Isavuconazole as Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Open-label, Prospective, Phase 2 Study

Fluconazole and levofloxacin prophylaxis are ineffective strategies for preventing infections in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia patients are at high risk for infections, which contribute to increased mortality rates of up to 70%. The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis has been shown to significantly lower rates of infection. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of two agents that showed effective results in the literature, levofloxacin and fluconazole, as prophylaxis strategies in AML patients.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 85 AML patients' medical records treated with a 7+3 induction chemotherapy protocol in the Cancer Hospital of Uberlândia from 2017 to 2021 were screened and their data was collected. Within these patients, groups for analysis were created based on whether the acting physician included an antibacterial or antifungal prophylaxis protocol during induction. Contingency tables with χ² and odds ratio tests were realized to verify associations between prophylaxis and infection. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves with Cox regression were developed to analyze survival.

RESULTS

The use of prophylaxis with either fluconazole or levofloxacin did not lower rates of infection, as those who with prophylaxis did not demonstrate significant differences when compared to those without (20.3-29.7%, and 12.3-23.3%, respectively). Patients who suffered a bacterial infection during induction were shown to have lower overall survival, with a similar trend seen in fungal infections.

CONCLUSION

Bacterial and fungal infections were associated with higher rates of induction mortality and lower overall survival, and prophylaxis using fluconazole and levofloxacin did not present any significant difference in preventing these infections in this study, contrasting results found in the literature. The individuality of each treatment center should be taken into consideration and future studies should be realized to better determine the most effective methods and agents for prophylaxis.

Real-World Experience with Isavuconazole in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Spain

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) pose a significant complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Isavuconazole (ISV) is a new generation azole with a favourable adverse effect and interaction profile approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. We analyzed the indications, effectiveness, adverse event profile and drug interaction management of ISV in the real-world setting in adults who received allogeneic-HSCT (allo-HSCT) within the Spanish Group of HSCT and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC). We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all consecutive adult allo-HSCT recipients (≥18 years) who received ISV either for IFI treatment or prophylaxis, from December 2017 to August 2021, in 20 centers within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC). A total of 166 adult allografted patients who received ISV from 2017 to 2021 were included. Median age was 48 years with 43% females. In 81 (49%) patients, ISV was used for treatment of IFI, and in 85 (51%) for prophylaxis. Median duration of ISV administration for IFI treatment was 57 days (range 31-126) and 86 days (range 33-196) for prophylaxis. Most frequent indication for treatment was invasive aspergillosis (78%), followed by mucormycosis (6%). Therapeutic success (45%) was the most frequent reason for ISV withdrawal. In the prophylaxis group, the resolution of IFI risk factors was the most frequent reason for withdrawal (62%). Six (7%) breakthrough IFI were reported. The majority of patients (80%) presented pharmacologic interactions. Twenty-one patients (13%) reported adverse events related to ISV, mainly liver biochemistry abnormalities, which led to ISV withdrawal in 7 patients (4%). ISV was effective and well tolerated for IFI treatment and prophylaxis, with a manageable interaction profile.

Isavuconazonium or posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) prophylaxis is recommended in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during induction chemotherapy. Posaconazole (POSA) is the recommended agent of choice; however, this medication can be associated with QTc prolongation, hepatotoxicity, and drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence for the role of isavuconazole (ISAV) in this setting as an alternative to POSA.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the use of ISAV prophylaxis for primary IFI prevention in patients with AML undergoing induction. Additionally, the study investigated the use of ISAV trough concentration monitoring and compared these results to the efficacy of POSA therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Other secondary objectives included assessing the rates of toxicities associated with either prophylactic agent. This study analyzed the impact these toxicities had on patient outcomes by examining the need to hold or discontinue therapy. The final endpoint considered the efficacy associated with multiple dosing strategies employed at the study institution. Specifically, this included the use of loading doses or foregoing these when initiating prophylaxis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Patients included in this study were adults with AML admitted to Duke University Hospital between June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2021, who received induction chemotherapy and primary IFI prophylaxis for at least 7 days. Exclusion criteria included patients who received concomitant antifungal agents and patients who received antifungal agents as secondary prophylaxis.

RESULTS

241 patients met inclusion criteria with 12 (4.98%) participants in the ISAV group and 229 (95.02%) participants in the POSA group. The IFI incidence in the POSA group was 14.5%, while the ISAV group did not have any occurrences of IFI. No significant difference was found in the rate of IFI occurrence between the two treatment groups (p  =  0.3805). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the use of a loading dose when initiating prophylaxis could impact rates of IFI for this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Due to no difference in incidence, patient specific factors such as concomitant medications and baseline QTc should influence the choice between prophylactic agent.

ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly

Five sessions presented at the European Respiratory Society Congress 2023 were selected by Assembly 8, consisting of thoracic surgeons and lung transplant professionals. Highlights covering management of adult spontaneous pneumothorax, malignant pleural effusion, infectious and immune-mediated complications after lung transplantation, as well as the pro and con debate on age limit in lung transplantation and results of the ScanCLAD study were summarised by early career members, supervised by the assembly faculty.

Characterization of the Use and Efficacy of Isavuconazonium Sulfate in a Pediatric Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant Population: A Single Institution Retrospective Review

Isavuconazonium sulfate (ISA) is a triazole antifungal approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in adults. This single-center, retrospective review of pediatric oncology and stem cell transplant patients receiving ISA for prophylaxis (n=20) or treatment (n=6) of invasive fungal disease (IFD) aims to characterize real-world clinical efficacy and toxicity of ISA in patients <18 years of age. Of 20 patients receiving ISA for prophylaxis, three patients had presumed breakthrough IFD (1 proven, 2 probable/possible). No adverse effects were attributed to ISA use or led to the discontinuation of therapy.

Pipeline of Novel Antifungals for Invasive Fungal Disease in Transplant Recipients: A Pediatric Perspective

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing transplantation. There is a growing armamentarium of novel antifungal agents recently approved for use or in late stages of clinical development. The overarching goal of this review is to discuss the mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, stage of development, and pediatric-specific data for the following agents: encochleated amphotericin B deoxycholate, fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, isavuconazole, olorofim, opelconazole, oteseconazole, and rezafungin. Additionally, key drug attributes of these novel agents and their potential future therapeutic roles in pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.

