Prognostic value of neurofilament light chain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Prognostic value of neurofilament light in blood in patients with polyneuropathy: A systematic review

Neurofilament light protein (NfL) is a part of the neuronal skeleton, primarily expressed in axons, and is released when nerves are damaged. NfL has been found to be a potential diagnostic biomarker in different types of polyneuropathies. However, whether NfL levels can be used as a predictor for the risk of disease progression is currently less understood. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Searches and included longitudinal studies with a baseline and follow-up examination of adult patients with polyneuropathy and NfL measured in blood. Twenty studies investigating NfL as a predictor of disease progression were identified, examining eight polyneuropathy subtypes. The results from studies in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients were divergent, with two out of five studies finding a significant association between NfL levels and clinical outcomes. Meta-analysis of the three Guillian-Barré Syndrome (GBS) studies found higher odds for the inability to run after 1 year in patients with high levels of NfL (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.56). Results from studies examining other subacute or chronic polyneuropathies like Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) varied in study design and results. Our findings suggest NfL can be used as a predictor of disease progression, particularly in polyneuropathies such as CIDP and GBS. However, NfL may not serve as a reliable and cost-effective biomarker for slowly progressive polyneuropathies like CMT. Future standardized studies considering NfL as a prognostic blood biomarker in patients with different types of polyneuropathies are warranted.

Current Biomarker Strategies in Autoimmune Neuromuscular Diseases

Inflammatory neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of immune-mediated diseases with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. The identification of specific biomarkers has the potential to provide valuable insights into disease pathogenesis, aid in accurate diagnosis, predict disease course, and monitor treatment efficacy. However, the rarity and heterogeneity of these disorders pose significant challenges in the identification and implementation of reliable biomarkers. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of biomarkers currently established in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), myasthenia gravis (MG), and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). It highlights the existing biomarkers in these disorders, including diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and monitoring biomarkers, while emphasizing the unmet need for additional specific biomarkers. The limitations and challenges associated with the current biomarkers are discussed, and the potential implications for disease management and personalized treatment strategies are explored. Collectively, biomarkers have the potential to improve the management of inflammatory neuromuscular disorders. However, novel strategies and further research are needed to establish clinically meaningful biomarkers.

Serum neurofilament light chain: a novel biomarker for early diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

No established blood-based biomarker exists to monitor diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) and evaluate treatment response. The neurofilament light chain (NFL), a blood biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in several neurodegenerative diseases, represents a potential biomarker for DSPN. We hypothesised that higher serum NFL levels are associated with prevalent DSPN and nerve dysfunction in individuals recently diagnosed with diabetes.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 423 adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and known diabetes duration of less than 1 year from the prospective observational German Diabetes Study cohort. NFL was measured in serum samples of fasting participants in a multiplex approach using proximity extension assay technology. DSPN was assessed by neurological examination, nerve conduction studies and quantitative sensory testing. Associations of serum NFL with DSPN (defined according to the Toronto Consensus criteria) were estimated using Poisson regression, while multivariable linear and quantile regression models were used to assess associations with nerve function measures. In exploratory analyses, other biomarkers in the multiplex panel were also analysed similarly to NFL.

RESULTS

DSPN was found in 16% of the study sample. Serum NFL levels increased with age. After adjustment for age, sex, waist circumference, height, HbA_1c, known diabetes duration, diabetes type, cholesterol, eGFR, hypertension, CVD, use of lipid-lowering drugs and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, higher serum NFL levels were associated with DSPN (RR [95% CI] per 1-normalised protein expression increase, 1.92 [1.50, 2.45], p<0.0001), slower motor (all p<0.0001) and sensory (all p≤0.03) nerve conduction velocities, lower sural sensory nerve action potential (p=0.0004) and higher thermal detection threshold to warm stimuli (p=0.023 and p=0.004 for hand and foot, respectively). There was no evidence for associations between other neurological biomarkers and DSPN or nerve function measures.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our findings in individuals recently diagnosed with diabetes provide new evidence associating higher serum NFL levels with DSPN and peripheral nerve dysfunction. The present study advocates NFL as a potential biomarker for DSPN.

Association of plasma neurofilament light chain with disease activity in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to explore associations between plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) concentration (pg/ml) and disease activity in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and examine the usefulness of pNfL concentrations in determining disease remission.

METHODS

We examined pNfL concentrations in treatment-naïve CIDP patients (n = 10) before and after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) induction treatment, in pNfL concentrations in patients on maintenance IVIg treatment who had stable (n = 15) versus unstable disease (n = 9), and in clinically stable IVIg-treated patients (n = 10) in whom we suspended IVIg to determine disease activity and ongoing need for maintenance IVIg. pNfL concentrations in an age-matched healthy control group were measured for comparison.

