Clinical impact, reactogenicity and immunogenicity after the first CoronaVac dose in dialysis patients: a Phase IV prospective study

Metabolomics acts as a powerful tool for comprehensively evaluating vaccines approved under emergency: a CoronaVac retrospective study

Introduction

To control the COVID-19 pandemic, great efforts have been made to realize herd immunity by vaccination since 2020. Unfortunately, most of the vaccines against COVID-19 were approved in emergency without a full-cycle and comprehensive evaluation process as recommended to the previous vaccines. Metabolome has a close tie with the phenotype and can sensitively reflect the responses to stimuli, rendering metabolomic analysis have the potential to appraise and monitor vaccine effects authentically.

Methods

In this study, a retrospective study was carried out for 330 Chinese volunteers receiving recommended two-dose CoronaVac, a vaccine approved in emergency in 2020. Venous blood was sampled before and after vaccination at 5 separate time points for all the recipients. Routine clinical laboratory analysis, metabolomic and lipidomic analysis data were collected.

Results and discussion

It was found that the serum antibody-positive rate of this population was around 81.82%. Most of the laboratory parameters were slightly perturbated within the relevant reference intervals after vaccination. The metabolomic and lipidomic analyses showed that the metabolic shift after inoculation was mainly in the glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, amino acid metabolism, urea cycle, as well as microbe-related metabolism (bile acid metabolism, tryptophan metabolism and phenylalanine metabolism). Time-course metabolome changes were found in parallel with the progress of immunity establishment and peripheral immune cell counting fluctuation, proving metabolomics analysis was an applicable solution to evaluate immune effects complementary to traditional antibody detection. Taurocholic acid, lysophosphatidylcholine 16:0 sn-1, glutamic acid, and phenylalanine were defined as valuable metabolite markers to indicate the establishment of immunity after vaccination. Integrated with the traditional laboratory analysis, this study provided a feasible metabolomics-based solution to relatively comprehensively evaluate vaccines approved under emergency.

Humoral Response to BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding inactivated vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are limited. We aimed to investigate humoral responses induced by CoronaVac compared to BNT162b2 in this population.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective cohort study, adult patients undergoing MHD who lacked a history of COVID-19 and decided to get vaccinated with BNT162b2 or CoronaVac were enrolled. Participants provided serum samples before, 1 and 3 months after 2 doses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies against receptor-binding domain of the virus were measured, and levels ≥50 AU/mL were considered as positive. Breakthrough infections and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included, 68 (73.9%) of whom were seronegative at baseline. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac were administered in 38 (55.9%) and 30 (44.1%) patients. At 1 month, seropositivity was 93.1% in BNT162b2 and 88% in CoronaVac groups (p = 0.519). Quantitative antibody levels were significantly higher in BNT162b2 (p < 0.001). At 3 months, both seropositivity (96.4% and 78.3%, p = 0.045) and antibody levels (p = 0.001) remained higher in BNT162b2 compared to CoronaVac. Five patients (7.4%) experienced breakthrough COVID-19. Adverse events were more frequent with BNT162b2, although all of them were mild. Multiple linear regression model showed that only vaccine choice (BNT162b2) was related to the humoral response (β = 0.272, p = 0.038). Seropositive patients at baseline (n = 24) had higher antibody levels at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

BNT162b2 and CoronaVac induced humoral responses in naïve patients undergoing MHD, which were more robust and durable for 3 months after BNT162b2. Both vaccines created high antibody levels in patients who were seropositive at baseline.