Membrane and centrifugal therapeutic plasma exchange: practical difficulties in anticoagulating the extracorporeal circuit

Safety and efficacy of plasmapheresis in treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) is a fatal disease occurring in 3rd trimester. The safety and efficacy of plasmapheresis/plasma exchange (PP/PE) as an adjunctive treatment in patients of AFLP has been studied. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the clinical parameters that included mortality rates and improvement of the biochemical parameters including Liver and Renal function enzymes, coagulopathy factors of AFLP patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL and Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov. RevMan statistical software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

Pooled survival proportion for AFLP patients treated with PP/PE was 87.74% (95% CI: 82.84 to 91.65). Efficacy of PP/PE was studied by its effect on mortality. PE/PP was associated with the reduction in the mortality with pooled odds ratio of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.08 to 3.09) with I2 = 86%. Sensitivity analysis after excluding outlier study, yielded a pooled odds ratio of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.02 to 1.52) with reduced heterogeneity (I2 = 63%). Biochemical parameter analysis demonstrated significant improvement post-PP/PE treatment, including decreased bilirubin (MD: 8.30, 95% CI: 6.75 to 9.84), AST (MD: 107.25, 95% CI: 52.45 to 162.06), ALT (MD: 111.08, 95% CI: 27.18 to 194.97), creatinine (MD: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.39 to 1.93), and Prothrombin time (MD: 5.08, 95% CI: 2.93 to 7.22).

Discussion

Despite some heterogeneity, PP/PE shows promise in improving biochemical parameters in AFLP patients. PE can serve as a therapeutic approach for AFLP particularly in severe or refractory cases. PE provides the time for organ to recover and helps in creating a homeostatic environment for liver. Large RCTs and propensity matched studies are needed to better understand the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022315698.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care unit and with the critically ill, a focus on clinical nursing considerations

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a blood purification technique removing antibodies and plasma proteins to modulate disease and promote recovery. The procedure has different methods, using a membrane or plasma separator with many elements similar to continuous renal replacement therapy (CCRT) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). These nursing knowledge and skill sets apply where ICU nurses are providing TPE with increasing need. However, different care models are also in place where TPE is the responsibility of apheresis and nephrology teams visiting the ICU. The plasma replacement volume and prescribing is aligned with published guidelines but is variable when critical illness overlays the primary indication for TPE. There are some important considerations for TPE with respect to anticoagulation, machine settings, prescribing, and associated nursing management. TPE can be performed concurrent with CRRT in acute situations using Y‐piece and valve connectors and is a new and recent advanced blood purification for the ICU.

Retrospective analysis comparing complication rates of centrifuge vs membrane-based therapeutic plasma exchange in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

There are two conventional modalities used to perform therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE): centrifuge TPE (cTPE) or membrane TPE (mTPE). There is limited data on complications with mTPE.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to better understand the patient and machine complications of mTPE compared to cTPE. We hypothesize that our protocol for mTPE using heparin anticoagulation is well-tolerated.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study of children <21 years of age, we evaluated differences in patient and machine characteristics and complications between cTPE (with citrate anticoagulation) vs mTPE (with heparin anticoagulation).

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, 63 received cTPE and 42 mTPE via Prismaflex. Those who used mTPE were younger (4.8 ± 2.8 years vs 15.2 ± 3.7 years, P = .0001) and weighed less (19.5 ± 10.6 vs 71.7 ± 28.5 kg, P = .0001). There were no significant differences in patient-related complications or indications for TPE between the two modalities. Of the 1031 therapies performed,1003 therapies were analyzed (646 using cTPE and 357 using mTPE) due to exclusion criteria. No significant difference in patient complications were detected between groups. Machine-related complications were infrequent in both approaches. More circuits clotted during mTPE than during cTPE (6.7% [24/357] vs 0% [0/646]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although we use mTPE in smaller children, we showed low rates of complications that were not statistically different from cTPE performed in older children. While the overall rate of circuit clotting using mTPE was low, it occurred more commonly than with cTPE.

Comparison of centrifugal and membrane filtration modalities on therapeutic plasma exchange

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a technique in which plasma is separated from the rest of the blood in an extracorporeal system and exchanged with appropriate fluids. Two main methods are used in the TPE process: membrane filtration (mTPE) and centrifuge-based (cTPE) TPE. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these methods and their effects on hemostatic parameters.

METHODS

A total of 88 TPE procedures performed on 51 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Hemostatic parameters, such as pre- and postoperative complete blood count, fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels were evaluated, as well as data recorded during the TPE application, such as preparation time, operation time, and plasma removal efficiency (PRE). The Fresenius multiFiltrate, software version 5.3 device was used for the mTPE procedure and the Spectra Optia device was used for cTPE.

