1
|
Greenberg SM, Bax F, van Veluw SJ. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities: manifestations, metrics and mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol 2025; 21:193-203. [PMID: 39794509 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-01053-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025]
Abstract
Three monoclonal antibodies directed against specific forms of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide have been granted accelerated or traditional approval by the FDA as treatments for Alzheimer disease, representing the first step towards bringing disease-modifying treatments for this disease into clinical practice. Here, we review the detection, underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), the most impactful adverse effect of anti-Aβ immunotherapy. ARIA appears as regions of oedema or effusions (ARIA-E) in brain parenchyma or sulci or as haemorrhagic lesions (ARIA-H) in the form of cerebral microbleeds, convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage, cortical superficial siderosis or intracerebral haemorrhage. Analysis of the radiographic appearance of ARIA, its clinical risk factors and underlying neuropathology, and results from animal models point to a central role for cerebral amyloid angiopathy - a condition characterized by cerebrovascular Aβ deposits - as a key component, either as a direct target for antibody-mediated inflammation or as recipient of Aβ mobilized from plaques in the Alzheimer brain parenchyma. The great majority of ARIA occurrences are associated with mild or no clinical symptoms. However, ~5% of all ARIA events are severe enough to result in hospitalization, permanent disability or death and thus raise challenging clinical questions regarding patient selection and use of concomitant agents. Therefore, identifying novel approaches to predicting, modelling, preventing and treating ARIA remains a key step towards allowing safe use of anti-Aβ immunotherapy for the world's rapidly ageing population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Greenberg
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Francesco Bax
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Neurosciences, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Susanne J van Veluw
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koemans EA, van Etten ES. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: one single entity? Curr Opin Neurol 2025; 38:29-34. [PMID: 39760721 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a common brain disorder among the elderly and individuals with Alzheimer's disease, where accumulation of amyloid-ß can lead to intracerebral hemorrhage and dementia. This review discusses recent developments in understanding the pathophysiology and phenotypes of CAA. RECENT FINDINGS CAA has a long preclinical phase starting decades before symptoms emerge. Its pathophysiology follows consecutive stages of amyloid-ß deposition, decreased vascular reactivity, nonhemorrhagic changes, and ultimately hemorrhages. Although impaired perivascular clearance is the leading hypothesis underlying CAA, several lines of evidence suggest that glymphatic dysfunction also plays a significant role in the disease process. Despite its common pathway, the disease course is variable. Some patients develop more microbleeds, while others develop larger hemorrhages, suggesting a differentiation in vascular remodeling. Some patients with CAA develop a symptomatic immune response, and inflammation could be an important contributor to vascular damage in CAA in general. Furthermore, the prion-like transmission of amyloid-β has been identified as a cause of iatrogenic CAA occurring decades after neurosurgical procedures involving cadaveric dura mater. SUMMARY Emerging evidence of sporadic, hereditary, inflammatory, and iatrogenic CAA suggests a complex interplay between brain clearance, inflammation and vascular remodeling leading to a diverse clinical phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma A Koemans
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ayton S, Barton D, Brew B, Brodtmann A, Clarnette R, Desmond P, Devos D, Ellis KA, Fazlollahi A, Fradette C, Goh AMY, Kalinowski P, Kyndt C, Lai R, Lim YY, Maruff P, O’Brien TJ, Rowe C, Salvado O, Schofield PW, Spino M, Tricta F, Wagen A, Williams R, Woodward M, Bush AI. Deferiprone in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2025; 82:11-18. [PMID: 39495531 PMCID: PMC11536302 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
Importance Interventions that substantially slow neurodegeneration are needed to address the growing burden of Alzheimer disease (AD) to societies worldwide. Elevated brain iron observed in AD has been associated with accelerated cognitive decline and may be a tractable drug target. Objective To investigate whether the brain-permeable iron chelator deferiprone slows cognitive decline in people with AD. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2, double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of 12-month duration was conducted at 9 sites in Australia between August 2, 2018, and April 1, 2023. Patients older than 54 years with amyloid-confirmed mild cognitive impairment or early AD (a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 20 or higher) were screened. Randomization was 2:1 and masked to participants and all study staff. Interventions Deferiprone 15 mg/kg twice a day or placebo administered orally for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite cognitive measure assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using a neuropsychological test battery (NTB) of memory, executive function, and attention tasks. Secondary outcomes included change in brain iron burden measured by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) magnetic resonance imaging (target engagement), brain volume changes (secondary efficacy measure), and adverse events (safety analysis). Results Of 167 patients screened for eligibility, 81 were included, with 53 randomly assigned to the deferiprone group (mean [SD] age, 73.0 [8.0] years; 29 male [54.7%]) and 28 to the placebo group (mean [SD] age, 71.6 [7.2] years; 17 male [60.7%]); 54 participants completed the study (7 [25.0%] withdrew from the placebo group and 20 [37.7%] from the deferiprone group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the deferiprone group showed accelerated cognitive decline on the NTB primary outcome (β for interaction = -0.50; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.20) compared with placebo (change in NTB composite z score for deferiprone, -0.80 [95% CI, -0.98 to -0.62]; for placebo, -0.30 [95% CI, -0.54 to -0.06]). Secondary analysis revealed that this result was driven by worsening performance on executive function tests. The QSM confirmed that deferiprone decreased iron in the hippocampus compared with placebo (change in hippocampal QSM for deferiprone, -0.36 ppb [95% CI, -0.76 to 0.04 ppb]; for placebo, 0.32 ppb [95% CI, -0.12 to 0.75 ppb]; β for interaction = -0.68 [95% CI, -1.27 to -0.09]). Longitudinal hippocampal volume loss was not affected by deferiprone, but exploratory analysis of other brain regions revealed increased volume loss with deferiprone in frontal areas. The frequency of the adverse effect of neutropenia (4 participants [7.5%] in the deferiprone group) was higher than in similar studies (1.6%-4.4%). Conclusions These trial findings show that deferiprone 15 mg/kg twice a day decreased hippocampal QSM and accelerated cognitive decline in patients with amyloid-confirmed early AD, suggesting that lowering iron with deferiprone is detrimental to patients with AD. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03234686.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Ayton
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Bruce Brew
- Department of Neurology and Peter Duncan Neurosciences Research Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital, Darlinghurst, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amy Brodtmann
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roger Clarnette
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| | - Patricia Desmond
- Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - David Devos
- Department of Medical Pharmacology, Expert Center of Parkinson’s Disease, ALS, and Neurogenetics, University of Lille, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center, Lille, France
| | - Kathryn A. Ellis
- Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Amir Fazlollahi
- Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Caroline Fradette
- Chiesi Global Rare Diseases, Chiesi Canada Corporation, Woodbridge, Canada
| | - Anita M. Y. Goh
- National Ageing Research Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Pawel Kalinowski
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Christopher Kyndt
- Melbourne Health Cognitive Neurology Clinic, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Rosalyn Lai
- KaRa Institute of Neurological Diseases, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Yen Ying Lim
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Maruff
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Cogstate Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Terence J. O’Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher Rowe
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Olivier Salvado
- Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Eveleigh, Australia
| | - Peter W. Schofield
- Neuropsychiatry Service, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia
- University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Michael Spino
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fernando Tricta
- Chiesi Global Rare Diseases, Chiesi Canada Corporation, Woodbridge, Canada
| | - Aaron Wagen
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Williams
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- National Imaging Facility, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Michael Woodward
- Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Ashley I. Bush
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bilodeau PA, Dickson JR, Kozberg MG. The Impact of Anti-Amyloid Immunotherapies on Stroke Care. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1245. [PMID: 38592119 PMCID: PMC10931618 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Anti-amyloid immunotherapies have recently emerged as treatments for Alzheimer's disease. While these therapies have demonstrated efficacy in clearing amyloid-β and slowing cognitive decline, they have also been associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) which include both edema (ARIA-E) and hemorrhage (ARIA-H). Given that ARIA have been associated with significant morbidity in cases of antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy, an understanding of mechanisms of and risk factors for ARIA is of critical importance for stroke care. We discuss the latest data regarding mechanisms of ARIA, including the role of underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and implications for ischemic stroke prevention and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe A. Bilodeau