High-Risk Neutropenic Fever and Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) still represent a relevant cause of mortality in patients affected by hematological malignancies, especially acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy, and in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Mold-active antifungal prophylaxis (MAP) has been established as a standard of care. However, breakthrough IFDs (b-IFDs) have emerged as a significant issue, particularly invasive aspergillosis and non-Aspergillus invasive mold diseases. Here, we perform a narrative review, discussing the major advances of the last decade on prophylaxis, the diagnosis of and the treatment of IFDs in patients with high-risk neutropenic fever undergoing remission induction chemotherapy for AML/MDS and allo-HSCT. Then, we present our single-center retrospective experience on b-IFDs in 184 AML/MDS patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy while receiving posaconazole (n = 153 induction treatments, n = 126 consolidation treatments, n = 60 salvage treatments). Six cases of probable/proven b-IFDs were recorded in six patients, with an overall incidence rate of 1.7% (6/339), which is in line with the literature focused on MAP with azoles. The incidence rates (IRs) of b-IFDs (95% confidence interval (95% CI), per 100 person years follow-up (PYFU)) were 5.04 (0.47, 14.45) in induction (n = 2), 3.25 (0.0013, 12.76) in consolidation (n = 1) and 18.38 (3.46, 45.06) in salvage chemotherapy (n = 3). Finally, we highlight the current challenges in the field of b-IFDs; these include the improvement of diagnoses, the expanding treatment landscape of AML with molecular targeted drugs (and related drug-drug interactions with azoles), evolving transplantation techniques (and their related impacts on IFDs' risk stratification), and new antifungals and their features (rezafungin and olorofim).

The impact of antifungal prophylaxis in patients diagnosed with acute leukemias undergoing induction chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute leukemias are complex diseases to treat and have a high mortality rate. The immunosuppression caused by chemotherapy also causes the patient to become susceptible to a variety of infections, including invasive fungal infections. Protocols established in many countries attempt to prevent these infections through the use of pharmacological antifungal prophylaxis. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the existing evidence for the use of antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia, and how prophylaxis can affect treatment response and mortality. Through the use of a population-variable-outcome strategy, keywords were utilized to search online databases. The included studies were selected and the data was collected to develop descriptive results for all studies, and, for studies that met the criteria, a meta-analysis of the Relative Risk (RR) was analyzed for infection rates, in-hospital mortality, and complete remission. A total of 33 studies were included in this systematic review, with most studies presenting positive results (n = 28/33) from the use of antifungal prophylaxis. Using a random effects model, the pooled results of the meta-analysis presented lower invasive fungal infections in AML (RR: 0.527 (95% CI: 0.391; 0.709). p < 0.001). p < 0.001) and ALL (RR: 0.753 (95% CI: 0.574; 0.988). p = 0.041). when antifungal prophylaxis was used. No discernible difference was encountered in the rate of complete remission when using prophylaxis. Antifungal prophylaxis provides a lower risk of invasive fungal infections and in-hospital mortality in acute leukemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy.

Breakthrough invasive fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis in hematologic malignancy & hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Isavuconazole (ISA) is a newer antifungal used in patients with history of hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic transplant and cellular therapies (HM/TCT). Although it has a more favorable side-effect profile, breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs) while on ISA have been reported.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study evaluating HM/TCT patients who received prophylactic ISA for ≥7 days, we evaluated the incidence and potential risk factors for bIFIs.

RESULTS

We evaluated 106 patients who received prophylactic ISA. The patients were predominantly male (60.4%) with median age of 65 (range: 21-91) years. Acute myeloid leukemia (48/106, 45.3%) was the most common HM, with majority having relapsed and/or refractory disease (43/106, 40.6%) or receiving ongoing therapy (38/106, 35.8%). Nineteen patients (17.9%) developed bIFIs-nine proven [Fusarium (3), Candida (2), Mucorales plus Aspergillus (2), Mucorales (1), Colletotrichum (1)], four probable invasive pulmonary Aspergillus, and six possible infections. Twelve patients were neutropenic for a median of 28 (8-253) days prior to bIFI diagnosis. ISA levels checked within 7 days of bIFI diagnosis (median: 3.65 μg/mL) were comparable to industry-sponsored clinical trials. All-cause mortality among the bIFI cases was 47.4% (9/19).We also noted clinically significant cytomegalovirus co-infection in 5.3% (1/19). On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities and potential risk factors between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

ISA prophylaxis was associated with a significant cumulative incidence of bIFIs. Despite the appealing side-effect and drug-interaction profile of ISA, clinicians must be vigilant about the potential risk for bIFIs.

Posaconazole and midostaurin in patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: Pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical facts in a real life study

Midostaurin is used in combination with chemotherapy to treat patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia exposes these patients to a significant risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). International guidelines recommend primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole (PCZ) but nested analysis of a phase III trial showed that strong PCZ inhibition of CYP3A4 diminished midostaurin metabolism and increased midostaurin plasma levels; however, midostaurin-related adverse events (AEs) were only moderately exacerbated. We conducted a prospective multicenter real-life study to evaluate (i) how often concerns around PCZ-midostaurin interactions made the hematologist prescribe antifungals other than PCZ, (ii) how remarkably PCZ increased midostaurin plasma levels, and (iii) how significantly PCZ-midostaurin interactions influenced hematologic and safety outcomes of induction therapy. Although the hematologists were blinded to pharmacokinetic findings, as many as 16 of 35 evaluable patients were prescribed antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin, weak CYP3A4 inhibitor, in place of PCZ (p < 0.001 for deviation from guidelines). In the 19 patients managed as per guidelines, PCZ-midostaurin interactions were more remarkable than previously characterized, such that at the end of induction therapy midostaurin minimum plasma concentration (Cmin ) was greater than three times higher than reported; moreover, midostaurin Cmin , maximum plasma concentration, and area under the curve were more than or equal to four times higher with PCZ than micafungin. Hematologic outcomes (complete remission and duration of severe neutropenia) and safety outcomes (midostaurin-related any grade or grade ≥3 AEs) were nonetheless similar for patients exposed to PCZ or micafungin, as was the number of breakthrough IFIs. In waiting for randomized phase III trials of new prophylaxis regimens, these findings show that PCZ should remain the antifungal of choice for the midostaurin-treated patient.

