Double-monoclonal immunofluorometric assays for pregnancy-associated plasma protein A/proeosinophil major basic protein (PAPP-A/proMBP) complex in first-trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome

Four double-monoclonal time-resolved immunofluorometric assays (TrIFMAs) have been developed for the specific determination of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A/proeosinophil major basic protein (PAPP-A/proMBP) complex in first-trimester maternal serum samples. The assays have a functional sensitivity of <4 mIU/L and a working range from 4 to 1000 mIU/L. These 4 assays, together with a polyclonal sandwich TrIFMA, were compared for their ability to discriminate between normal pregnancies (n = 149) and pregnancies carrying a Down syndrome fetus (n = 36) in maternal serum screening samples from gestational weeks 4–13. In 26 Down syndrome pregnancies from gestational weeks 7–12, the median PAPP-A multiples of the median concentration in controls (MoMs) determined by monoclonal antibody combinations 234–3/234–2*, 234–4/234–2*, 234–4/234–5*, and 234–5/234–6* were 0.35, 0.37, 0.42, and 0.44, respectively, whereas the median MoM determined by the polyclonal assay was 0.56. ROC curve analysis also showed that better overall diagnostic accuracy and detection rates were achieved by the monoclonal TrIFMAs than by the polyclonal TrIFMA. This report is the first to describe assays that specifically measure PAPP-A/proMBP complex without possible interference from other proMBP-containing complexes.

Immunological heterogeneity of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). Effects on the radioimmunoassay of PAPP-A

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) is a macromolecular glycoprotein produced by the trophoblast during pregnancy. Because the presence of PAPP-A in non-pregnant females is controversial, we re-evaluated our own radioimmunoassay technique for PAPP-A in the light of new observations about its immunological heterogeneity. Irrespective of the antibody (Geneva anti-PAPP-A or Dako anti-PAPP-A) the use of EDTA pregnancy plasma instead of pregnancy serum as a standard yielded different slopes of the standard curves and estimated significantly different amounts of PAPP-A in test samples. Moreover, highly purified tracers, isolated from maternal EDTA pregnancy plasma or pregnancy serum also produced significantly different results. So that the use of a tracer purified from EDTA plasma and EDTA pregnancy plasma as a standard will yield measurable levels of PAPP-A in non-pregnant female serum whereas the use of a tracer purified from maternal pregnancy serum and maternal pregnancy serum as a standard will not detect PAPP-A in the same samples. We conclude that, irrespective of the antiserum used, but depending on the biological origin of the tracer and the standard, different results will be obtained. PAPP-A is clearly immunologically heterogeneous, and the immunorecognition of PAPP-A will depend on whether or not blood coagulation has taken place.