1
|
Paiella S, Malleo G, Lionetto G, Cattelani A, Casciani F, Secchettin E, De Pastena M, Bassi C, Salvia R. Adjuvant Therapy After Upfront Resection of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Patterns of Omission and Use-A Prospective Real-Life Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2892-2901. [PMID: 38286884 PMCID: PMC10997715 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14951-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about adjuvant therapy (AT) omission and use outside of randomized trials. We aimed to assess the patterns of AT omission and use in a cohort of upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients in a real-life scenario. METHODS From January 2019 to July 2022, 317 patients with resected pancreatic cancer and operated upfront were prospectively enrolled in this prospective observational trial according to the previously calculated sample size. The association between perioperative variables and the risk of AT omission and AT delay was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Eighty patients (25.2%) did not receive AT. The main reasons for AT omission were postoperative complications (38.8%), oncologist's choice (21.2%), baseline comorbidities (20%), patient's choice (10%), and early recurrence (10%). At the multivariable analysis, the odds of not receiving AT increased significantly for older patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, p < 0.001), those having an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥II (OR 2.03, p = 0.015), or developing postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 2.5, p = 0.019). The likelihood of not receiving FOLFIRINOX as AT increased for older patients (OR 1.1, p < 0.001), in the presence of early-stage disease (stage I-IIa vs. IIb-III, OR 2.82, p =0.031; N0 vs. N+, OR 3, p = 0.03), and for patients who experienced postoperative major complications (OR 4.7, p = 0.009). A twofold increased likelihood of delay in AT was found in patients experiencing postoperative complications (OR 3.86, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS AT is not delivered in about one-quarter of upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients. Age, comorbidities, and postoperative complications are the main drivers of AT omission and mFOLFIRINOX non-use. CLINICALTRIALS REGISTRATION NCT03788382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Paiella
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriella Lionetto
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alice Cattelani
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Casciani
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Erica Secchettin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo De Pastena
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Driessens H, Wijma AG, Buis CI, Nijkamp MW, Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke GJ, Klaase JM. Prehabilitation: tertiary prevention matters. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae028. [PMID: 38436470 PMCID: PMC10910596 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Driessens
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Allard G Wijma
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten W Nijkamp
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aliseda D, Arredondo J, Sánchez-Justicia C, Alvarellos A, Rodríguez J, Matos I, Rotellar F, Baixauli J, Pastor C. Survival and safety after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery for locally advanced colon cancer: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae021. [PMID: 38381934 PMCID: PMC10881053 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to treat locally advanced (T3-4 Nx-2 M0) colon cancer due to its potential advantages over the standard approach of upfront surgery. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse data from comparative studies to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on oncological outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search encompassed RCTs, propensity score-matched studies, and controlled prospective studies published up to 1 April 2023. As a primary objective, overall survival and disease-free survival were compared. As a secondary objective, perioperative morbidity, mortality, and complete resection were compared using the DerSimonian and Laird models. RESULTS A total of seven studies comprising a total of 2120 patients were included. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in the hazard of recurrence (HR 0.73, 95% c.i. 0.59 to 0.90; P = 0.003) and death (HR 0.67, 95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.83; P < 0.001) compared with upfront surgery. Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with higher 5-year overall survival (79.9% versus 72.6%; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (73.1% versus 64.5%; P = 0.028) rates. No significant differences were observed in perioperative mortality (OR 0.97, 95% c.i. 0.28 to 3.33), overall complications (OR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 1.16), or anastomotic leakage/intra-abdominal abscess (OR 0.88, 95% c.i. 0.60 to 1.29). However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of incomplete resection (OR 0.70, 95% c.i. 0.49 to 0.99). CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a reduced hazard of recurrence and death, as well as improved overall survival and disease-free survival rates, compared with upfront surgery in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aliseda
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Arredondo
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carlos Sánchez-Justicia
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alvarellos
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Rodríguez
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Matos
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jorge Baixauli
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carlos Pastor
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marchegiani G. The best of HPB in BJS Open 2023. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae005. [PMID: 38364054 PMCID: PMC10869211 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
|
5
|