Real-world Use of Mold-Active Triazole Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases: Results From a Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter National Registry

Background

Antifungal prophylaxis can prevent invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in high-risk, immunocompromised patients. This study assessed the real-world use of mold-active triazoles (MATs) for the prevention of IFDs.

Methods

This subgroup analysis of a multicenter, observational, prospective registry in the United States from March 2017 to April 2020 included patients who received MATs for prophylaxis (isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole) at study index/enrollment. The primary objective was to describe patient characteristics and patterns of MAT use. Exploratory assessments included the frequency of breakthrough IFDs and MAT-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results

A total of 1177 patients (256 isavuconazole, 397 posaconazole, 272 voriconazole, and 252 multiple/sequenced MATs at/after index/enrollment) were included in the prophylaxis subgroup analysis. Patient characteristics were similar across MAT groups, but risk factors varied. Hematological malignancy predominated (76.5%) across all groups. Breakthrough IFDs occurred in 7.1% (73/1030) of patients with an investigator's assessment (5.0% [11/221] isavuconazole; 5.3% [20/374] posaconazole; 4.0% [9/226] voriconazole; and 15.8% [33/209] multiple/sequenced MATs). Aspergillus (29.5% [18/61]) and Candida (36.1% [22/61]) species were the most common breakthrough pathogens recovered. ADRs were reported in 14.1% of patients, and discontinuation of MATs due to ADRs was reported in 11.1% of patients (2.0% [5/245] isavuconazole; 8.2% [30/368] posaconazole; and 10.1% [27/267] voriconazole).

Conclusions

Breakthrough IFDs were uncommon in patients who received MATs for prophylaxis. Candida and Aspergillus species were the most commonly reported breakthrough pathogens. The discontinuation of MATs due to ADRs was infrequent. These findings support prophylactic strategies with isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole in high-risk patients.

Antifungal prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy: When and how?

The growing pool of critically ill or immunocompromised patients leads to a constant increase of life-threatening invasive infections by fungi such as Aspergillus spp., Candida spp. and Pneumocystis jirovecii. In response to this, prophylactic and pre-emptive antifungal treatment strategies have been developed and implemented for high-risk patient populations. The benefit by risk reduction needs to be carefully weighed against potential harm caused by prolonged exposure against antifungal agents. This includes adverse effects and development of resistance as well as costs for the healthcare system. In this review, we summarise evidence and discuss advantages and downsides of antifungal prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment in the setting of malignancies such as acute leukaemia, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CAR-T cell therapy, and solid organ transplant. We also address preventive strategies in patients after abdominal surgery and with viral pneumonia as well as individuals with inherited immunodeficiencies. Notable progress has been made in haematology research, where strong recommendations regarding antifungal prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment are backed by data from randomized controlled trials, whereas other critical areas still lack high-quality evidence. In these areas, paucity of definitive data translates into centre-specific strategies that are based on interpretation of available data, local expertise, and epidemiology. The development of novel immunomodulating anticancer drugs, high-end intensive care treatment and the development of new antifungals with new modes of action, adverse effects and routes of administration will have implications on future prophylactic and pre-emptive approaches.

Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: 2022 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD) with high morbidity and attributable mortality. We reviewed data published until September 2021 to update the 2017 antifungal prophylaxis recommendations of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). The strong recommendation to administer antifungal prophylaxis in patients with HM with long-lasting neutropenia, i.e. <500 cells/μL for >7 days remains unchanged. Posaconazole remains the drug of choice for mould-active prophylaxis in these patients. Novel treatment options in HM, such as CAR-T-cell treatment or novel targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were considered, however, data are insufficient to give general recommendations for routine antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Major changes regarding specific recommendations compared to the 2017 edition are the now moderate instead of mild support for the recommendations of isavuconazole and voriconazole. Furthermore, published evidence on micafungin allows recommending it at moderate strength for its use in HM. For the first time we included recommendations for non-pharmaceutical measures regarding IFD, comprising the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, smoking, measures during construction work and neutropenic diets. We reviewed the impact of antifungal prophylaxis with triazoles on drug-drug interactions with novel targeted therapies that are metabolized via cytochrome p450 where triazoles inhibit CYP3A4/5. The working group recommends reducing the dose of venetoclax when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inhibiting antifungals. Furthermore, we reviewed data on the prophylactic use of novel antifungal agents. Currently there is no evidence to support their use in a prophylactic setting in clinical practice.

Supportive Care for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of bone marrow disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, progressive cytopenias, and an innate capability of progressing to acute myeloid leukemia. The most common causes of morbidity and mortality are complications related to myelodysplastic syndromes rather than progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Although supportive care measures are applicable to all patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, they are especially essential in patients with lower-risk disease who have a better prognosis compared with their higher-risk counterparts and require longer-term monitoring of disease and treatment-related complications. In this review, we will address the most frequent complications and supportive care interventions used in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, including transfusion support, management of iron overload, antimicrobial prophylaxis, important considerations in the era of COVID-19 (coronavirus infectious disease 2019), role of routine immunizations, and palliative care in the myelodysplastic syndrome population.

New Targeted Drugs for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Antifungals: Pharmacokinetic Challenges and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a life-threatening disease whose treatment is made difficult by a number of mutations or receptor overexpression in the proliferating cellular clones. Life expectancy of patients diagnosed with new, relapsed-refractory, or secondary AML has been improved by drugs targeted at such moieties. Regrettably, however, clinical use of new AML drugs is complicated by pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs the patient is exposed to.

SUMMARY

The most relevant drug-drug interactions (DDI) with clinical implications build on competition for or induction/inhibition of CYP3A4, which is a versatile metabolizer of a plethora of pharmacological agents. Here, we review DDI between AML drugs and the agents used to prevent or treat invasive fungal infections (IFI). The pathophysiology of AML, characterized by functionally defective white blood cells and neutropenic/immunosuppressive effects of concomitant induction chemotherapy, can in fact increase the risk of infectious complications, with IFI causing high rates of morbidity and mortality. Triazole antifungals, such as posaconazole, are strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and may thus cause patient's overexposure to AML drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4. We describe potential strategies to minimize the consequences of DDI between triazole antifungals and targeted therapies for AML and the role that collaboration between clinical pharmacologists, hematologists, and clinical or laboratory microbiologists may have in these settings.