RESULTS

Among treatment-naïve patients, pNfL concentration was higher in patients before IVIg treatment than healthy controls and subsequently reduced to be comparable to control group values after IVIg induction. Among CIDP patients on IVIg treatment, pNfL concentration was significantly higher in unstable patients than stable patients. A pNFL concentration > 16.6 pg/ml distinguished unstable treated CIDP from stable treated CIDP (sensitivity = 86.7%, specificity = 66.7%, area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73). Among the treatment withdrawal group, there was a statistically significant correlation between pNfL concentration at time of IVIg withdrawal and the likelihood of relapse (r = 0.72, p < 0.05), suggesting an association of higher pNfL concentration with active disease.

CONCLUSIONS

pNfL concentrations may be a sensitive, clinically useful biomarker in assessing subclinical disease activity.

Neurofilament light chain and total tau in the differential diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of acute and chronic inflammatory polyneuropathies

Background and Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of axonal injury biomarkers in patients with inflammatory polyneuropathies.

Methods

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and total tau (T‐tau) were measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma in 41 patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), 32 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 10 with paraproteinemia‐related demyelinating polyneuropathy (PDN), and 8 with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), in comparison with 39 disease‐free controls and 59 other controls. Outcome was measured with the GBS‐disability score (GBS‐ds) or Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score.

Results

Neurofilament light chain levels in CSF and plasma were higher in GBS, CIDP, and PDN vs. disease‐free controls. Patients with MMN had higher NfL levels in plasma vs. disease‐free controls, but lower levels in CSF and plasma vs. patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

T‐tau levels in plasma were higher in GBS, CIDP, PDN, and MMN vs. all control groups.

Neurofilament light chain levels in CSF and plasma in patients with GBS correlated with GBS‐ds, as higher levels were associated with inability to run after 6 and 12 months. NfL levels in CSF and plasma in CIDP did not correlate significantly with outcome.

Conclusions

Acute and chronic inflammatory neuropathies are associated with an increase in levels of NfL in CSF and plasma, but NfL is validated as a prognostic biomarker only in GBS. NfL could be used in differentiating patients with MMN from ALS. T‐tau in plasma is a novel biomarker that could be used in a diagnostic assessment of patients with acute and chronic inflammatory polyneuropathies.

Axonal damage determines clinical disability in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): A prospective cohort study of different CIDP subtypes and disease stages

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Monitoring of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging in daily medical practice because the interrelationship between clinical disability, CIDP subtype, and neuronal degeneration is still elusive. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the role of different electrophysiological variables in CIDP monitoring.

METHODS

Comprehensive bilateral nerve conduction studies (NCS) and structured clinical examinations were performed in 95 patients with typical CIDP and CIDP variants (age at inclusion 58.6 ± 11.6 years; median [range] inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment overall disability score (INCAT-ODSS) 3 [0-9]), at time of first diagnosis in 25 of these patients (based on data from the prospective Immune-mediated Neuropathies Biobank registry). After 12 months, 33 patients underwent follow-up examination. Typical CIDP patients and patients with CIDP variants were characterized electrophysiologically and each individual NCS variable and the overall sum score for axonal damage and demyelination were then correlated to clinical disability scores (INCAT-ODSS, modified Medical Research Council (MRS) sum score, and INCAT sensory score).

RESULTS

As opposed to demyelination markers, the NCS axonal damage variable correlated strongly with disability at both first diagnosis and advanced disease stages in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Distal compound muscle action potential amplitudes of the upper limbs were found to have the strongest correlation with overall clinical function. Typical and atypical CIDP variants had distinct electrophysiological characteristics but, in typical CIDP, axonal degeneration markers were more strongly associated with clinical disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Total disability is largely determined by the degree of axonal damage, especially in typical CIDP. Although most patients have symptoms predominantly in the legs, NCS of the upper limbs are essential for the monitoring of patients with CIDP and CIDP variants.

Fluid Biomarkers for Monitoring Structural Changes in Polyneuropathies: Their Use in Clinical Practice and Trials

Reliable and responsive tools for monitoring disease activity and treatment outcomes in patients with neuropathies are lacking. With the emergence of ultrasensitive blood bioassays, proteins released with nerve damage are potentially useful response biomarkers for many neurological disorders, including polyneuropathies. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing literature focusing on potential applications in polyneuropathy clinical care and trials. Whilst several promising candidates have been identified, no studies have investigated if any of these proteins can serve as response biomarkers of longitudinal disease activity, except for neurofilament light (NfL). For NfL, limited evidence exists supporting a role as a response biomarker in Guillain-Barré syndrome, vasculitic neuropathy, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Most evidence exists for NfL as a response biomarker in hereditary transthyretin-related amyloidosis (hATTR). At the present time, the role of NfL is therefore limited to a supporting clinical tool or exploratory endpoint in trials. Future developments will need to focus on the discovery of additional biomarkers for anatomically specific and other forms of nerve damage using high-throughput technologies and highly sensitive analytical platforms in adequality powered studies of appropriate design. For NfL, a better understanding of cut-off values, the relation to clinical symptoms and long-term disability as well as dynamics in serum on and off treatment is needed to further expand and proceed towards implementation.