Multi-label classification for biomedical literature: an overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19 literature topic annotations

Machine learning models for abstract screening task - A systematic literature review application for health economics and outcome research

OBJECTIVE

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are critical for life-science research. However, the manual selection and retrieval of relevant publications can be a time-consuming process. This study aims to (1) develop two disease-specific annotated corpora, one for human papillomavirus (HPV) associated diseases and the other for pneumococcal-associated pediatric diseases (PAPD), and (2) optimize machine- and deep-learning models to facilitate automation of the SLR abstract screening.

METHODS

This study constructed two disease-specific SLR screening corpora for HPV and PAPD, which contained citation metadata and corresponding abstracts. Performance was evaluated using precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-score of multiple combinations of machine- and deep-learning algorithms and features such as keywords and MeSH terms.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The HPV corpus contained 1697 entries, with 538 relevant and 1159 irrelevant articles. The PAPD corpus included 2865 entries, with 711 relevant and 2154 irrelevant articles. Adding additional features beyond title and abstract improved the performance (measured in Accuracy) of machine learning models by 3% for HPV corpus and 2% for PAPD corpus. Transformer-based deep learning models that consistently outperformed conventional machine learning algorithms, highlighting the strength of domain-specific pre-trained language models for SLR abstract screening. This study provides a foundation for the development of more intelligent SLR systems.

Taiyi: a bilingual fine-tuned large language model for diverse biomedical tasks

OBJECTIVE

Most existing fine-tuned biomedical large language models (LLMs) focus on enhancing performance in monolingual biomedical question answering and conversation tasks. To investigate the effectiveness of the fine-tuned LLMs on diverse biomedical natural language processing (NLP) tasks in different languages, we present Taiyi, a bilingual fine-tuned LLM for diverse biomedical NLP tasks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We first curated a comprehensive collection of 140 existing biomedical text mining datasets (102 English and 38 Chinese datasets) across over 10 task types. Subsequently, these corpora were converted to the instruction data used to fine-tune the general LLM. During the supervised fine-tuning phase, a 2-stage strategy is proposed to optimize the model performance across various tasks.

RESULTS

Experimental results on 13 test sets, which include named entity recognition, relation extraction, text classification, and question answering tasks, demonstrate that Taiyi achieves superior performance compared to general LLMs. The case study involving additional biomedical NLP tasks further shows Taiyi's considerable potential for bilingual biomedical multitasking.

CONCLUSION

Leveraging rich high-quality biomedical corpora and developing effective fine-tuning strategies can significantly improve the performance of LLMs within the biomedical domain. Taiyi shows the bilingual multitasking capability through supervised fine-tuning. However, those tasks such as information extraction that are not generation tasks in nature remain challenging for LLM-based generative approaches, and they still underperform the conventional discriminative approaches using smaller language models.

Lessons learned to enable question answering on knowledge graphs extracted from scientific publications: A case study on the coronavirus literature

The article presents a workflow to create a question-answering system whose knowledge base combines knowledge graphs and scientific publications on coronaviruses. It is based on the experience gained in modeling evidence from research articles to provide answers to questions in natural language. The work contains best practices for acquiring scientific publications, tuning language models to identify and normalize relevant entities, creating representational models based on probabilistic topics, and formalizing an ontology that describes the associations between domain concepts supported by the scientific literature. All the resources generated in the domain of coronavirus are available openly as part of the Drugs4COVID initiative, and can be (re)-used independently or as a whole. They can be exploited by scientific communities conducting research related to SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and also by therapeutic communities, laboratories, etc., wishing to find and understand relationships between symptoms, drugs, active ingredients and their documentary evidence.

Systematic Guidelines for Effective Utilization of COVID-19 Databases in Genomic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Research

The pandemic has led to the production and accumulation of various types of data related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To understand the features and characteristics of COVID-19 data, we summarized representative databases and determined the data types, purpose, and utilization details of each database. In addition, we categorized COVID-19 associated databases into epidemiological data, genome and protein data, and drug and target data. We found that the data present in each of these databases have nine separate purposes (clade/variant/lineage, genome browser, protein structure, epidemiological data, visualization, data analysis tool, treatment, literature, and immunity) according to the types of data. Utilizing the databases we investigated, we created four queries as integrative analysis methods that aimed to answer important scientific questions related to COVID-19. Our queries can make effective use of multiple databases to produce valuable results that can reveal novel findings through comprehensive analysis. This allows clinical researchers, epidemiologists, and clinicians to have easy access to COVID-19 data without requiring expert knowledge in computing or data science. We expect that users will be able to reference our examples to construct their own integrative analysis methods, which will act as a basis for further scientific inquiry and data searching.

