1
|
Molina R, Crespo-Cobo Y, Esteban FJ, Arias AV, Rodríguez-Árbol J, Soriano MF, Ibáñez-Molina AJ, Iglesias-Parro S. Dynamic Evolution of EEG Complexity in Schizophrenia Across Cognitive Tasks. ENTROPY (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2025; 27:226. [PMID: 40149150 PMCID: PMC11941378 DOI: 10.3390/e27030226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2025] [Revised: 02/19/2025] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Schizophrenia is characterized by widespread disruptions in neural connectivity and dynamic modulation. Traditional EEG analyses often rely on static or averaged measures, which may overlook the temporal evolution of neural complexity across cognitive demands. This study employed Higuchi Fractal Dimension, a non-linear measure of signal complexity, to examine the temporal dynamics of EEG activity across five cortical regions (central, frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal lobes) during an attentional and a memory-based task in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and healthy controls. A permutation-based topographic analysis of variance revealed significant differences in neural complexity between tasks and groups. In the control group, results showed a consistent pattern of higher neural complexity during the attentional task across the different brain regions (except during a few moments in the temporal and occipital regions). This pattern of differentiation in complexity between the attentional and memory tasks reflects healthy individuals' ability to dynamically modulate neural activity based on task-specific requirements. In contrast, the group of patients with schizophrenia exhibited inconsistent patterns of differences in complexity between tasks over time across all neural regions. That is, differences in complexity between tasks varies across time intervals, being sometimes higher in the attentional task and other times higher in the memory task (especially in the central, frontal, and temporal regions). This inconsistent pattern in patients can explain reduced task-specific modulation of EEG complexity in schizophrenia, and suggests a disruption in the modulation of neural activity on function of task demands. These findings underscore the importance of analyzing the temporal dynamics of EEG complexity to capture task-specific neural modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Molina
- Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain; (R.M.); (A.J.I.-M.); (S.I.-P.)
| | - Yasmina Crespo-Cobo
- Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain; (R.M.); (A.J.I.-M.); (S.I.-P.)
| | | | - Ana Victoria Arias
- Department of Social Psychology, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Javier Rodríguez-Árbol
- Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain; (R.M.); (A.J.I.-M.); (S.I.-P.)
| | - Maria Felipa Soriano
- Mental Health Department, San Agustín University Hospital, 33401 Linares, Spain;
| | | | - Sergio Iglesias-Parro
- Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain; (R.M.); (A.J.I.-M.); (S.I.-P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gambaretti M, Viganò L, Gallo M, Pratelli G, Sciortino T, Gay L, Conti Nibali M, Gallotti AL, Tariciotti L, Mattioli L, Bello L, Cerri G, Rossi M. From non-human to human primates: a translational approach to enhancing resection, safety, and indications in glioma surgery while preserving sensorimotor abilities. Front Integr Neurosci 2025; 19:1500636. [PMID: 40008262 PMCID: PMC11847902 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2025.1500636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Since the pivotal studies of neurophysiologists in the early 20th century, research on brain functions in non-human primates has provided valuable insights into the neural mechanisms subserving neurological function. By using data acquired on non-human primates as a reference, important progress in knowledge of the human brain and its functions has been achieved. The translational impact allowed by this scientific effort must be recognized in the implementation of the current surgical techniques particularly in support of the neurosurgical approach to brain tumors. In the surgical treatment of brain tumors, the ability to maximally extend the resection allows an improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life of patients. The main goal, and, at the same time, the main challenge, of oncological neurological surgery is to avoid permanent neurological deficit while reaching maximal resection, particularly when the tumor infiltrates the neural network subserving motor functions. Brain mapping techniques were developed using neurophysiological probes to identify the areas and tracts subserving sensorimotor function, ensuring their preservation during the resection. During the last 20 years, starting from the classical "Penfield" technique, brain mapping has been progressively implemented. Among the major advancements was the introduction of high-frequency direct electrical stimulation. Its refinement, along with the complementary use of low-frequency stimulation, allowed a further refinement of stimulation protocols. In this narrative review, we propose an analysis of the process through which the knowledge acquired through experiments on non-human primates influenced and changed the current approach to neurosurgical procedures. We then describe the main brain mapping techniques used in the resection of tumors located within sensorimotor circuits. We also detail how these techniques allowed the acquisition of new data on the properties of areas and tracts underlying sensorimotor control, in turn fostering the design of new tools to navigate within cortical and subcortical areas, that were before deemed to be "sacred and untouchable."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Gambaretti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Gallo
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pratelli
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gay
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Conti Nibali
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Luigi Gallotti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Tariciotti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mattioli
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Cerri
