BioCreative VI Precision Medicine Track system performance is constrained by entity recognition and variations in corpus characteristics

Large-scale protein-protein post-translational modification extraction with distant supervision and confidence calibrated BioBERT

MOTIVATION

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are critical to normal cellular function and are related to many disease pathways. A range of protein functions are mediated and regulated by protein interactions through post-translational modifications (PTM). However, only 4% of PPIs are annotated with PTMs in biological knowledge databases such as IntAct, mainly performed through manual curation, which is neither time- nor cost-effective. Here we aim to facilitate annotation by extracting PPIs along with their pairwise PTM from the literature by using distantly supervised training data using deep learning to aid human curation.

METHOD

We use the IntAct PPI database to create a distant supervised dataset annotated with interacting protein pairs, their corresponding PTM type, and associated abstracts from the PubMed database. We train an ensemble of BioBERT models-dubbed PPI-BioBERT-x10-to improve confidence calibration. We extend the use of ensemble average confidence approach with confidence variation to counteract the effects of class imbalance to extract high confidence predictions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The PPI-BioBERT-x10 model evaluated on the test set resulted in a modest F1-micro 41.3 (P =5 8.1, R = 32.1). However, by combining high confidence and low variation to identify high quality predictions, tuning the predictions for precision, we retained 19% of the test predictions with 100% precision. We evaluated PPI-BioBERT-x10 on 18 million PubMed abstracts and extracted 1.6 million (546507 unique PTM-PPI triplets) PTM-PPI predictions, and filter [Formula: see text] (4584 unique) high confidence predictions. Of the 5700, human evaluation on a small randomly sampled subset shows that the precision drops to 33.7% despite confidence calibration and highlights the challenges of generalisability beyond the test set even with confidence calibration. We circumvent the problem by only including predictions associated with multiple papers, improving the precision to 58.8%. In this work, we highlight the benefits and challenges of deep learning-based text mining in practice, and the need for increased emphasis on confidence calibration to facilitate human curation efforts.

New advances in extracting and learning from protein-protein interactions within unstructured biomedical text data

Protein-protein interactions, or PPIs, constitute a basic unit of our understanding of protein function. Though substantial effort has been made to organize PPI knowledge into structured databases, maintenance of these resources requires careful manual curation. Even then, many PPIs remain uncurated within unstructured text data. Extracting PPIs from experimental research supports assembly of PPI networks and highlights relationships crucial to elucidating protein functions. Isolating specific protein-protein relationships from numerous documents is technically demanding by both manual and automated means. Recent advances in the design of these methods have leveraged emerging computational developments and have demonstrated impressive results on test datasets. In this review, we discuss recent developments in PPI extraction from unstructured biomedical text. We explore the historical context of these developments, recent strategies for integrating and comparing PPI data, and their application to advancing the understanding of protein function. Finally, we describe the challenges facing the application of PPI mining to the text concerning protein families, using the multifunctional 14-3-3 protein family as an example.

Automated assessment of biological database assertions using the scientific literature

Background

The large biological databases such as GenBank contain vast numbers of records, the content of which is substantively based on external resources, including published literature. Manual curation is used to establish whether the literature and the records are indeed consistent. We explore in this paper an automated method for assessing the consistency of biological assertions, to assist biocurators, which we call BARC, Biocuration tool for Assessment of Relation Consistency. In this method a biological assertion is represented as a relation between two objects (for example, a gene and a disease); we then use our novel set-based relevance algorithm SaBRA to retrieve pertinent literature, and apply a classifier to estimate the likelihood that this relation (assertion) is correct.

Results

Our experiments on assessing gene–disease relations and protein–protein interactions using the PubMed Central collection show that BARC can be effective at assisting curators to perform data cleansing. Specifically, the results obtained showed that BARC substantially outperforms the best baselines, with an improvement of F-measure of 3.5% and 13%, respectively, on gene-disease relations and protein-protein interactions. We have additionally carried out a feature analysis that showed that all feature types are informative, as are all fields of the documents.

Conclusions

BARC provides a clear benefit for the biocuration community, as there are no prior automated tools for identifying inconsistent assertions in large-scale biological databases.