Classifying literature mentions of biological pathogens as experimentally studied using natural language processing

BACKGROUND

Information pertaining to mechanisms, management and treatment of disease-causing pathogens including viruses and bacteria is readily available from research publications indexed in MEDLINE. However, identifying the literature that specifically characterises these pathogens and their properties based on experimental research, important for understanding of the molecular basis of diseases caused by these agents, requires sifting through a large number of articles to exclude incidental mentions of the pathogens, or references to pathogens in other non-experimental contexts such as public health.

OBJECTIVE

In this work, we lay the foundations for the development of automatic methods for characterising mentions of pathogens in scientific literature, focusing on the task of identifying research that involves the experimental study of a pathogen in an experimental context. There are no manually annotated pathogen corpora available for this purpose, while such resources are necessary to support the development of machine learning-based models. We therefore aim to fill this gap, producing a large data set automatically from MEDLINE under some simplifying assumptions for the task definition, and using it to explore automatic methods that specifically support the detection of experimentally studied pathogen mentions in research publications.

METHODS

We developed a pathogen mention characterisation literature data set -READBiomed-Pathogens- automatically using NCBI resources, which we make available. Resources such as the NCBI Taxonomy, MeSH and GenBank can be used effectively to identify relevant literature about experimentally researched pathogens, more specifically using MeSH to link to MEDLINE citations including titles and abstracts with experimentally researched pathogens. We experiment with several machine learning-based natural language processing (NLP) algorithms leveraging this data set as training data, to model the task of detecting papers that specifically describe experimental study of a pathogen.

RESULTS

We show that our data set READBiomed-Pathogens can be used to explore natural language processing configurations for experimental pathogen mention characterisation. READBiomed-Pathogens includes citations related to organisms including bacteria, viruses, and a small number of toxins and other disease-causing agents.

CONCLUSIONS

We studied the characterisation of experimentally studied pathogens in scientific literature, developing several natural language processing methods supported by an automatically developed data set. As a core contribution of the work, we presented a methodology to automatically construct a data set for pathogen identification using existing biomedical resources. The data set and the annotation code are made publicly available. Performance of the pathogen mention identification and characterisation algorithms were additionally evaluated on a small manually annotated data set shows that the data set that we have generated allows characterising pathogens of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

N/A.

Comprehensively identifying Long Covid articles with human-in-the-loop machine learning

A significant percentage of COVID-19 survivors experience ongoing multisystemic symptoms that often affect daily living, a condition known as Long Covid or post-acute-sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, identifying scientific articles relevant to Long Covid is challenging since there is no standardized or consensus terminology. We developed an iterative human-in-the-loop machine learning framework combining data programming with active learning into a robust ensemble model, demonstrating higher specificity and considerably higher sensitivity than other methods. Analysis of the Long Covid Collection shows that (1) most Long Covid articles do not refer to Long Covid by any name, (2) when the condition is named, the name used most frequently in the literature is Long Covid, and (3) Long Covid is associated with disorders in a wide variety of body systems. The Long Covid Collection is updated weekly and is searchable online at the LitCovid portal: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/docsum?filters=e_condition.LongCovid.

Multi-class classification of COVID-19 documents using machine learning algorithms

In most biomedical research paper corpus, document classification is a crucial task. Even due to the global epidemic, it is a crucial task for researchers across a variety of fields to figure out the relevant scientific research papers accurately and quickly from a flood of biomedical research papers. It can also assist learners or researchers in assigning a research paper to an appropriate category and also help to find the relevant research paper within a very short time. A biomedical document classifier needs to be designed differently to go beyond a "general" text classifier because it's not dependent only on the text itself (i.e. on titles and abstracts) but can also utilize other information like entities extracted using some medical taxonomies or bibliometric data. The main objective of this research was to find out the type of information or features and representation method creates influence the biomedical document classification task. For this reason, we run several experiments on conventional text classification methods with different kinds of features extracted from the titles, abstracts, and bibliometric data. These procedures include data cleaning, feature engineering, and multi-class classification. Eleven different variants of input data tables were created and analyzed using ten machine learning algorithms. We also evaluate the data efficiency and interpretability of these models as essential features of any biomedical research paper classification system for handling specifically the COVID-19 related health crisis. Our major findings are that TF-IDF representations outperform the entity extraction methods and the abstract itself provides sufficient information for correct classification. Out of the used machine learning algorithms, the best performance over various forms of document representation was achieved by Random Forest and Neural Network (BERT). Our results lead to a concrete guideline for practitioners on biomedical document classification.

