Ventricular coupling via the pericardium: normal versus tamponade

Cardiac dysfunction in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: MRI measurements

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is a non-invasive 3-dimensional imaging technique which can provide morphologic and functional information as well as tissue characterization without the use of ionizing radiation or nephrotoxic contrast agents. It has a high accuracy and reproducibility and is optimally suited to quantify structural and functional abnormalities and to follow a patient over time. In the setting of heart failure with normal ejection fraction it can be used as an alternative to echocardiography in those patients with suboptimal image quality but it can also provide unique information for the differential diagnosis and the underlying physiopathology of this syndrome.

A novel technique for measurement of pericardial pressure

To determine whether pericardial liquid pressure accurately measures pericardial constraint, we developed a technique in which a catheter was positioned perpendicular to the epicardial surface. This device, which occupies little or no pericardial space, couples the thin film of liquid to a transducer. In six open-chest dogs, we also measured left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and anteroposterior and septum-to-free wall diameters. LVEDP was raised incrementally to approximately 25 mmHg by saline infusion. With the use of the product of the two diameters as an index of area (A(LV)), LVEDP-A(LV) relationships were obtained with the pericardium closed and again after the pericardium had been widely opened to obtain the isovolumic difference in LVEDP (DeltaLVEDP). In all dogs, the technique yielded values of pericardial pressure equal to DeltaLVEDP as well as equal to that measured using a previously placed balloon transducer in the same location and at the same A(LV). We conclude that, when the pressure of the pericardial liquid is appropriately measured, it (in addition to the balloon-measured contact stress) defines the diastolic constraining effect of the pericardium. Furthermore, we suggest that earlier measurements of pericardial "liquid pressure" were low, due to an artifact of measurement.