Barry M, Kell MR. Immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1039-1042. [PMID: 36972211 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Heeney
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Siun Walsh
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mitchel Barry
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Malcolm R Kell
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bonci EA, Anacleto JC, Cardoso MJ. Sometimes it is better to just make it simple. De-escalation of oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures. Breast 2023; 69:265-273. [PMID: 36924556 PMCID: PMC10027565 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple breast conservation surgery (sBCS) has technically advanced onto oncoplastic breast procedures (OBP) to avoid mastectomy and improve breast cancer patients' psychosocial well-being and cosmetic outcome. Although OBP are time-consuming and expensive, we are witnessing an increase in their use, even for cases that could be managed with sBCS. The choice between keeping it simple or opting for more complex oncoplastic procedures is difficult. This review proposes a pragmatic approach in assisting this decision. Medical literature suggests that OBP and sBCS might be similar regarding local recurrence and overall survival, and patients seem to have higher satisfaction levels with the aesthetic outcome of OBP when compared to sBCS. However, the lack of comprehensive high-quality research assessing their safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes hinders these supposed conclusions. Postoperative complications after OBP may delay the initiation of adjuvant RT. In addition, precise displacement of the breast volume is not effectively recorded despite surgical clips placement, making accurate dose delivery tricky for radiation oncologists, and WBRT preferable to APBI in complex OBP cases. With a critical eye on financial toxicity, patient satisfaction, and oncological outcomes, OBP must be carefully integrated into clinical practice. The thoughtful provision of informed consent is essential for decision-making between sBCS and OBP. As we look into the future, machine learning and artificial intelligence can potentially help patients and doctors avoid postoperative regrets by setting realistic aesthetic expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E-A Bonci
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Surgical Oncology Department, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Surgical Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - J Correia Anacleto
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital CUF Cascais, Cascais, Portugal
| | - M-J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Impact of Surgical Care Bundle on Surgical Site Infection after Non-Reconstructive Breast Cancer Surgery: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030919. [PMID: 36765876 PMCID: PMC9913200 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are the commonest cause of healthcare-related infections. Although a surgical care bundle (SCB), defined as a group of preventative measures, is effective in reducing SSIs, it has not been well documented in breast cancer surgery. We aimed to investigate the impact of SCB on SSI. METHODS A single-centre retrospective comparative cohort study between 2016 and 2020 was carried out. An SCB including eight different measures was implemented in October 2018 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. Patients who underwent non-reconstructive breast cancer surgery were included for analysis. The primary endpoint was SSI within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS Overall, 10.4% of patients (100/958) developed SSI. After SCB implementation, the overall SSI rate reduced from 11.8% to 8.9% (p = 0.15). The largest SSI rate reduction was seen in the subgroup that underwent breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), from 18.8% to 9.8% (p = 0.01). In this multivariable analysis adjusting for patient and treatment factors, the implementation of SCB resulted in a statistically significant reduction in SSI risk (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.99, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a SCB could reduce the incidence of SSI in breast cancer surgery.
Collapse
|