LitCovid ensemble learning for COVID-19 multi-label classification

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has shifted the focus of research worldwide, and more than 10 000 new articles per month have concentrated on COVID-19-related topics. Considering this rapidly growing literature, the efficient and precise extraction of the main topics of COVID-19-relevant articles is of great importance. The manual curation of this information for biomedical literature is labor-intensive and time-consuming, and as such the procedure is insufficient and difficult to maintain. In response to these complications, the BioCreative VII community has proposed a challenging task, LitCovid Track, calling for a global effort to automatically extract semantic topics for COVID-19 literature. This article describes our work on the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track. We proposed the LitCovid Ensemble Learning (LCEL) method for the tasks and integrated multiple biomedical pretrained models to address the COVID-19 multi-label classification problem. Specifically, seven different transformer-based pretrained models were ensembled for the initialization and fine-tuning processes independently. To enhance the representation abilities of the deep neural models, diverse additional biomedical knowledge was utilized to facilitate the fruitfulness of the semantic expressions. Simple yet effective data augmentation was also leveraged to address the learning deficiency during the training phase. In addition, given the imbalanced label distribution of the challenging task, a novel asymmetric loss function was applied to the LCEL model, which explicitly adjusted the negative-positive importance by assigning different exponential decay factors and helped the model focus on the positive samples. After the training phase, an ensemble bagging strategy was adopted to merge the outputs from each model for final predictions. The experimental results show the effectiveness of our proposed approach, as LCEL obtains the state-of-the-art performance on the LitCovid dataset. Database URL: https://github.com/JHnlp/LCEL.

An improved author-topic (AT) model with authorship credit allocation schemes

Authorship credit allocation schemes have attracted considerable research attention. However, no consensus about which one is the best has been attained until now, and limited evidence from practical tasks has been reported. Therefore, this study uses the author interest discovery task as a real-world task case to provide valuable insights into authorship credit allocation schemes and guidelines for further practical applications. For this purpose, a novel model, ATcredit, is proposed to strengthen the Author-Topic (AT) model with an authorship credit allocation scheme, and collapsed Gibbs sampling is used to approximate the posterior and estimate model parameters. Extensive experiments using the SynBio dataset reveal several interesting findings as follows. (a) Any scheme for allocating unequal authorship credits performs better than its equal-credit counterpart with our ATcredit model in terms of perplexity. (b) The fixed versions of four out of the six schemes work better than their flexible counterparts with our ATcredit model, regardless of the hyper-authorship strategy. (c) The variation coefficient of credit awards can serve as a criterion to decide whether the hyper-authorship strategy should be used. (d) When the number of authors in a scholarly article is less than three, the six authorship credit allocation schemes are similar to each other with our ATcredit model in terms of perplexity. (e) The harmonic counting scheme performs the best, followed by the arithmetic counting scheme, and the network-based counting scheme performs the worst with our ATcredit model in terms of perplexity. (f) The arithmetic counting scheme is similar to the harmonic counting scheme in terms of the normalised mutual information (NMI) of discovered interests, but the geometric counting scheme is different from the axiomatic and network-based counting schemes.

LitCovid in 2022: an information resource for the COVID-19 literature

LitCovid (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/)-first launched in February 2020-is a first-of-its-kind literature hub for tracking up-to-date published research on COVID-19. The number of articles in LitCovid has increased from 55 000 to ∼300 000 over the past 2.5 years, with a consistent growth rate of ∼10 000 articles per month. In addition to the rapid literature growth, the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved dramatically. For instance, the Omicron variant has now accounted for over 98% of new infections in the United States. In response to the continuing evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic, this article describes significant updates to LitCovid over the last 2 years. First, we introduced the long Covid collection consisting of the articles on COVID-19 survivors experiencing ongoing multisystemic symptoms, including respiratory issues, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and profound fatigue. Second, we provided new annotations on the latest COVID-19 strains and vaccines mentioned in the literature. Third, we improved several existing features with more accurate machine learning algorithms for annotating topics and classifying articles relevant to COVID-19. LitCovid has been widely used with millions of accesses by users worldwide on various information needs and continues to play a critical role in collecting, curating and standardizing the latest knowledge on the COVID-19 literature.

LitMC-BERT: Transformer-Based Multi-Label Classification of Biomedical Literature With An Application on COVID-19 Literature Curation

The rapid growth of biomedical literature poses a significant challenge for curation and interpretation. This has become more evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. LitCovid, a literature database of COVID-19 related papers in PubMed, has accumulated over 200,000 articles with millions of accesses. Approximately 10,000 new articles are added to LitCovid every month. A main curation task in LitCovid is topic annotation where an article is assigned with up to eight topics, e.g., Treatment and Diagnosis. The annotated topics have been widely used both in LitCovid (e.g., accounting for ∼18% of total uses) and downstream studies such as network generation. However, it has been a primary curation bottleneck due to the nature of the task and the rapid literature growth. This study proposes LITMC-BERT, a transformer-based multi-label classification method in biomedical literature. It uses a shared transformer backbone for all the labels while also captures label-specific features and the correlations between label pairs. We compare LITMC-BERT with three baseline models on two datasets. Its micro-F1 and instance-based F1 are 5% and 4% higher than the current best results, respectively, and only requires ∼18% of the inference time than the Binary BERT baseline. The related datasets and models are available via https://github.com/ncbi/ml-transformer.