Interhemispheric visuo-motor integration in humans: the effect of redundant targets

We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the functional locus of response facilitation during parallel visuo-motor processing. In a simple reaction-time task, subjects typically respond faster to two copies of the same stimulus than to a single copy. This facilitation, called the redundant-target effect, can occur at three functional levels: perceptual, 'cognitive' or motor. Normal right handers were studied while performing a simple reaction-time task to unilateral (left or right) and bilateral light flashes. Subjects were instructed to respond with their right index finger. Reaction times were faster to bilateral light flashes than to unilateral ones, even right flashes. Greater fMRI signal for bilateral stimuli compared to unilateral ones was observed in the left precentral and postcentral gyrus, and in the right precentral gyrus. A greater fMRI signal for bilateral and for unilateral left stimuli, compared to unilateral right stimuli, was observed in an area of the right intraparietal sulcus. These results support the hypothesis that the functional locus of response facilitation during parallel visuo-motor processing is premotor.

Crossed-uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized flashes: between- and within-subjects variability

In unimanual reaction times (RT) to lateralized flashes, contralateral responses tend to be slower than ipsilateral responses. This has been called Crossed-Uncrossed Difference (CUD). The CUD tends to show variability across subjects and across studies, but until now the stability of the CUD in an individual subject has not been investigated. To address the role of inter- and intra-subject variability in the CUD, three normal right handers were tested over 50 experimental sessions of 800 trials each, for a total of 40,000 trials of simple reaction times to lateralized flashes. In each subject, CUDs were computed for each session, over two, three, or more sessions, and over the entire dataset. These CUDs were then compared to the CUDs obtained in a group of 15 normal right handers, each tested once in a single session. Results show that: (i) CUD variability across several sessions in a single subject mimics the variability observed in a sample of subjects tested in a single session; (ii) this variability is considerably reduced when the CUD is computed over at least 2400 trials per subject; (iii) CUDs computed over 2400 and up to 12,000 of trials tend to be extremely similar ( approximately 2 ms) across the three subjects tested here; (iv) when reaction times are ordered from the fastest to the slowest and divided into bins, the CUD is remarkably stable over the entire reaction time distribution; and (v) in contrast to the variability of the CUD, the variability for crossed and uncrossed responses across several sessions in a single subject is small and does not mimic the variability observed in a sample of subjects tested in a single session. Taken together, these data suggest that the intersubject variability in the CUD observed in single experimental sessions does not represent a reliable intersubject difference and that the CUD computed over thousands of trials reflects hard-wired mechanisms of callosal transmission.

Cortical mechanisms of human imitation

How does imitation occur? How can the motor plans necessary for imitating an action derive from the observation of that action? Imitation may be based on a mechanism directly matching the observed action onto an internal motor representation of that action ("direct matching hypothesis"). To test this hypothesis, normal human participants were asked to observe and imitate a finger movement and to perform the same movement after spatial or symbolic cues. Brain activity was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. If the direct matching hypothesis is correct, there should be areas that become active during finger movement, regardless of how it is evoked, and their activation should increase when the same movement is elicited by the observation of an identical movement made by another individual. Two areas with these properties were found in the left inferior frontal cortex (opercular region) and the rostral-most region of the right superior parietal lobule.