More Evidence Is Warranted to Establish the Role of 18FDG-PET/CT in Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Investigations Among Children

Emerging Trends in Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation in Pediatrics: Focus on FDG PET/CT and Immune Reactivity

The most common indication for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is tumor imaging, which may be performed for initial diagnosis, staging, therapeutic response monitoring, surveillance, or suspected recurrence. In the routine practice of pediatric nuclear medicine, most infectious, inflammatory, and autoimmune processes that are detected on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging - except for imaging in fever or inflammation of unknown origin - are coincidental and not the main indication for image acquisition. However, interpreting these "coincidental" findings is of utmost importance to avoid erroneously attributing these findings to a neoplastic process. We review the recent literature on fever of unknown origin as well as inflammation of unknown origin in pediatrics and then focus on the ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT imaging findings seen in two specific entities with increased immune reactivity: hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome and the immune-related adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors. We will subsequently close with two sections highlighting related topics and relevant references for further reading.

Quantifying the contribution of 18F-FDG PET to the diagnostic assessment of pediatric patients with fever of unknown origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic assessment of pediatric fever of unknown origin is not known, and evidence from adults is not applicable.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the contribution of ¹⁸F-FDG PET to pediatric fever of unknown origin, considering its diagnostic limitations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to Feb. 18, 2021. We included studies on patients with pediatric fever of unknown origin presenting sufficient data to calculate the likelihood of achieving definite diagnosis (based on pathology or clinical follow-up) between those with abnormal PET findings versus those with normal PET findings. We assessed the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale and quantified the value of PET by pooling the likelihood of achieving definite diagnosis using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 6 studies and found that pediatric patients with abnormal PET findings were about 17 times more likely to achieve definite diagnoses than those with normal PET findings (odds ratio [OR]: 16.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0-35, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analyses using a fixed-effect model (OR 16.91, 95% CI 8.1-35, P < 0.0001) or removing one study at a time (OR 12-20, 95% CI lower bound 3.8-8.6, 95% CI upper bound 33-45, P < 0.0001) did not significantly alter the results. Sample size (interaction P = 0.75), imaging modality (interaction P = 0.29), length of follow-up (interaction P = 0.37), fever of unknown origin subclasses (interaction P = 0.89) and geographical areas (interaction P = 0.74) of studies showed no statistically significant influence on the results.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET is a promising approach in the diagnostic work-up of pediatric fever of unknown origin. Further studies are warranted to support routine use in clinical care.