RESULTS

While both modalities removed similar amounts of plasma, the total time to perform the cTPE treatment was significantly lower than the mTPE (107 [66-191] min vs 116.5 [80-181] min, respectively) (P = .026). At the PRE rate, the mTPE procedure was as effective as cTPE (86.8% ± 16.3 vs 85.15% ± 17.63 respectively, P = .64). The difference was not statistically significant, and this is the highest rate of PRE reported about the mTPE procedure in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study directly comparing Fresenius and Spectra regarding mTPE and cTPE. While there were no statistically significant differences regarding PRE, treatment time of the mTPE was significantly longer than the cTPE treatment time.

Plasma Exchange in Acute and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure

Liver failure in the context of acute (ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with high mortality in the absence of a liver transplant. For decades, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is performed for the management of immune-mediated diseases. TPE has emerged as an attractive extracorporeal blood purification technique in patients with ALF and ACLF. The basic premise of using TPE is to remove the toxic substances which would allow recovery of native liver functions by facilitating liver regeneration. In recent years, encouraging data have emerged, suggesting the benefits of TPE in patients with liver failure. TPE has emerged as an attractive liver support device for the failing liver until liver transplantation or clinical recovery. The data in patients with ALF suggest routine use of high-volume TPE, while the data for such a strategy are less robust for patients with ACLF.

Pulmonary embolism and diffuse alveolar bleeding: combination options and therapy features

The analysis of the mechanisms of the formation of a rare clinical combination of pulmonary embolism (PE) and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH), which are complications of systemic vasculitis associated with antibodies to the cytoplasm of neutrophils (primarily granulomatosis with polyangiitis), systemic lupus erythematosus and secondary antiphlogistic syndrome primary antiphospholipid syndrome and Goodpastures syndrome. Taking into account the chronological sequence of the occurrence of PE and DAH, 3 variants of the onset of these potentially fatal additions to the underlying disease were considered: the anticipatory DAH development of PE, delayed from DAH PE and joint (within 24 hours) formation of PE and DAH. A review of single descriptions of such a combination of complications of granulomatosis with polyangiitis is carried out, criteria are indicated, a working classification of severity is given and, taking this into account, a modern program of therapy for DAH as an independent event and in combination with PE.

Application of regional citrate anticoagulation in membrane therapeutic plasma exchange

BACKGROUND

Both regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) and heparin are used as anticoagulants during membrane therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE). However, there are few reports of comparisons of the two methods. The aim of this study was to compare different anticoagulants in mTPE and observe the effectiveness, safety, and advantages of RCA.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 85 patients who underwent mTPE in the past 1 year, and divided them into three groups. Patients with no bleeding tendency were administered heparin anticoagulation; patients with bleeding tendency/with liver dysfunction/who had undergone an operation were treated with RCA, or did not receive anticoagulation. In the heparin group, low-dose heparin anticoagulation was administered; in the RCA group, 4% sodium citrate solution was administered, and 10% calcium gluconate solution was pumped from the venous circuit tube. The peripheral blood platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and electrolytes were detected before and after treatment in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 255 sessions of mTPE were performed in 85 patients (2-7 times/case) with 120 sessions of heparin anticoagulation, 93 sessions of RCA, and 42 sessions of no anticoagulation. Compared with pretreatment values, the platelet count decreased by 53.7% and the PT and APTT increased (p < 0.05) in the heparin group after treatment. There were no differences in platelet count and PT before and after treatment in the RCA group. In the RCA group, the patients did not experience hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia, and no separator clotting occurred.

CONCLUSION

RCA is safe, feasible, and effective in mTPE, especially for patients with bleeding tendency and frequent monitoring is needed. It is worth widely developing and applying it in clinical practice.

Successful treatment of a patient with severe atopic dermatitis and severe asthma by centrifugal therapeutic plasma exchange

This is a case of a 42-year-old atopic man with severe atopic dermatitis and asthma who despite long-term immunosuppression was not well controlled. He had a very high IgE at 7897 Iu/mL prior to treatment. He underwent two therapeutic plasma exchanges (TPEs) through two peripheral lines in our outpatient department, which led to an absolute decrease of 44.1% and 37% in his plasma IgE for each exchange, and immediate sustained improvement in shortness of breath, and atopic dermatitis, and hence led to a vast improvement in his quality of life. TPE offers a new exciting adjunctive treatment option for severe atopic individuals, where it may provide a novel role to reduce health burden and improve clinical symptoms. Further studies need to be performed to establish an optimal protocol and potential maintenance with recently available targeted anti-IgE biologics.