Micro-diffusely abnormal white matter: An early multiple sclerosis lesion phase with intensified myelin blistering

OBJECTIVE

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic central nervous system disease whose white matter lesion origin remains debated. Recently, we reported subtle changes in the MS normal appearing white matter (NAWM), presenting with an increase in myelin blisters and myelin protein citrullination, which may recapitulate some of the prodromal degenerative processes involved in MS pathogenesis. Here, to clarify the relevance of these changes for subsequent MS myelin degeneration we explored their prevalence in WM regions characterized by subtly reduced myelination (dubbed as micro-diffusely abnormal white matter, mDAWM).

METHODS

We used an in-depth (immuno)histochemistry approach in 27 MS donors with histological presence of mDAWM and 5 controls. An antibody panel against degenerative markers was combined and the presence of myelin/axonal aberrations was analyzed and compared with the NAWM from the same cases/slices/regions.

RESULTS

mDAWM-defined areas exhibit ill-defined borders, no signs of Wallerian degeneration, and they associate with visible veins. Remarkably, such areas present with augmented myelin blister frequency, enhanced prevalence of polar myelin phospholipids, citrullination, and degradation of myelin basic protein (MBP) when compared with the NAWM. Furthermore, enhanced reactivity of microglia/macrophages against citrullinated MBP was also observed in this tissue.

INTERPRETATION

We report a new histologically defined early phase in MS lesion formation, namely mDAWM, which lacks signs of Wallerian pathology. These results support the prelesional nature of the mDAWM. We conceptualize that evolution to pathologically evident lesions comprises the previously documented imbalance of axo-myelinic units (myelin blistering) leading to their degeneration and immune system activation by released myelin components.

[Use of Gadolinium in Follow-Up MRI of Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Current Recommendations]

Multiple sclerosis is the most frequent demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and is characterized by early onset and progressive disability. Magnetic resonance imaging, due to its high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of demyelinating lesions, is the most useful diagnostic test for this disease, with the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents being an important contribution to imaging interpretation. Although contrast is essential for diagnostic purposes, its routine use in monitoring disease activity, response to treatment, and related complications is controversial. This article aims to collate current recommendations regarding the use of gadolinium in the imaging follow-up of multiple sclerosis and establish effective and safe guidelines for clinical practice. The literature review was conducted in PubMed, using the terms 'multiple sclerosis', 'magnetic resonance imaging' and 'gadolinium', or 'contrast media'. Articles published between January 2013 and January 2023 concerning the safety of gadolinium and the use of these contrast agents in follow-up scans of adult patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis were selected. Although no biological or clinical consequences have been unequivocally attributed to the retention of gadolinium in the brain, which were mostly reported with linear agents, health authorities have been recommending the restriction of contrast to essential clinical circumstances. In multiple sclerosis, the detection of subclinical contrast-enhancing lesions with no corresponding new/ enlarging T2-WI lesions is rare and has a questionable impact on therapeutic decisions. On the other hand, gadolinium has a higher sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of relapses, in the detection of recent disease activity, before and after treatment initiation, and in patients with a large lesion burden or diffuse/confluent T2-WI lesions. Contrary to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy screening, monitoring of immune restitution inflammatory syndrome also benefits from the administration of gadolinium. It is feasible and safe to exclude gadolinium-based contrast agents from routine follow-up scans of multiple sclerosis, despite their additional contribution in specific clinical circumstances that should be acknowledged by the neurologist and neuroradiologist.

MRI and laboratory monitoring of disease-modifying therapy efficacy and risks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasingly, therapeutic strategy in multiple sclerosis (MS) is informed by imaging and laboratory biomarkers, in addition to traditional clinical factors. Here, we review aspects of monitoring the efficacy and risks of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with both conventional and emerging MRI and laboratory measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The adoption of consensus-driven, stable MRI acquisition protocols and artificial intelligence-based, quantitative image analysis is heralding an era of precision monitoring of DMT efficacy. New MRI measures of compartmentalized inflammation, neuro-degeneration and repair complement traditional metrics but require validation before use in individual patients. Laboratory markers of brain cellular injury, such as neurofilament light, are robust outcomes in DMT efficacy trials; their use in clinical practice is being refined. DMT-specific laboratory monitoring for safety is critical and may include lymphocytes, immunoglobulins, autoimmunity surveillance, John Cunningham virus serology and COVID-19 vaccination seroresponse.

SUMMARY

A biomarker-enhanced monitoring strategy has immediate clinical application, with growing evidence of long-term reductions in disability accrual when both clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic inflammatory activity is fully suppressed; and amelioration of the risks associated with therapy. Emerging MRI and blood-based measures will also become important tools for monitoring agents that target the innate immune system and promote neuro-repair.