Effects of switching from oral administration to intravenous injection of l-carnitine on lipid metabolism in hemodialysis patients

Biomarkers to Be Used for Decision of Treatment of Hypogonadal Men with or without Insulin Resistance

Male hypogonadism is a result of low testosterone levels, but patients could be insulin-sensitive (IS) or insulin-resistant (IR), showing different impaired metabolic pathways. Thus, testosterone coadministration, which is commonly used to reestablish testosterone levels in hypogonadism, must take into account whether or not insulin is still active. By comparing metabolic cycles recorded in IS and IR plasma before and after testosterone therapy (TRT), it is possible to know what metabolic pathways can be reactivated in the two different groups upon testosterone recovery, and it is possible to understand if antagonism or synergy exists between these two hormones. IS hypogonadism uses glycolysis, while IR hypogonadism activates gluconeogenesis through the degradation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs). Upon administration of testosterone, acceptable improvements are observed in IS patients, wherein many metabolic pathways are restored, while in IR patients, a reprogramming of metabolic cycles is observed. However, in both subgroups, lactate and acetyl-CoA increases significantly. In IS patients, lactate is used through the glucose-lactate cycle to produce energy, while in IR patients, both lactate and acetyl-CoA are metabolized into ketone bodies, which are used to produce energy. Thus, in IR patients, an ancestral molecular mechanism is activated to produce energy, mimicking insulin effects. Regarding lipids, in both groups, the utilization of fatty acids for energy (β-oxidation) is blocked, even after TRT; free fatty acids (FFAs) increase in the blood in IS patients, while they are incorporated into triglycerides in those with IR. In both subgroups of hypogonadism, supplementation of useful chemicals is recommended during and after TRT when metabolites are not restored; they are listed in this review.

On the Need to Distinguish between Insulin-Normal and Insulin-Resistant Patients in Testosterone Therapy

Male hypogonadism is a disorder characterized by low levels of the hormone testosterone and patients may also have insulin sensitivity (IS) or insulin resistance (IR), such that they show different clinical complications and different metabolic pathways. In this review, we compare metabonomic differences observed between these two groups before and after testosterone therapy (TRT) in order to obtain information on whether the two hormones testosterone and insulin are synergistic or antagonistic. IS hypogonadism uses glucose as the main biofuel, while IR activates gluconeogenesis by the degradation of branched-chain amino acids. The Krebs (TCA) cycle is active in IS but connected with glutaminolysis, while in IR the TCA cycle stops at citrate, which is used for lipogenesis. In both cases, the utilization of fatty acids for energy (β-oxidation) is hampered by lower amounts of acetylcarnitine, although it is favored by the absence of insulin in IR. Increased free fatty acids (FFAs) are free in the blood in IS, while they are partially incorporated in triglycerides in IR. Thus, upon TRT, the utilization of glucose is increased more in IS than in IR, revealing that in IR there is a switch from preferential glucose oxidation to lipid oxidation. However, in both cases, a high production of lactate and acetyl-CoA is the final result, with these levels being much higher in IR. Lactate is used in IS in the glucose–lactate cycle between the liver and muscle to produce energy, while in IR lactate and acetyl-CoA are biotransformed into ketone bodies, resulting in ketonuria. In conclusion, the restoration of testosterone values in hypogonadism gives better results in IS than in IR patients: in IS, TRT restores most of the metabolic pathways, while in IR TRT impairs insulin, and when insulin is inactive TRT activates an ancestral molecular mechanism to produce energy. This evidence supports the hypothesis that, over time, hypogonadism switches from IS to IR, and in the latter case most of the insulin-related metabolisms are not reactivated, at least within 60 days of TRT. However, testosterone therapy in both IS and IR might be of benefit given supplementation with metabolites that are not completely restored upon TRT, in order to help restore physiological metabolisms. This review underlines the importance of using a systems biology approach to shed light on the molecular mechanisms of related biochemical pathways involving insulin and testosterone.

Plasma Metabonomics in Insulin-Resistant Hypogonadic Patients Induced by Testosterone Treatment

Hypogonadic subjects with insulin resistance (IR) showed different metabonomic profiles compared to normo-insulinemic subjects (IS). Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) may have a different impact on the metabolisms of those with the presence or absence of insulin resistance. We evaluated the changes in the metabolism of IR hypogonadic patients before and after 60 days of TRT. The metabonomic plasma profiles from 20 IR hypogonadal patients were recorded using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Plasma metabolites, before and after 60 days of TRT, were compared. In hypogonadic patients, carnosine, which is important for improving performance during exercise, increased. Conversely, proline and lysine—amino acids involved in the synthesis of collagen—reduced. Triglycerides decreased and fatty acids (FFAs) increased in the blood as a consequence of reduced FFA β-oxidation. Glycolysis slightly improved, while the Krebs cycle was not activated. Gluconeogenesis (which is the main energy source for hypogonadal IR before TRT) stopped after treatment. As a consequence, lactate and acetyl CoA increased significantly. Both lactate and acetyl CoA were metabolized into ketone bodies which increased greatly, also due to leucine/isoleucine degradation. Ketone bodies were derived predominantly from acetyl CoA because the reaction of acetyl CoA into ketone bodies is catalyzed by mtHMGCoA synthase. This enzyme is inhibited by insulin, which is absent in IR patients but overexpressed following testosterone administration. Ketosis is an alternative route for energy supply and provides the same metabolic effects as insulin but at the metabolic or primitive control level, which bypasses the complex signaling pathway of insulin. After treatment, the hypogonadic patients showed clinical symptoms related to ketonuria. They presented similarly to those following a ketogenic diet, the so-called ‘keto flu’. This must be taken into account before the administration of TRT to hypogonadic patients.

Effects of L-Carnitine Supplementation in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis

L-carnitine is an important factor in fatty acid metabolism, and carnitine deficiency is common in dialysis patients. This study evaluated whether L-carnitine supplementation improved muscle spasm, cardiac function, and renal anemia in dialysis patients. Eighty Japanese outpatients (62 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 18 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients) received oral L-carnitine (600 mg/day) for 12 months; the HD patients further received intravenous L-carnitine injections (1000 mg three times/week) for 12 months, amounting to 24 months of treatment. Muscle spasm incidence was assessed using a questionnaire, and cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography. Baseline free carnitine concentrations were relatively low in patients who underwent dialysis for >4 years. Total carnitine serum concentration, free carnitine, and acylcarnitine significantly increased after oral L-carnitine treatment for 12 months, and after intravenous L-carnitine injection. There was no significant improvement in muscle spasms, although decreased muscle cramping after L-carnitine treatment was reported by 31% of patients who had undergone HD for >4 years. Hemoglobin concentrations increased significantly at 12 and 24 months in the HD group. Therefore, L-carnitine may be effective for reducing muscle cramping and improving hemoglobin levels in dialysis patients, especially those who have been undergoing dialysis for >4 years.

Efficacy of l-carnitine supplementation for management of blood lipids: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

l-carnitine has an important role in fatty acid metabolism and could therefore act as an adjuvant agent in the improvement of dyslipidemia. The purpose of present systematic review and meta-analysis was to critically assess the efficacy of l-carnitine supplementation on lipid profiles.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic search of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Scopus, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, The Cochrane Library. Mean difference (MD) of any effect was calculated using a random-effects model. In total, there were 55 eligible RCTs included with 58 arms, and meta-analysis revealed that l-carnitine supplementation significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC) (56 arms-MD: -8.53 mg/dl, 95% CI: -13.46, -3.6, I²: 93%), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (47 arms-MD: -5.48 mg/dl, 95% CI: -8.49, -2.47, I²: 94.5) and triglyceride (TG) (56 arms-MD: -9.44 mg/dl, 95% CI: -16.02, -2.87, I²: 91.8). It also increased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (51 arms-MD:1.64 mg/dl, 95% CI:0.54, 2.75, I²: 92.2). l-carnitine supplementation reduced TC in non-linear fashion based on dosage (r = 21.11). Meta-regression analysis indicated a linear relationship between dose of l-carnitine and absolute change in TC (p = 0.029) and LDL-C (p = 0.013). Subgroup analyses showed that l-carnitine supplementation did not change TC, LDL-C and TG in patients under hemodialysis treatment. Intravenous l-carnitine and lower doses (>2 g/day) had no effect on TC, LDL-C and triglycerides.