Dumitrascu T. Pancreaticoduodenectomies with Concurrent Colectomies: Indications, Technical Issues, Complications, and Oncological Outcomes. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7682. [PMID: 38137749 PMCID: PMC10744251 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Multi-visceral resections for colon and pancreatic cancer (PDAC) are feasible, safe, and justified for early and late outcomes. However, the use of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with concurrent colectomies is highly debatable in terms of morbidity and oncological benefits. Based on current literature data, this review assesses the early and long-term outcomes of PD with colectomies. The association represents a challenging but feasible option for a few patients with PDAC or locally advanced right colon cancer when negative resection margins are anticipated because long-term survival can be achieved. Concurrent colectomies during PD should be cautiously approached because they may significantly increase complication rates, including severe ones. Thus, patients should be fit enough to overcome potential severe complications. Patients with PD and colectomies can be classified as borderline resectable, considering the high risk of developing postoperative complications. Carefully selecting patients suitable for PD with concurrent colectomies is paramount to mitigate the potentially severe complications of the two surgical procedures and maximize the oncological benefits. These procedures should be performed at high-volume centers with extensive experience in pancreatectomies and colectomies, and each patient situation should be assessed using a multimodal approach, including high-quality imaging and neoadjuvant therapies, in a multidisciplinary team discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traian Dumitrascu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Jesus VHF, Peixoto RD, Ribeiro HSDC, Pinheiro RN, Oliveira AF, Anghinoni M, Torres SM, Boff MF, Weschenfelder R, Prolla G, Riechelmann RP. Current clinical practice in the management of Brazilian patients with potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). J Surg Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37795658 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe the routine clinical practice of physicians involved in the treatment of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in Brazil. METHODS Physicians were invited through email and text messages to participate in an electronic survey sponsored by the Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumor Group (GTG) and the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO). We evaluated the relationship between variable categories numerically with false discovery rate-adjusted Fisher's exact test p values and graphically with Multiple Correspondence Analysis. RESULTS Overall, 255 physicians answered the survey. Most (52.5%) were medical oncologists, treated patients predominantly in the private setting (71.0%), and had access to multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTDTB; 76.1%). Medical oncologists were more likely to describe neoadjuvant therapy as beneficial in the resectable setting and surgeons in the borderline resectable setting. Most physicians would use information on risk factors for early recurrence, frailty, and type of surgery to decide treatment strategy. Doctors working predominantly in public institutions were less likely to have access to MTDTB and to consider FOLFIRINOX the most adequate regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. CONCLUSIONS Considerable differences exist in the management of localized PDAC, some of them possibly explained by the medical specialty, but also by the funding source of health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus
- Medical Oncology Unit, Grupo Oncolínicas Florianópolis, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas (CEPON), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Post-Graduate Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer, São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renata D'Alpino Peixoto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Grupo Oncoclínicas/Centro Paulista de Oncologia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Marciano Anghinoni
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Centro de Oncologia do Paraná (Oncoville), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Silvio Melo Torres
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Márcio Fernando Boff
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Rui Weschenfelder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Moinho de Vento, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Gabriel Prolla
- Grupo Oncoclínicas Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Rachel P Riechelmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abu-Khudir R, Hafsa N, Badr BE. Identifying Effective Biomarkers for Accurate Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis Using Statistical Machine Learning. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3091. [PMID: 37835833 PMCID: PMC10572229 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the lowest survival rates among all major types of cancer. Consequently, it is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Serum biomarkers historically correlate well with the early prognosis of post-surgical complications of PC. However, attempts to identify an effective biomarker panel for the successful prognosis of PC were almost non-existent in the current literature. The current study investigated the roles of various serum biomarkers including carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 8 (CXCL-8), procalcitonin (PCT), and other relevant clinical data for identifying PC progression, classified into sepsis, recurrence, and other post-surgical complications, among PC patients. The most relevant biochemical and clinical markers for PC prognosis were identified using a random-forest-powered feature elimination method. Using this informative biomarker panel, the selected machine-learning (ML) classification models demonstrated highly accurate results for classifying PC patients into three complication groups on independent test data. The superiority of the combined biomarker panel (Max AUC-ROC = 100%) was further established over using CA19-9 features exclusively (Max AUC-ROC = 75%) for the task of classifying PC progression. This novel study demonstrates the effectiveness of the combined biomarker panel in successfully diagnosing PC progression and other relevant complications among Egyptian PC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha Abu-Khudir
- Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 380, Hofuf 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
- Chemistry Department, Biochemistry Branch, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
| | - Noor Hafsa
- Computer Science Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Hofuf 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Badr E. Badr
- Egyptian Ministry of Labor, Training and Research Department, Tanta 31512, Egypt;
- Botany Department, Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|