Six vs Eight Weeks of Antibiotics for Small Mycobacterium ulcerans Lesions in Australian Patients

Management of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection (Buruli ulcer) in Australia: consensus statement

INTRODUCTION

Buruli ulcer, caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is increasing in incidence and spreading to new areas in southeast Australia. With increasing experience and emerging evidence, this consensus statement considers contemporary data to provide up-to-date recommendations to clinicians who may encounter this disease. The emergence of Buruli ulcer in previously non-endemic areas highlights the importance of increasing clinician and community awareness of this disease. Main recommendations and changes in management as a result of this consensus statement: Buruli ulcer is a notifiable disease in Victoria, the Northern Territory and Queensland. Cases identified in other states or territories should be discussed with relevant health authorities. We call for Buruli ulcer to be made nationally notifiable to monitor for its potential emergence in non-endemic regions. Diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction is sensitive and specific if performed correctly; a dry swab under the undermined edge of ulcers or a tissue sample via punch biopsy if the lesion is not ulcerated is recommended. If swabs are incorrectly performed or performed on non-ulcerated skin, they can give a false negative result. There is high quality evidence to support treatment of eight weeks' duration using rifampicin-based dual oral antibiotic therapy, in combination with clarithromycin or a fluoroquinolone; relapse is very rare but can occur in people with risk factors. There is emerging evidence for shorter durations of treatment (six weeks) in individuals with small lesions who are at low risk of relapse and in those who have undergone surgical excision of the lesion (four weeks). Patients should be warned that ulcers typically enlarge with antibiotic treatment, will not have healed by completion of antibiotics, and take a median of four to five months to heal. Surgical management is usually not required, but may be beneficial to reduce healing times, avoid or reduce the duration of antibiotics, and manage paradoxical reactions. Early identification and treatment of paradoxical reactions is important, as they are associated with increased tissue necrosis and delayed wound healing. Good wound care is critical in successful treatment of Buruli ulcer, as it enhances healing and prevents secondary bacterial infection. Compared with adults, children have a higher proportion of non-ulcerative and severe lesions, are less likely to experience adverse antibiotic effects, but have higher rates of paradoxical reactions; specialist referral is recommended.

A human model of Buruli ulcer: Provisional protocol for a Mycobacterium ulcerans controlled human infection study

Critical knowledge gaps have impeded progress towards reducing the global burden of disease due to Mycobacterium ulcerans, the cause of the neglected tropical disease Buruli ulcer (BU). Development of a controlled human infection model of BU has been proposed as an experimental platform to explore host-pathogen interactions and evaluate tools for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. We have previously introduced the use case for a new human model and identified M. ulcerans JKD8049 as a suitable challenge strain. Here, we present a provisional protocol for an initial study, for transparent peer review during the earliest stages of protocol development. Following simultaneous scientific peer review and community/stakeholder consultation of this provisional protocol, we aim to present a refined protocol for institutional review board (IRB) evaluation.

Recent Advances in the Management Strategies for Buruli Ulcers

Buruli ulcer (BU) is a bacterial skin infection that is caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans and mainly affects people who reside in the rural areas of Africa and in suburban and beach resort communities in Australia. The infection typically begins as a painless papule or nodule that gradually develops into a large ulcer that can cause substantial impairment, damaging soft tissues and even bones. Early detection and immediate treatment are crucial to preventing further tissue damage and any potential complications, although it is worth noting that access to proper therapeutic resources can be limited in certain areas. The most commonly used antibiotics for treating BU are rifampicin, streptomycin, and clarithromycin; efforts have recently been made to introduce new treatments that increase the effectiveness and adherence to therapy. This article presents the latest research and management strategies regarding BU, providing an updated and intriguing perspective on this topic.