CONCLUSION

l-carnitine supplementation at doses above 2 g/d has favorable effects on patients' lipid profiles, but is modulated on participant health and route of administration.

Atorvastatin and carnitine combination versus atorvastatin alone impacts on the lipid profile of haemodialyzed patients: A randomised clinical trial

Introduction: Dyslipidemia is one of the most common problems in hemodialysis patients and healthcare system. Some studies have suggested the use of carnitine in the treatment of dyslipidemia in hemodialysis patients. This study was carried out aiming to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin and carnitine combination versus atorvastatin alone on the lipid profile of hemodialyzed patients. Methods: In this clinical trial, 50 hemodialysis patients referred to the educational centres of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, for haemodialysis were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group, patients were treated with carnitine (1000 mg three times daily) and atorvastatin (10-80 mg/day based on the baseline lipid profile of the patients) and in the second group, the patients were treated with atorvastatin alone for six months. The levels of triglyceride (TG), cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and haemoglobin before and after intervention were compared. The side effects of carnitine administration were also evaluated. Results: Results showed that TG, cholesterol, and LDL levels were significantly lower in the carnitine group compared to those in the other group at the end of study (P < 0.050). In addition, HDL and haemoglobin levels were significantly higher in the carnitine group in comparison to the other group (P < 0.050). No major side effects of carnitine were observed among the patients. Conclusion: The use of carnitine plus atorvastatin combination is an effective and safe method in the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis without imposing significant side effects.

Kinetics of carnitine concentration after switching from oral administration to intravenous injection in hemodialysis patients

Carnitine has high dialyzability and is often deficient in dialysis patients. This deficiency is treated by either intravenous (IV) or oral supplementation of carnitine. In this study, the mode of carnitine administration was changed from oral to IV in 17 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and the treatment was discontinued after 1 year. We found that the levels of total carnitine (TC), free-carnitine (FC), and acyl-carnitine (AC) significantly increased after 3 months of switching to IV administration (p < .05). After discontinuation of carnitine administration, the TC, FC, and AC levels decreased before dialysis. The average FC value was maintained at the normal levels until 9 months, but fell below the normal values when measured at the 12th month of discontinuation. In conclusion, carnitine was maintained at significantly high levels despite the smaller dose by IV infusion as compared with that by oral administration. We therefore suggest that our results be considered while determining both the carnitine administration route and the administration period in dialysis patients under clinical settings.

The Effect of Different l-Carnitine Administration Routes on the Development of Atherosclerosis in ApoE Knockout Mice

SCOPE

l-Carnitine (LC) is abundant in red meat and is widely added to health supplements and food. This study focuses on the adverse effects of oral supplementation of 1.3% LC in ApoE^-/- mice and whether the parenteral administration of LC (subcutaneously, sub) has any impact on the development of atherosclerosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mice are randomly divided into three groups (n = 15). All mice are fed a high-fat diet (HFD). The number of Ly6C^hi monocytes; degree of atherosclerosis; plasma LC, γ-butyrobetaine (γBB), and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) levels; and microbial community composition are analyzed. Compared with the HFD and HFD ± LC (sub) groups, the number of Ly6C^hi monocytes, atherosclerotic plaque area, and plasma γBB and TMAO levels are increased in the HFD ± LC (oral) group (p < 0.001). Plasma LC levels in the HFD ± LC (sub) group are higher than those in other groups. The levels of γBB, TMAO, and Ly6C^hi monocytes are positively correlated with atherosclerotic plaque area (p < 0.01), and TMAO is positively correlated with Bacteroidetes and negatively correlated with Firmicutes at the phylum level.

CONCLUSION

In contrast with oral LC administration, subcutaneous LC administration, which bypasses its conversion to TMAO in the liver, does not have a detrimental effect on the development of atherosclerosis in male ApoE^-/- mice. Taking LC parenterally may be preferable among patients who require LC supplementation.