Genomic profiling of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals intraindividual concordance of genetic alterations

Tumour burden predicts outcomes after curative resection of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver resection for multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial due to a poor prognosis, driven by aggressive tumour biology. The aim of this study was to stratify multifocal ICC patients to identify those who are likely to benefit from resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent hepatectomy for ICC were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Among patients with multifocal tumours, overall survival (OS) was analysed using multivariable Cox regression to identify prognostic factors. Tumour burden score (TBS) was used for stratification of multifocal ICC, with the optimal cut-off determined via restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1502 patients, 208 (13.8%) had multifocal ICC. Among them, independent predictors of prognosis included TBS (HR 1.09), ASA grade >II (HR 1.48), cirrhosis (HR 2.05), periductal infiltrating/mass forming plus periductal infiltrating morphological subtype (HR 1.58), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.59). RCS analysis identified a TBS of 7.0 as the optimal cut-off. Notably, multifocal ICC patients with a low TBS (<7.0) demonstrated comparable 3-year OS to solitary ICC patients with AJCC stage II/III. In contrast, patients with a high TBS (≥7.0) and multifocal ICC exhibited the worst prognosis (3-year OS: stage I and solitary 67.1%, stage II/III and solitary 43.2%, low TBS and multifocal 43.4%, and high TBS and multifocal 17.8% (P < 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

Whereas patients with high-TBS multifocal ICC had a poor prognosis, individuals with low-TBS multifocal ICC demonstrated survival outcomes comparable to solitary ICC patients. These findings emphasize the importance of stratifying patients by tumour burden to guide surgical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for multifocal ICC.

Concordance in Oncogenic Alterations Between the Primary Tumor and Advanced Disease: Insights Into the Heterogeneity of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is characterized by significant phenotypic and clinical heterogeneities and poor response to systemic therapy, potentially related to underlying heterogeneity in oncogenic alterations. We aimed to characterize the genomic heterogeneity between primary tumors and advanced disease in patients with ICCA.

METHODS

Biopsy-proven CCA specimens (primary tumor and paired advanced disease [metastatic disease, progressive disease on systemic therapy, or postoperative recurrence]) from two institutions were subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing. Overall concordance (oncogenic driver mutations, copy number alterations, and fusion events) and mutational concordance (only oncogenic mutations) were compared across paired samples. A subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of exposure to systemic therapy. Patients with extrahepatic CCA (ECCA) were included as a comparison group.

RESULTS

Sample pairs from 65 patients with ICCA (n = 54) and ECCA (n = 11) were analyzed. The median time between sample collection was 19.6 months (range, 2.7-122.9). For the entire cohort, the overall oncogenic concordance was 49% and the mutational concordance was 62% between primary and advanced disease samples. Subgroup analyses of ICCA and ECCA revealed overall/mutational concordance rates of 47%/58% and 60%/84%, respectively. Oncogenic concordance was similarly low for pairs exposed to systemic therapy between sample collections (n = 50, 53% overall, 68% mutational). In patients treated with targeted therapy for IDH1/2 alterations (n = 6) or FGFR2 fusions (n = 3), there was 100% concordance between the primary and advanced disease specimens. In two patients, FGFR2 (n = 1) and IDH1 (n = 1) alterations were detected de novo in the advanced disease specimens.

CONCLUSION

The results reflect a high degree of heterogeneity in ICCA and argue for reassessment of the dominant driver mutations with change in disease status.

Prognostic influence of multiple hepatic lesions in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Presence of multiple hepatic lesions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is included in staging as a negative prognostic factor, but both prognostic value and therapeutic implications remain debated. The aim of this study was to systematically review the prognostic influence of multiple lesions on survival after resection for iCCA, with stratification for distribution and number of lesions.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were systematically searched to identify records (2010-2021) reporting survival for patients undergoing primary resection for iCCA. Included were original articles reporting overall survival, with data on multiple lesions including tumour distribution (satellites/other multiple lesions) and/or number. For meta-analysis, the random effects model and inverse variance method were used. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included for review. For meta-analysis, nine studies reporting data on the prognostic influence of satellite lesions (2737 patients) and six studies reporting data on multiple lesions other than satellites (1589 patients) were included. Satellite lesions (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.67-2.13) and multiple lesions other than satellites (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.72-3.37) were significant negative prognostic factors. Data stratified for tumour number, while limited, indicated increased risk per additional lesion.

CONCLUSION

Satellite lesions, as well as multiple lesions other than satellites, was a negative prognostic factor in resectable iCCA. Considering the prognostic impact, both tumour distribution and number of lesions should be evaluated together with other risk factors to allow risk stratification for iCCA patients with multiple lesions, rather than precluding resection for the entire patient group.

