1
|
Samarasinghe A, Wong G, Teixeira-Pinto A, Johnson DW, Hawley C, Pilmore H, Mulley WR, Roberts MA, Polkinghorne KR, Boudville N, Davies CE, Viecelli AK, Ooi E, Larkins NG, Lok C, Lim WH. Association between diabetic status and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality on dialysis following first kidney allograft loss. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfad245. [PMID: 38468698 PMCID: PMC10926326 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a greater risk of mortality in kidney transplant patients, primarily driven by a greater risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality. However, the associations between diabetes status at time of first allograft loss and mortality on dialysis remain unknown. Methods All patients with failed first kidney allografts transplanted in Australia and New Zealand between 2000 and 2020 were included. The associations between diabetes status at first allograft loss, all-cause and cause-specific mortality were examined using competing risk analyses, separating patients with diabetes into those with pre-transplant DM or post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Results Of 3782 patients with a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 2.7 (1.1-5.4) years, 539 (14%) and 390 (10%) patients had pre-transplant DM or developed PTDM, respectively. In the follow-up period, 1336 (35%) patients died, with 424 (32%), 264 (20%) and 199 (15%) deaths attributed to CVD, dialysis withdrawal and infection, respectively. Compared to patients without DM, the adjusted subdistribution HRs (95% CI) for pre-transplant DM and PTDM for all-cause mortality on dialysis were 1.47 (1.17-1.84) and 1.47 (1.23-1.76), respectively; for CVD-related mortality were 0.81 (0.51-1.29) and 1.02 (0.70-1.47), respectively; for infection-related mortality were 1.84 (1.02-3.35) and 2.70 (1.73-4.20), respectively; and for dialysis withdrawal-related mortality were 1.71 (1.05-2.77) and 1.51 (1.02-2.22), respectively. Conclusions Patients with diabetes at the time of kidney allograft loss have a significant survival disadvantage, with the excess mortality risk attributed to infection and dialysis withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amali Samarasinghe
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine and National Pancreas Transplant Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carmel Hawley
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - Helen Pilmore
- Department of Renal Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - William R Mulley
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew A Roberts
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kevan R Polkinghorne
- Department of Nephrology and Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil Boudville
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Internal Medicine, University of Western Australia Medical School, Perth, Australia
| | - Christopher E Davies
- Faculty of Health and Medical Science, Adelaide University Medical School, South Australia, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Esther Ooi
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Larkins
- Department of Nephrology, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Charmaine Lok
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wai H Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Internal Medicine, University of Western Australia Medical School, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corr M, Lawrie K, Baláž P, O'Neill S. Management of an aneurysmal arteriovenous fistula in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2023; 37:100799. [PMID: 37804690 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Aneurysms remain the most common complication of an arteriovenous fistula created for dialysis access. The management of an aneurysmal arteriovenous fistula (AAVF) in kidney transplant recipients remains contentious with a lack of clear clinical guidelines. Recipients of a functioning graft do not require the fistula for dialysis access, however risk of graft failure and needing the access at a future date must be considered. In this review we outline the current evidence in the assessment and management of a transplant recipient with an AAVF. We will describe our recommended five-step approach to assessing an AAVF in transplant patients; 1.) Define AAVF 2.) Risk assess AAVF 3.) Assess transplant graft function and future graft failure risk 4.) Consider future renal replacement therapy options 5.) Vascular mapping to assess future vascular access options. Then we will describe the current therapeutic options and when they would most appropriately be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Corr
- Centre of Public Health - Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Regional Nephrology & Transplant Unit-Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom.
| | - Kateřina Lawrie
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Peter Baláž
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Cardiocenter, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Vascular Surgery, National Institute for Cardiovascular Disease, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Stephen O'Neill
- Regional Nephrology & Transplant Unit-Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom; Centre of Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Piarulli P, Vizzardi V, Alberici F, Riva H, Aramini M, Regusci L, Cippà P, Bellasi A. Peritoneal dialysis discontinuation: to the root of the problem. J Nephrol 2023; 36:1763-1776. [PMID: 37747660 PMCID: PMC10543152 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01759-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
As the global burden of chronic kidney disease continues to increase, the use of peritoneal dialysis is often advocated as the preferred initial dialysis modality. Observational studies suggest a survival advantage for peritoneal dialysis over hemodialysis for the initial 2-3 years of dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis has been associated with better graft survival after kidney transplantation and has a reduced cost burden compared to hemodialysis. However, several medical and non-medical reasons may limit access to peritoneal dialysis, and less than 20% of patients with end-stage kidney disease are treated with peritoneal dialysis worldwide. In this narrative review, we sought to summarize the recent medical literature on risk factors for peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, distinguishing the early and the late phase after peritoneal dialysis initiation. Although the definition of clinically relevant outcomes varies among studies, we observed that center size, older age, and the presence of many comorbidities are risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, regardless of the phase after peritoneal dialysis initiation. On the contrary, poor technique training and late referral to nephrology care, as opposed to the need for a caregiver, patient burnout and frequent hospitalizations, are related to early and late peritoneal dialysis drop-out, respectively. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the most relevant parameters to be considered when advising patients in the selection of the most appropriate dialysis modality and in the clinical management of peritoneal dialysis patients. In addition, we wish to provide the readers with a critical appraisal of current literature and a call for a consensus on the definition of clinically relevant outcomes in peritoneal dialysis to better address patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Piarulli
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ospdeale Civico, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Tesserete 46, 6903, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Valerio Vizzardi
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Alberici
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Hilary Riva
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Marta Aramini
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ospdeale Civico, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Tesserete 46, 6903, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regusci
- Servizio di Chirurgia, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Cippà
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ospdeale Civico, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Tesserete 46, 6903, Lugano, Switzerland
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland
- Servizio di Chirurgia, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Bellasi
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ospdeale Civico, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Tesserete 46, 6903, Lugano, Switzerland.
- Servizio di Nefrologia, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
- Servizio di Chirurgia, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
- Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murakami N, Reich AJ, Pavlakis M, Lakin JR. Conservative Kidney Management in Kidney Transplant Populations. Semin Nephrol 2023; 43:151401. [PMID: 37499572 PMCID: PMC10543459 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Conservative kidney management (CKM) has been increasingly accepted as a therapeutic option for seriously ill patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. CKM is active medical management of advanced chronic kidney disease without dialysis, with a focus on delaying the worsening of kidney disease and minimizing symptom burden. CKM may be considered a suitable option for kidney transplant recipients with poorly functioning and declining allografts, defined as patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (<20 mL/min per 1.73 m2) who are approaching allograft failure. CKM may be a fitting option for transplant patients facing high morbidity and mortality with or without dialysis resumption, and it should be offered as a choice for this patient population. In this review, we describe clinical considerations in caring for patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts, especially the unique decision-making process around kidney replacement therapies. We discuss ways to incorporate CKM as an option for these patients. We also discuss financial and policy considerations in providing CKM for this population. Patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts should be supported throughout transitions of care by an interprofessional and multidisciplinary team attuned to their unique challenges. Further research on when, who, and how to integrate CKM into existing care structures for patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoka Murakami
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Martha Pavlakis
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|