Problems and benefits of an antibiotic compassionate therapy program

Current State of Compassionate Phage Therapy

There is a current unmet medical need for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant infections, and in the absence of approved alternatives, some clinicians are turning to empirical ones, such as phage therapy, for compassionate treatment. Phage therapy is ideal for compassionate use due to its long-standing historical use and publications, apparent lack of adverse effects, and solid support by fundamental research. Increased media coverage and peer-reviewed articles have given rise to a more widespread familiarity with its therapeutic potential. However, compassionate phage therapy (cPT) remains limited to a small number of experimental treatment centers or associated with individual physicians and researchers. It is possible, with the creation of guidelines and a greater central coordination, that cPT could reach more of those in need, starting by increasing the availability of phages. Subsequent steps, particularly production and purification, are difficult to scale, and treatment paradigms stand highly variable between cases, or are frequently not reported. This article serves both to synopsize cPT publications to date and to discuss currently available phage sources for cPT. As the antibiotic resistance crisis continues to grow and the future of phage therapy clinical trials remains undetermined, cPT represents a possibility for bridging the gap between current treatment failures and future approved alternatives. Streamlining the process of cPT will help to ensure high quality, therapeutically-beneficial, and safe treatment.

Ethics review in compassionate use

BACKGROUND

Compassionate use is the use of unapproved drugs outside of clinical trials. So far, compassionate use regulations have been introduced in the US, Canada, many European countries, Australia and Brazil, and treatment on a compassionate use basis may be performed in Japan and China. However, there are important differences between relevant regulations in individual countries, particularly that approval by a research ethics committee (institutional review board) is a requirement for compassionate use in some countries (e.g. the US, Spain, and Italy), but not in others (e.g. Canada, the UK, France, and Germany).

DISCUSSION

The main objective of this article is to present aspects of compassionate use that are important for the discussion of the role of research ethics committees in the review of compassionate use. These aspects include the nature of compassionate use, potential risks to patients associated with the use of drugs with unproven safety and efficacy, informed consent, physicians' qualifications, and patient selection criteria. Our analysis indicates that the arguments for mandatory review substantially outweigh the arguments to the contrary.

CONCLUSIONS

Approval by a research ethics committee should be obligatory for compassionate use. The principal argument against mandatory ethical review of compassionate use is that it is primarily a kind of treatment rather than biomedical research. Nonetheless, compassionate use is different from standard clinical care and should be subject to review by research ethics committees. First, in practice, compassionate use often involves significant research aspects. Second, it is based on unapproved drugs with unproven safety and efficacy. Obtaining informed consent from patients seeking access to unapproved drugs on a compassionate use basis may also be difficult. Other important problems include the qualifications of the physician who is to perform treatment, and patient selection criteria.

The value of new antimicrobial agents

New antimicrobial agents require careful assessment to determine whether they possess the appropriate properties for clinical use. Many new compounds of value in the prophylaxis and therapy of infections have been included in the current armamentarium. Close monitoring to identify possible adverse effects of new agents is essential. Alternative uses of older agents also expands therapeutic opportunities in the combat against infectious diseases. Inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents contributes to the worldwide problem of increasing bacterial resistance. The dramatic spread of such bacterial strains is partially responsible for the rising costs of infectious diseases. A rational and strict antibiotic policy is thus of great importance for the optimal use of these agents.

Pharmacoepidemiology in pre-approval clinical trial safety monitoring

Applications of pharmacoepidemiology to the pre-approval safety monitoring of investigational drugs are examined and compared with the post-approval applications. Pre-approval epidemiologic assessments of drug safety can complement clinical assessments of rare, serious adverse events occurring in open label uncontrolled clinical trials. Applications include retrospective identification of patient risk factors for adverse drug events and incidence comparisons based on historical controls. While similar in concept to applications of pharmacoepidemiology in the analyses of uncontrolled open label post-marketing surveillance studies, answers are often needed in days rather than weeks and the emphasis is on whether human studies can continue. Advance planning of historical data sources is essential as is an effective clinical trial data management system. Implications for methodologic research and for drug development are discussed.