KEY MESSAGES

Therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical pharmacology stewardship could represent two strategies that best express multidisciplinary collaboration for improving patient management.

Incidence of breakthrough fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis compared to posaconazole and voriconazole

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a common infectious complication during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For these patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends posaconazole or voriconazole for IFI prophylaxis. In clinical practice, however, there has been increased use of isavuconazole due to favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters despite limited data for this indication. The comparative prophylactic efficacy of antifungals in this patient population has not been reported, and an analysis is warranted.

METHODS

This retrospective, matched cohort, single-center study, included AML, MDS, or HCT patients who began treatment or underwent transplant between January 1, 2015 and July 31, 2021. Isavuconazole patients were matched 1:2 with patients receiving posaconazole or voriconazole prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included, 42 received isavuconazole, 81 received posaconazole, and three received voriconazole. The majority of patients were male receiving secondary IFI prophylaxis while receiving steroids for treatment of GVHD. The incidence of possible, probable or proven IFI was 16.7% in the isavuconazole group compared to 10.7% in the posaconazole and voriconazole group (OR 1.28, 95% CI -0.9-1.4; p = .67). Hepatotoxicity occurred in 16 total patients, 14 receiving posaconazole and two receiving isavuconazole.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received isavuconazole prophylaxis during AML induction therapy or post-HCT experienced a similar incidence of breakthrough fungal infections compared to those who received posaconazole or voriconazole. These results suggest no difference in antifungal prophylactic efficacy; however larger prospective comparative studies are needed.

Effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in the haematologic setting

OBJECTIVES

Patients with haematologic malignancies are at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Current guidelines recommend the use of azoles for IFI prophylaxis; however, in many clinical situations, antifungal prophylaxis is used off-label. We conducted a systematic literature review to provide haematologists with the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole in IFI prophylaxis in interventional and real-world, observational studies.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases, and relevant conference proceedings and clinical trial registries, were searched for studies on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole prophylaxis in adults at high risk of IFIs. Studies were assessed for inclusion and risk of bias.

RESULTS

Nine studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, eight of which were in haematologic populations (patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes; n = 5) or included haematologic populations (n = 3). Evidence from these studies suggests isavuconazole is effective for IFI prophylaxis in the haematologic setting. However, the studies frequently lacked safety data, most were based on small patient populations from single centres and risk of bias could not be assessed for five studies.

DISCUSSION

These findings provide evidence for isavuconazole as an alternative azole for prophylaxis in high-risk populations. Limitations include lack of applicability of risk of bias assessment tools, level of filtering applied in the search strategy and focus on English-language publications.

CONCLUSION

Isavuconazole may be an effective azole for IFI prophylaxis in high-risk haematologic populations, although further studies are needed.

Clinical research advances of isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal diseases

Purpose

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are a major global public health concern. The incidence of IFD has increased the demand for antifungal agents. Isavuconazole (ISA) is a new triazole antifungal agent that has shown promising efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent real-world experiences of using ISA for the treatment and prevention of IFD.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for clinical applications of ISA in the real world. Tables and reference lists are presented for this systematic review.

Results

IFD poses a major threat to public health and causes high mortality rates. ISA may provide a good treatment. For example, the efficacy of ISA in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is comparable to that of voriconazole, and its efficacy in the treatment of invasive mucormycosis (IM) is similar to that of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB); therefore, ISA is recommended as the first-line treatment for IA and IM. ISA can also achieve good efficacy in the treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC) and can be used as an alternative to de-escalation therapy after first-line drug therapy. In addition, most studies have shown the efficacy and safety of ISA for the prophylaxis of IFD.

Conclusion

Taken together, ISA are expected to become a new choice for the treatment and prevention of IFD because of their good tolerability, high bioavailability, and few drug interactions.

Oral Antineoplastics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comprehensive Review

AML is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease that is associated with poor overall long-term survival. The expanding knowledge of genomic landscape in AML as well as advancements in molecular and chemical biology over the pathway in AML. After 40 years of stagnancy, the recent approval of numerous novel oral anti-leukemic agents for the treatment of AML has changed both the armamentarium of medications and treatment paradigms. These agents have unique clinical considerations in terms of administration, adverse effects, and monitoring parameters which may differ from clinician's historical expectations. Understanding the data, indication and clinical considerations for such novel oral anti-leukemic agents is paramount for clinicians caring patients with AML.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Invasive Mold Infections: A Challenging Field

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients comprise a highly immunocompromised group due to factors associated either with the treatment or the disease itself. Invasive mold infections (IMIs) are considered to be responsible for higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients with hematologic malignancies, including ALL. Defining the exact incidence of IMIs in ALL patients has been rather complicated. The available literature data report a highly variable incidence of IMIs, ranging from 2.2% to 15.4%. Although predisposing factors for IMIs in the setting of ALL are ill-defined, retrospective studies have indicated that a longer duration of neutropenia, treatment with high-dose corticosteroids, and a lack of antimold prophylaxis are associated with an increased risk of IMIs. Additionally, the influence of novel ALL treatments on the susceptibility to fungal infections remains obscure; however, initial data suggest that these treatments may induce prolonged neutropenia and thus an increased risk of IMIs. Administering primary antimold prophylaxis in these patients has been challenging since incorporating azole antifungal agents is troublesome, considering the drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) and increased toxicity that may occur when these agents are coadministered with vincristine, a fundamental component of ALL chemotherapy regimens. Isavuconazole, along with several novel antifungal agents such as rezafungin, olorofim, and manogepix, may be appealing as primary antimold prophylaxis, given their broad-spectrum activity and less severe DDI potential. However, their use in ALL patients needs to be investigated through more clinical trials. In summary, this review outlines the epidemiology of IMI and the use of antifungal prophylaxis in ALL patients.