Mycobacterium ulcerans culture results according to duration of prior antibiotic treatment: A cohort study

Mycobacterium ulcerans disease is a necrotising disease of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and is effectively treated with eight-weeks antibiotic therapy. Significant toxicities, however, are experienced under this prolonged regimen. Here, we investigated the length of antibiotic duration required to achieve negative cultures of M. ulcerans disease lesions and evaluated the influence of patient characteristics on this outcome. M. ulcerans cases from an observational cohort that underwent antibiotic treatment prior to surgery and had post-excision culture assessment at Barwon Health, Victoria, from May 25 1998 to June 30 2019, were included. Antibiotic duration before surgery was grouped as <2 weeks, ≥2-<4 weeks, ≥4-<6 weeks, ≥6-<8 weeks, ≥8-<10 weeks and ≥10-20 weeks. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association between variables and culture positive results. Ninety-two patients fitted the inclusion criteria. The median age was 60 years (IQR 28-74.5) and 51 (55.4%) were male. Rifampicin-based regimens were predominantly used in combination with clarithromycin (47.8%) and ciprofloxacin (46.7%), and the median duration of antibiotic treatment before surgery was 23 days (IQR, 8.0-45.5). There were no culture positive results after 19 days of antibiotic treatment and there was a significant association between antibiotic duration before surgery and a culture positive outcome (p<0.001). The World Health Organisation category of the lesion and the antibiotic regimen used had no association with the culture outcome. Antibiotics appear to be effective at achieving negative cultures of M. ulcerans disease lesions in less than the currently recommended eight-week duration.

Risk Factors Associated with Antibiotic Treatment Failure of Buruli Ulcer

Combination antibiotic therapy is highly effective in curing Buruli ulcer (BU) caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans Treatment failures have been uncommonly reported with the recommended 56 days of antibiotics, and little is known about risk factors for treatment failure. We analyzed treatment failures among BU patients treated with ≥56 days of antibiotics from a prospective observational cohort at Barwon Health, Victoria, from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2018. Treatment failure was defined as culture-positive recurrence within 12 months of commencing antibiotics under the following conditions: (i) following failure to heal the initial lesion or (ii) a new lesion developing at the original or at a new site. A total of 430 patients received ≥56 days of antibiotic therapy, with a median duration of 56 days (interquartile range [IQR], 56 to 80). Seven (1.6%) patients experienced treatment failure. For six adult patients experiencing treatment failure, all were male, weighed >90 kg, did not have surgery, and received combination rifampin-clarithromycin (median rifampin dose, 5.6 mg per kg of body weight per day; median clarithromycin dose, 8.1 mg/kg/day). When compared to those who did not fail treatment on univariate analysis, treatment failure was significantly associated with a weight of >90 kg (P < 0.001), male gender (P = 0.02), immune suppression (P = 0.04), and a first-line regimen of rifampin-clarithromycin compared to a regimen of rifampin-fluoroquinolone (P = 0.05). There is a low rate of treatment failure in Australian BU patients treated with rifampin-based oral combination antibiotic therapy. Our study raises the possibility that treatment failure risk may be increased in males, those with a body weight of >90 kg, those with immune suppression, and those taking rifampin-clarithromycin antibiotic regimens, but future pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies are required to determine the validity of these hypotheses.

Pharmacologic management of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological treatment of Buruli ulcer (Mycobacterium ulcerans infection; BU) is highly effective, as shown in two randomized trials in Africa.

AREAS COVERED

We review BU drug treatment - in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials (PubMed: '(Buruli OR (Mycobacterium AND ulcerans)) AND (treatment OR therapy).' We also highlight the pathogenesis of M. ulcerans infection that is dominated by mycolactone, a secreted exotoxin, that causes skin and soft tissue necrosis, and impaired immune response and tissue repair. Healing is slow, due to the delayed wash-out of mycolactone. An array of repurposed tuberculosis and leprosy drugs appears effective in vitro and in animal models. In clinical trials and observational studies, only rifamycins (notably, rifampicin), macrolides (notably, clarithromycin), aminoglycosides (notably, streptomycin) and fluoroquinolones (notably, moxifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin) have been tested.

EXPERT OPINION

A combination of rifampicin and clarithromycin is highly effective but lesions still take a long time to heal. Novel drugs like telacebec have the potential to reduce treatment duration but this drug may remain unaffordable in low-resourced settings. Research should address ulcer treatment in general; essays to measure mycolactone over time hold promise to use as a readout for studies to compare drug treatment schedules for larger lesions of Buruli ulcer.

Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions.

METHODS

We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pobè). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01659437.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts.

INTERPRETATION

Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer.

FUNDING

WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac.