Clinical experience with aztreonam for treatment of infections in children

The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence-based guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) were published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) in 1992, 2002, and 2010. At the time the most recent guideline was released, the plan was to update the guideline every five years to ensure the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommendations.

METHODS

Based on the previous guidelines, the task force outlined a number of topics related to the treatment of patients with IAI and then developed key questions on these various topics. All questions were approached using general and specific literature searches, focusing on articles and other information published since 2008. These publications and additional materials published before 2008 were reviewed by the task force as a whole or by individual subgroups as to relevance to individual questions. Recommendations were developed by a process of iterative consensus, with all task force members voting to accept or reject each recommendation. Grading was based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system; the quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, or weak, and the strength of the recommendation was graded as strong or weak. Review of the document was performed by members of the SIS who were not on the task force. After responses were made to all critiques, the document was approved as an official guideline of the SIS by the Executive Council.

RESULTS

This guideline summarizes the current recommendations developed by the task force on the treatment of patients who have IAI. Evidence-based recommendations have been made regarding risk assessment in individual patients; source control; the timing, selection, and duration of antimicrobial therapy; and suggested approaches to patients who fail initial therapy. Additional recommendations related to the treatment of pediatric patients with IAI have been included.

SUMMARY

The current recommendations of the SIS regarding the treatment of patients with IAI are provided in this guideline.

Neonatal bacteremia: patterns of antibiotic resistance

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and evaluate the antimicrobial-susceptibility patterns of bacterial infections in our neonatal units.

DESIGN

Retrospective surveillance study.

SETTING

The neonatal units of the Hadassah University Hospitals, Jerusalem, Israel.

PATIENTS

All newborns admitted from January 1994 through February 1999.

METHODS

The records of all patients with positive blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures were reviewed. Bacteremia was considered early-onset (vertical) when occurring within the first 72 hours of life and late-onset (nosocomial) when occurring later. The prevalence and antibiotic-resistance patterns of vertically transmitted and nosocomially acquired strains were compared and studied over time.

RESULTS

219 of 35,691 newborn infants had at least one episode of bacteremia (6.13/1,000 live births). There were 305 identified organisms, of which 21% (1.29/1,000 live births) were considered vertically transmitted and 79% nosocomially acquired. The most common organism causing early-onset disease (29.2%) was group B streptococcus (0.38/1,000 live births), whereas coagulase-negative staphylococci (51%) were the most prevalent in late-onset disease. All gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin. Most gram-positive organisms other than staphylococci were susceptible to ampicillin. Gram-negative organisms represented 31% of all isolates. Generally, there was a trend of increasing resistance to commonly used antibiotics among nosocomially acquired gram-negative organisms, compared to those vertically transmitted, with statistically significant differences for ampicillin and mezlocillin (P<.05 and P<.01, respectively). Over the years, a trend toward an increasing resistance to antibiotics was observed among gram-negative organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

The trend of increasing bacterial resistance to commonly used antibiotics necessitates the implementation of a rational empirical treatment strategy, based on local susceptibility data, reserving certain agents for emerging resistant pathogens.

The use of aztreonam as an alternate therapy for multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The emergence of multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has created a most alarming clinical situation. The armamentarium of antibiotics used against this group of organisms is rapidly being depleted. Our routine therapeutic approach to control and prevent these Gram-negative bacteria from gaining a foothold was the empirical use of an aminoglycoside combined with piperacillin. However, aminoglycoside resistance is now routine rather than unusual. We evaluated the role of the monobactam aztreonam in burn wound infections and compared it to the aminoglycosides amikacin and gentamicin as well as piperacillin for the Enterobacteriacae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A total of 1274 Gram-negative isolates including P. aeruginosa were evaluated for susceptibility to the above-mentioned antibiotics from January 1995 to August 1995 (Table I). Among the Enterobacteriacae, aztreonam was more effective than amikacin and piperacillin (58.4 per cent vs. 45.8 per cent, respectively). However, it still fluctuated among the Enterobacteriacae as did the aminoglycosides. One major significant finding was that while susceptibility to aztreonam was variable for the Enterobacteriacae, P. aeruginosa remained 90 per cent susceptible to aztreonam and 90 per cent susceptible to piperacillin, whereas it was 79 per cent resistant to the aminoglycosides. Consequently, when choosing an antimicrobial in a suspected P. aeruginosa burn wound infection, aztreonam and piperacillin should be considered as the first line of defense.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of aztreonam. An update

Plasma concentrations of aztreonam follow a 2-compartment open model with a distribution half-life of 0.20 hours after intravenous injection. The volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) after intravenous and intramuscular injection is about 0.16 L/kg (0.42 L/kg for free drug). After intramuscular injection, absorption is almost complete. Absorption after intraperitoneal administration in patients with peritonitis is 92%. Over a large dosage range, plasma concentrations increase dose proportionally. In healthy individuals, about 56% of the drug is plasma protein bound. Diffusion into tissues is generally slow, and the ratio between mean tissue and plasma aztreonam concentration seems to depend mainly on tissue composition. Aztreonam penetrates into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) more rapidly in patients with inflamed meninges than in those with noninflamed meninges. Diffusion through the placenta is poor, as is diffusion into breastmilk. Aztreonam is predominantly eliminated by the kidney, partly by active tubular excretion. Extrarenal clearance appears to be through hepatic excretion. Metabolism occurs to a very limited extent. Total plasma clearance (CLp) in healthy adults is about 5.6 L/h and the terminal elimination half-life is 1.7 to 2.0 hours. CLp is similar in both children and adults when expressed as a function of bodyweight. However, in neonates, especially in low birthweight infants, CLp is lower. In various disease states, the Vss of aztreonam is not appreciably different from that found in healthy individuals. However, patients with low serum albumin levels (e.g. burn patients, critically ill patients and those with cirrhosis of the liver) generally have an increased volume of distribution. The elimination half-life of the drug is dependent on renal function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)