Real-World Comparison of Isavuconazole and Voriconazole in Terms of the Need for Dosage Adjustments Guided by Clinical Pharmacological Advice During Primary Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Patients with Hemato-Oncological Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence concerning optimal azole dosing regimens currently exists for antifungal prophylaxis in hemato-oncological pediatric patients.

METHODS

Hemato-oncological children receiving intravenous or oral isavuconazole or voriconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis at IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna during November 2020 to October 2021 and undergoing CPA programs based on real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were retrospectively analyzed. CPAs for isavuconazole and voriconazole and the number of dosage adjustments were collected. Normalized trough concentrations [(C min )/dose/kg] were calculated for both drugs at each TDM assessment, and the coefficient of variation was determined. The efficacy and safety of the drugs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen hemato-oncological pediatric patients received azole prophylaxis (mean age and weight: 9.1 ± 4.9 years and 32.6 ± 16.0 kg; 6 isavuconazole and 10 voriconazole). Sixty and 89 CPAs were delivered as isavuconazole and voriconazole, respectively. Dosage adjustments were needed in 3.3% of cases for isavuconazole and 53.9% of cases for voriconazole ( P < 0.001). At first TDM, achievement of the desired target during standard dosing regimens was higher for isavuconazole (83.3%) than for voriconazole (10.0%; P = 0.008). Dispersion of normalized concentrations was higher for voriconazole (CV = 139.1% vs. CV = 79.4%). Elevation of ALT and aspartate aminotransferase levels between baseline and the third month was higher in patients receiving voriconazole (median, 28 vs. 90 U/L; P = 0.038, and 19 vs. 65.5 U/L; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there is limited variability in isavuconazole exposure in hemato-oncological pediatric patients receiving azole prophylaxis , resulting in a low need for CPA-guided dosage adjustments.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Isavuconazole

Isavuconazole is the newest of the clinically available advanced generation triazole antifungals and is active against a variety of yeasts, molds, and dimorphic fungi. Its current FDA-approved indications include the management of invasive aspergillosis as well as mucormycosis, though the latter indication is supported by limited clinical data. Isavuconazole did not achieve noninferiority to caspofungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and therefore lacks an FDA-approved indication for this invasive disease. Significant advantages of isavuconazole, primarily over voriconazole but in some circumstances posaconazole as well, make it an appealing option for the management of complex patients with invasive fungal infections. These potential advantages include lack of QTc interval prolongation, more predictable pharmacokinetics, a less complicated drug interaction profile, and improved tolerability, particularly when compared to voriconazole. This review discusses these topics in addition to addressing the in vitro activity of the compound against a variety of fungi and provides insight into other distinguishing factors among isavuconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The review concludes with an opinion section in which the authors provide the reader with a framework for the current role of isavuconazole in the antifungal armamentarium and where further data are required.

Isavuconazole for COVID-19-Associated Invasive Mold Infections

Isavuconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal drug recently approved as a first-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis and as a first or alternative treatment for mucormycosis. The purpose of this review was to report and discuss the use of isavuconazole for the treatment of COVID-19-associated aspergillosis (CAPA), and COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM). Among all studies which reported treatment of CAPA, approximately 10% of patients were reportedly treated with isavuconazole. Considering 14 identified studies that reported the use of isavuconazole for CAPA, isavuconazole was used in 40% of patients (95 of 235 treated patients), being first-line monotherapy in over half of them. We identified six studies that reported isavuconazole use in CAM, either alone or in combination therapy. Overall, isavuconazole was used as therapy in 13% of treated CAM patients, frequently as combination or sequential therapy. The use of isavuconazole in CAPA and CAM is complicated by the challenge of achieving adequate exposure in COVID-19 patients who are frequently obese and hospitalized in the ICU with concomitant renal replacement therapy (RRT) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The presence of data on high efficacy in the treatment of aspergillosis, lower potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and for subtherapeutic levels, and no risk of QT prolongation compared to other mold-active azoles, better safety profile than voriconazole, and the possibility of using an intravenous formulation in the case of renal failure are the advantages of using isavuconazole in this setting.

Multicenter Registry of Patients Receiving Systemic Mold-Active Triazoles for the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections

Introduction

‘Real-world’ data for mold-active triazoles (MATs) in the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are lacking. This study evaluated usage of MATs in a disease registry for the management of IFIs.

Methods

Data were collected for this multicenter, observational, prospective study from 55 US centers, between March 2017 and April 2020. Eligible patients received isavuconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole as MAT monotherapy (one MAT) or multiple/sequenced MAT therapy (more than one MAT) for prophylaxis or treatment. Patients were enrolled within 60 days of MAT initiation. The primary objective was to characterize patients receiving a MAT and their patterns of therapy. The full analysis set (FAS) included eligible patients for the relevant enrollment protocol, and the safety analysis set (SAF) included patients who received ≥ 1 MAT dose.

Results

Overall, 2009 patients were enrolled in the SAF. The FAS comprised 1993 patients (510 isavuconazole; 540 posaconazole; 491 voriconazole; 452 multiple/sequenced MAT therapies); 816 and 1177 received treatment and prophylaxis at study index/enrollment, respectively. Around half (57.8%) of patients were male, and median age was 59 years. Among patients with IFIs during the study, the most common pathogens were Aspergillus fumigatus in the isavuconazole (18.2% [10/55]) and voriconazole (25.5% [12/47]) groups and Candida glabrata in the posaconazole group (20.9% [9/43]); the lungs were the most common infection site (58.2% [166/285]). Most patients were maintained on MAT monotherapy (77.3% [1541/1993]), and 79.4% (1520/1915) completed their MAT therapies. A complete/partial clinical response was reported in 59.1% (591/1001) of patients with a clinical response assessment. Breakthrough IFIs were reported in 7.1% (73/1030) of prophylaxis patients. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 14.7% (296/2009) of patients (3.9% [20/514] isavuconazole; 11.3% [62/547] posaconazole; 14.2% [70/494] voriconazole).

Conclusions

In this ‘real-world’ study, most patients remained on their initial therapy and completed their MAT therapy. Over half of patients receiving MATs for IFIs had a successful response, and most receiving prophylaxis did not develop breakthrough IFIs. ADRs were uncommon.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00661-5.