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - John R. Dickson
- MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 114 16th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA;
| | - Mariel G. Kozberg
- MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 114 16th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA;
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Faigle W, Piccirelli M, Hortobágyi T, Frontzek K, Cannon AE, Zürrer WE, Granberg T, Kulcsar Z, Ludersdorfer T, Frauenknecht KBM, Reimann R, Ineichen BV. The Brainbox -a tool to facilitate correlation of brain magnetic resonance imaging features to histopathology. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad307. [PMID: 38025281 PMCID: PMC10664401 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has limitations in identifying underlying tissue pathology, which is relevant for neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis, stroke or brain tumours. However, there are no standardized methods for correlating MRI features with histopathology. Thus, here we aimed to develop and validate a tool that can facilitate the correlation of brain MRI features to corresponding histopathology. For this, we designed the Brainbox, a waterproof and MRI-compatible 3D printed container with an integrated 3D coordinate system. We used the Brainbox to acquire post-mortem ex vivo MRI of eight human brains, fresh and formalin-fixed, and correlated focal imaging features to histopathology using the built-in 3D coordinate system. With its built-in 3D coordinate system, the Brainbox allowed correlation of MRI features to corresponding tissue substrates. The Brainbox was used to correlate different MR image features of interest to the respective tissue substrate, including normal anatomical structures such as the hippocampus or perivascular spaces, as well as a lacunar stroke. Brain volume decreased upon fixation by 7% (P = 0.01). The Brainbox enabled degassing of specimens before scanning, reducing susceptibility artefacts and minimizing bulk motion during scanning. In conclusion, our proof-of-principle experiments demonstrate the usability of the Brainbox, which can contribute to improving the specificity of MRI and the standardization of the correlation between post-mortem ex vivo human brain MRI and histopathology. Brainboxes are available upon request from our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Faigle
- Neuroimmunology and MS Research Section, Neurology Clinic, University Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marco Piccirelli
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tibor Hortobágyi
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl Frontzek
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, WC1N 1PJ London, United Kingdom
| | - Amelia Elaine Cannon
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Emanuel Zürrer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, S-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zsolt Kulcsar
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Ludersdorfer
- Neuroimmunology and MS Research Section, Neurology Clinic, University Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Katrin B M Frauenknecht
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Luxembourg Center of Neuropathology (LCNP), Laboratoire National de Santé, 3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg
- National Center of Pathology (NCP), Laboratoire National de Santé, 3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Regina Reimann
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Victor Ineichen
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Reproducible Science, University of Zurich, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hampel H, Elhage A, Cho M, Apostolova LG, Nicoll JAR, Atri A. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA): radiological, biological and clinical characteristics. Brain 2023; 146:4414-4424. [PMID: 37280110 PMCID: PMC10629981 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Excess accumulation and aggregation of toxic soluble and insoluble amyloid-β species in the brain are a major hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Randomized clinical trials show reduced brain amyloid-β deposits using monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid-β and have identified MRI signal abnormalities called amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) as possible spontaneous or treatment-related adverse events. This review provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art conceptual review of radiological features, clinical detection and classification challenges, pathophysiology, underlying biological mechanism(s) and risk factors/predictors associated with ARIA. We summarize the existing literature and current lines of evidence with ARIA-oedema/effusion (ARIA-E) and ARIA-haemosiderosis/microhaemorrhages (ARIA-H) seen across anti-amyloid clinical trials and therapeutic development. Both forms of ARIA may occur, often early, during anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibody treatment. Across randomized controlled trials, most ARIA cases were asymptomatic. Symptomatic ARIA-E cases often occurred at higher doses and resolved within 3-4 months or upon treatment cessation. Apolipoprotein E haplotype and treatment dosage are major risk factors for ARIA-E and ARIA-H. Presence of any microhaemorrhage on baseline MRI increases the risk of ARIA. ARIA shares many clinical, biological and pathophysiological features with Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. There is a great need to conceptually link the evident synergistic interplay associated with such underlying conditions to allow clinicians and researchers to further understand, deliberate and investigate on the combined effects of these multiple pathophysiological processes. Moreover, this review article aims to better assist clinicians in detection (either observed via symptoms or visually on MRI), management based on appropriate use recommendations, and general preparedness and awareness when ARIA are observed as well as researchers in the fundamental understanding of the various antibodies in development and their associated risks of ARIA. To facilitate ARIA detection in clinical trials and clinical practice, we recommend the implementation of standardized MRI protocols and rigorous reporting standards. With the availability of approved amyloid-β therapies in the clinic, standardized and rigorous clinical and radiological monitoring and management protocols are required to effectively detect, monitor, and manage ARIA in real-world clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Hampel
- Eisai Inc., Alzheimer’s Disease and Brain Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Aya Elhage
- Eisai Inc., Alzheimer’s Disease and Brain Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Min Cho
- Eisai Inc., Alzheimer’s Disease and Brain Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
| | - Liana G Apostolova
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - James A R Nicoll
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Banner Health, Sun City, AZ 85351, USA
- Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jucker M, Walker LC. Alzheimer's disease: From immunotherapy to immunoprevention. Cell 2023; 186:4260-4270. [PMID: 37729908 PMCID: PMC10578497 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Recent Aβ-immunotherapy trials have yielded the first clear evidence that removing aggregated Aβ from the brains of symptomatic patients can slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. The clinical benefit achieved in these trials has been modest, however, highlighting the need for both a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms and the importance of intervening early in the pathogenic cascade. An immunoprevention strategy for Alzheimer's disease is required that will integrate the findings from clinical trials with mechanistic insights from preclinical disease models to select promising antibodies, optimize the timing of intervention, identify early biomarkers, and mitigate potential side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Jucker
- Department of Cellular Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Lary C Walker
- Department of Neurology and Emory National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ohashi SN, DeLong JH, Kozberg MG, Mazur-Hart DJ, van Veluw SJ, Alkayed NJ, Sansing LH. Role of Inflammatory Processes in Hemorrhagic Stroke. Stroke 2023; 54:605-619. [PMID: 36601948 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.122.037155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Hemorrhagic stroke is the deadliest form of stroke and includes the subtypes of intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. A common cause of hemorrhagic stroke in older individuals is cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage both lead to the rapid collection of blood in the central nervous system and generate inflammatory immune responses that involve both brain resident and infiltrating immune cells. These responses are complex and can contribute to both tissue recovery and tissue injury. Despite the interconnectedness of these major subtypes of hemorrhagic stroke, few reviews have discussed them collectively. The present review provides an update on inflammatory processes that occur in response to intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and the role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage. The goal is to highlight inflammatory processes that underlie disease pathology and recovery. We aim to discuss recent advances in our understanding of these conditions and identify gaps in knowledge with the potential to develop effective therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah N Ohashi
- Department of Neurology (S.N.O., J.H.D., L.H.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Immunobiology (S.N.O., J.H.D., L.H.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Jonathan H DeLong
- Department of Neurology (S.N.O., J.H.D., L.H.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Immunobiology (S.N.O., J.H.D., L.H.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Mariel G Kozberg
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.G.K., S.J.v.V.)
- MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown (M.G.K., S.J.v.V.)
| | - David J Mazur-Hart
- Department of Neurological Surgery (D.J.M.-H.), Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Portland
| | - Susanne J van Veluw
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.G.K., S.J.v.V.)
- MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown (M.G.K., S.J.v.V.)
| | - Nabil J Alkayed
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine and Knight Cardiovascular Institute (N.J.A.), Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Portland
| | - Lauren H Sansing
- Department of Neurology (S.N.O., J.H.D., L.H.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Immunobiology (S.N.O., J.H.D., L.H.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|