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bellacicca A, Rossi M, Viganò L, Simone L, Howells H, Gambaretti M, Gallotti A, Leonetti A, Puglisi G, Talami F, Bello L, Gabriella C, Fornia L. Peaglet: A user-friendly probabilistic Kernel density estimation of intracranial cortical and subcortical stimulation sites. J Neurosci Methods 2024; 408:110177. [PMID: 38795978 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on human brain function obtained with direct electrical stimulation (DES) in neurosurgical patients have been recently integrated and combined with modern neuroimaging techniques, allowing a connectome-based approach fed by intraoperative DES data. Within this framework is crucial to develop reliable methods for spatial localization of DES-derived information to be integrated within the neuroimaging workflow. NEW METHOD To this aim, we applied the Kernel Density Estimation for modelling the distribution of DES sites from different patients into the MNI space. The algorithm has been embedded in a MATLAB-based User Interface, Peaglet. It allows an accurate probabilistic weighted and unweighted estimation of DES sites location both at cortical level, by using shortest path calculation along the brain 3D geometric topology, and subcortical level, by using a volume-based approach. RESULTS We applied Peaglet to investigate spatial estimation of cortical and subcortical stimulation sites provided by recent brain tumour studies. The resulting NIfTI maps have been anatomically investigated with neuroimaging open-source tools. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS Peaglet processes differently cortical and subcortical data following their distinguishing geometrical features, increasing anatomical specificity of DES-related results and their reliability within neuroimaging environments. CONCLUSIONS Peaglet provides a robust probabilistic estimation of the cortical and subcortical distribution of DES sites going beyond a region of interest approach, respecting cortical and subcortical intrinsic geometrical features. Results can be easily integrated within the neuroimaging workflow to drive connectomic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bellacicca
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Luciano Simone
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Parma, Parma 43125, Italy
| | - Henrietta Howells
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Matteo Gambaretti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Alberto Gallotti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Antonella Leonetti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Puglisi
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Francesca Talami
- Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, Istituto di Neuroscienze, Parma, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Cerri Gabriella
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Fornia
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tariciotti L, Mattioli L, Viganò L, Gallo M, Gambaretti M, Sciortino T, Gay L, Conti Nibali M, Gallotti A, Cerri G, Bello L, Rossi M. Object-oriented hand dexterity and grasping abilities, from the animal quarters to the neurosurgical OR: a systematic review of the underlying neural correlates in non-human, human primate and recent findings in awake brain surgery. Front Integr Neurosci 2024; 18:1324581. [PMID: 38425673 PMCID: PMC10902498 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1324581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The sensorimotor integrations subserving object-oriented manipulative actions have been extensively investigated in non-human primates via direct approaches, as intracortical micro-stimulation (ICMS), cytoarchitectonic analysis and anatomical tracers. However, the understanding of the mechanisms underlying complex motor behaviors is yet to be fully integrated in brain mapping paradigms and the consistency of these findings with intraoperative data obtained during awake neurosurgical procedures for brain tumor removal is still largely unexplored. Accordingly, there is a paucity of systematic studies reviewing the cross-species analogies in neural activities during object-oriented hand motor tasks in primates and investigating the concordance with intraoperative findings during brain mapping. The current systematic review was designed to summarize the cortical and subcortical neural correlates of object-oriented fine hand actions, as revealed by fMRI and PET studies, in non-human and human primates and how those were translated into neurosurgical studies testing dexterous hand-movements during intraoperative brain mapping. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched. Original articles were included if they: (1) investigated cortical activation sites on fMRI and/or PET during grasping task; (2) included humans or non-human primates. A second query was designed on the databases above to collect studies reporting motor, hand manipulation and dexterity tasks for intraoperative brain mapping in patients undergoing awake brain surgery for any condition. Due to the heterogeneity in neurosurgical applications, a qualitative synthesis was deemed more appropriate. Results We provided an updated overview of the current state of the art in translational neuroscience about the extended frontoparietal grasping-praxis network with a specific focus on the comparative functioning in non-human primates, healthy humans and how the latter knowledge has been implemented in the neurosurgical operating room during brain tumor resection. Discussion The anatomical and functional correlates we reviewed confirmed the evolutionary continuum from monkeys to humans, allowing a cautious but practical adoption of such evidence in intraoperative brain mapping protocols. Integrating the previous results in the surgical practice helps preserve complex motor abilities, prevent long-term disability and poor quality of life and allow the maximal safe resection of intrinsic brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Tariciotti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mattioli
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Gallo
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Gambaretti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gay
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Conti Nibali
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Gallotti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Cerri
- MoCA Laboratory, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|