Comparison of mold active triazoles as primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in the era of molecularly targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Multiple factors influence the choice of primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy (RIC) given the recent incorporation of targeted leukemia therapies into these regimens.

METHODS

We evaluated the incidence and characteristics of breakthrough IFI (bIFI) in 277 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing RIC with high-intensity, or low-intensity venetoclax-containing therapy. Patients receiving posaconazole (PCZ), voriconazole (VCZ), or isavuconazole (ISA) for > 5 days as PAP during RIC were included. Echinocandin use prior to, but not concomitantly with, the PAP azole was allowed. IFI (modified EORTC/MSG criteria) occurring after > 5 days of continuous azole exposure or within 14 days of discontinuation were considered bIFI.

RESULTS

Proven or probable bIFI were observed in 11 patients (4%). The incidence of bIFI was 2.9% for PCZ, 4.8% for VCZ, and 5.7% for ISA (p=0.55). 161 patients (58%) received echinocandin prophylaxis prior to azole initiation. Neither echinocandin exposure nor chemotherapy intensity impacted bIFI rate. Patients with bIFI had a lower rate of absolute neutrophil count recovery >1000 cells/µL (64% vs 90%, p=0.021) or complete remission (CR; 18% vs 66%, p=0.002) after RIC. Thirty-eight patients (14%) discontinued PAP due to toxicity, most often hepatotoxicity. Discontinuation due to hepatotoxicity was similar among azoles (PCZ: 13%; VCZ: 15%; ISA: 13%).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of bIFI is low during RIC in patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving any of the mold-active triazoles as PAP. Neutrophil recovery and achievement of CR are important for bIFI risk.

Efficacy and safety of Isavuconazole for the treatment of invasive Aspergillus infection - an update of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Invasive aspergillosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. It is now increasingly reported in critically ill patients, including those with respiratory viral infections, such as influenza and COVID-19. Antifungal management is challenging due to diagnostic delay, adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions, narrow therapeutic window, and the emergence of resistance. Isavuconazole is the most recent FDA approved azole for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, with data continuing to accumulate.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the safety and efficacy of isavuconazole in the management of invasive aspergillosis based on the currently available evidence. The authors also report on the structure, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, in vitro and in vivo studies as well as clinical safety and efficacy reports of isavuconazole since its FDA approval.

EXPERT OPINION

Isavuconazole is non-inferior to voriconazole and is a safe, effective, and better tolerated option for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. It offers several advantages over other antifungal agents, including having a better adverse event profile with respect to hepatotoxicity, neuro-visual toxicity, QTc prolongation, as well as a stable pharmacokinetic profile obviating the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Further studies are needed to evaluate its performance in prophylaxis against invasive aspergillosis as well as in the treatment of aspergillosis in critically ill patients without underlying cancer or transplant.

How We Incorporate Venetoclax in Treatment Regimens for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

ABSTRACT

Venetoclax has transformed the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hypomethylating agents with venetoclax (HMA-VEN) have significantly improved outcomes and have become the standard therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML and are comparable to intensive chemotherapy in salvage setting. Venetoclax with intensive chemotherapy have shown high response rates in both frontline and salvage setting in younger patients, and triplet combinations with HMA-VEN and FLT3 inhibitors have shown encouraging results in FLT3mut AML. While patients with NPM1mut, IDH1/2mut experience favorable outcomes, those with TP53mut and secondary AML may experience minimal benefit from the addition of venetoclax. Despite improved outcomes, severe cytopenias and infectious complications are common with venetoclax-based regimens. Early response evaluation, dose reductions, venetoclax interruptions, use of growth factors, and prophylactic antimicrobials may minimize such myelosuppression and risk of infections. Outcomes after failure of frontline HMA-VEN are dismal, and novel approaches are needed to abrogate primary and acquired resistance.

Consensus guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis in haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, 2021

Antifungal prophylaxis can reduce morbidity and mortality from invasive fungal disease (IFD). However, its use needs to be optimised and appropriately targeted to patients at highest risk to derive the most benefit. In addition to established risks for IFD, considerable recent progress in the treatment of malignancies has resulted in the development of new 'at-risk' groups. The changing epidemiology of IFD and emergence of drug resistance continue to impact choice of prophylaxis, highlighting the importance of active surveillance and knowledge of local epidemiology. These guidelines aim to highlight emerging risk groups and review the evidence and limitations around new formulations of established agents and new antifungal drugs. It provides recommendations around use and choice of antifungal prophylaxis, discusses the potential impact of the changing epidemiology of IFD and emergence of drug resistance, and future directions for risk stratification to assist optimal management of highly vulnerable patients.

Venetoclax combination therapy with hypomethylating agents in young adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia

In recent years, one of the most successful advances in treating acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has been the combination of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (decitabine or azacytidine). This combination treatment has an accelerated approval by the Food and Drug Administration for newly diagnosed AML adults who are 75 years of age or older or who have comorbidities and are not eligible to receive intensive induction chemotherapy. AML is the most common form of acute leukaemia in adults, with a median age at diagnosis of 68 years. Consequently, most of the patients included in the studies are elderly. Traditionally, young patients achieve higher remission rates compared with the elderly AML population. Although venetoclax combination therapy could become a treatment option for treating young patients with relapsed/refractory AML, this regimen has not been systematically tested in this setting. In this study, we summarize the currently available evidence on the treatment of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of young relapsed/refractory AML patients, in addition to our experience in clinical practice with two case reports. Venetoclax, combined with hypomethylating agents, seems to be an effective option for young relapsed/refractory AML patients. However, due to the poor quality of the evidence, additional well-designed studies with greater numbers of patients are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of venetoclax combination regimens for this population.

Clinical Considerations of Isavuconazole Administration in High-Risk Hematological Patients: A Single-Center 5-Year Experience

Background

There are limited real-life data on isavuconazole prophylaxis and treatment of invasive mold infections (IMI) in hematological patients and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.

Objectives

Primary objective was to describe the indications of real-life isavuconazole administration at a university hospital. Secondary objectives included the description of liver function tests and QTc interval between baseline and end of treatment (EOT), clinical outcomes and breakthrough IMI by the EOT.

