Artesunate Versus Quinine: Keeping Our Options Open

Artesunate regulates the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells by activating the JAK‑2/STAT‑3 signaling pathway in ischemic stroke

Ischemic stroke is one of the most common causes of disability and death globally; therefore, the repair and reconstruction of the central nervous system (CNS) after stroke is very important. Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) may be the key to cell replacement therapy to treat CNS damage. It has previously been reported that artesunate (ART) is involved in the regulation of the biological functions of NSPCs; however, the mechanism of action of ART remains unclear. In the present study, different concentrations of ART were used to treat NSPCs following oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD). Cell viability and apoptosis were analyzed using Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and flow cytometry, respectively, whereas immunofluorescence analysis was used to measure the expression levels of the differentiation-related molecule doublecortin (DCX) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Western blotting was performed to analyze the expression levels of molecules related to the JAK-2/STAT-3 signaling pathway. The present results indicated that treatment with ART following OGD significantly promoted the viability of NSPCs, inhibited the apoptosis of NSPCs, and promoted the expression of PCNA and DCX. Moreover, ART significantly downregulated the protein expression levels of phosphorylated (p)-JAK-2 and p-STAT-3. Furthermore, activation of the JAK-2/STAT-3 signaling pathway and treatment with ART reversed the effects of ART on the proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation of NSPCs. In conclusion, the present data suggested that ART may promote the proliferation and differentiation of NSPCs, and reduce the apoptosis of NSPCs, by inhibiting the JAK-2/STAT-3 signaling pathway. ART may potentially be used for the treatment of ischemic stroke.

Artesunate monotherapy versus artesunate plus quinine combination therapy for treatment of imported severe malaria: a TropNet retrospective cohort study

Background

The addition of intravenous quinine (IVQ) to intravenous artesunate (IVA) has been recently suggested by World Health Organization  in areas where artemisinin resistance is highly prevalent. Since IVA is not yet widely available as “Good Manufacturing Practices” product, for several years combination treatment with IVA and IVQ was used in some Italian centers to mitigate the legal risks in using an unlicensed drug.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare IVA + IVQ and IVA treatment for imported severe malaria. We collected data from three Italian centers. Adult and pediatric cohorts were analyzed separately.

Results

Forty-nine patients treated with IVA and 44 with IVA + IVQ were enrolled, 45 were adults and 48 children. All acquired malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the adult cohort, median of fever clearance time (FCT) was similar in both groups (48 h vs 48 h, p = 0.19) but number of patients who reached apyrexia within 48 h (FCT48) was higher in IVA group (20/24, 83.3% vs 8/17, 47%, p = 0.002). The parasite clearance time (PCT) measure did not differ (median 48 h vs 48 h, p = 0.669). In the pediatric cohort, FCT did not differ in the two groups (median 30 vs 48 h, p = 0.50) while PCT was longer in IVA + IVQ group (median 72 vs 48 h, p = 0.002). Adverse events (AEs) in adults were more common in the combination treatment group (6/19, 31.58% vs 2/26, 7.69%, p = 0.055).

Conclusion

IVA + IVQ treatment did not show better outcome with respect to IVA monotherapy. AEs were more frequent in the IVA + IVQ group compared to the monotherapy. Further studies are necessary to investigate whether IVA + IVQ could be an efficient strategy to treat severe malaria cases in areas at high risk of artemisinin resistance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-022-01771-5.