Suppressive effects of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-15a-5p on the progression of cholangiocarcinoma by inhibiting CHEK1 expression

Currently, surgical extraction is the main therapy for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients, but it’s highly susceptible to postsurgical complications and recurrence rate. Thus, we identified the suppressing roles of exosomal miR-15a-5p from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) in the EMT and metastasis of CCA. The microarray dataset GSE265566 was employed to determine the expression of CHEK1 in CCA tissues. The relationship of miR-15a-5p with CHEK1 was analyzed using bioinformatics tools and dual-luciferase reporter assay. The particle size of HUCMSCs-exo was detected by scanning electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis. The cellular and tumorous phenotypes were assessed through flow cytometry, CCK-8 assay, Transwell assay and the in vivo tumor xenograft experiments. CHEK1 was predicated to be markedly elevated in CCA. miR-15a-5p targeted CHEK1 and downregulated the expression of CHEK1. HUCMSCs-exo activated cell apoptosis but repressed the proliferative, invasive, and migratory potentials of CCA cells. After miR-15a-5p was silenced, HUCMSCs-exo presented an opposite effect in regulating CCA. Overexpression of miR-15a-5p promoted apoptosis but suppressed malignancy and tumorigenicity of CCA cells as well as EMT through downregulating CHEK1. Our data suggested that miR-15a-5p in HUCMSCs-exo suppresses EMT and metastasis of CCA through targeting downregulation of CHEK1.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: tumour heterogeneity and its clinical relevance

Treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is currently at a significant turning point due to the identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) fusions that can be targeted with currently available therapies. Clinical trials of these targeted therapies have been promising, and the iCCA patients who may benefit from these targeted treatments can be identified by pathological examination prior to molecular investigations. This is because IDH mutations and FGFR fusions are mainly seen in the small duct type iCCA, a subtype of iCCA defined by the 5th World Health Organization classification, which can be recognized by the pathological diagnostic process. Therefore, pathology plays an important role in precision medicine for iCCA, not only in confirming the diagnosis, but also in identifying the iCCA patients who may benefit from targeted treatments. However, caution is advised with the pathological diagnosis, as iCCA shows tumour heterogeneity, making it difficult to distinguish small duct type iCCA from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and combined HCC-CCA. This review focuses on the pathological/molecular features of both subtypes of iCCA (large and small duct types), as well as their diagnostic pitfalls, clinical relevance, and future perspectives.

An Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Focal Rhabdoid Features and SMARCA4-Deficiency

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with rhabdoid morphology is rare, and only three case reports have been published to date, none of which discuss the genetic changes in the rhabdoid component. We present a case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with focal rhabdoid features and SMARCA4-deficiency detected using immunohistochemistry. A Japanese man in his 60s without viral hepatitis was diagnosed with an avascular tumor in the liver, measuring 4.4 cm in the greatest dimension. The tumor was mostly composed of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, focal poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and an undifferentiated rhabdoid component. Immunohistochemical analysis showed an inclusion-like staining pattern for keratin AE1/AE3 and vimentin in the rhabdoid component. BRG1/SMARCA4 was detected in the differentiated component but not in the poorly- and undifferentiated components. Our novel findings reflecting the morphological and genetic heterogeneity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and will aid the research on drugs targeting the aberrant SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable complex.

Biliary Tract Cancers: Treatment Updates and Future Directions in the Era of Precision Medicine and Immuno-Oncology

The effective management of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) has been hampered by limited options for systemic therapy. In recent years, the focus on precision medicine has made technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) accessible to clinicians to identify targetable mutations in BTCs in tumor tissue (primarily) as well as blood, and to treat them with targeted therapies when possible. It has also expanded our understanding of functional pathways associated with genetic alterations and opened doors for identifying novel targets for treatment. Recent advances in the precision medicine approach allowed us to identify new molecular markers in BTCs, such as epigenetic changes (methylation and histone modification) and non-DNA markers such as messenger RNA, microRNA, and long non-coding RNA. It also made detecting these markers from non-traditional sources such as blood, urine, bile, and cytology (from fine-needle aspiration and biliary brushings) possible. As these tests become more accessible, we can see the integration of different molecular markers from all available sources to aid physicians in diagnosing, assessing prognosis, predicting tumor response, and screening BTCs. Currently, there are a handful of approved targeted therapies and only one class of immunotherapy agents (immune checkpoint inhibitors or ICIs) to treat BTCs. Early success with new targets, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), HER2, protein kinase receptor, and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1); new drugs for known targets, fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) such as futabatinib, derazantinib, and erdafitinib; and ICIs such as durvalumab and tremelimumab is encouraging. Novel immunotherapy agents such as bispecific antibodies (bintrafusp alfa), arginase inhibitors, vaccines, and cellular therapy (chimeric antigen receptor-T cell or CAR-T, natural killer cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) have the potential to improve outcomes of BTCs in the coming years.

Current challenges to underpinning the genetic basis for cholangiocarcinoma

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview regarding the current scenario and knowledge of the CCA genomic landscape and the potentially actionable molecular aberrations in each CCA subtype.

EXPERT OPINION

The establishment and advances of high-throughput methodologies applied to genetic and epigenetic profiling are changing many cancer types' therapeutic landscape , including CCA.The large body of data generated must be interpreted appropriately and eventually implemented in clinical practice. The following advancements toward precision medicine in CCA management will require designing better clinical trials with improved methods to stratify biliary tumor patients.