Therapeutic variability in adult minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Assessing the Risk of Relapse

Introduction

Kidney outcomes are improved in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) by maintaining a remission in proteinuria. However, characteristics associated with relapses are uncertain. We sought to identify these by analyzing each remission.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study in patients with biopsy-proven lesions of FSGS, absent identifiable secondary cause, who had at least 1 remission from nephrotic-range proteinuria. In each patient, we identified every remission, every relapse, and their durations. Using a multilevel logistic regression to account for the clustering of multiple remissions within a patient, we tested which clinical characteristics were independently associated with relapses.

Results

In 203 individuals, 312 remissions occurred, 177 with and 135 without relapse. A minority of remissions were atypical, defined by either absent hypoalbuminemia and/or no immunosuppression (IS), in contrast to the classic nephrotic syndrome that remits with IS. Atypical remission variants were just as likely to relapse as the classical presentation. Only 24% of remission events were on maintenance therapy at relapse. Independent characteristics associated with relapses were higher maximal proteinuria while nephrotic; and in remission, higher nadir proteinuria, lower serum albumin, and higher blood pressure. Using these variables, we created a tool estimating the 1-year risk of relapse ranging from 9% to 80%, well-calibrated to the observed data.

Conclusion

In FSGS, relapses are frequent but predictable using independent clinical characteristics. We also provide evidence that atypical presentations remit and relapse following the same pattern as classic FSGS presentations. Treatment strategies to prolong remission duration should be addressed in future trials.

Later Response to Corticosteroids in Adults With Primary Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis Is Associated With Favorable Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines advise initial therapy with corticosteroids (CSs) in patients with presumed primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (pFSGS). Many patients do not achieve complete remission (CR) after 8 or 16 weeks. Although these patients are considered steroid resistant, clinical outcomes are ill defined.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with pFSGS who were referred between January 1995 and December 2014. Data of clinical presentation until last follow-up were collected from patient records.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (median age 47 years, 20 female/31 male) were included (median follow-up 7.1 years). There were 10 patients who achieved partial response (PR) at 8 weeks. High-dose CS monotherapy was continued for a median of 17 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 11-21 weeks) (total duration 56 weeks [IQR 28-83 weeks]). With CSs, the cumulative incidence of CR + PR was 18% and 35%, respectively. Of 24 patients with persistent nephrotic-range proteinuria, 22 received additional immunosuppressive (IS) therapy, resulting in CR in 3 (14%) and PR in 11 patients (50%). A decrease of >20% of proteinuria at 8 weeks predicted response. In addition, 8 patients (36%) were considered primary nonresponders. A genetic cause was found in 2 patients. Proteinuria at end of follow-up was 1.2 g (IQR 0.4-3.0 g/24 hours or g/10 mmol creatinine). Renal survival at 3, 5, and 10 years was 92%, 87%, and 64%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with presumed pFSGS often respond late to IS therapy. A decrease in proteinuria of >20% after 8 weeks of therapy is a predictor of responsiveness. Regardless of CR in some patients, improved biomarkers are needed to predict response/outcomes in patients with pFSGS.

A National Registry Study of Patient and Renal Survival in Adult Nephrotic Syndrome

Introduction

We aimed to determine the mortality rate, cause of death, and rate of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in adults with nephrotic syndrome (NS).

Methods

We conducted a national registry–based study, including all 522 adults who had a kidney biopsy for NS in Scotland in 2014–2017. We linked the Scottish Renal Registry to death certificate data. We performed survival and Cox proportional hazards analyses, accounting for competing risks of death and ESKD. We compared mortality rates with those in the age- and sex-matched general population.

Results

A total of 372 patients had primary NS; 150 had secondary NS. Over a median follow-up of 866 days, 110 patients (21%) died. In patients with primary NS, observed versus population 3-year mortality was 2.1% (95% CI 0.0%–4.6%) versus 0.9% (0.8%–1.0%) in patients aged <60 years and 24.9% (18.4%–30.8%) versus 9.4% (8.3%–10.5%) in those aged ≥60 years. In secondary NS, this discrepancy was 17.1% (5.6%–27.2%) versus 1.1% (0.9%–1.2%) in <60-year-olds and 49.4% (36.6%–59.7%) versus 8.1% (6.6%–9.6%) in ≥60-year-olds. In primary NS, cardiovascular causes accounted for 28% of deaths, compared with 18% in the general population. Eighty patients (15%) progressed to ESKD. Incidence of ESKD by 3 years was 8.4% (95% CI 4.9%–11.7%) in primary and 35.1% (24.3%–44.5%) in secondary NS. Early remission of proteinuria and the absence of early acute kidney injury (AKI) were associated with lower rates of death and ESKD.

Conclusions

Adults with NS have high rates of death and ESKD. Cardiovascular causes account for excess mortality in primary NS.

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: State-of-the-Art and Clinical Perspective

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a histological pattern of glomerular injury, rather than a single disease, that is caused by diverse clinicopathological entities with different mechanisms of injury with the podocyte as the principal target of lesion, leading to the characteristic sclerotic lesions in parts (i.e., focal) of some (i.e., segmental) glomeruli. The lesion of FSGS has shown an increasing prevalence over the past few decades and is considered the most common glomerular cause leading to ESKD. Primary FSGS, which usually presents with nephrotic syndrome, is thought to be caused by circulating permeability factors that have a main role in podocyte foot process effacement. Secondary forms of FSGS include maladaptive FSGS secondary to glomerular hyperfiltration such as in obesity or in cases of loss in nephron mass, virus-associated FSGS, and drug-associated FSGS that can result in direct podocyte injury. Genetic FSGS is increasingly been recognized and a careful evaluation of patients with atypical primary or secondary FSGS should be performed to exclude genetic causes. Unlike primary FSGS, secondary and genetic forms of FSGS do not respond to immunosuppression and tend not to recur after kidney transplantation. Distinguishing primary FSGS from secondary and genetic causes has a prognostic significance and is crucial for an appropriate management. In this review, we examine the pathogenesis, clinical approach to distinguish between the different causes, and current recommendations in the management of FSGS.

Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Characteristics and Identification of Prognostic Factors

There are various histopathological forms of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, including minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Whereas some relapse predictor factors have been identified in renal transplantation, the clinical future of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in the native kidney remains uncertain. We designed a multicentric retrospective descriptive cohort study including all patients aged 15 years and over whose renal biopsy confirmed MCD or FSGS between January 2007 and December 2014. We studied 165 patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome; 97 with MCD and 68 with FSGS. In the MCD cohort, 91.7% of patients were treated with corticosteroids for a median total duration of 13 months. During 45 months of follow-up, 92.8% of patients achieved remission and 45.5% experienced relapse. In this cohort, 5% of patients experienced terminal kidney disease. With respect to FSGS patients, 51.5% were treated with corticosteroids for a median total duration of 15 months. During 66 months of follow-up, 73.5% of patients achieved remission and 20% experienced relapse. In this cohort, 26.5% of patients experienced terminal kidney disease. No statistical association was observed between clinical and biological initial presentation and relapse occurrence. This study describes the characteristics of a cohort of patients with the nephrotic idiopathic syndromes of MCD and FSGS from the time of renal biopsy and throughout follow-up.

Regional variations in immunosuppressive therapy in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome: the Japan nephrotic syndrome cohort study

BACKGROUND

The lack of high-quality clinical evidences hindered broad consensus on optimal therapies for primary nephrotic syndromes. The aim of the present study was to compare prevalence of immunosuppressive drug use in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome across 6 regions in Japan.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2010, 380 patients with primary nephrotic syndrome in 56 hospitals were enrolled in a prospective cohort study [Japan Nephrotic Syndrome Cohort Study (JNSCS)], including 141, 151, and 38 adult patients with minimal change disease (MCD), membranous nephropathy (MN), and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), respectively. Their clinical characteristics were compared with those of patients registered in a large nationwide registry of kidney biopsies [Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J-RBR)]. The regional prevalence of use of each immunosuppressive drug was assessed among adult MCD, MN, and FSGS patients who underwent immunosuppressive therapy in the JNSCS (n = 139, 127, and 34, respectively). Predictors of its use were identified using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of JNSCS patients were comparable to those of J-RBR patients, suggesting that the JNSCS included the representatives in the J-RBR. The secondary major immunosuppressive drugs were intravenous methylprednisolone [n = 33 (24.6%), 24 (19.7%), and 9 (28.1%) in MCD, MN, and FSGS, respectively] and cyclosporine [n = 25 (18.7%), 62 (50.8%), and 16 (50.0%), respectively]. The region was identified as a significant predictor of use of intravenous methylprednisolone in MCD and MN patients.

CONCLUSION

Use of intravenous methylprednisolone for MCD and MN differed geographically in Japan. Its efficacy should be further evaluated in a well-designed trial.

Translational science in chronic kidney disease

The KDIGO definition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) allowed a more detailed characterization of CKD causes, epidemiology and consequences. The picture that has emerged is worrisome from the point of view of translation. CKD was among the fastest growing causes of death in the past 20 years in age-adjusted terms. The gap between recent advances and the growing worldwide mortality appears to result from sequential roadblocks that limit the flow from basic research to clinical development (translational research type 1, T1), from clinical development to clinical practice (translational research T2) and result in deficient widespread worldwide implementation of already available medical advances (translational research T3). We now review recent advances and novel concepts that have the potential to change the practice of nephrology in order to improve the outcomes of the maximal number of individuals in the shortest possible interval. These include: (i) updating the CKD concept, shifting the emphasis to the identification, risk stratification and care of early CKD and redefining the concept of aging-associated 'physiological' decline of renal function; (ii) advances in the characterization of aetiological factors, including challenging the concept of hypertensive nephropathy, the better definition of the genetic contribution to CKD progression, assessing the role of the liquid biopsy in aetiological diagnosis and characterizing the role of drugs that may be applied to the earliest stages of injury, such as SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease (DKD); (iii) embracing the complexity of CKD as a network disease and (iv) exploring ways to optimize implementation of existing knowledge.