Patients/Methods

This was a 5-year single-center retrospective study of all adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia and/or allogeneic HCT recipients who received isavuconazole as prophylaxis and/or treatment between June 1, 2016, and July 31, 2020.

Results

Among 30 identified patients, the indications for isavuconazole administration were adverse events associated with prior antifungal treatment (N: 18, 60%: hepatotoxicity, renal insufficiency, long QTc interval, neurotoxicity, and potential drug–drug interactions in 6, 4, 3, 1 and 4 patients, respectively), clinical efficacy (N: 5, 16.6%), and other reasons (N: 10, 33.3%; 5/10 patients treated with isavuconazole to facilitate hospital discharge with orally administered appropriate treatment). Alanine aminotransferase significantly decreased from baseline (mean: 129 IU/L, range: 73, 202) to a mean of 48 IU/L (range: 20, 80) by day 14 (P-value: 0.02), 23.5 IU/L (range: 20, 27) by day 28 (P-value: 0.03) and 16.5 IU/L (range: 16, 17) by day 42 (P-value: 0.009). The QTc interval decreased from baseline (mean: 456.8 ms, range: 390, 533) to EOT (mean: 433.8 ms, range: 400, 472; P-value: 0.03). The mean isavuconazole plasma concentration was 2.9 mg/L (range: 0.9, 6.7). There was no breakthrough IMI observed.

Conclusion

Isavuconazole is a safe and reliable antifungal agent in complex hematological patients, with relatively low hepatotoxicity and QTc interval shortening properties.

Isavuconazole Is as Effective as and Better Tolerated Than Voriconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common following lung transplantation. Isavuconazole is unstudied as prophylaxis in organ transplant recipients. We compared effectiveness and tolerability of isavuconazole and voriconazole prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study of patients who received isavuconazole (September 2015-February 2018) or voriconazole (September 2013-September 2015) for antifungal prophylaxis. IFIs were defined by EORTC/MSG criteria.

RESULTS

Patients received isavuconazole (n = 144) or voriconazole (n = 156) for median 3.4 and 3.1 months, respectively. Adjunctive inhaled amphotericin B (iAmB) was administered to 100% and 41% of patients in the respective groups. At 1 year, 8% of patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole developed IFIs. For both groups, 70% and 30% of IFIs were caused by molds and yeasts, respectively, and breakthrough IFI (bIFI) rate was 3%. Outcomes did not significantly differ for patients receiving or not receiving iAmB. Independent risk factors for bIFI and breakthrough invasive mold infection (bIMI) were mold-positive respiratory culture and red blood cell transfusion >7 units at transplant. Bronchial necrosis >2 cm from anastomosis and basiliximab induction were also independent risk factors for bIMI. Isavuconazole and voriconazole were discontinued prematurely due to adverse events in 11% and 36% of patients, respectively (P = .0001). Most common causes of voriconazole and isavuconazole discontinuation were hepatotoxicity and lack of oral intake, respectively. Patients receiving ≥90 days prophylaxis had fewer IFIs at 1 year (3% vs 9%, P = .02). IFIs were associated with increased mortality (P = .0001) and longer hospitalizations (P = .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Isavuconazole was effective and well tolerated as antifungal prophylaxis following lung transplantation.

Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients Managed with an Antifungal Diagnostic Driven Approach

Patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) are at high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD). The practice of antifungal prophylaxis with mold-active azoles has been challenged recently because of drug–drug interactions with novel targeted therapies. This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive cases of proven or probable IFD, diagnosed between 2009 and 2019, in adult hematologic patients and HCT recipients managed with fluconazole prophylaxis and an antifungal diagnostic-driven approach for mold infection. During the study period, 94 cases of IFD occurred among 664 hematologic patients and 316 HCT recipients. The frequency among patients with allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, acute leukemia and other hematologic malignancies was 8.9%, 1.6%, 17.3%, and 6.4%, respectively. Aspergillosis was the leading IFD (53.2%), followed by fusariosis (18.1%), candidiasis (10.6%), and cryptococcosis (8.5%). The overall 6-week mortality rate was 37.2%, and varied according to the host and the etiology of IFD, from 28% in aspergillosis to 52.9% in fusariosis. Although IFD occurred frequently in our cohort of patients managed with an antifungal diagnostic driven approach, mortality rates were comparable to other studies. In the face of challenges posed by the use of anti-mold prophylaxis, this strategy remains a reasonable alternative.

Isavuconazole for treatment of refractory coccidioidal meningitis with concomitant cerebrospinal fluid and plasma therapeutic drug monitoring

Coccidioidal meningitis (CM) is a life-threatening infection with limited treatment options. Small series have reported success with isavuconazole; however, limited data exist on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration. Paired plasma and CSF isavuconazole concentrations were measured. Eleven CSF levels were tested, (7 ventricular, 4 lumbar) in three CM patients. Ventricular CSF levels were undetectable despite detectable plasma levels. All lumbar CSF levels were detectable (mean 1.00 µg/mL). Three pairs of lumbar CSF/plasma concentrations taken within one hour of each other yielded a mean CSF/plasma ratio of 0.31. Isavuconazole was detectable in lumbar but not ventricular CSF in three patients treated for refractory CM.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Isavuconazole: Serum Concentration Variability and Success Rates for Reaching Target in Comparison with Voriconazole

Isavuconazole (ISZ) is used in the treatment of aspergillosis and mucormycosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ISZ samples from a clinical setting performed at Statens Serum Institut. Materials/methods: Isavuconazole serum concentrations were determined by fluorescent detection on a UHPLC. Serum-ISZ (s-ISZ) results were included and compared to those of serum-voriconazole (s-VRZ) in a 33 month period from March 2017. Clinical data were obtained for patients receiving ISZ. The therapeutic range was initially 2-10 mg/L, but was adjusted to 2-5 mg/L during the study period except for selected patients with Mucorales infections who received off-label doses of ISZ. Results: A total of 273 s-ISZ and 1242 s-VRZ measurements from 35 and 283 patients, respectively, were included. Seventeen patients had received both ISZ and VRZ with TDM within the study period. The median s-ISZ was 4.3 mg/L (0.5-15.4 mg/L) with 83% of measurements within the therapeutic index. The median s-VRZ was 2.6 mg/L (0.2-21.9 mg/L) with 67% of measurements within the therapeutic index. The median intra-/interindividual coefficient of variation (CV) was 43.4%/54.8% for ISZ compared to 53.2%/83.3% for VRZ. For patients receiving ISZ, the adverse events were mostly gastroenteric and few drug-drug interactions were observed. Furthermore, immediate change from ISZ to VRZ treatment seemed to lead to prolonged metabolism of ISZ with detection up to 35 days after discontinuation. Conclusions: The majority of patients achieved s-ISZ levels well within the therapeutic range with less intra/interindividual CV than patients receiving VRZ.

