Efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with parenteral sulbactam/ampicillin and oral sultamicillin for skeletal infections in children

Clinical Practice Guideline by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): 2023 Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Arthritis in Pediatrics

This clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial arthritis (ABA) in children was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for children with ABA, including specialists in pediatric infectious diseases and orthopedics. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA in children. The panel followed a systematic process used in the development of other IDSA and PIDS clinical practice guidelines, which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (see Figure 1). A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text.

Management of Pediatric Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis, Part I: Antimicrobial Stewardship Approach and Review of Therapies for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Kingella kingae

Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO), often occurring in young children, is the most frequently diagnosed type of osteomyelitis in pediatric patients. Optimizing antibiotics is essential as delays to receipt of appropriate therapy can lead to chronic osteomyelitis, as well as impairments in bone growth and development. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are in a key position to help improve the care of patients with AHO as they contain a pharmacist with expertise in antibiotic drug selection, optimization of dosing, and microbiologic test review. A literature search of the MEDLINE database was conducted from initiation through January 2018. Articles selected for the review focus on pathogen identification, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety in children, transition from intravenous to oral therapy, duration of treatment, and antimicrobial stewardship interventions. This review will highlight the potential roles ASPs can have in improving the management of AHO in pediatric patients. These roles include the creation of clinical pathways, improving testing algorithms, antibiotic choice and dosing, intravenous to oral transitions, duration of treatment, and therapy monitoring. Overall, patients are most effectively treated by focusing treatments on age, presentation, local sensitivities, and directed therapy with pathogen identification.

Sequential antibiotic therapy: Effective cost management and patient care

The escalating costs associated with antimicrobial chemotherapy have become of increasing concern to physicians, pharmacists and patients alike. A number of strategies have been developed to address this problem. This article focuses specifically on sequential antibiotic therapy (sat), which is the strategy of converting patients from intravenous to oral medication regardless of whether the same or a different class of drug is used. Advantages of sat include economic benefits, patient benefits and benefits to the health care provider. Potential disadvantages are cost to the consumer and the risk of therapeutic failure. A critical review of the published literature shows that evidence from randomized controlled trials supports the role of sat. However, it is also clear that further studies are necessary to determine the optimal time for intravenous to oral changeover and to identify the variables that may interfere with the use of oral drugs. Procedures necessary for the implementation of a sat program in the hospital setting are also discussed.

Rational antibiotic therapy and the position of ampicillin/sulbactam

In the current context of increasing antimicrobial resistance, it is important to use antibiotics rationally and to re-assess regularly the clinical usefulness of commonly used agents. This review focuses on the efficacy of the beta-lactam ampicillin co-administered with the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam, either parenterally (ampicillin/sulbactam) or orally (sultamicillin), for the treatment of bacterial infections. Clinical findings from the past decade confirm the results of numerous older studies and together provide good evidence to support the continued use of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin in hospital- and community-acquired infections both in adults and children. This is also recognised in recent published national and international guidelines, many of which recommend ampicillin/sulbactam as first-line therapy for various respiratory and skin infections.

Shorter courses of parenteral antibiotic therapy do not appear to influence response rates for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) occurs primarily in children and is believed to evolve from bacteremia followed by localization of infection to the metaphysis of bones. Currently, there is no consensus on the route and duration of antimicrobial therapy to treat AHO.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of a short versus long course of treatment for AHO due primarily to Staphylococcus aureus in children aged 3 months to 16 years. We searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane trials registry for controlled trials. Clinical cure rate at 6 months was the primary outcome variable, and groups receiving less than 7 days of intravenous therapy were compared with groups receiving one week or longer of intravenous antimicrobials.

RESULTS

12 eligible prospective studies, one of which was randomized, were identified. The overall cure rate at 6 months for the short course of intravenous therapy was 95.2% (95% CI = 90.4 - 97.7) compared to 98.8% (95% CI = 93.6, 99.8) for the longer course of therapy. There was no significant difference in the duration of oral therapy between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the potential increased morbidity and cost associated with longer courses of intravenous therapy, this finding should be confirmed through a randomized controlled equivalence trial

Use of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin in pediatric infections: a re-evaluation

Ampicillin/sulbactam is an effective solution to the emergence of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance among common pediatric pathogens, and is a widely recognized treatment option for a variety of pediatric infections. Recent antimicrobial surveillance data confirm the continued susceptibility of many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes to ampicillin/sulbactam. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated high drug concentrations at a variety of infection sites, including cerebrospinal fluid and bone. Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that ampicillin/sulbactam, administered intravenously, intramuscularly or orally (as the mutual prodrug sultamicillin), is clinically and bacteriologically effective against upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, skin, bone and soft-tissue infections, and meningitis, and provides effective surgical prophylaxis. Sultamicillin has an excellent tolerability profile, which is associated with a low rate of treatment discontinuation. Accordingly, ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin should be considered first-choice options for the management of a variety of pediatric infections.

Sultamicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Sultamicillin is the tosylate salt of the double ester of sulbactam plus ampicillin. Sulbactam is a semisynthetic beta-lactamase inhibitor which, in combination with ampicillin, extends the antibacterial activity of the latter to include some beta-lactamase-producing strains of bacteria that would otherwise be resistant. The combination of sulbactam plus ampicillin for parenteral use has previously been shown to be clinically and bacteriologically effective in a variety of infections. The chemical linkage of sulbactam and ampicillin has now produced an orally effective compound, sultamicillin, with antibacterial activity and clinical efficacy which are similar to those of the parenteral formulation. Sultamicillin has been shown to be clinically effective in non-comparative trials in patients with infections of the respiratory tract, ears, nose and throat, urinary tract, skin and soft tissues, as well as in obstetric and gynaecological infections, and in the treatment of gonorrhoea. In a small number of controlled trials, sultamicillin has shown comparable clinical efficacy to phenoxymethyl penicillin (penicillin V) and to amoxycillin (alone and in combination with clavulanic acid) in the treatment of paediatric streptococcal pharyngitis and acute otitis media, respectively; to cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in adults; and to bacampicillin, cloxacillin and flucloxacillin plus ampicillin in skin and soft tissue infections in adults, children and adult diabetic patients, respectively. Sultamicillin was superior in efficacy to bacampicillin in the treatment of chronic respiratory infections, to cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in adults, and to cefadroxil in the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infections. However, in single-dose treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea, sultamicillin (1500mg plus probenecid 1g) was inferior to a 2g intramuscular dose of spectinomycin. While in several studies the incidence of diarrhoea associated with sultamicillin was greater than that with comparative antibacterials, sultamicillin-associated diarrhoea was generally mild and transitory, although occasionally severe enough to necessitate discontinuation of treatment. Further studies in larger groups of patients are needed to clarify the therapeutic efficacy and safety of sultamicillin in comparison with other antibacterial regimens, and to determine the optimum single dosage for the treatment of gonorrhoea. Nonetheless, sultamicillin appears to provide a similar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile to that of parenteral sulbactam plus ampicillin and, as such, will extend the therapeutic efficacy of ampicillin, with the further advantage of allowing treatment of patients with an oral formulation, thus avoiding the potentially adverse clinical and financial effects of prolonged parenteral therapy.

Sulbactam/ampicillin, a new beta-lactamase inhibitor/beta-lactam antibiotic combination

Sulbactam/ampicillin is a combination of a beta-lactamase inhibitor with minimal intrinsic antibacterial activity (sulbactam sodium), and an aminopenicillin (ampicillin sodium). The addition of sulbactam to ampicillin has no effect on the chemical stability of ampicillin in aqueous solution, and the administration guidelines of the combination are the same as for ampicillin alone. Sulbactam acts primarily by irreversible inactivation of beta-lactamases from most beta-lactamase-producing organisms. The pharmacokinetics of sulbactam are similar to those of ampicillin with an elimination half-life of about one hour in most patients. One difference is that serum and tissue concentrations of sulbactam are usually twice those of ampicillin, at equivalent doses. The sulbactam/ampicillin combination has been approved for the treatment of adults with intraabdominal, skin and skin structure, and gynecological infections due to beta-lactamase-producing bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and species of Klebsiella and Bacteroides. Clinical studies to date have also shown the combination to be effective for the treatment of meningitis, pneumonia, gonorrhea, epiglottis, urinary tract infections, cervical adenitis, and as prophylaxis for abdominal and gynecological surgeries. Many of these studies, however, have included small numbers of patients and/or had design flaws. Adverse effects have been minor with most being attributed to the ampicillin component. Sulbactam/ampicillin compares favorably with other antibiotic regimens in terms of acquisition costs and ease of administration.

Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use

Sulbactam is a semisynthetic beta-lactamase inhibitor which when combined with certain beta-lactam antibacterials extends their activity against bacteria that are normally resistant to the antibiotic due to production of beta-lactamases. In combination with ampicillin it extends the antibacterial activity of ampicillin to include beta-lactamase-producing strains which are otherwise resistant, including Bacteroides fragilis, and increases the susceptibility of many sensitive strains. Sulbactam is poorly absorbed after oral administration and sulbactam/ampicillin is therefore administered parenterally, although another linked sulbactam-ampicillin compound, sultamicillin, has been developed which is well absorbed after oral administration. The basic pharmacokinetic characteristics of sulbactam after parenteral administration are similar to those of ampicillin. Multiple-dose therapy with sulbactam/ampicillin is clinically and bacteriologically effective in infections of the urinary tract, skin and soft tissue, bones and joints, respiratory tract, ears, nose and throat, as well as intra-abdominal and obstetric and gynaecological infections and septicaemia. In addition, single intramuscular doses of sulbactam/ampicillin administered with oral probenecid are therapeutically effective in gonorrhoea, including infections due to penicillinase-producing and/or ampicillin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In the prophylaxis of infectious complications of surgery sulbactam/ampicillin is superior to placebo and appears to be similar in efficacy to several alternative antibacterial regimens. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are needed to clarify the comparative therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of sulbactam/ampicillin and alternative antibacterial drugs. Nonetheless, sulbactam/ampicillin improves the therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of an antibacterial of familiar safety, and must be seen as a worthwhile advance.