Duration of cytopenias with concomitant venetoclax and azole antifungals in acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Venetoclax (VEN) combined with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine improves survival in patients aged ≥75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). VEN and HMA treatment can result in prolonged and often profound neutropenia, and this warrants antifungal prophylaxis. Azole antifungals inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, the primary enzyme responsible for VEN metabolism; this results in VEN dose reductions for each concomitant antifungal. Limited clinical data exist on outcomes for patients treated with VEN, an HMA, and various azoles.

METHODS

The time to neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] > 1000 cells/mm³ ) and platelet (PLT) recovery (PLT count > 100,000 cells/mm³ ) in 64 patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieved a response after course 1 of VEN plus an HMA were evaluated. HMA therapy included azacitidine (75 mg/m² intravenously/subcutaneously for 7 days) or decitabine (20 mg/m² intravenously for 5 or 10 days).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (73%) received an azole: posaconazole (n = 17; 27%), voriconazole (n = 9; 14%), isavuconazole (n = 20; 31%), or fluconazole (n = 1; 2%). The median time to ANC recovery were similar for patients who did receive an azole (37 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34-38 days) and patients who did not receive an azole (39 days; 95% CI, 30 days to not estimable; P = .8). The median time to PLT recovery was significantly longer for patients receiving azoles (28 vs 22 days; P = .01). The median times to ANC recovery (35 vs 38 days) and PLT recovery (26 vs 32 days) were similar with posaconazole and voriconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

VEN plus an HMA resulted in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with the latter prolonged in patients receiving concomitant azoles. Concomitant posaconazole or voriconazole and VEN (100 mg) resulted in similar ANC and PLT recovery times, suggesting the safety of these dosage combinations during course 1.

American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series, 2: Management and Prevention of Aspergillosis in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious disease guidelines for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A completely fresh approach was taken with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious disease series as a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQs), tables, and figures. Adult and pediatric infectious disease and HCT content experts developed, then answered FAQs, and finalized topics with harmonized recommendations that were made by assigning an A through E strength of recommendation paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I through III. This second guideline in the series focuses on invasive aspergillosis, a potentially life-threatening infection in the peri-HCT period. The relevant risk factors, diagnostic considerations, and prophylaxis and treatment approaches are reviewed.

Isavuconazole-Animal Data and Clinical Data

The treatment of invasive fungal infections has deeply evolved in the last years with the inclusion of new antifungals, mainly new azoles (i.e., posaconazole, isavuconazole), to the therapeutic armamentarium. This review focuses on the role of isavuconazole for treating the most important invasive fungal infections both in animals and humans (hematological and non-hematological patients).

Low Rate of Invasive Fungal Infections During Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Without Anti-mold Prophylaxis: Single-Center 2002-2018 Empirical/Pre-emptive Approach

Broad-spectrum antifungal prophylaxis is currently considered the standard of care for adults with de novo AML for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), especially invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Because fluconazole has been used in our center as anti-yeast prophylaxis, we sought to analyze in detail the incidence of IFIs over a 17-year period, as well as their impact on outcome. A standardized protocol of patient management, including serum galactomannan screening and thoracic CT-guided diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy, was used in all patients. A total of 214 consecutive adults with de novo AML who were treated in 3 CETLAM (Grupo Cooperativo para el Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias) protocols from 2002 to 2018 were included. The 90-day incidence of any IFI (including possible cases) was 11% (95% CI 4-15%), most cases occurred during induction chemotherapy (8%, 95% CI 4-12%), and most cases were probable/proven IPA (8%, 95% CI 3-13%). Developing an IFI during induction and consolidation had no impact on 1-year survival. A case-control study with 23 cases of IPA and 69 controls identified induction/re-induction chemotherapy, chronic pulmonary disease and age > 60 years/poor baseline performance status as potential pretreatment risk factors. The current study proves that inpatient induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML can be given in areas with "a priori" high-burden of airborne molds with fluconazole prophylaxis, while the selective use of anti-mold prophylaxis in patients at very high risk may further reduce the incidence of IFI in this specific clinical scenario.

Antifungal prophylaxis and novel drugs in acute myeloid leukemia: the midostaurin and posaconazole dilemma

With the advent of new targeted drugs in hematology and oncology patient prognosis is improved. Combination with antifungal prophylaxis challenges clinicians due to pharmacological profiles prone to drug–drug interactions (DDI). Midostaurin is a novel agent for FLT3-TKD/-ITD^mut-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and metabolized via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Posaconazole is a standard of care antifungal agent used for prophylaxis during induction treatment of AML and a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Concomitant administration of both drugs leads to elevated midostaurin exposure. Both drugs improve overall survival at low numbers needed to treat. The impact of CYP3A4-related DDI remains to be determined. Severe adverse events have been observed; however, it remains unclear if they can be directly linked to DDI. The lack of prospective clinical studies assessing incidence of invasive fungal infections and clinical impact of DDI contributes to neglecting live-saving antifungal prophylaxis. Management strategies to combine both drugs have been proposed, but evidence on which approach to use is scarce. In this review, we discuss several approaches in the specific clinical setting of concomitant administration of midostaurin and posaconazole and give examples from everyday clinical practice. Therapeutic drug monitoring will become increasingly important to individualize and personalize antineoplastic concomitant and antifungal treatment in the context of DDI. Pharmaceutical companies addressing the issue in clinical trials may take a pioneer role in this field. Other recently developed and approved drugs for the treatment of AML likely inhere potential of DDI marking a foreseeable issue in future treatment of this life-threatening disease.